Only Three parts but impossible!? - The Three Cubes

It does not look like a serious puzzle! 3 parts with simple geometry, that need to be arranged into 3 solid cubes. I completely underestimated this puzzle. A psychological game that seems to use the most unusual arrangement of these 3 pieces.
My Amazon.com shop:
www.amazon.com/shop/mrpuzzle
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
www.PuzzleMaster.ca is a Canadian website that carries many thousands of puzzles/brain teasers and offers you worldwide free shipping at $99 by using the coupon code available here:
www.PuzzleMaster.ca/mrpuzzle2...
The puzzle shown in this video is available here:
cubicdissection.com/collectio...
cubicdissection.com/collectio...
More cool puzzle shops I do recommend:
US:
www.puzzlemaster.ca/?a=643812
www.artofplay.com/?rfsn=60833...
www.creativecrafthouse.com (10% discount by using the voucher "Mr Puzzle")
Europe:
jpgamesltd.co.uk/?tracking=5b...
www.knobelbox.com/?sPartner=m...
www.logicagiochi.com/?cmid=Yk...
Australia:
www.dailypuzzles.com.au/mrpuzzle (5% discount if using this link)
Asia:
www.siammandalay.com/?ac=mrpu...
The links above are affiliate links. If you click the link and buy a product, I will receive a commission from the seller.
Visit me on facebook for additional information:
/ mr.puzzleyoutube
Support me and become one of my Patrons:
/ mrpuzzle
Music:
Mandeville von Kevin MacLeod ist unter der Lizenz "Creative Commons Attribution" (creativecommons.org/licenses/...) lizenziert.
Quelle: incompetech.com/music/royalty-...
Interpret: incompetech.com/

[@TheAgamemnon911]

With pieces that are identical, the solution is usually some kind of symmetry. As soon as one realises that, its suddenly a lot easier.

[@thatoneginger]

Yeah, I think you just got stuck on thinking they should “nest” on the concave side. There’s some interesting psychology going on there.

[@tinwhiskerSC]

Yup, I recognized that right away as I've seen a similar puzzle before. So many puzzles have pieces that have pieces that "face inside" and the interlocks meet on interior corners of the pieces. I think this plays on that because you actually fit the "outside" pieces of the puzzle against each other.

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Definitely!

[@Novaximus]

Yeah I saw that too. I didn't know the solution because I don't have the puzzle in front of me but I kept thinking...."when is mr puzzle going to try putting these pieces back to back instead of "nestled" It reminds me of that flat 2D puzzle where you have to make the letter "T" out of 5 pieces. One of the pieces looks so distinguished with a 90 degree angle that you swear it should go at the top of the T but that was too fool you.

[@SpiderSparta56]

@@Mr.Puzzle you are Awesome and I love watching you and Chris Ramsey. Thanks for your time showing us awesome Puzzles

[@MoTab78]

You struggled because you were trying to make cubes only with the inward sides. Another way of saying it is that you didn't "think outside the box" :)

[@fewwiggle]

Shouldn't the admonition be: You didn't think "inside" the box ??? :-)

[@groowanderer]

Love it. Different puzzles are difficult to different people. It has always been this way. Mr Puzzle is no exception :)

[@Dreadzilla]

Yes! I love “live” solves! Not so much when it’s done on KZbin Live, but I like this format where you film solving a puzzle for the first time!

[@Ogsonofgroo]

What awesome little puzzle! Thank you Mr. Puzzle for your postings, I am not a puzzler but for some strange reason I have a fascination for how they come apart and how you guys figure things out, some of the complex ones are quite amazing to me, just not how they are done, but also their construction/engineering and beauty. Cheers from Canada PNW!

[@skyscraperfan]

When I saw the three pieces, I was quite sure that the would be a "trisymmetric" solution. It was clear that A) each piece was part of exactly two cubes and B) two pieces could not be part of the same two cubes. Otherwise those cubes would already be "full" and the thirs piece could only be part of the third cube, which contradicts A). Those thought makes most of the possible solutions impossible, because each cube has to touch each other cube at at least a 0.5 times length x 0.5 times length square, where the pieces are glued together.

[@Mr.Puzzle]

😊👌

[@Croftice1]

All the pieces are not only identical, they are also symetric with opposite polarities. If you want a shape from two pieces that don't initially stick together, just turn one of the pieces 180° around axis X, then 180° around axis Y, you'll get the exact same shape with polarities, that attract.

[@kozag-realityauditor7075]

after how bored you have sounded with recent puzzles, it was nice to hear that little 'what?' of pleasant surprise at success :)

[@creageous]

If it were only shaped like a giraffe.

[@robchandler755]

That is savage!

[@u.v.s.5583]

The giraffe puzzle is still the hardest one, it has only two freaking pieces and it is impossible!!!!

[@Ciaolo]

That would make it impossibler

[@gabydewilde]

3 pieces is way harder than 2. Difficulty seems to progress in a non-linear fashion. Call me utopian but I think humans might one day do a puzzle with 4.

[@u.v.s.5583]

@@gabydewilde It depends on the shape of the puzzle. In theory you can make a planar two piece puzzle arbitrarily complex, since the length of the boundary of every piece can be arbitrary large. Like you have to fint the two only parts of the boundaries that connect, you have to pick one of N possible portions from every piece, so the complexity is N^2, as N to infinity. Always only two pieces. The Giraffe is truly unfathomable.

[@XiphosCreates]

I think the list of "possible arrangements" you made at the start might have made it more difficult for you to see other solutions like the end result

[@pyr4mid3]

yes and the last one he drew was impossible

[@RubberyCat]

Not necessarily, it was just that he did not draw ALL possible combinations.

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Absolutely!

[@joevitaebella]

I did purchase this beautiful puzzle!! It is so simple, and yet, so hard to figure out!! That's what makes this puzzle so clever and intriguing. Only 3 pieces, how hard can that be? Well, I have handed this out to many people, after first letting them actually see what it looks like when solved, for just a moment. Then I take it apart and hand it to them, and I have not yet had anyone solve it. ( In which none of them are puzzlers) but still :) My Wife who's pretty good at these, tried for about 22 minutes and gave up. My boss brought it home for a week and never solved it!! It is ingenious, and I love the magnets, and think that may throw things off a bit. I certainly is deceptive!! Love it!! As for me, I watched your solution :}

[@1NOTTOOOLD]

I enjoy watching your videos very much. I enjoy your humility when you find a puzzle difficult. I also enjoy your sense of humor and your ability to laugh at yourself.

[@jesuschrist7508]

Amazing puzzle,so simple,yet so tricky.We need more of these!:)

[@staceykart2503]

Cool puzzle, I'm glad you're solving the puzzle in front of us instead of showing us the end result. Really enjoyable to watch you go through the process of figuring it out. This puzzle has a lot of charm.

[@Jen848]

Love this puzzle. Well done!

[@rickyhall7514]

You were trying to connect each part together like a jigsaw puzzle, as anyone would do. Meanwhile the answer was to face the parts away from each other.

[@6n6rchst]

way to spoil the video for everyone dude

[@rickyhall7514]

@@6n6rchst My bad, I distain spoilers as well. Although, in these instances, do you really go to comments before watching a puzzle video???

[@caster269]

Kief Adam To be fair 95% of people don’t goto the comment section until after watching the video. The point of comments is to discuss the video after all.

[@UweKeim]

I am looking through the comments WHILE watching the video currently I am at 5:30

[@caster269]

Uwe Keim That’s fine to do but it still isn’t the norm. If someone’s worried about spoilers then they obviously shouldn’t be one of the ones who read comments during the video.

[@der0hund]

This is one of the most stunning puzzles i've ever seen! Greetings from Vienna!

[@DomAZ]

So simple but give you some hard time. Nice puzzle, thank you to share with us.

[@_Bosley]

Such a happy reaction for such a seemingly simple puzzle... love it!

[@england6317]

I love your channel puzzles are so interesting and mentally stimulating the challenge of working out how something works and how to solve it its just cool I have been watching for over a year

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Thanks! Great to hear you following on already that long!

[@HolyNickTheHobbit]

That reaction to solving it was great

[@SergeMatveenko]

The first thing to notice on paper is that after two pieces have been connected the third must connect free sides of both together. So, the solution must be circular.

[@debdottir]

Excellent in its simplicity!

[@nanobiggy]

I definitely find all the videos you make trying to solve a puzzle much more interesting than ones where you solve it beforehand, and just show us the solution. Please keep on doing those types of videos. Thanks!

[@MaggotKing556]

I love Mr. Puzzle's videos. I love those 'ah ha' moments after a difficult puzzle

[@J.Tronix]

Mr puzzle is the best, hes often imitated but can never be duplicated 💪💪💪

[@Mr.Puzzle]

😂👌

[@PushSueAside]

I love the genuine gasp of surprise when you got it. It looked easy but, when you were puzzled it looked exciting. Cheers

[@stuartkcalvin]

Mate, it was interesting. My son-in-law loves your stuff when I send him your recommended puzzles. Thanks, stu

[@CrimFerret]

I started to wonder when you showed some of the magnets repelling if they should actually go together with the other two faces even though that didn't seem intuitive. If it were just an interlocking puzzle, the magnets wouldn't really be needed, but they are to hold this together when the solution is found. Pretty neat puzzle.

[@damianlopez7630]

Your Kindly Voice and Enthusiastic Disposition Makes You an Ideal Host for a Children's Show based on Puzzle Solving. A Show to Awaken Children's Curiosity and Interest In Learning To Solve Puzzles which Carries Over to Problem Solving Skills Later In Life. You Have a Clear Idea of Your Great Potential.

[@Thecoxdd44]

I really like this puzzle. Great Job.

[@ciary]

I don't own this puzzle, but while watching you fiddle I thought "He always tries to connect on the 'inside' faces of the piece. what if you connect all the outside faces instead?" turns out that was the right thought

[@fk6536]

Nice video, some mindgame this one.. Would love to see a video of your puzzle storage :)

[@ashleybruton7076]

Very enjoyable the challenge and confusion love the simplicity

[@georgecypher4568]

Its amazing how something so simple could be so mind bending….. Had me stumped as well Good one anyhow Mr. Puzzle !

[@mhelvens]

It helps to think about the relative positioning that the two unjoined magnets of a two-piece configuration should have in order to accommodate the third piece. That will reduce your search space. The two unjoined magnets of a single piece, when thought of as line segments, are on parallel planes a full cube length away from each other. So to accommodate the third piece, our two-piece configuration must exhibit that same property between *its* two unjoined magnets. That means the first two pieces must face away from each other, leaving only four configurations left to check.

[@Croftice1]

I'm not quite sure, because it was shown multiple times in the video, that each piece has opposite polarities. If you want a shape from two pieces, that repel, all you need to do for them to stick together, is turning one of them around twice (first around one axis, then around another axis), you'll get the exact same configuration now with opposite polarities, that attract. The magnets don't indicate any solution in fact.

[@IamFluffY90]

I don’t have this puzzle but I like to watch you solve and think about how I would approach it. I particularly like these puzzles that have a simple geometric solution. From the start I had a theory that they would each align on a different axis but I must admit I would’ve been stuck trying to put them together on the concave sides rather than the convex. Great solve Mr. Puzzle!

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Thanks!

[@queencarter3048]

This is still completely blowing my mind, I can't comprehend how this works by just seeing it no matter how many times I watch this video. This puzzle is ingenious!

[@Novaximus]

Great puzzle!

[@artax3967]

When will you be solving the 3 sea shells?

[@Mr.Puzzle]

When the time has come!

[@peterberry2691]

A very satisfying finish!

[@EleanorPeterson]

That's a beautiful puzzle. I think a key part of its cleverness is the name; by using the word 'cube', most people attempting to solve it will place the pieces 'internally', creating an impossible box. Once the internal cube idea takes hold it's very hard to shift! Ironically, somebody with no preconceptions about boxes, cubes, or puzzle blocks would probably have a less difficult time with this. Let a puppy play with it, or give it to a 3 year-old child; I mean no disrespect, Mr Puzzle, but sometimes a great deal of knowledge can be a dangerous thing! :-)

[@Mr.Puzzle]

This is exactly what I will do! I'm also curious how long others will nerd. The ones I asked are all close to my time. Interesting!

[@animakias26]

I enjoyed watching this :)

[@changemylife1803]

Sometimes something so simple can be staring in your face, but you mind will make you think it impossible

[@fewwiggle]

I think the hard part is imagining that each "cube" shares a portion of the other "cubes" -- IOW, the obvious move is to join two "faces" together to form an un-intersected cube.

[@kookyflukes9749]

Great concept that. As seemingly simple puzzle that is actually quite tricky.

[@ariesmars29]

That was fun to watch!

[@Arthurpiano9]

digger, deine videos sind richtig professionell geworden! mach weiter so :-) Macht richtig spaß zuzusehen

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Danke! 😎

[@SparkieGoth]

You're too clever for that puzzle, that's why it took so long for you to find a relatively simple solution. Keep on puzzlin', Mr Puzzle! 👍🏻

[@spacemansam3416]

Watching Mr. puzzle is like asmr for my brain

[@Mr.Puzzle]

😎

[@spacemansam3416]

Mr.Puzzle 😁

[@vvsandgaming4648]

I draw alot of geometric shapes and I have drawn those cubes before as a perspective exercise. I drew them after I saw this puzzle in a friend's collection of puzzles and it took me around 47 minutes to solve and like so many others have suggested, yes I got stuck on the same principle you did.

[@John-he6yh]

What a wonderful puzzle!

[@fizixx]

Very cool puzzle. I bet they could come up with other solids too --- spheres, pyramids, cones, etc.

[@Baki_B]

Really cool puzzle

[@rickwyckoff291]

brilliant puzzle!

[@glasswinder]

Funny how afterwards it's that simple. I enjoy puzzles.

[@mydemon]

"is this possible at all?" *THE DOUBT*

[@xenaguy01]

7:20 Your reaction is *_PRICELESS!_* ROFL

[@Mr.Puzzle]

😆🤗

[@michaelrichter9427]

Rather than sketching out "all possible" arrangements, I would have numbered and measured the poles of each magnet. Take one object at random and take one of its half-cubes and arbitrarily mark it "1". Mark the magnet on one side as "+". Then systematically pick up one piece at a time, numbering each half consecutively and measure each magnet by putting it against "1+". If it repels, mark it also as "+" and if it attracts mark it at "-". (Using stickers, obviously, so you don't ruin the gorgeous puzzle!) Keep mapping until every magnet has been numbered 1-6 and tagged "+"/"-" by pole. After that it's easier to figure out which pieces can go where.

[@nathancate582]

Im seeing a pattern of 3/5 ratings. Someone step up and send Mr Puzzle a 5/5 again! Lol

[@Mr.Puzzle]

😁

[@MaggotKing556]

5/5 is too easy send him a 6/5

[@nathancate582]

@@MaggotKing556 that would be like if you crossed Excalibur with the Giraffe. Excaliraffe.

[@pepperonipizza8200]

The Giraffe itself is already a 6/5. You need to have him create an entire herd.

[@notahotshot]

@@rg8766, the only way a puzzle can be impossible is if there is no solution. If there is no solution, it's not a puzzle, it's a paperweight. If you accept the fact that there are exactly zero "impossible" puzzles then you will be able to stop worrying about the word "impossible" being in the title.

[@altaris6593]

That's the power of simplicity!

[@missionimpuzzible3510]

ABSOLUTELY AMAZINGLY SIMPLE YET INTRIGUING PUZZLE!

[@jamesbrandon8582]

As adults, we look for logical patterns. Our flaw is that we over complicate things. Children on the other hand mostly ignore this thinking pattern and could probably solve it in under a minute. Get rid of that sketch book and just be random! This is a cool one, definitely a coffee table puzzle that you leave out for friends to try 👍

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Absolutely, sometimes it's better just just use a hands-on approach!

[@Name-js5uq]

Very nice puzzle.

[@perfection4749]

That looked fun!

[@J.C...]

I figured this one out immediately. It was obvious to me that each cube had to be made of part of the other cube. Meaning all 3 were interconnected. Once you realize that, it's easy.

[@Samalanderable]

I have seen that organization of 3 cubes before... I think there is even a name for it. So I knew it was possible from the begining. The tricky part was I had thought you had tried it already based on your drawings. I thought the magnets could be keeping you from it. Bravo tho. I like puzzles like that. Deceptive.

[@curthatt6461]

Boy, that one had you going for awhile. Nice!

[@skaterslife6305]

Apparently not as easy as it looks ,For only three pieces to fool Mr. puzzle you are absolutely right It is a little difficult, and I love the fact that it is giving you a hard time to solve, thank you Mr. puzzle ,, It’s the simplicity of it that makes it appear difficult

[@BlueAsterismSolstice]

When you started to draw the possibilities out was when I guessed it was rotating pattern, but I remember seeing something like this before.

[@WhatAboutTheBee]

Not drawn as part of the initial solution set. Interesting!

[@fishmeister2625]

For your final ever video you should solve the Lament Configuration puzzle box from Hellraiser.

[@vlad09]

That’s really cool wish I had that! 🔥❤️🔥

[@damianlopez7630]

There is a Grand Reason Why I Subscribed To You Sir. Ja Wohl.

[@night5653]

Sweet, that's a nice little puzzle

[@ericpetersen8155]

Very nice puzzle, it appeared much easier to solve than it was, which really makes it a very special puzzle(that’s one of my favorite types of puzzles) looks easy but isn’t. I think the polarity of the magnets mite have made it more difficult. Dexterity puzzles are frustrating for me. This is puzzle would be very enjoyable for my personal tastes. Very nice video!

[@mazerinthemage2395]

I enjoyed this video.

[@Maninawig]

I love these deceptively simple puzzles. They seem to ask you to think outside of conventional puzzle solving.

[@dylanbjornholtlund2791]

That sure is a beautiful puzzle

[@leefisher6366]

Not sure, but this might have been recorded on October 1st, and it's a sort of 'Halfway April fool' puzzle. Honestly, how could they have been arranged all in a straight line? I think he's having a giraffe.

[@pattidematteo36]

I saw the solution right away and was screaming it at the screen. Lol

[@JoshuaKennedy321]

I expected it to be a trick, like one of the 3 cubes is not solid but is an empty space you form by arranging the pieces the right way. The actual solution is way better because it's not "cheaty" in any way.

[@Mr.Puzzle]

While doing it I also thought there might be a trick involved. When seeing the final solution it makes it even more satisfying.

[@lindy7985]

this is what i expected from the 2 part giraffe puzzle

[@Mr.Puzzle]

The Giraffe is the Giraffe.

[@neilisalive4892]

Ay, nice lens! I love the Sigma 18-35!

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Great lens, especially in combination with the Metabones Ultra Adapter

[@SporeMystify]

That is what I expected the solution to look like after seeing the pieces

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Nice! 👏

[@joshuascholar3220]

I was almost yelling at the screen. It's obvious before you start that what you have to do with two pieces is make ONE cube PLUS the negative space between the other piece and it being two cubes. But yes there is more than one configuration of two sides that form that negative space because translating a face through it's mating face also makes a cube.

[@Mr.Puzzle]

I was also getting desperate! 😅

[@superhunk1989]

0:56 That's an optical illusion. I really thought that the piece in the middle was damaged.

[@rohitbhatt8986]

That was insane

[@aracheldra8763]

I don't own this puzzle, but I was able to guess the solution from the video description. My guess as to why the puzzle is so hard is that it's not iterative. It's easy to get one or two cubes, so you feel like you're on the right track, but getting all three needs a completely different approach. My first thought was to put two pieces in a 1×1×2 cube, but that obviously leaves no place for the third piece - somehow my mind went in that direction and got to the concave assembly as the most different way to do the arrangement.

[@NathanChisholm041]

As usual very cool! Any chance of 1080p 60fps?

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Not possible with my current main cam. I already thought about it but does it make sense for these kind of videos?

[@NathanChisholm041]

@@Mr.Puzzle That's OK mate it's still pin point sharp!

[@minicapralinica]

I like this puzzle.. 👏👍🏻😍

[@jeringjering]

I was surprised you got nowhere on paper. Once I put pen to paper, it was easy. Your video demonstrated nice workmanship by the builder. It took you so long because you have the left handed version :)

[@gillandro2]

Id love to see the tessarisis solved some time... great puzzle a 5 on the scale in my opinion

[@maulaucraw1209]

Something my brain does in the orienting flat pieces in space outwit my own eyes seeing the solution.

[@marcellosalis5063]

This one I've figured out at first glance. :)

[@shykitten55]

Just as another question: Now knowing the solution, have you tried assembling it so the wood grain match? I would have used that as a starting point to see if the grains lined up when solved and used that to resolve how they fit together.

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Did not try it. I would wonder it they consider it. The manufacturing would be a nightmare. 😁

[@shykitten55]

@@Mr.Puzzle Well I only suggested it because somewhere in the time line they would have had 3 cubes. If they cut them in half and made the pieces randomly or cut them in half and kept their original positions when building the pieces. Who knows, but it was one way I would have looked at finding a solution.

[@sandynix5268]

Man erwartet eine andere Anordnung der Würfel (so wie bei Deinen Zeichnungen z.B., immer Seite auf Seite), und dass es so auszusehen hat, hätte ich nie erwartet.😂 Sehr cooles Teil!👍🏼😃

[@ridercfo3368]

I am being honest from when you first showed the pieces I was able to see exactly how they fit. Don't think it would of taken me long at all.

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Nice!

[@joshdobson2737]

Brilliant

[@TM-ym9to]

Naturally our brains think they should connect inwardly to construct the cubes, hence the initial difficulty. Thats the trick...by designing the blocks to only connect and form outwardly, that's enough to cause confusion👍 Talk about thinking outside the square(cube) 😉

[@Mr.Puzzle]

Yes! 😁