OnenessTalks with Andreas Müller, Friday 27th April 2018, Helsinki

OnenessTalks with Andreas Müller, recorded in Helsinki, April 27th 2018.
'What is' does not need any realization. 'What is' is not dependent on you seeing it. 'What is' is not dependent on you understanding it. 'What is' is not dependent on you at all - it cannot, because there is no 'you'.
In the meetings, the dilemma of the seeking self, the root of all suffering, is discussed and illuminated.
www.thetimelesswonder.com

[@yoso585]

Some of the heaviest pitch and catch, batters at the plate that I’ve ever experienced. And Andreas just sits there undisturbed in the slightest slightest way, fielding all the balls.

[@octanerender9753]

This Congo fill up the emptyness.Thank you for there

[@PeterMastropasqua-rk7tp]

The Me Likes Stories 😊

[@MikkoVille]

What is "the Me"?

[@N8teyrve]

Liking this apparent KZbin happens. No one did it and it didn’t really happen. Thanks goodbye hello

[@borislanger7194]

"Proudly sponsored by Ferrari®" ;-)

[@borislanger7194]

ps: I don't even have a driving license ;-)

[@michaellebherz1882]

Bad luck, but anyway, there´s nobody driving a Ferrari

[@robertjsmith]

if you are all that is here,who or what could teach you anything?

[@MikkoVille]

who? what? where?!

[@robertjsmith]

@@MikkoVille if you're aware of this sentence then you're already all that exists So what difference does it make to you whether thought says that you're all that exists or whether it says that you're a person?

[@MikkoVille]

@@robertjsmith, what does it prove that the brain has an experience of being aware? How is it "all that exists"? If the brain isn't aware of itself does that mean that physical reality does not exist?

[@robertjsmith]

@@MikkoVille words and (concepts) never point to inherently real things.

[@MikkoVille]

@@robertjsmith, is that your way of saying you can't answer a simple question?

[@robertjsmith]

you are all that exists,thought says you are a person

[@MikkoVille]

who is??

[@zatoichiable]

how does one knows is when the knower is illusion and IS is an illusion?

[@MikkoVille]

Who would know any of that in the first place? :)

[@zatoichiable]

nothing