Our Mathematical Universe | Max Tegmark | Talks at Google

[@diabl2master]

Damn, the introducer has an awful cold. His voice sounds like something out of a parody xD

[@johnsmith6555]

"I've seen some shit in 'Nam, man..."

[@ArtDekko]

If you close your eyes while listening to him, you will realise its actually Marvin the martian from Looney Tunes. "at long last, the illudium q-36 explosive space mod-u-lay-tor"

[@vrinyankatipeiteh3366]

Velvet fog

[@syndroid]

This man turned out to be the first COVID-19 case...

[@Loli.Rancher]

1:05 - for those of you that don't care for the intro dude. (I was surprised nobody made a shortcut yet, but here ya go - saves about a minute of your time)

[@phoenixzappa7366]

Loli Rancher fuck you

[@Loli.Rancher]

Mulletboy :)

[@Loli.Rancher]

Don't already have one? Wouldn't be surprised; would explain why you can afford the time posting such thoughtful comments. I can hook you up if you live 'round the Bay.

[@syndroid]

Damn... you couldn't have edited out the last 5 years?

[@birdie9240]

He is brilliant and they seem like the most dull audience ever.

[@davidwilkie9551]

True positioning. This Amateur supports this Mathematical Conjecture from Professor Tegmark. The reason should be obvious from 3D-T Perspective and projection-drawing Observation.

[@rogerfarias4506]

Thanks for the subtitles!

[@UpendraYadav-if6ow]

Mr. Mark 1:- Biology- (a) Unit (cell) (b) Body (human, animal & plant) (c) Responsible for explain Functionality, from Unit (cell) to Body (human, animal & plant). 2:- Chemistry - (a) Unit (Atom) (b) Body (matter) (c) Responsible for explain Functionality, from Unit (Atom) to Body (matter). 3:- Physics - (a) Unit (particle) (b) Body (Mass) (c) Responsible for explain Functionality, from Unit (particle) to Body (Mass). 4:- Then what mathematics? (a) Unit---? (b) Body----? (c) Responsible for explain everything. Because of absent unit & body, all people think that, math is only a process in human mind. But, dose unit & body of mathematic really absent? 5:- Unit of mathematic-Yes, we all know and use, but not believe. “Point is the unit of mathematic”. Point is not a physical existence. For a physical existence, unit size must be fixed. But point don’t have fixed size. That’s why point cannot belong to physics. So “Point is a nonphysical reality”. Finally we can say “Point is a mathematical reality.” 6:- Body--- Mathematical formula can be use at “any point of universe” Or “Mathematical formula independent from place (location)”. Then “Entire POINTS of universe is body of mathematic.” 7:- Another word universe (energy, matter, live body or free space-VOLUME) made from points. 8:- Point is fundamental unit of everything. 9:- Now mathematic have body which have infinite volume and infinite small unit size i.e. point. 10:- when we say small variation dx, or delta, or something tense to zero, actually we want use of mathematical reality or body. 11:- when we say volume of x, density of x, mass of x, gravity of x, color of x, velocity of x……………………or CONSCIOUSNESS of x. Actually x (noun) is mathematical reality cover externally and internally to x. 12:- Some say science is poetry of reality. Then what is reality? Actually mathematics is reality, and science is properties of mathematical reality. Because work of science is only discover relation among properties. So “Science is properties of mathematics”. 13:- Scientist ask/discuss why universe is well fine tune? Because Universe exist in body of mathematics, our biological brain also exist in same body of mathematics and this mathematical reality is our origin of conciseness, that’s why our mind map/mirrored/ synchronize with all scientific law of universe. 14:- we can write 500 page book on this topic, this become useless while intellectual world not giving recognition of mathematical reality (body). So I request to Mr. Mark they should use his platform to get recognition of mathematical reality (body). And then say “Universe is only mathematical.” Then no need this parallel universe, origin of parallel universe came after story big bang.

[@UpendraYadav-if6ow]

geirtwo, Smoked weed by mouth?

[@TBX819]

there are lots of high level discussions out there with poorest audio. please let sound engineers do their work for a more proper sound. it is a common problem in speech oriented presentations these days. thx

[@cimerioporinternet5989]

max tegmark es uno de los fisicos mas brillante de nuestro tiempo vamos alguien que lea esto y pueda subirlo con subtitulos

[@mishaguitar]

I realize that we’ve mapped out our entire universe, but google maps still doesn’t acknowledge road closures that have been in effect for years lol.

[@junak777]

Mendeleyev also just by thinking more precisly done measurement than Frenchs. Riemann hypothesis is secret of mind. Love Max's approach.

[@keniangervo8417]

A couple of things that came to my mind: How can emotions be quantified as mathematical constructions? Tegmark also remarked about the fluffiness of the animal (and some other things) but never said anything how that could be mathematical. Anyways. I gotta say it's very mysterious how precise the numbers are regarding the various properties/objects etc of the Universe. Why are they what they are? Could there really be a mathematical reasoning behind that? Also: Mathematics hasn't been able to describe the big bang event or the black hole singularities at all. I strongly believe that either there is more to the Universe than pure math or there's something fundamentally wrong with the foundations of our mathematics.

[@vemodalen2483]

+Keni Angervo It's under the basis that the brain and the animal are matter, which act according to physical laws (albeit, not fully understood laws, but well enough to hinge your bet). It's not specifically that an mathematical construct describes our subjective experience of emotions, but that they describe the physical object (in this case, the brain) which is made of atoms. Emotions are thought to be brain activity which we experience and perceive - but strictly speaking, it's matter acting according to physical laws, which in theory is calculable via mathematics - or so that is the thought. Fluffiness is a term we assign to help us describe certain properties which we perceive, but fundamentally speaking, once again, the animal is a physical being made of matter, which in theory can be described by equations - or so that is the thought.

[@Mist3rr0bot]

However, if we look at emotions as chemical reactions, which is based on mathematics, and then factor in the mathematical structure of brain A and take into account the chemical reaction occurring in brain B, we may be able to predict mathematically the chemical reaction of brain A. Also if we really were to deconstruct and walk everything backwards it does always come down to mathematical object such as quarks, so that would give everything a base of mathematics. Figuring out how it came to emotions would just be very difficult mathematics. Also I believe you are very broadly using the term "at all" for the Big Bang and singularities. The theory of relativity whether started as a thought experiment or not is in essence a mathematical theory. Black holes were predicted from the theory of relativities mathematics, so if math predicts black holes and singularities prior to ever observing these black holes and singularities than it definitely is the main reason for their discovery.

[@necrophagis9983]

Emotions can be quantified mathematically based on the patterns in our neurons that give rise to them

[@cg40k]

spot on cutting edge lecture. as time moves forward we keep seeing math as the universal "glue" if you will.

[@UpendraYadav-if6ow]

Ancient Indian say-universe is illusion (MAYA). Mathematician say- Universe is only mathematical. Physicist say - Total energy of universe is zero. These three statement are only different prospective, but same meaning.

[@Rubbernecker]

Good thing the dude introducing Max wasn't the speaker.

[@lepidoptera9337]

Why? He might have done better than Tegmark did.

[@OlleHellman]

Thank you for sharing this!

[@climatebeef]

and Mathematics is information.. which happens inside of consciousness.

[@anotherjohn]

Enjoyable talk right up to the unseemly panhandling tacked on the end during which at around 44:36 Max unfortunately exhibits that he can't do percentages.

[@BenLansdell]

+anotherjohn Yeah... a little awkward

[@paruu100]

@@BenLansdell for real haha

[@nihonbunka]

Mr. Hoggles probably also has consciousness too. Which properties of the quarks and electrons correspond to the visual field of Mr. Hoggles?

[@phoenixzappa7366]

Schrödinger's grave. What is the probability that his body is in the casket

[@phoenixzappa7366]

What point are you trying to portray. It was a joke

[@mainbattlerobot]

I lol'd.

[@colincomposer]

"Space is really really big." Douglas Adams was right it seems (it's bigger than the universe).

[@DavidAKZ]

I like the Total Improbability Vortex.

[@Fransamsterdam]

If the speed of light is constant for any observer, how can it be that the color / energy is different? (redshift)

[@fNktn]

The color has to do with the wavelength l of the photon, it's energy with the frequency f. These 2 parameters are connected to the speed of light c by l*f=c. Now c being constant only means that the wavelength has to be indirectly proportional to the frequency l~1/f but in principle can take on any value greater than 0

[@phiguy6473]

59:53 "Eat your vitamins."

[@kingacaloosa5449]

Mr. Max Tegmark (MadMax) Phenomenon in Hebrew Genesis first sentence patterns of 7 found in no other book or sentence. And there's more. Hebrew Genesis first sentence "7"s.

[@chalino19]

don't kid yourselves people, the earth is flat and we are the universe, the edge is where our atmosphere ends!

[@ThatisnotHair]

29:20 32:23 35:08 It's not the universe is Math but our conciousness is math (-¹£¡) 55:50

[@tomaszkozien5596]

With all the brain power at this convention they couldn't come to the simple conclusion that you don't use a person with no voice as an introductory speaker!

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Astro-Physics Community (with 12,541 likes) has now given the following three writings the thumbs up. TOTAL PERFECTION: E=MC2 AS F=MA CLEARLY PROVES (ON BALANCE) WHY AND HOW THE PROPER AND FULL UNDERSTANDING OF TIME (AND TIME DILATION) UNIVERSALLY ESTABLISHES THE FACT THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY: A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Indeed, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA. Great. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. I have mathematically unified physics/physical experience, as I have CLEARLY proven that E=mc2 IS F=ma in what is a truly universal and BALANCED fashion. By Frank DiMeglio Mr. Boris Stoyanov is a super bright and an HONEST physicist. He has agreed that the following post is "crystal clear": ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. Accordingly, gravity/acceleration involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. "Mass"/energy involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance consistent with/as what is balanced ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as electromagnetism/energy is gravity. Gravity IS electromagnetism/energy. That objects fall at the same rate (neglecting air resistance, of course) PROVES that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Think about it. By Frank DiMeglio THE SIMPLE, PROPER, FULL, AND BALANCED UNDERSTANDING OF THE SHAPE, FORM, AND RELATIONAL MOTION OF WHAT IS THE MOON IN UNIVERSAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA: What is THE MOON is moving AND not moving IN BALANCED RELATION to the Earth AND the Sun AS a linked AND BALANCED opposite in accordance with the UNIVERSAL fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma. THEREFORE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON necessarily matches it's revolution; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the shape AND form of the Moon is basically constant or invariant. The Moon is a BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE manifestation or form that is in fundamental accordance with the Earth/Sun BALANCE pursuant to the fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! Therefore, the Moon is electromagnetically/gravitationally extended AND contracted ON BALANCE in true agreement with the fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravitational force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. By Frank DiMeglio

[@anthonymannwexford]

Loved this talk. Thank you Google Talks :o)

[@benjamin_markus]

he pronounces human and huge like sanders

[@VexylObby]

We invented the form, but discovered the function of mathematics.

[@DavidAKZ]

please explain ?

[@VexylObby]

People tend to think, "wow, look at this thing we have discovered". But really, we invented the symbols and the forms that mathematics is made of. Every number and equation is a human made form. However, we only discovered the very functions of those forms, and how mathematics must work. The underlying behavior of the numbers and equations was not made by us. The very logical nature of mathematics is the nature of the universe. We just represent it with numbers and equations.

[@DavidAKZ]

VexylMusic Thanks. Do you have some references ?

[@Pidxr]

VexylMusic No, the real numbers are merely special cases of complex numbers which are infinite.

[@VexylObby]

DavidAKZ For what?

[@richmeister1960]

It's either analogous to the casimir effect or the casimir effect itself, the blinding flash of the big bag caused by a pre existing condition and an energy source which is characterised by the name cosmic inflation. This would mean that the our universe was born in a part of the vacuum where the energy was or is very high, assuming this energy occurs in clumps or pockets in the pre existing vacuum. The interaction of two of these clumps or pockets in the pre existing vacuum at different energy states would indeed cause a reaction where the energies will try to balance causing the big bang and the expansion of the our universe?

[@MichaelZibulevsky]

So clear an d thoughtful!

[@voiceofREASONS]

“Baby galaxies” 😅

[@phillipwong4283]

god is a mathematician.. How wonderful.

[@diabl2master]

+Phillip Wong No, it is quite the converse

[@Pidxr]

I'm not sure seeing is the most important part of learning. If I were blind I might still consider the expansion of the universe, or the nature of a quark.

[@philipgray4209]

their are more stars and planets in the universe than their are grains of sand on earth. their are no walls or doors surrounding our universe and when i look up into the night sky it becomes obviously clear that our universe is indeed eternally infinite going on and on in every direction for ever and ever. to the average mind the world is massive but if you compare the earth to the entire universe then the earth becomes incredibly small very small because the universe has no end no barriers so basically earth is proof that life does exist on the atomic level. our ancients new this as above so below

[@rmigdias]

+Philip Gray however there are more quarks in my dick than stars in the known universe.

[@dylan3657]

Excellent

[@nalexandi]

39:44 there is corona with their spike proteins!

[@hehehe6810]

bRO!!

[@Ramkumar-uj9fo]

I discovered an equation about me. May get tattoo. A cybernetics equation for me. I am not going to tattoo this equation ❤️ A cybernetics equation for a female cyborg could represent the interaction between biological and mechanical systems. One approach is to express it as a feedback loop equation that balances biological processes (B) with mechanical augmentation (M), factoring in inputs like environmental stimuli (E) and control systems (C). Here's a basic formulation: \[ C_{f}(t) = \alpha B(t) + \beta M(t) + \gamma E(t) \] Where: - \( C_{f}(t) \) is the cyborg's output or control function over time (behavior, response, or actions). - \( B(t) \) is the biological function at time \( t \) (like brain activity, hormones, sensory input). - \( M(t) \) is the mechanical augmentation (like cybernetic limbs, sensory enhancers, or neural interfaces). - \( E(t) \) is the environmental stimuli (external conditions affecting the system). - \( \alpha, \beta, \gamma \) are weights or coefficients representing the influence of each factor on the cyborg's behavior. In this case, the female aspect could be linked to hormonal or biological cycles, integrated through the \( B(t) \) component, while mechanical systems could reflect enhancements designed for her physical and cognitive capabilities in \( M(t) \). Drafted by AI

[@nathanielruss7657]

Why do you have that guy introduce? Awful presentation voice

[@naimulhaq9626]

We do not have a mathematical model for every physical process, but the mathematics known to God, is like His mind, that is complete and explains everything/processes. Human mind is like a limited version of God's mind, and explains only a limited number of physical process. If we want to generate the natural numbers, all infinite of them, we will need infinite iteration to achieve completeness, although we need an algorithm of finite axioms to do it. Socrates discovered how God and man compliment each other, when God shared the divine knowledge of mathematics with Meno's slave.

[@saburius]

+Naimul Haq Which god is that and how do you know? Does he talk to you? Do you hear the voice in your head?

[@naimulhaq9626]

lgbtTV5 Among scientists there are more atheists than believers. It is in fact easier to be atheists than to see the beauty of perfect creation. Not at all easy. God (Spinoza's, not that prescribed by religion) and man compliments each other and embrace a divine purpose.

[@bobaldo2339]

To a mathematician everything looks like math. It's just projection.

[@syndroid]

To a cynic, everything is cynical...

[@ArtDekko]

C'mon man...such amazing ideas..those ideas deserve a better set of shoes than those scruffy ones you are wearing. You are on a stage, not a hiking trip.

[@raderator]

Why is it always back to the leftist politics?

[@Carlsbadude]

Mankind lost its way the moment money came into being !!

[@adriancook9742]

that's true.

[@MrVaypour]

!00% agree.

[@milesman1001]

You don’t understand the way the world works

[@robosergTV]

you dont understand what you are talking about. Money made barter easier.

[@karlkoch9324]

Show me a better unit for information on most efficient resource allocation or make an argument that human existence (on the total, not just currently) is worse than „regular“ nature. I’ll/ the world will gladly take it - don’t get caught by lazy feelgood arguments

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Tegmark is knowingly and deceitfully lying about physics.

[@HussainFahmy]

Every design has a designer. A mathematical Universe is is an hall mark just as the Noble Quran is a design of a Creator.

[@HussainFahmy]

Definition of God in the Islamic context is. He is The One; Not Divisible! The eternal!. He begetteth not nor was begotten. And there is none comparable unto Him. No beginning No end. Only Death is an absolute certainty in Life. The rest is based on Belief, Faith, Fun, Evidence, Logic, Love, Respect, Humility, Devotion, Peace, Prosperity, Perseverance, so on and so forth. Seek the purpose of life with an open mind so we shall find happiness and contentment. He it is Who hath placed you as viceroys of the earth and hath exalted some of you in rank above others, that He may try you by (the test of) that which He hath given you. Lo! Thy Lord is swift in prosecution, and Lo! He verily is Forgiving, Merciful. (The Noble Quran 6:165) Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were of one piece, then We parted them, and we made every living thing of water? Will they not then believe? (The Noble Quran 21:30) And We have placed in the earth firm hills lest it quake with them, and We have placed therein ravines as roads that haply they may find their way. (The Noble Quran 21:31) And we have made the sky a roof withheld (from them). Yet they turn away from its portents. (The Noble Quran 21:32) And He it is Who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon. They float, each in an orbit. (The Noble Quran 21:33) We appointed immortality for no mortal before thee. What! if thou diest, can they be immortal! (The Noble Quran 21:34) Have they not travelled in the land and seen the nature of the consequence for those who were before them, and they were mightier than these in power? Allah is not such that aught in the heavens or in the earth escapeth Him. Lo! He is the Wise, the Mighty. (The Noble Quran 35:44) If Allah took mankind to task by that which they deserve, He would not leave a living creature on the surface of the earth; but He reprieveth them unto an appointed term, and when their term cometh - then verily (they will know that) Allah is ever Seer of His slaves. (The Noble Quran 35:45)

[@Zetarrino]

Proof plz

[@HussainFahmy]

Zetarrino To an Atheist proof is an excuse to deny God and the marvels of His Creation. God does not need to prove that He exists, for proof denies faith and without faith, Atheists are lost.

[@Zetarrino]

Hussain Fahmy Exactly. Lost from delusions and small-mindedness.

[@HussainFahmy]

Zetarrino Profit from research and development.