One Small Step

This video shows Neil Armstrong climbing down the lunar module ladder to the lunar surface. The video compares existing footage with the partially restored video. The thumbnail image shows the new footage on the left and the old on the right.

[@mariodevincenzi]

Kubrick was proud

[@JKTube]

One of the greatest moments in human history.

[@discopanzer1009]

Best moment of history, this was best achievement for me

[@LoveTurnshateful]

Never mind the stars as seen from the moon's surface. Let's see the beautiful photographs of the heavens taken during the half-million-mile-round-trip! These photos possess awe-inspiring clarity of the stars! Has anyone seen them?

[@andreaandyoakleelee5494]

DOUBTERS SAY WHAT YOU WILL... but I'm celebrating the anniversary

[@darkrocker246]

I never brought up anything about the Van Allen belt, and I know better than to think they would "incinerate instantly". But I am surprised that most, if not all the astronauts that walked on the lunar surface did not receive some form of radiation sickness. I find it unlikely that the space suits used on the Apollo missions were able to block more than 70% of the radiation.

[@JulianWavy]

50 years!!!!!

[@pianofixer898]

actually he didn't forget to say the "a". I believe he did say it and there was just a radio transmission cut out for a split second there. Also, i'm pretty sure that he thought of that on his own and it wasn't scripted.

[@Samanthasuxmorethanu]

vsauce!!

[@neon1sky]

yes,i brought me here

[@SHOSET1]

WHY DOES THE ASTRONAUT SEE TRANSPARENT? 0:11

[@TheVaga9]

Who’s holding the camera?

[@timolee]

Idk if they were on the moon this time but I am sure they have gotten to there by now and I really dont see the big deal about this

[@DarrylXE]

P.S. 250,000 miles isn't that far, guys, in scientific terms. It seems silly to insist it was impossible, if one has any idea of proportion.

[@iammrfrank]

@DarrylXE Yeah. you could make it there in 4 days if traveling at 2604.16 MPH. :) or using the real number of closer to 252,000miles; 5 days at 2100MPH. (and just for fun, 1 year (365days) at 28mph)

[@TheOmega11]

Armstrong wasn't an actor. If he was, he would have said something like "Sponsored by Disney" at the end.

[@reeflakin213]

"...use code "MickeyMouse69 for twelve bucks off your next merch order."

[@CoyoteTwelve]

Actually you are wrong. Amrstrong does say the word "a". It is a hickup in the transmition and delay that covers up the word.

[@HipotesisdePoder]

One small step...

[@himshake]

For man

[@raceintothesunset]

I think it'd be neat if they did it in 2019 to mark 50 years ;)

[@trevorgood3526]

the moon lading was fake

[@kenpankowski5644]

Moon landing was not faked. Reason? The moon dust did not "cloud up" when the lander's rockets hit it. Since the moon has no atmosphere, the dust just went out flat. If it were shot on earth with an atmosphere, it would have created dust clouds. In 1969 we didn't have the technology to fake it.

[@Halfshanks]

gtfo

[@bald_agent_smith]

go chill to the cave

[@copitoh]

FOR A MAN not for man

[@damianaguilera9440]

Hola

[@d4rthm0]

you want to pay billions of dollar of taxes for it?

[@METATRONS_CUBE]

If somebody still believe in this after all the evidence must be incredible stupid. There is no other explanation.

[@Halfshanks]

No, you're just too dumb to comprehend what our minds can achieve

[@greatandmightykevin]

And what evidence would that be?

[@METATRONS_CUBE]

@@greatandmightykevin There are at least 100 evidence. But the capability of seing them is limited with the IQ of the person who observe them. To it will be irrelevant showing them...

[@METATRONS_CUBE]

@@Halfshanks 😂😂😂

[@greatandmightykevin]

@@METATRONS_CUBE Well then, show me the '100 evidence'. Avoiding the question isn't becoming of someone with intellect.

[@DarrylXE]

I was being sarcastic. Of course those guys landed on the moon. Have you ever spoken seriously to one of the "moon landing=hoax" people? Their "conspiracy" arguments are usually so simple-minded as to be embarrassing. I blame high school science teachers in this country for just teaching science and not scientific THOUGHT. Going to the moon is dangerous and expensive (and probably not worth it), but not impossible, from an engineering standpoint. And it certainly wasn't impossible in 1969.

[@theexchipmunk]

Exactly. A moon landing today would actually be no big deal, except for the inherent dangers of space travel, but it is not worth the costs. (at least now, as the moon is a very good "Gate" into deep space.)

[@AussieMayte]

Im the newest comment

[@PackNic]

yep and thats why there is no life there. they had to wait light years for mediocre or worse healthcare. but at least it was free right?

[@PackNic]

sorry bud... its not pro patient. Its pro-bureaucracy. Instead of heath corporations getting your money (which is agreeably unfortunate) .. politicians get your money and more power over you. But sign over your life... see if i care. Just dont whine when your kid bust open his chin and bleeds for 18 hours while you wait to be seen by a second rate doctor who didnt flee to Bahrain or the like to get paid appropriately.

[@kang174]

fake

[@trevorgood3526]

i agree

[@voyagerofdoom]

^FTW Seriously. I know many people who don't think we've landed on the Moon. And none of them give me any good reason. *sigh*