Let us know your thoughts on the movie and if there's any other things from it you'd like to see us cover. If you enjoyed this video then please subscribe to the channel kzbin.info/door/q3hT5JPPKy87JGbDls_5BQ *Check out our BEST new videos below* *Secret Invasion Episode 6* - kzbin.info/www/bejne/gZeweaturbR7rMk *Invincible Atom Eve Breakdown* - kzbin.info/www/bejne/f6LMlGx7rL9_qpo *Oppenheimer* - kzbin.info/www/bejne/lXvKZYR9is2HqLc *The Marvels Trailer* - kzbin.info/www/bejne/a4XXhWWwe69pqsk *Mission Impossible Dead Reckoning* - kzbin.info/www/bejne/epfadXt7obGXidk *The Witcher Season 3* - kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZpK6hoWCet2CqtU
@alberto5147 Жыл бұрын
You really need to quit referring to the US as “america”. It’s insulting to the other countries of the continent and makes you look like a US sympathiser.
@anyagetman8596 Жыл бұрын
71 trillion pounds of Paul's puns
@anyagetman8596 Жыл бұрын
@alberto5147 No other country in the Western Hemisphere, other than Canada, who doesn't refer to itself as the Canada of America, played any significant role in WW2 other than to harbor frigging NAZIS, so until those other countries FESS UP TO THE RAT LINES, sit your pretty little butt back down and wait until later when other Western Hemisphere countries EARNED a distinction other than the Catholic Hypocrite Fascist Traitor PIECES OF DUNG of the Americas.
@matityaloran9157 Жыл бұрын
I loved the movie
@AA-qb7ni Жыл бұрын
Cillian and RDJ were truly phenomenal in the film. The whole cast was steller though. Evertime a new person appeared I was in awe 😂😂
@antoniobunni7740 Жыл бұрын
Had exactly the same 😵💫
@matwinner9708 Жыл бұрын
My fav was Florence. Both of them.
@AA-qb7ni Жыл бұрын
@@matwinner9708 she was incredible!!
@MildMisanthropeMaybeMassive Жыл бұрын
It had an all star cast with Oscar winners playing small side roles. There wasn’t a single weak performance. The age makeup was also stellar and elevated the sense of immersion.
@IanLai Жыл бұрын
Yea same to me, especially when Gary Oldman & Rami Malek appeared
@maxmustermann-hx3fx Жыл бұрын
As a german it was shocking to see Matthias Schweighöfer as Heisenberg. He is a german actor mostly appearing in german comedy movies
@carola-lifeinparis Жыл бұрын
I was excited to see him, did not know he would be. after all, he’s one of maybe 3 good German actors… While sure, he mostly does comedy, there’s also Der rote Baron
@RobinMueller1 Жыл бұрын
I was so proud and happy for him to be in such a movie but I cannot see him as a serious actor after everything he's done with Joko & Klaas 😂
@tiamia2370 Жыл бұрын
Not really he played a coach on a drama movie. I took him seriously
@axplade2899 Жыл бұрын
Matthias is a good actor tho. I remember him as Dieter in Army of the Dead.
@cupcakeinlondon Жыл бұрын
Well, not only in comedies. For instance he had a small role in "Valkyrie" (with Tom Cruise as Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg) as Lieutenant Franz Herber. Looks for international movies he is being cast for more serious roles.
@Ludvigvanamadeus Жыл бұрын
The reason Heisenberg failed at building the bomb was simple - his budget was 8 million RM, equivalent to about 2 million USD. Yes, that's right - million. He had 1/1000th of the budget of the Manhattan project. It wasn't because the Nazis were out of resources, not really - the development of V2 rockets is estimated to have been MORE expensive than the Manhattan Project. They just did not prioritise it. Honestly given the almost nonexistent funding he had it's actually really impressive how much they achieved.
@coachhannah2403 Жыл бұрын
Well, B29 was more expensive than Manhattan. US could do both, plus build the biggest navy & air force, and prosecute two WWIIs at the same time...
@cashrjr23 Жыл бұрын
@@coachhannah2403yes...and we still can
@donaldshotts4429 Жыл бұрын
Hitler almost always seemed to prioritize the wrong things, but I think this movie covered the reason why in this instance. He considered it Jewish science
@hailbane9633 Жыл бұрын
The Nazis were absolutely running out of raw resources and the reason the Allies won is because of simple war of attrition. The Nazi government had barely any gasoline, oil, steel and other raw materials by 1943. The allies won because they had excess to way more raw resources. Both USSR and United States had large untapped lands of raw resources and produced way more tanks, trucks, planes, etc... compared to the Germans. Also the USSR and United States had huge populations that outnumbered the axis massively.
@fuckso2342 Жыл бұрын
But the Germans were running out of resources. The Nazis could only focus on one advanced weapon(V2 rockets) at a time. The US had clearly had more money in research and development. They could invest money in atomic bombs and rocket technology. The Germans were also running out of men by 1943. They had to conscript scientists to fight something the US never had to do.
@MrDremmetbrown Жыл бұрын
I love how a movie just gives us history lessons
@emilyhassel7914 Жыл бұрын
me too! i didnt know much about this before seeing the movie. I found out there were lots of details left out of the movie like how a lot of families were forced out of their homes to make way for the town and how a lot of children who lived near by died of lukemia (sorry I can't spell haha) anyway so harrowing but good to learn it.
@mopnem Жыл бұрын
Eh..frankly I don’t recommend you take to much from its sex lessons
@MartyFox Жыл бұрын
Some other interesting things that happened after the time frame of Oppenheimer: 1) Albert Einstein co-authored a manifesto with leading scientists and intellectuals, including Bertrand Russell, arguing that nuclear weapons posed a grave threat to humanity and pleading with world leaders to seek diplomatic solutions rather than further nuclear development. Oppenheimer did not sign it. 2) Oppenheimer’s daughter was also denied security clearance later in life due to her father’s previous denial, costing her a job as a UN translator. She relocated to the family’s beach house in the US Virgin Islands (where her parents were buried), became a recluse, and died by suicide at 32.
@Jansenbaker Жыл бұрын
Why didn't Oppenheimer sign it?
@TFQ1 Жыл бұрын
@@Jansenbakercuz there is a possibility of another side of Oppenheimer, As he displayed empathy and was sympathetic on the outside. Some evidence points he wanted to be the father of the atomic bomb and he was fully aware of what he was doing and yet he pushed on as hard as he could while he kept reasoning it's to end the great war etc.
@shirleymcdonald2777 Жыл бұрын
Holly f thanks that's terrible but incredibly interesting
@Eroil Жыл бұрын
When was that manifesto signed? Perhaps Oppenheimer avoided signing it in fear it will make his security clearance even less likely?
@pricklypear7516 Жыл бұрын
@@TFQ1 Oppenheimer's ambition, arrogance, and professional curiosity have been well documented, but in this case, I think there's a much simpler explanation for why he refused to sign Einstein's manifesto: The USSR was not far behind us in nuclear capabilities, and NOBODY under Joe Stalin would even consider signing such a document. It WAS an arm's race LONG before the bombs were dropped on Japan.
Oppenheimer is a master Class on movie making. Nolan really nailed it. Some side notes about how Russia made their own nuclear bomb. Wernher von Braun who invented the v2 rocket was also captured along with Werner Heisenberg at the end of war and were put into service in the US. Wernher von Braun would later be instrumental in putting a man in space for the US, but there were other german scientists who were capture by the Russians and they helped develop Russia's first A Bomb. I loved how Edward Teller was portrayed, looking so greasy. He went on to pushing for the creation of Nuclear power plants and making bigger and bigger nuclear weapons. He went for the money and had no ethics.
@SueFerreira75 Жыл бұрын
Teller was the model for Stanley Kubrick's "Dr Strangelove"
@krishadyn5211 Жыл бұрын
Teller came across as on the spectrum. He seemed to be in hyperfocus. His dislike of the 'unpredictability' of Oppenheimer is also supportive of this theory. There's nothing unethical about pushing for nuclear power plants though.
@sahilsharma-zw8ct Жыл бұрын
you know a movie is good when every other youtuber is making videos on it. Glad I experienced it in theatres.
@TrangPakbaby Жыл бұрын
I just saw it today, it was mind blowing 👏🏽👏🏽❤️
@topdog5252 Жыл бұрын
Heisenberg also produced the first paper on matrix mechanics in 1925, which was the first major progress past the Bohr electron orbits, which he disregarded completely in that paper.
@bjarnerost2002 Жыл бұрын
As a German, I'd never have thought that I'd see Matthias Schweighöfer on a thumbnail of yours😂
@heavyspoilers Жыл бұрын
Army of thieves!
@DavidDatura Жыл бұрын
@@heavyspoilersso that’s where I’d seen that actor before 🤔 doesn’t he have a part in that upcoming Gal Gadot Netflix movie?
@nancyscogin7549 Жыл бұрын
So Heisenberg was...never mind. You did your breaking bad joke before I could get this typed out.😄
@jeepercreep12 Жыл бұрын
"I have become Heisenberg, the knocker of doors"
@AustinTheCityTV Жыл бұрын
Honestly, the movie was amazing. It was cool to see the overlapping of many famous scientists and politicians in history. My favorite quote was when Oppenheimer spoke to Heisenberg, and Heisenberg said, “You clearly don’t know who you’re talking to, so let me clue you in. I am not in danger, Robert. I am the danger. A guy opens his door and gets shot, and you think that of me? No! I am the one who knocks!”
@Aces77777 Жыл бұрын
So glad that there are so many people who are interested to learn about one of the most important moment in human history
@ChubbyChecker182 Жыл бұрын
I would like to have seen Oppenheimers thoughts during the Cuban Missle Crisis.
@marktwain5232 Жыл бұрын
Excellent post!
@thebiscuitguy646 Жыл бұрын
Oppenheimer would probably take a personal visit to Vasili Arkhipov's home to apologise
@marktwain5232 Жыл бұрын
I had a nice but brief talk with Norman Cousins in NYC back in 1983. I would have asked him this question on Oppenheimer's possible thoughts on the Cuban Missile Crisis myself had I been much more thoughtful! It is a fascinating question you have come up with!
@marktwain5232 Жыл бұрын
@@thebiscuitguy646 Unfortunately Vasili Arkhipov's story did NOT become known until 2002 after his passing in 1998. Perhaps they are only now conversing in the World beyond with the recent passing of Daniel Ellsberg too? I hope somebody is trying to help us! I lived through the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962 as a teenager. It was absolutely harrowing. The spiritual rebellion of the 1960's started in that vortex!
@thebiscuitguy646 Жыл бұрын
@@marktwain5232 It must have been horrible for everyone around the world, preparing for the worst.
@jamone5 Жыл бұрын
I was going to be livid if there wasn’t a breaking bad reference. Good job bruv
@rebecca1_01 Жыл бұрын
Hey Paul. Here is some interesting I was wondering that you might cover. The beginning of Oppenheimer explains who the titan Prometheus was. As I sat in the audience, I couldn’t help but think of Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein subtitled The Modern Prometheus. In a lot of ways the story of Oppenheimer could be seen as a real (modern) retelling of Frankenstein. One wonders if this was deliberate by Nolan or just a big coincidence. This is a question that I think could make for an interesting discussion in a future video.
@heavyspoilers Жыл бұрын
Love that comment, really good pickup with it, might try and work that into something in the future. Thanks so much
@joal1743 Жыл бұрын
Well Frankenstein story also took inspiration from the Prometheus story to that’s where the similarities come from. Man gaining the power of a god and being punished by the consequences of having that power.
@themiddleman781 Жыл бұрын
The movie was inspired by the book "Oppenheimer: American Prometheus" which was definitely a play on the Frankenstein title.
@SirToaster9330 Жыл бұрын
Well Oppenheimer is Modern meanwhile Frankenstein is like a bajillion years old
@qzorn4440 Жыл бұрын
Oppenheimer is a very interesting movie. The getting started of the Nuke-stuff is very different than today. The old ones thought that this was just a Russian and USA weapon. Oppenheimer and many other scientists realized the atomic bomb building blocks were now set in motion and no turning back. If you cannot make it, then buy it as if it were an expensive lightbulb.
@DC-zi6se Жыл бұрын
Heisenberg remains the 2nd youngest Nobel Laureate in physics and a GOAT of physics. 😅
@Jkwilliams-o4t Жыл бұрын
Yeah and 3rd youngest after Malala and Lawrence Bragg
@WhizPill Жыл бұрын
He pledged loyalty to a nazi commander tho
@musiccer7446 Жыл бұрын
@@WhizPillcause he had to, he didn’t want to betray his country, however, he didn’t support the doings of the nazis. He was a Jew sympathise which is why he was investigated and distrusted. He didn’t want to develop a bomb against his own country. He had to chose sides, he didn’t choose the nazis, just his people
@epic9203 Жыл бұрын
@@WhizPill Ok and? He destroyed Gus Fring and his meth empire and became one of the most feared kingpins in America.
@daisyblossomflowerchild9702 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the additional information. My husband and I very much enjoyed Oppenheimer. :)
@heavyspoilers Жыл бұрын
thanks so much for checking out the video and all the support
@thecraigster8888 Жыл бұрын
The OSS agent Moe Berg was a very interesting person. In the 1920s & 30s he was a pro baseball player. He played for several teams at various infield positions, but had his best years as a catcher in the American League.
@joe187506 ай бұрын
The Catcher was a Spy, 2018 movie is about Mo Berg.
@justinb32512 күн бұрын
Thank you for the little background on Heisenberg. It woulda been nice if they did in the movie
@theresaivy704511 ай бұрын
Heisenberg sounds like a fascinating man. Your video induced me to do research on him, which is why I gave you a thumbs up and subscribed to channel. I subscribe to channels that stimulate my mind and emotions. Good video.
@adraino7345 Жыл бұрын
As a fan of science youtube the first half of this movie was awesome. It was like an avengers movie but instead of heroes it’s a bunch of nerds and instead of unlocking new superpowers it’s making scientific discoveries.
@matityaloran9157 Жыл бұрын
As a fan of history and someone who finds politics fascinating the second half of the movie was also magnificent
@adraino7345 Жыл бұрын
@@matityaloran9157 we could start a band
@Rheinhard Жыл бұрын
Funny how you liken it to an Avengers (Marvel) movie... For reasons which should begin to be obvious from the movie, Edward Teller's nickname was "Doctor Doom". This continued after the war with his intense push for development of thermonuclear weapons, and through the 1980s, he was a big proponent of the "Strategic Defense Initiative", commonly referred to as "Star Wars" anti-missile defense, pushed by President Reagan. Well, years later, Stan Lee and Jack Kirby created their own "Dr. Doom" for Marvel Comics, and his main opponent was Reed Richards, the leader of the Fantastic Four. And Richards was a lanky scientific genius who constantly smoked a pipe! So yeah, Reed Richards and Victor von Doom were directly based on Oppenheimer and Teller, respectively!
@ca-ke9493 Жыл бұрын
So what ur telling me is the MCU aged backwards in time? Ran out of comics to adapt and ended up pulling from the oldest canon there is?
@LaReinaZorra Жыл бұрын
Kidney cancer isn’t contracted, like a cold. Cancer arises from malignant tumor cells. Brilliant BB pivot!
@saltyjo7514 Жыл бұрын
Contracted means caught or developed. Not exactly wrong, you are nitpicking.
@Rockabelle Жыл бұрын
Great vid! I continue to be astonished every time I see pics of the real Oppenheimer. He…really was that handsome, huh?? Most real ppl played by movie stars get a ridiculous glow-up, but Oppenheimer already had movie star good looks. I wonder how much that played into his famous charisma?
@OhDeeDeeEssOhYouEl Жыл бұрын
I love when i refresh my subs and you pop up with a fresh boi
@ssuuppeerrbbooyy Жыл бұрын
I wish they showed more technical/engineering work that went into the building the bomb. We had marbles in a bowl then its already a manufactured cartridge being placed in the device.
@peterl3417 Жыл бұрын
Like in these 4 hours of investigations they couldn't fit in 5 minutes of the designing the uranium separation and construction of the actual facilities, not just barracks?
@ca-ke9493 Жыл бұрын
Gotta film those barracks glamour shots for the US military complex. Why have science when you can just flash some weird led light graphic on screen.
@MatthewK122 Жыл бұрын
Thank you Paul
@sreelakshmipillai5233 Жыл бұрын
Nice video dude..Climax city ka bhi explanation Acha tha yarr scene to scene smajye h.
@supbrotv Жыл бұрын
When Matt damons' character kept saying the government spent $2 billion on this project, like its a big deal was a funny moment. They only spent 71 billion in todays money to create the greatest weapon known to mankind. Meanwhile the military today spent 2.1 TRILLION dollars on a new fighter plane that does not even work.
@Dundoril Жыл бұрын
Nobody spend 2 trillion on fighter planes
@DDewberry Жыл бұрын
As a person who works directly w/ the F35 you’re incredibly wrong lol.
@terrencewilsonpoopoo Жыл бұрын
@@DDewberrythat plane knows the enemies internet search history.
@Arcticos0 Жыл бұрын
Doesn’t work? Tell that to Switzerland, Finland, and Czechia, all of whom purchased them sometime in the last year. I’m sure they’ll listen to some ignorant internet troll 😂
@jmaitland5709 Жыл бұрын
The idea that the F35 doesn't work is a meme that comes from a Russia Today article that read the title of a Financial Times article covering a report from the pentagon that they didn't understand- which was that the Air Force wanted to make a new plane with all the new fancy tech of the F-35 but was smaller and cheaper, as a replacement for the *F-16*, with the point being they could sell this new plane to friendly countries that couldn't afford the F-35. The FT saw this and thought this request was actually a proposal for a replacement to the F-35, RT took that and claimed it was an admission the F-35 didn't work, and then it became an internet meme amongst the 'America bad' online crowd.
@l.s.9671 Жыл бұрын
The little clip of Mr. Bean walking out of a room, followed by an explosion after you'd mentioned Heisenberg accidentally destroyed his lab made me laugh so hard I almost threw up💀
@NoUploadJustComment Жыл бұрын
The clips with Paul Rudd as Moe Berg are from the film The Catcher Was a Spy. Highly recommend seeing it if you want to learn about one of the most interesting people who ever lived.
@clippyclop Жыл бұрын
how did you get all these high quality shots from the movie?
@pizzajona Жыл бұрын
7:30 The security hearing was in 1954, not 1945
@kyleschmitt28310 ай бұрын
Moe Berg reference! The funny thing is before I watched Oppenheimer for the first time this weekend. I actually watched “the catcher was a spy” not realizing both movies would kinda relate
@aviiswu4921 Жыл бұрын
Just finished watching the movie 30 mins ago in the theatre....I was wondering that too 😂😂😂 thank you for the explanation
@divyanshugogna6152 Жыл бұрын
5:13 man I really wish that was true, Walter white the Heisenberg such a great show breaking bad
@vinni3c4 ай бұрын
Thanks for the RL lore vid
@dinocollins720 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! Thank you!
@djtripmix Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info
@RandomVideosFirst Жыл бұрын
Interesting fact Mo Berg was a Baseball player
@johnsullivan6843 Жыл бұрын
yes, and he played in the Major Leagues (the highest professional level). Berg has also been the subject of his own book/movie. That 2018 Berg movie starring Paul Rudd did not seem resonate with audiences nor critics.
@AmerikasFavoriteLuis Жыл бұрын
Do one on teller and his continued work on the h bomb
@riccarrasquilla379 Жыл бұрын
thanks for the explainer
@renvill Жыл бұрын
The title is on Strauss Oppenheimer but the video was almost finished and it’s almost all about Heisenberg. Confusing.
@python3773 Жыл бұрын
Whenever you say “your host Paul…” I long for the days of “your host definition!”
@timothytorigian7932 Жыл бұрын
Heisenberg = 90% of the video.. Strauss... died.
@kylecarter1599 Жыл бұрын
When's the shot by shot breakdown coming?
@heavyspoilers Жыл бұрын
probably when its released digitally so I can properly rewatch it
@jamiewilshaw3595 Жыл бұрын
This film is my favourite so far of the year, I hope that Nolan goes further down the history route, dare I say a remake of JFK 😮.
@terrondt Жыл бұрын
I seen it twice. It was that good
@Vaedoh Жыл бұрын
MLK
@cristianarteaga1092 Жыл бұрын
RFK
@virnamisra1657 Жыл бұрын
Good job
@cheekster777 Жыл бұрын
Thank you Paul.
@jim124210 ай бұрын
3:15 - $71 billion , a lot of money!
@LouisHCampagna Жыл бұрын
So, if you’re intent on untangling the timeline with Strauss, maybe get your years right? At 7:29, you state that the “closed hearings” occurred in 1945, when I assume they occurred in 1954, five years before the 1959 Strauss appointment hearings.
@hayley4514 Жыл бұрын
Honestly i wish i knew all this BEFORE i watched the movie
@Aeoxander Жыл бұрын
"Heavy spoilers ahead, so if you haven't cracked open a history book and educated yourself about something that happened almost 90 years ago... wow what are you doing with your life seriously"
@kurtvonfricken6829 Жыл бұрын
We need: “Oppenheimer II, the sequel”
@emilyhassel7914 Жыл бұрын
thank u!!!
@NeverLetOff Жыл бұрын
Awesome video!
@heavyspoilers Жыл бұрын
Thank you 🙏
@Chavanun555 Жыл бұрын
Quick question. Why did Iron Man character had to make Oppenheimer go throught that trail thingy and what was the ending scene with Einstein mean? Did the gov. just said they were sorry but not sorry in the end and just gave him a medal? English is my second language sorry
@jmaitland5709 Жыл бұрын
So to put it simply. Strauss (RDJ's character) wanted his prestigious government position, but he was being overshadowed by Oppenheimer, so he conspired to destroy Oppenheimer's reputation and reframe himself as the hero. And what Einstein said, meant that when they all apologised to Oppenheimer and gave him medals and such, they were only doing it because they felt guilty, and to make themselves feel better, not because they had realised Oppenheimer was actually right.
@Chavanun555 Жыл бұрын
@@jmaitland5709 so Iron Man didnt do it because of the difference in politics views that Oppenheimer made him look like a fool and that he made Einstein ignored him?
@jmaitland5709 Жыл бұрын
@@Chavanun555 It was both I think. Oppenheimer did make him look like a fool its true. But because of how famous and respected Oppenheimer was, people everywhere valued Oppenheimer's opinions and views, which clashed with Strauss's views. As an example: if we think about the scene at the dinner table when they found out the Russians had an atomic bomb too, Strauss wanted to build H-Bombs to counter them, Oppenheimer was opposed to that, and because of how much people respected Oppenheimer, people would choose to listen to him instead of Strauss.
@Chavanun555 Жыл бұрын
@@jmaitland5709 the flower in the middle of the table scene right? Also so this also happens in real life as well or was the story with Iron Man abit different in real life
@jmaitland5709 Жыл бұрын
@@Chavanun555 Yes exactly, the scene where they had to move the flowers yes. As for how accurate it is to real life, I think it is mostly accurate, but I don't know for certain.
@akeel_1701 Жыл бұрын
@3.16, just over seventy one billion? @5.17, kudos! I was thinking the same thing LOL
@IanLai Жыл бұрын
Give Cillian & RDJ oscars… what a great assemble of actors Gary Oldman, and even Rami Malek!
@romanclark3274 Жыл бұрын
Thank you SOOO much for the Breaking Bad reference!!!!💞
@TheMelihTube Жыл бұрын
Great explanation about Heisenberg but your video title is totally misleading.
@halfxue Жыл бұрын
The whole cast was bombastic!
@robertbruce7686 Жыл бұрын
"Focusing on hard water .." That will be heavy water (Deuterium) 😆
@DavidDatura Жыл бұрын
Yeah, that was a funny 😄
@mon699 Жыл бұрын
No why did i actually laugh out loud at the breaking bad reference 😂😂😂😂😂
@sit-insforsithis1568 Жыл бұрын
Because you have 0 respect for European victims
@connorb9008 Жыл бұрын
Tumor behind Oppi’s right ear can be seen during the film. He died of throat cancer.
@uzumaki2689 Жыл бұрын
Learned more from this than school
@JKUTWatcher Жыл бұрын
Heavy History. I’ll subscribe with alerts.
@anyagetman8596 Жыл бұрын
Paul is the mushroom cloud of my Pun dreams!
@MCsCreations Жыл бұрын
I hope the next movie is about Richard Feynman.
@cowboyatthebebop10 ай бұрын
About Heisenberg, Hitler never really believed in the bomb or thought it would end all life on earth. Secondly Heisenberg knew he was not making any progress on it and went to beg niehls bohr for help who refused
@SEROBERT Жыл бұрын
Not a lot of seats left in the IMAX theater in town and we ended up with a seat that was too close to the screen for my liking. I hurt my neck having to look so far up to the screen. I did not think the IMAX version added anything. Just my take, but I recommend seeing it in a regular theater if you have the choice.
@westfield90 Жыл бұрын
My only criticism was of the character of Jean Tatlock where almost all of her scenes involved nudity and sex. In fact she had gone to medical school and was a psychiatrist. I wish those nude scenes were not included but had reflected her as the highly achieved person that she really was and not just a nymph. Plus Matt Damon was terribly miscast. The real life guy was so much taller and heavier than Matt.
@BadNewsBella Жыл бұрын
Not interested in seeing this movie but I love your break downs so you know commenting for the algorithm 👍🏾😁
@heavyspoilers Жыл бұрын
Awesome! Thank you!
@4evrnick Жыл бұрын
Heisenberg never figured out that graphite could be a substitute for heavy water to control nuclear flux. That made it impossible for Germany to create a bomb that could be delivered to a target.
@armandocendejas4222 Жыл бұрын
Emily Blunt during the communist membership party card discussion blew me away. She was amazing
@johnbecker521311 ай бұрын
yuck!!!!! i suppose you like commie sex scenes , to each his own ,i did not like this movie was very tacky in places
@DavidDatura Жыл бұрын
Great video! At least one prominent German that wasn’t a douche during WW2.
@thomaswagenaar Жыл бұрын
The voice underneath the breakdown is an AI copy of your voice right?
@erikagholston6610 Жыл бұрын
The movie was very good & I need to watch it again.
@MoonMoon-bj9jr Жыл бұрын
I heard he also had a great relationship with the Texas Chicken Chain Los Pollos Hermanos owner Gus Fring
@virnamisra1657 Жыл бұрын
That Clip Or Clipper o the steam getting the better of thou two. In the Heisenberg laboratory. That's WUS my days n Me
@Zerzayar Жыл бұрын
He would have never won an assassination attempt from the non-aging Ant-Man himself.
@_bjorn__bjorn_37849 ай бұрын
The thing that bugs me is that Oppenheimer only got his security clearance back last year and not back when they found out Strauss was smearing his name it really took a movie to come out and the world to now what happened back then to clear his name publicly that’s the us for u, I guess
@HarshTekie Жыл бұрын
Strauss was only Acting Secretary of Commerce.
@littleman787 Жыл бұрын
3:15 bruh it’s literally “71 billion” - not that hard to say
@adalarce Жыл бұрын
7:28 was 1954
@ShadyPlatinum777 Жыл бұрын
Thanks I was confused 😂
@DouwedeJong Жыл бұрын
That is an annoying error.
@soulsinsomniac734 Жыл бұрын
I don't mean to ruin the video, but I cant see someone with the name Heisenberg without thinking of Walter White
@56postoffice Жыл бұрын
Heisenberg, poor sap. Didn't realise how close he was to being whacked.
@LeethLee1 Жыл бұрын
Awesome
@MrYash1381 Жыл бұрын
Jesse Pinkman! Did not see that coming!😂😂
@LiamADHD Жыл бұрын
Dude, where is alien resurrection?
@NoraGermain Жыл бұрын
Did anyone think the creepy clicking geiger counter effects ij the film sounded a little bit like the clickers in the last of us? 😅
@ChubbyChecker182 Жыл бұрын
Mr. bean and The Muppets 😂😂
@ellafieldipops Жыл бұрын
I love Magnum ice lollies, yum
@heavyspoilers Жыл бұрын
No doubt
@jeswanthkumar4291 Жыл бұрын
I would like to tell one thing, if people now it can be done it will be done. I have designed 3 products this way
@Ultra-Collector9 ай бұрын
Who killed his side piece or did she mill herself,did he actually confess by the tree that he killed her?
@_bjorn__bjorn_37849 ай бұрын
With side piece do you mean the commi Jackie if so there is a conspiracy that she was killed because she could have been a security risk for the us but this was never proven and most think she offed herself and in the movie you can see a gloved hand on her hand while she’s kneeling over the bath half full of water for like 3 frames letting you believe what you like fits best nice thing they added that in the movie giving it more depth
@howardwilliams2925 Жыл бұрын
What happened to Heisenberg? I thought he became Walter White!😂😂
@anonimochenta44398 ай бұрын
Just learned Strauss was Jewish. Why people omit that? When it a latin, english, irish, muslin or whatever they always include it in the history books