Optimize Ubuntu 2024! Apps, Design, Flatpak instead of Snap

[@und3rpr]

very nice guide, thank you.

[@NoCommentaryGameplay_ID]

Pls do tutorial to install Opencl on ubuntu 24.04 for rendering, mining, machine learning purpose. Thank you 🙏

[@dragonballjiujitsu]

Or...hear me out.... install a distro that does not force snaps on the end user. Save yourself about half an hour.

[@blackandcold]

This process sounds like it could be perfectly done by a Nix config :) Maybe I'll try that now that my Arch with wayland is so broken it black screens and crashes when I tray any Wayland start

[@cybernit3]

Anyone know how to have unique background wallpaper per workspace? I tried that Paper extension but it is unstable. I thought maybe there is a way to do this with a script. Since Gnome 47 is in wayland, xrandr works only for x11; is there wayland tools that work with Mutter/Gnome? Thanks.

[@Joe-uc9kf]

I think you should mention that some flatpak apps are unverified. This means, they are maintained by the original developer, but could be maintained by anybody.

[@timfd.w.4163]

they should rename and rebrand to FATPAKS

[@FossLinuxJournal]

I don't see that Canonical does that. After all, you have an advantage over Flathub with Snapcraft. There are more acceptable, verified software developers there. Flathub is moving straight but is not yet at the same level. For private users, it may not matter but in the Enterprise environment, it can definitely be a matter of gaining deals if you can at the same time prove that software is only obtained from trustworthy sources. For example, the Microsoft accounts at Flathub are not currently verified. In the example of the example, VSCode and Edge, as software of trustworthy sources at Flathub, fell away. This is just an example and does not mean that I support Snap. I only show where Flathub still has to catch up and would also welcome it if I would not have to carry out the steps shown here in the video on every Ubuntu system, but if it were going perfectly after switching on ...

[@DefCantGame]

optimizing the non minimal install makes no sense

[@FossLinuxJournal]

Why that?