In this session I have tried to cover the concept of Ostensible Owner or Doctrine of Holding Out or Benami Ownership which is discussed under section 41 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Пікірлер: 75
@ashokhegde33212 жыл бұрын
One of the best law series lecture and I am appreciative of you Prof Poojari
@aanchaljaiswal86933 жыл бұрын
There was lot of confusion before coming to this lecture nd infact upto 2 slides I was not able to understand it........ Now after complete lecture everything is clr..... tq sir👏
@jahidhasanimon20763 жыл бұрын
Thank u Sir for making this point so easy..doing self study.. Love from🇧🇩💚
@vinuthabc55964 жыл бұрын
thank you,i understood verywell plz continue this
@chitranjali014 жыл бұрын
Ha ha ha example of Mr Shashi Tharoor 😃😃😃 nice video made by you 👌
@pamelalobo48352 жыл бұрын
i love the way u teach keep up the gud work God bless you
@ashimajiji80603 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir🙏🙏 from Kerala
@arjunyadav26135 жыл бұрын
You make the topic so easy to study
@avdnr1961 Жыл бұрын
wonderful lecture . Very clear voce i am very happy thank u very much
@umauma21053 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation sir👍
@vismayauchambally87163 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooo much sir. Iam always thank to you♥️♥️
@harnamsingh55442 жыл бұрын
Good analysis.
@suribabunsuri74142 жыл бұрын
Verry good explanation sir Verey eassy wiring exam. This topic
@2002dimpu4 жыл бұрын
Very nicely presented..well done.
@parthgaurav36492 жыл бұрын
Sir ur smile is as lovely as your teaching
@advashutoshshukla84994 жыл бұрын
Sir, you make it very easily understandable.🙏🙏
@bhuvanathangamani7590 Жыл бұрын
Really its to good to understand and very useful for examination
@rajkunwarupadhye35104 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir very helpful lecture
@faizalmohamed75434 жыл бұрын
It is very useful class for me for guiding me for all subject conversation in Tamil also...
@anbujayabal30794 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining in English only
@gowrinandana51093 жыл бұрын
U r gem❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@ajayshukla63653 жыл бұрын
Thak u really ur explanation is excellent
@shikharbhardwaj45994 жыл бұрын
Brilliant Sir!!!! Very Helpful
@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for comment. Please share videos with your friends ☺️😊
@charanharish5783 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot Wonderful explanation sir Always smiling Gives us positive vibes to study And makes tough topics easy❤️
@RightandWrite4 жыл бұрын
Very simple and quite helpful
@mouriyaraja52953 жыл бұрын
Video of sec.41 yet to complete but now i feel am comfortable with your expression and the way you explaining things with background picture. Very kind of you sir. God bless you. Can i get your number sir? ....happy dreams sir. Vanakkam🙏🍎
@meeracyriac3789 Жыл бұрын
Good video sir.. please do more videos on tranfer of property act
@bhuvanathangamani7590 Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lots sir
@SB-jp7wd4 жыл бұрын
Good...explanation....
@arjunyadav26135 жыл бұрын
Very well done sir
@geetanjalidas26734 жыл бұрын
Very helpful sir....
@lawyerparijat3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much.
@venkatuduthala72056 ай бұрын
Superb
@vaibhavpkhanna3 жыл бұрын
Even i doubt Shashi Tharoor would have given such tough words :D
@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll3 жыл бұрын
👏👏👏 ☺️😊👌
@advarathypraveen37383 жыл бұрын
Great effort
@spicybond007 Жыл бұрын
Is there a link or copy judgement on “Luchmunn v/s Kallichuran (1873) 19 W.R. 192” that is mentioned in the video?
@jintukalita7911 Жыл бұрын
Great
@souravdas51374 жыл бұрын
Good lecture sir
@vanshbatra76404 жыл бұрын
Awesome video Better then others. Shashi Tharoor punch was lit 💥.
@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll4 жыл бұрын
😊
@athulyams4442 жыл бұрын
❤️🔥
@pryankurbhardwaj56254 жыл бұрын
Its great
@athirasajeev60133 жыл бұрын
Very useful class sir
@faizalmohamed75434 жыл бұрын
Continue your career for all legal subjects...
@jagadishtg2 жыл бұрын
Can you do video on doctrine of lis pendence u/s 52 & doctrine of part performance u/s 53A
@rukminiray33664 жыл бұрын
Please make a video about 53 and 53A .I need it very badly
@ranjitbasfor4204 жыл бұрын
Sir, may I mention a little bit of error ? that's Bunnoo Bibee was wife of Alexander and Macqueen was daughter of Alexander, during the lecture, you mentioned Macqueen as wife of Alexander. Ranjit Basfor, Guwahati, Assam.
@bilalshaikh70553 жыл бұрын
Sir i have a qestion if husband purchase a property on the name of wife she became ostensible owener but the possession is under the husband then can wife sell that property and can it become a valid trasfer?
@aabidislam19975 жыл бұрын
Nice sir
@bhuvanathangamani7590 Жыл бұрын
Sir please cover all the topics in property law
@vismayauchambally87163 жыл бұрын
Sir, in this in whose name the agreement of property lies?
@MsDONSHERE2 жыл бұрын
Sir a doubt in requirements point 2 there should be consent from real owner but in mc donald case there was no consent from husband no sir?
@ratnanjalibansal43593 жыл бұрын
Sir you explained it very well..🙏🙏
@vishnump95024 жыл бұрын
Sooppr sir
@kannamavlogs159 Жыл бұрын
Valid
@sowmyasai8204 Жыл бұрын
Sir under ram kumar vs MC queen case the sale was valid without the consent of mc Donald But under requirements u said that consent must be there Can u pls clarify on this?
@anupamsharma99704 жыл бұрын
Sir this is mains question please tell me which provision will be explained in this question from transfer of property act. The question is Where there is no gift but a direction to transfer from and after a given event, the vesting will be postponed till after that event has happened, " Are there exceptions of this rule? Explain
@supriyanavali20823 жыл бұрын
🙏👌👏
@tharanishreedinesh145 Жыл бұрын
Sir....plz can you put a video doctrine of lis pendens in transfer of property act....mu semester exams is coming soon .....I always follows your video to clarify my doubts ....I can't find out the exact explanation in others video
@goldengirlgoldengirl7498 Жыл бұрын
😮😮😮
@Ankit-xi8nw3 жыл бұрын
A brings his horse and B his tonga and they ply it and divide the income everyday. Are they partners? Please reply..
@roadtripwithkhaleef16652 жыл бұрын
Mr. ganesh poojary ji its more help full if you use Hindi language and cartoons to make better uderstanding undoutedly ur teaching is amazing
@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll2 жыл бұрын
This is a English Channel and my Hindi is poor
@anbujayabal30794 жыл бұрын
Put videos to Evidence Act .... Please sir
@chandrakumari76834 жыл бұрын
Sir can you please explain Doctrine of Priority sec 48 of TP Act
@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll4 жыл бұрын
Will try sometime
@adv.dipalikamalakar79984 жыл бұрын
Easement pe video plzz to make
@neelamprusty76314 жыл бұрын
Sir make video for Section 43 to 53
@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll4 жыл бұрын
Will try
@umasanthu834 жыл бұрын
sir u have wrongly mentioned that mr. donald purchased a property in mr. donald name... i think it should be mrs. donald name..
@nooriamina70439 ай бұрын
sir kindly minimize your picture as it is hiding the slides
@jadejanandkunvarba97654 ай бұрын
Sir no match
@jacobzachariah9756 Жыл бұрын
What is so difficult about the word " ostensible " ? Is it not another word for " apparent " ? " Ostensible" appears to be more attractive ! That's all.