Another thing worth noting for people considering this filter is that stars will appear green or white, so unless you’re ok with that, you’ll want to take some separate subs for rgb stars with something like a uv/ir cut filter. Also, polar aligning takes longer since for me at least, my exposures have to be 10 seconds. Doesn’t sound like a lot but it adds up quick when you’re constantly making small adjustments and resetting. I’ve been able to image stuff when the moon was 66% illuminated with no visible gradient in my subs. Haven’t tried any brighter than that but I would be curious to know others’ experiences shooting with this filter during bright moons.
@fluke7302 ай бұрын
Hi why not PA without filter first? Goto target insert filter and refocus?
@ispcapret16 ай бұрын
Great job, Astrotan- educational and easily understood. Great technical information, and very clear.
@jstlkhvn136 ай бұрын
What a difference that filter makes! Wow!!!
@museablesmokeproductions6 ай бұрын
Well done, Astrotan!! That filter rocks! And so do you!! 🤟
@DaddyEric6846 ай бұрын
Very detailed and easy to understand! Way to go and keep up the good work, :)
@matforsbon5 ай бұрын
Beautiful capture, very well done.
@AmatureAstronomer6 ай бұрын
I have been using the Svbony 220 filter. It is a 7nm dual band filter which lets Hydrogen alpha and Oxygen III through for use in emission nebulae. I like it and only paid $150 for it.
@DrNat16 ай бұрын
Do you get halos with the sv220?
@peeb28965 ай бұрын
@@DrNat1 Probably does...lots of reviews showing images with halos... I suppose you get what you pay for and if you happy with halos?
@Tony-Elliott6 ай бұрын
Great video and review Tanner
@astrotan6 ай бұрын
Thanks man! Much appreciated :)
@declanraven23506 ай бұрын
Tanner , which NINA plugins do you use, if you use any?
@astrotan6 ай бұрын
I don’t really use any plugins, but occasionally I use 3 point polar alignment, but normally I just do it myself. The only main plugin I use is ASTAP for plate solving