"Out of Africa" Theory Changed

[@VndNvwYvvSvv]

"changed". More like debunked.

[@palebluedot7435]

@@VndNvwYvvSvv debunked by adding precision ?

[@Whatsahandle4]

Hybridization theory makes more sense with real DNA science with no holes in it like the missing link

[@palebluedot7435]

@@Whatsahandle4 ummm no …… even hybridization would have gaps out of Africa is the most accurate am matches dna

[@codysmith3061]

@@palebluedot7435 accept it is not. recent studies no longer support it.... not saying that hybridization is better but out of Africa is now facing some serious questions.

[@palebluedot7435]

@@codysmith3061 nope it’s still out of Africa with us absorbing small amounts of locals 2% Europe 4% Asia 5% Australia With 1% actually being back fed into Africa Remember this isn’t a real 2 % difference it’s 2% of dna that was 99 percent the same lol just had markers that are easily traced We essentially did a bit of the rape and woman stealing as we left Africa The we have no real missing links Technically hybridization would have MORE. Missing links as you now need to trace all the local lineages not just the one But ya missing links aren’t really a thing anymore we have a fairly smooth transition from Australopithecus to modern man Where do you think there is a missing link

[@dlbstl]

I don't mind the background music but does it have to be so loud? I have to turn on captions in order to know what he actually is saying.

[@bethbartlett5692]

🔹 The "all Out of Africa Theory" has been proven inaccurate by (David Reich, PhD, Geneticist, Harvard, while working on his project: "Mapping Ancient Migrations Worldwide using DNA", circa 2019). Data confirmed 3 times, Peer Reviewed.

[@nikibronson133]

One paper doesn’t disprove CONSENSUS…not how that works💀

[@nikibronson133]

Also did you even READ his publications. He constantly talks about how we came from Africa and went back and came back out 😂😂 Racists really are stupid

[@Yowie277]

How when the biggest volcano in history mt Toba happen 😂😂😂

[@Seanenanigans]

​@@nikibronson133 consensus is not fact though.

[@TheLionFarm]

Out of Africa theory is eugenics

[@roblogs7168]

Kinda reaching Im not black or African 😂but even I can smell you reaching. Now hitler the 3xK is more along those lines

[@nikibronson133]

This is incredibly stupid

[@palebluedot7435]

lol your child has 7 new mutations and will have kids that carry in some of those That’s eugenics ?

[@zairatulumierah9436]

Asia are from different humans sub,we do not have any sub saharan descent

[@davidkeenan5642]

The DNA evidence says you are incorrect.

[@zairatulumierah9436]

@@davidkeenan5642 Nah,South east Asia dont have any sub saharan dna.

[@kevinsamuelsghost685]

@@zairatulumierah9436 than what about the Jarawa tribe who's DNA is closely related to most Asians than Africans? Even though the Jarawa look black they are not considered Africans

[@zairatulumierah9436]

@Claptrap Trap Maybe it egyptian but not all asian.

[@ihatebtskoreanmusicsucks8645]

@@kevinsamuelsghost685 just because person is black it dosent mean he is African.

[@ESPLTD322]

I’m no anthropologist, but I knew out of Africa theory was complete BS when: 1) “We’re all derived from South Africa, but we say at the exact same time, somehow, only whites and Asians (to a lesser extent) have Neanderthal DNA, so blacks are actually the most evolved.” 2) “Even though we just stated fact number 1, saying whites and Asians are the only ones with Neanderthal DNA, whites and blacks are the most closely related, and Asians, Native Americans, and Pacific Islanders are their own thing.” 3) It popped up out of nowhere immediately after the LA race riots in the early 90’s. 4) Any time a historical or scientific “fact” is made to tell someone they should change their ways of thinking or behavior, or control them, it’s 100% made up. 5) “Caucasians lost their melanin as they left Africa and grew hair to keep themselves warm in the colder climates, because we’re gonna pretend North Africa, is less sunny and not as hot as sub Saharan Africa. So don’t pay any attention to the fact that 1/3rd of Africa’s landmass in the north was originally Caucasian and they had pale skin, according to Roman and Islamic sources at the time, and just pretend they’re 100% black still, even though they’re clearly mostly Caucasians mixed with a smaller amount of black, and some to this day are still as pale as can be.”

[@palebluedot7435]

1) no it doesn’t state anyone is less evolved As a matter of fact almost all humans have some archaic or extinct species of human in them But just to make things clear At the point of extinction or Absorption Neanderthal we’re EQUALLY evolved as us They are not our ancestor but more like our distance cousin we readsorbed 2 No Australians have a slightly different lineages as the left africa first But all other groups left African and split off from each other while having sex with local species 3) nope it’s a old theory and was used by racist in 1940s to say blacks aren’t equals Since they didn’t properly understand evolution 4) it’s not made for anything just happens to be how the facts land 5) no as noted by the locals and Roman the locals were tan skinned Now dark like oxam but darker Your confusing the locals with the invaded rulers of late Rome Hope that helped

[@sszorin]

@@palebluedot7435 - "Australians have a slightly different lineages as the left africa first" Did they have airplanes 2 million years ago ?

[@sszorin]

@@palebluedot7435 - "all other groups left African and split off from each other while having sex with local species" Since 'local species' were in place when 'Africans' arrived this kills "out of Africa" theory.

[@palebluedot7435]

@@sszorin not really because we had been bonding those local species for So much so that the Neanderthal Y chromosome was homo sapian chromosome from n earlier migration Given it died off anyway But if you want to say 99-98 homosaps leaving Africa and 1 or 2 Neanderthals getting raped or raping our women along the way before dying off Debunks the idea that our species originated in Africa Kinda seems like grasping at straws but your free to argue it

[@palebluedot7435]

@@sszorin Nope only 100-70k years ago and they are the first group to successfully leave Africa and not die off The local groups they left behinds along the way seem to have died off rapidly tho very few surviving till our group left

[@ranjith999]

I am bit confused with this theory. Any living beings changes it's behaviours based on the climate and its conditions. I would assume that the conditions in middle affrica is similar to south India. So why can't the same beings survived at the same time in both the places and changed their behaviours based on the conditions at the same time. I don't beleive our from African theory. I can understand that rest of the world is really distinct from Africa South America and South and South East Asia.

[@MAGAman-uy7wh]

I think the migration was a very gradual event of waves of migration and continuous migrations to more distant lands (in many directions) over sufficient time to undergo genetic diversity. Cooler climate and decreased exposure to sunlight, minerals in the "newer" environments (water an soil) combined with new food sources, inbreeding, and other adaptations may have had an effect on the genetic selection. I think more studies into those factors would reveal a lot. we didn't just "turn white" one day and have blonde hair. These were gradual adaptations to the environmental conditions. We are not so different as to be unable to successfully inter- breed.

[@badfairy9554]

We are mostly out of Africa.

[@JustJoe827]

For a long time I've personally believed that outward human colors would not necessarily take that long to evolve into whatever tone needed for survival. It probably happened in, " emergency mode " faster ways as well. (This might also apply to the over all evolution of humanity - in general - as well)

[@badfairy9554]

Hi@@JustJoe827 Pro Christ Stringer (BNHM) said we are mostly out of Africa. I think that adds to it.

[@JustJoe827]

@@badfairy9554 " Mostly " ?? Red Flag..

[@badfairy9554]

Hi@@JustJoe827 yes. no red flag needed. I think Pro Stringer knows something we don't yet.

[@russellkierstead8095]

Out of Africa hypothesis is very old. I would like to see a new theory based off the genetic science.. If all humans came from southern Africa? How come Sub Saharan African's, have admixture. As much as 19% with an unknown ghost hominid population. That seemingly never left Africa. That isn't found in the genome of EMH in Europe or Asia. All modern humans have various different admixture with hominids. That other groups don't have this idea that we just mutated without hybridization seem comical.

[@ayodejiolowokere1076]

Because Africa is a big place and introgression took place after the Out of Africa migration. At least theoretically. Not that any of this is fact.

[@russellkierstead8095]

@@ayodejiolowokere1076 Exactly and anthropologist say that we evolved from Homo erectus. Which is about two million years old. If you go back that far in time. What is now Africa was most likely connected to Saudi Arabia and Southern Europe. So Homo erectus could have originated in what is now the middle east or southern Europe. This out of Africa theory is pawned off as imperial fact. When geneticists don't have DNA from Homo erectus or many other specimens of hominids. So there working with fragments of information and declaring bits and pieces as the entire story of human evolution. Which is deceptive and unscientific at best.

[@ayodejiolowokere1076]

@@russellkierstead8095 Homo Erectus is an extremely broad chrono species. Sapiens and Neanderthals are said to derive from Homo Heidelbergensis deep into the pleistocene. That is, long after the continents had assumed their present positions. Again it's all intelligent speculation but there are some lines of reasoning that are supported by archeological and genomists. Secondly even Darwin observed most of the great apes are found in Africa. The oldest hominins are also found in Africa. Chances are humans are an African species ultimately.

[@russellkierstead8095]

@@ayodejiolowokere1076 A tooth carbon dated to 9 million years ago was found in Germany. That is from a great ape according to the scientist that examine the tooth. A partial skull of a ape was found in Greece carbon dated to 7.2 million years. So if we evolved from apes these fossils are older than anything found in Africa. Two million years ago the sea levels were lower. How else could these hominids have gotten outside of Africa or into Africa?

[@ayodejiolowokere1076]

@@russellkierstead8095 the deepest lineages of hominids are African. Proconsul, for example. It's much older than these hominids.

[@Anythingforfreedom]

1:51 I was astonished when he said the kid weighed 90kg (198lbs)!! Then the text beneath him displayed the correct number.

[@kapildevtiwari730]

Great Catch:)

[@MAGAman-uy7wh]

I heard him say "that if he had reached adulthood he would have been 1.8 meters tall and weighed 90kg"

[@stewiepid4385]

Remember, JEWS At The Ambassador Bridge Detroit Michigan.

[@JungleJargon]

The human family tree is rooted in the Eurasians, not the youngest Hamitic populations.

[@Biafranbushboy]

Lol do you even know what a Natufian is 😅

[@JungleJargon]

@@Biafranbushboy If they were E, they are Hamitic.

[@SaintFort]

The Bible is mythology; Noah and his sons did not exist, and Africans do not descend from Ham.

[@JungleJargon]

@@SaintFort Prove it. Prove all of known human history is false.

[@AfriasporaFilms]

@@JungleJargon No one uses the biblical term Hamitic in a scientific context. It is a meaningless term, much like Caucasian to describe white Europeans or anyone with a brachiocephalic skull and aquiline features. Those terms wreak of psuedo science and scientific racism. Besides I and my entire paternal line are E from Nigeria. Am I Hamitic too?

[@36G]

So he's saying that humans came out of his country?

[@miskwainini]

It means we don’t all share a common origin and have no idea how the earth was populated and racialized. I know I don’t give a crap what anyone from his country has to say about anything because it’s not truth whatever it is.

[@cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647]

Thank you for this, I have been saying this for years, and everyone has been giving me the stink eye and ugly glares I think it's more out of Australia I could be wrong though

[@kapildevtiwari730]

Absolutely...

[@tycho_Grayken]

This video is disingenuous... There's multiple different species of hominoids..Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis, Homo erectus, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo floresiensis (nicknamed 'the Hobbit'), Homo neanderthalensis (the Neanderthals) and the recently discovered Homo naledi.. Evidence still suggests that all modern HUMANS are descended from an African population of Homo sapiens that spread out of Africa about 60,000 years ago but also shows that they interbred quite extensively with local archaic populations as they did so (Neanderthal and Denisovan genes are found in all living non-Africa populations) and these local populations contributed to our species’ success. So this video isn't disproving the out of Africa theory..it's PROVING human migration

[@tycho_Grayken]

@Anja we all do have African dna🤦🏼‍♂️ The only way you DON'T have african melanoid blood line is if you you come from unbroken generation of incest. Where do you think the people of India came from???.

[@darrellm9915]

@Anja the anarchist. They came from the Middle East.

[@AfroPick82]

@Anja the anarchist. Even tho we all have blue eyes underneath the melanin or color within ones iris regardless of race/skin color?

[@JavierFernandez01]

The out of Africa theory has always postulated multiple mass migrations. It hasn't changed.

[@IFY0USEEKAY]

Another thing that muddies the subject is using arrows showing migrations over CURRENT maps. The sea levels have varied wildly over the last 2 million years.

[@JavierFernandez01]

@@IFY0USEEKAY good point. I would really like a full movie on our ancient history and our migrations with everything we were up to. Homo florencis (the hobbits), denisovans, neanderthal,... Id watch. :)

[@killeryhiltons8499]

Out of Africa theory is a lie in plaint sight . Migration into Africa is more plausible than the other lol.

[@JavierFernandez01]

@@killeryhiltons8499 oh yea. We came from venus and built megaliths with pleadians and then forgot how after they left. Whoopsie! Then we forgot how to speak those languages and use those writings. We just devolved into what we are today. Yea. Thats it... Im making fun of you. ;)

[@killeryhiltons8499]

@@JavierFernandez01 I do believe we’re aliens so deal with it. Makes more sense than a suppose monkey evolution crap lmao, and they turned to different races wtf. Do you not questions things. Also I don’t believe in others opinions saying humanity is 6k years lmao. And go make fun because I’m laughing at you. Hahahah You wouldn’t even question a clown with a knife you’ll be like “it’s part of the show” . Keep going. sheep. P.S giants existed they build it period little hobbits existed. Neanderthal as so far away from modern day humans.

[@fightfannerd2078]

they just found a modern looking person in europe dated to 1.5 million years old

[@AestheticHair-ek5iq]

Where can I read about that?

[@badfairy9554]

Hi@@AestheticHair-ek5iqChris Stringer is the best for info. He was at the NHM in London.

[@yolandagibson8154]

Sure they did [sarcasm]. The lies we will tell, because the truth makes us feel less than.

[@yourewrongabouteverything]

​@yolandagibson8154 just like saying we all came out of africa right?

[@Yahwuda]

⁠@@yourewrongabouteverythingwell, black people didn’t create that theory so why would it make us feel greater or less than?

[@MrAtown3057]

Probably happened every ice age cycle

[@thedailybeaker6037]

Crazy what info we can pull out of old bones!

[@thedude4795]

its vertebrae, not a verte, brah!

[@lordcommandernox9197]

Não, é vértebra, bárbaro.

[@Cinnemax77]

great work

[@kapildevtiwari730]

A Theory come with a Find and Changes with Next Find.

[@DaboooogA]

How we learn.

[@tycho_Grayken]

This video is bias and disingenuous Hominems evolved on Africa.. multiple times ..and left...and came back . multiple times .. there's multiple different species of hominoids. But what isn't disputed is that homo sapiens sapien evolved in central Africa. Evidence still suggests that all modern humans are descended from an African population of Homo sapiens that spread out of Africa about 60,000 years ago but also shows that they interbred quite extensively with local archaic populations as they did so (Neanderthal and Denisovan genes are found in all living non-Africa populations) and these local populations contributed to our species’ success. This video only proves human migration.. nothing more

[@killeryhiltons8499]

You’re the one that’s been fed the out of Africa theory so many times it’s ingrained in your thoughts and mind. How the f did a sub Saharan African turned Chinese or Caucasian lmao. Bruh . … Just impossible evolution is a lie is more about species interbreeding with one another .

[@hazardousjazzgasm129]

Bingo. People are basically jumping the gun because they don't understand how to use "human" different from "homo sapiens", very lazy and irresponsible

[@snowforest6487]

@@hazardousjazzgasm129 mostly white people who don't want to accept were a African, some clown said were all out of Australia 😭😭

[@whiteeye3453]

Humans did not originated from africa they were miggrated species

[@tycho_Grayken]

@@whiteeye3453 right....migrated out of Africa...and spread....this is FACT

[@lnchgj]

Those migrating from Africa ~40TYA , meeting, mating, and having reproducing offspring with th ose they found, proves that they were all members of the same speices in the first place. So yes, there were multiple migrations.

[@SW-et4zb]

Has the “Out of Africa” theory been debunked? What do u think?

[@yolandagibson8154]

This guy built a strawman, and is beating that strawman over the head with everything he's got. His hypothesis can be destroyed by yanking on any 3 straws that hold the strawman up: 1. First, the OOA (Out Of Africa)Theory never postulated that ancient humans came ONLY from Africa. The Out Of Africa Theory postulated that ONLY Anatomically Correct Humans (which look like us today) came out of Africa. He's literally butchering what the theory says. 2.Secondly, if you look closely, he is comparing two different species of humans. He is using a 1.5M year old EXTINCT human relative that did not look anything like us today. The fossil he's using is likely Graecopithecus freybergi. In comparison, we are called Homo sapiens sapiens. We are only 150K- 200K years old. He is basing his theory on a different species of human that did not look like us to misdirect viewers into believing OOA was debunked. That's an unfair tactic, because modern humans (us) did come from one location: Africa. DNA proves it. No scientist ever argued about the origins of where any extinct human relative (a different species of human) ever came from. That's his strawman! Scientists have only argued that we (Homo sapiens sapiens) have conclusively come from one location: Africa. So even if an extinct, human relative originated in Europe, that does not have any bearing on where modern humans (us) came from. 3. Thirdly, the OOA has never been debunked. In fact, the theory has expanded. Why? Because the theory is based on DNA evidence. People, like the guy in the video, who seek to debunk Out Of Africa are using fossilized evidence, which is based soley on viewing the artifact with the human eye. That's old technology. DNA technology is literally 1 trillion times more accurate than fossilized artifacts. The only time in a man's life when he prefers outdated, older technology over modern technology is when the subject of evolution is involved. That's not called science. That's called SCIENTIFIC RACISM

[@karsaorlong3761]

cope lol

[@Sepdet9]

You were doing fine with your analysis until you devolved to generalized ad hominem to those who disagree with you. You could have simply said they were ignorant.

[@Speedofdark339]

​Cope with what? Reality.?​@@karsaorlong3761

[@whyisitneeded9012]

Somebody explain skin cancer then??

[@badfairy9554]

@AkhetofHeruthat is so 1919.

[@yolandagibson8154]

@@badfairy9554 It may be 1919, but the people who look like Trump are still playing that game.

[@brandyanon8789]

Did you know that bk people also get skin cancer or are you so focused on wt people that you forget that fact.

[@MrPrimus004]

One wave or two, you're basically saying early humans, hominids, or whatever they're called, still migrated out of Africa?

[@Hood_ufc]

Thank you it makes no sense about these videos

[@MrPrimus004]

Whatever dude, i'm not alluding there is a master race and I think the OOA theory is best explained theory for modern humans. It's today's self-proclaimed master race that lives with this denial. Some have claimed we came from the Middle East while others claim Europe. Learning more about Neanderthals combined with OOA, I'm pretty convinced black Africans (with exceptions) are the one and only pure homosapien.

[@MrPrimus004]

@@robertzepeda3493 I won't say you're wrong because idk your credentials on the subject, but this is a compelling segment. I gotta assume the lecturer is well-versed in the study of genetics. kzbin.info/www/bejne/a4TPhnp9bbV4ack

[@noahdeark7173]

@@snuurferalangur4357 blue eyes and dark skin aka Cheddar Man from ancient Britain

[@badseedzontop5687]

Israel? Blahhhhh

[@georgeb7716]

Out of Africa theory probably still holds ,there are lots of animals there like Giraffes etc

[@tommythebaastud8159]

Looking at old maps of the world they’d class Israel as Africa or aethiopia it makes sense seeing as so many Eastern European’s are dying from skin cancer there

[@vasiliantonov7484]

Weird how Jews aren’t genetically related to Eastern Europeans yet you call them Eastern Europeans?