Over Priced Micro Brand Zodiac Super Sea Wolf

[@richardcrossfield5474]

Your opinion of Zodiac is undermined by your lack of research and knowledge about the brand. In no way are they a microbrand. They are corporately owned by Fossil group. Saying a crystal faced Seiko with a movement that has a stated accuracy of +45spd to -35spd is better than the Zodiac is embarrassing, never mind comparing a three hander with date to a GMT. I can’t comment on the Spinnaker as I’ve never seen one in person. That’s called being objective!

[@TheNomadsLens]

Tell us more about the brand from 1882 to 2022. If they're not a microbrand don't you think they should make batter watches then brands coming out of China? Which Zodiac do you have? I'm always intrested in seeing other people watches, Whats your Instagram?

[@richardcrossfield5474]

No thanks. Do your own research.

[@TheNomadsLens]

I did when by buying the watch so I know what I'm talking about. Maybe you should do the same.

[@richardcrossfield5474]

Clearly you didn’t as you think Zodiac is a microbrand 😂

[@TheNomadsLens]

If I didn't then whats the watch in the video? A fan boy who doesn't even know the watch he is a fan boy off 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 or own it.

[@Chris-de2qc]

This guy is getting roasted in the comments and wants to fight every last one of them lol

[@TheNomadsLens]

and?

[@RabbitWatchShop]

That’s quite the norm with this Asian female stalker.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Your Ignorant and Racist Remark but coming from a jewish man what else would you say. Let's dissect your masterpiece, shall we? Your sweeping generalization about "creepy western white men" in Asian countries not only reeks of ignorance but also reflects a level of stupidity that's hard to fathom. Do you honestly believe that your racist drivel contributes anything meaningful to the conversation? Now, onto your delightful suggestion for me to "go home." How original. My channel is not a platform for your xenophobia, and I won't be taking advice from someone who spews hate without an ounce of intelligence behind it. And what's this about Asians supposedly knowing why these so-called "creepy western white men" are in their countries? Your assumptions are as laughable as they are baseless. Newsflash: people travel for various reasons, and your attempt to box them into your narrow-minded narrative is nothing short of pathetic. Now, let's address the real issue here - your demand that I conform to your infantile taste in watches. I hate to break it to you, but I don't need your approval or guidance on what timepieces to appreciate. Your condescending attitude is as irrelevant as it is obnoxious. In conclusion, your racist remarks and attempts at being a watch critique guru are not welcome here. If you can't contribute to a civilized discussion, kindly refrain from polluting my comment section with your toxic nonsense. The world doesn't need more ignorance - do us all a favor and educate yourself. Cheers to dismantling stereotypes and fostering genuine conversation, which you clearly need a lesson in. Free palestine stop the genocide

[@RabbitWatchShop]

@@TheNomadsLens he really thinks I’m going to read that book of a comment conveying his anger and sadness 🤭🥲

[@TheNomadsLens]

It's truly disheartening to see your persistent toxicity infesting our comment section. It appears that despite the abundance of intelligence out there, it has somehow managed to elude you entirely. Your analogy comparing this situation to someone crying in pain while striking is not only absurd but also a testament to the depth of your ignorance. Now jewish man is crying. How does it fell they most of the world hates you now? Jewish man still buying swiss watches? Switzerland was the favorite haven for Nazi bank accounts and safe deposit boxes, which often contained property plundered from Jews. Hows your tudor? Hey do you drive a VW? Free Palestine 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸

[@FonofonFilm]

You get two things wrong: Zodiac was never dormant for a prolonged period and Zodiac had a very rich history ie great heritage. It was a far more important brand than Oris back in the day.

[@baljitsandhu6372]

Please expand how was it important than other brands

[@bladeknockingon700]

@@baljitsandhu6372 zodiac released the sea wolf prior to the submariner and was in between price wise between a 50 fathoms and a submariner back in the day. Great watch, but I agree with the reviewer, should be half off and a great bargain

[@Watchandcutgearchannel]

I completely agree with you. The history is very rich and dates back to 1953, I have a super sea wolf myself and love it. I know these are subjective… I’m not saying it’s a bargain but I do agree it’s great quality for the price. The Bracelet is awesome IMO. I unfortunately for this video I had the complete opposite experience then this reviewer.. I love it 🥰. Plus what’s funny to me is when you buy a zodiac, it’s a brand you look at for their crazy look of colors and he picked the most plain version… Next he compares a Seiko 5 gmt where I actually also own both of these and to compare the quality is where he lost me and that’s laughable to me I’m sorry 🤷‍♂️

[@Quadratick]

More important than Rolex too

[@richardbonanno7236]

I've owned 4 Zodiacs. They make great watches. 👍

[@TheNomadsLens]

Which do you own?

[@NotoriousK_I_T]

Do you genuinely think a £200 Spinnaker is better than a Zodiac, or were you shaken as a baby?

[@TheNomadsLens]

Do you genuinely think it worth 5 times as much as a £200 Spinnaker, or were you shaken as a baby?

[@NotoriousK_I_T]

@@TheNomadsLens yes, because I actually know something about watches, whereas you appear to know nothing. You are proof that any idiot can set up a watch KZbin channel 🤣🤣🤣

[@TheNomadsLens]

@Nav San yes, because I actually know something about watches, whereas you appear to know nothing. You are proof that any idiot can set up a watch KZbin channel 🤣🤣🤣 What do you know about watches? what make sea wold better? Do you own this watch? I don;t think you do. You are proof that any idiot can set up a watch KZbin channel and make a comment about a watch they don't own 🤣🤣🤣

[@TheNomadsLens]

I guess you don't need to shake your fat baby you just let fatty fall over. Obesity look in to it.

[@NotoriousK_I_T]

@@TheNomadsLens maybe you should concentrate on buying a few more subscribers for your pokey little channel, rather than be such a sensitive little snowflake in the comments 🤣 Perhaps if you got your facts right in your reviews, people would take you more seriously. Until then you're just an idiot with a camera with zero actual horological knowledge. Enjoy your Spinnaker 🤣🤣🤣😘

[@gabrielstorm3536]

What an unbalanced review. You clearly don’t like the Zodiac brand and value proposition and that’s fine, but please get your facts straight before reviewing. To say Zodiac is a micro brand is laughable. The original Seawolf released before the Rolex Submariner and was similarly priced!

[@TheNomadsLens]

What an unbalanced comment from who one who doesn't own the watch. You clearly don’t have a Zodiac watch , but please get your facts straight before commenting. To say Zodiac is a micro brand is 100%. come back when you buy one.

[@bandoiler]

absolutely wrong, zodiac is not a microbrand. The sea wolf is a excellent watch.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Tell me about your experience as a owner of a zodiac watch. What made you buy your zodiac? Which microbrand do you own? You didn't tell me your instagram I would like to see your watches.

[@AntonioMiccoliDj]

I confirm it is an excellent watch and above all a great brand born before rolex

[@TheNomadsLens]

But you don't own this watch so how would you know.

[@900bdk]

The point is that it may be a good or excellent watch, but I would not spend 1400 $ on it - that is a personal opinion. So what do I buy instead : I buy a vintage Seamaster or a Casio MDV for 85$ for sports .... Not just Zodiac is overpriced . another one is ZRC .. 2300 $ and more for an ETA movement .. ofcourse all the marketing and sponsoring needs to be paid ... but if a Zodiac makes you happy and is worth 1400 then by all means buy it ... I personally liked in fact the design of the watch .. but that's where it stopped

[@andreapecoranera4934]

@@TheNomadsLens But what does it have to do with which watches one has or what experience do they have with the brand? Apart from its previous history, it is a brand of the Fossil group ... how the hell would it be a microbrand? as if someone said that Mido of the swatch group is a microbrand? But do you know the definition of microbrand?

[@insightman9632]

Can you share a video for a watch that you actually like? I just want to understand your point of reference, and what you compare it to. I think it compares well to an oris 65.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Sure The Timex Mk1 Mechanical vintage inspired military watch studio.kzbin.info-Kj19bytbUY/edit Jaeger LeCoultre Master Compressor Memovox Alarm 18 Years Later Review kzbin.info/www/bejne/h4Cyg51piLCAY6M Junghans Meister Telemeter Chronoscope kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5y7dmNurdqBndk Breitling navitimer 50th anniversary special edition 20 year on kzbin.info/www/bejne/gYq7eIWDppKkhK8 JDM Vintage Seiko 7002 700J Automatic Divers Watch Seiko Presage Limited Edition Sakura Fubuki SSA363J1 Watch kzbin.info/www/bejne/h5zFhnt3m75oeZY Seagull 1963 Chinese Military Watch studio.kzbin.infoP0Ol6jBXxYY/edit Breitling B1 Professional 17 Years On The Wrist. kzbin.info/www/bejne/m2PIm52qpbVloZo Enjoy

[@rcm4u2]

They were a very popular divers watch in the 50's and 60's. If you want to discount watches that went dormant for a period, you must consider all of the companies bought by the Swatch group in that category- Omega, Hamilton, Tissot, etc.

[@DCTag]

Your replies in the comment section are quite unprofessional. It’s the internet, don’t get triggered by every Tom, Dick and Harry not agreeing with you.

[@TheNomadsLens]

This is youtube and not BBC. Tom, Dick and Harry that are ones who are triggered by my video. ANy normal person would just say well this did didn't like the watch and move on.

[@TheNomadsLens]

urely thou Hast not brusheth thy teeth upon the rising of the sun on this day flee from my presence for thy stench can and nostrils no longer continue to Bear What's your instagram? 😀 This is fun, can't wait for tomorrow. 😋

[@eddiehernandez651]

Zodiac is not a micro brand, it's the grand father of dive watches,

[@TheNomadsLens]

I think we all appreciate your insight on a watch that you don't own. Where did you get all of your reference points from Wikipedia?

[@Cyime]

Out of curiosity what do you define as a microbrand? A lot of the older brands don’t have a continuous history and have died and been revived like Breitling and Zenith for example.

[@sneakyscorpia]

Thanks for your breakdown, I see a lot of Zodiac watches on sale - do you think they would be at good value at say -30% discount at MSRP?(There are a few models here in the UK which are currently -50%!)

[@TheNomadsLens]

If the watch you want is not at 50% off just wait they will be. Not pay more then half for a new one. I seen the chrono at 50% off and I was thinking of buying and making video but I would rather have a Hamiliton for the same price if not less.

[@sneakyscorpia]

@@TheNomadsLens Thank you, waiting for a Hamilton might be the better option, have a good day.

[@RossCrawford-g2q]

The watch is an automatic… it doesn’t wind, that’s why you were having difficulty.

[@TheNomadsLens]

If you don't wear the watch for 7 days how would you power up the movement? Let me give you clue you wind it.

[@buddahead1459]

Hardly a microbrand... they have been doing this since the 1800's. The Sea Wolf watch is now 70 years old. Do your research first !!!

[@TheNomadsLens]

I did do my research. Did you? Tell me about there timeline since the 1800's id how long did they stop trading?

[@childrenofalessergod]

Uh in 1953 they introduced the sports dive watch prior to Rolex

[@TheNomadsLens]

Do you think if they had made a good watch back then they wouldn't need Fossil Group Fashion company to buy them out? Or maybe if they didn't discount the watches 40% off RRP they would do better? or made a good watch. Are you thinking of buying one?

[@FretWiredJournal]

Do they come with warranty card? I didn't find one.

[@TheNomadsLens]

If you bought it new then it should but if second hnd people loss the card. Enjoy your watch, not my cup of tea but as long as you like it thats all the matters.

[@fakenewsisthenews3542]

Micro brand??

[@TheNomadsLens]

You can have it for £2000 unless you don't think it worth it. Do you think it better then £400 micro brand or not? £2000 is it then. Put your money where your mouth is.

[@chrishennemeyer7276]

Why are you harping on this weird "microbrand" theory when you acknowledge it's part of the Fossil empire, as far from a microbrand as it could be? Overpriced, sure, but get your arguments straight.

[@TheNomadsLens]

So I can trigger the fan boys who don't own the watch 🤫 don't tell them

[@NN-gw7qc]

Considering Breitling has a similar looking watch for over 4 times the price, I would say this is a pretty good deal

[@TheNomadsLens]

The new superocean? OMG that has to be the ugliest watch I have seen. I don't know what they're thinking.

[@EDHBlvd]

@@TheNomadsLens they weren’t thinking. Hahahaha

[@krasnaludek298]

Agree 100% and I’m a huge Breitling fan: SuperOcean & Navitimer in particular. 👍🏻

[@thefrogking481]

Seems you have all wrong.

[@TheNomadsLens]

What do I have wrong?

[@scaramuzza9]

where did you get the rubber strap for it from??

[@krasnaludek298]

Zodiac is not a microbrand & they have a solid history of making excellent timepieces at obtainable prices. Could not DISAGREE with you more. Their movements are largely from STP; proven track record at this point. Out of all the watches that offer high value in the automatic and/or mechanical segment: Zodiac, Seiko, & Farer (which is a microbrand) are the first few that come to mind.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Tell me about its solid history. Seiko is a microbrand?

[@kevinong1306]

I think he meant Farer is a microbrand. ETA: I see what you did there. You implied that Zodiac is a microbrand in your video and Krasnaludek implied that Farer is a microbrand in his comment, therefore you “poke the bear” by sarcastically insinuating that Seiko is also a microbrand since all three are mentioned in the same sentence.

[@ulisesroman7259]

@@TheNomadsLens dude, the seawolf is an older dive watch than the submariner.

[@WINDINGCROWNS]

@@kevinong1306 yeah exactly. He hates to be wrong or called out on errors so he goes into defensive mode. He is basically an ass who can't admit his viewers know more than him. 😂

[@TheNomadsLens]

By your videos, I see your trying to suck up to the brand to get free watch and argue with everyone who disagrees with you or corrects you. You are not so humble when proven wrong. 😆Yet I mention history in my video but didn't say I bought it for its history 😂 That makes sense. You're just throwing a tantrum like a kid. May you should buy it or maybe you can get mimos jewelry to loan you one just like the seikos you get from them and claim its your watch. All that money you spend on the junk watches you could just buy one. You don't know but pretend to know. Now you keep arguing? about a watch you never owned. At least I have the money to buy it. Something you should have done before opening your mouth. 😂😂😂😂😂

[@eddiehernandez651]

Zodiac is not a micro brand, it's the grand father of the dive watches, along with blancpain with its fifty fathoms, they debut their dive watches in 1953s Baselwatch fair, rolex came out in 1954 a year later

[@TheNomadsLens]

I think we all appreciate your insight on a watch that you don't own. Where did you get all of your reference points from Wikipedia?

[@polipoms]

@@TheNomadsLens Why you just dint admit that you are wrong?

[@TheNomadsLens]

I own the watch unlike this clown who just crys about a watch he hasn't got.

[@ProjectSerpo90]

Anybody that simply points out to you that you’re wrong for calling Zodiac a “microbrand” gets called a “fanboy” and “haha i can afford it, you cant, clown.” Why don’t you grow up and admit you are a moron who doesn’t know what he is talking about. Zodiac has been around since 1882 and beat the Rolex Submariner to the market in 1953. And i dont need wikipedia to tell me that, it’s a fact and can be easily verified. You dont have to like them, i dont think anybody gives a shit if you do or dont. What people care about is your blatant disregard of facts and lack of knowledge which shows the level of effort you put into a “review.” Glad i came across this channel tonight, ill be sure to never visit it again after the way you treat the people in your comments for simply correcting you. Limey Jerkoff.

[@TheNomadsLens]

It's always a blast dealing with self-proclaimed horological know-it-alls who think their taste in watches is the holy grail of timekeeping. So, you stumbled upon my video, huh? Buckle up, because the truth might sting a bit. First off, to all the Zodiac enthusiasts out there, congratulations! You've cracked the code of time and space, and now you're here to enlighten the rest of us mere mortals. You're the chosen ones who can differentiate between a watch and a potato, apparently. Now, let's address the "microbrand" debacle. Oh, the horror! If anyone dares to point out that Zodiac is not a cosmic giant but rather a microbrand, they get the esteemed title of "fanboy." Clap, clap, my friend! Your ability to defend a brand as if it's your long-lost sibling is truly commendable. And the pinnacle of intellect: the "haha, I can afford it, you can't, clown." Well, bravo! Your financial prowess is truly awe-inspiring. Maybe next time, we can compare bank statements instead of watch collections, because, you know, that's the ultimate measure of one's intelligence. But wait, there's more! The timeless classic - "Why don't you grow up and admit you're a moron?" Ah, the wisdom of a thousand watch movements encapsulated in a single insult. I bow to your superior intellect, oh mighty timekeeper. And here's a little gem of wisdom for you: Zodiac has been around since 1882, beating the Rolex Submariner to the market in 1953. Because obviously, historical accuracy and chronology are subjects only the chosen ones master without the need for Wikipedia. Who cares if the internet has facts when you can shout your truth into the void? In conclusion, dear Zodiac defenders, keep shining like the dazzling diamonds on your timepieces. Your wit and charm are rivaled only by the accuracy of your watches - both truly unparalleled in the vast expanse of the universe. May your collection grow, and your insults remain as sharp as a well-honed escapement. Cheers to the champions of horological superiority! 🍻

[@AntonioMiccoliDj]

I absolutely disagree with you!

[@TheNomadsLens]

Glad you like the watch. I didn't. Whats your instagram I would like to see your other watches between 1000-2000 € but prefer this one.

[@AntonioMiccoliDj]

@@TheNomadsLens mybestwatches2020

[@TheNomadsLens]

Where is your zodiac? How much did you pay for the HERITOR EDGARD and you zodiac?

[@AntonioMiccoliDj]

@@TheNomadsLens 200€ hedgard and 1100€ zodiac ssw

[@TheNomadsLens]

hahahaha The hedgard RRP is 1000. The other guy you send the inta link got tired of me asking about the watch and didn't even know what watch. A+ for effort but F for scam. If you're going to pretend to own a watch try better or just don't say anything about a watch you don't own.

[@andreapecoranera4934]

Micro brand!! 🤣

[@TheNomadsLens]

Yes you're right its a Micro brand!! do you own this Micro brand?

[@jaer.6540]

Zodiac is not a microbrand lol the fuck? Overpriced, yes...but they have been around forever.

[@TheNomadsLens]

On paper yes but trading no.

[@JC61990]

Zodiac has been around since 1882, they are not a microbrand.

[@TheNomadsLens]

They started in 1882 but closed for decades and only now after being bought by fossil group they back. Lots of dead brands out there.

[@fliberatos]

Your opinion doesn't count on account of you consider then a micro brand. Zodiacs history goes back to the likes of Rolex and omega. It's also using it's parents company's movement so you almost have everything in house at a third of Tudors price

[@TheNomadsLens]

Your perspective lacks weight since you don't possess the watch, yet you express admiration for the brand. If you are fond of the brand, why haven't you made a purchase? This could be attributed to it being classified as a micro brand. Despite Zodiac's historical connections to renowned brands like Rolex and Omega, it faced bankruptcy. Moreover, it employs a $100 movement commonly found in other micro brands. This implies a substantial reliance on components made in China, assembled for a cost that is comparable to other micro brands but at a third of the price.

[@julienfroidevaux1143]

Acryyluc bezel on a diver ??????

[@ThePlaiibox]

To be fair I got my tudor bb58 for 2k and this is nowhere near that level so for 2k I fully agree these are not worth it. However, the aquamarine dream (possibly the best) version of the seawolf is currently 999. So quite a good deal. Especially as the first seawolf was released in the same window as the original Submariner and the fifty fathoms. That's some great heritage

[@Boerje69]

Got myself a Super Seawolf with a good discount. Been happy with it so far.

[@TheNomadsLens]

how much did you pay?

[@Boerje69]

@@TheNomadsLens Bit under thousand euros. The biggest minus so far is the bracelet in which fine adjustment has been replaced with this stretching function.

[@TheNomadsLens]

I just used a leather strap. No fan of bracelets.

[@x3mperformace]

Zodiak is NOT a Microbrand. They have a rich history, and as you nebtion, it has been arround for more than 40 years.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Tell me about there history from 1882 to 2022.

[@900bdk]

History or not, .. it remains overpriced ... is a watch more worth because of the history ... ?

[@andreapecoranera4934]

@@TheNomadsLens A microbrand is a small-scale brand recognized only in a certain geographic location, or by consumers in a specific micromarket or niche market.The majority of microbrands are owned by a microbusiness, though this trend is changing due to the expansion of the Internet and advancement of micromarketing tools. The process of identifying and micro-segmenting customers into more refined targets is becoming an efficient and rewarding operation for larger companies and corporations. On wikipedia ... do you think that a brand of the fossil group that has more than a century of history, and a wide diffusion, with non-small-scale production systems can I be a micro brand? Zelos is a micro brand, 200 watches per release, all sold on the internet and located only in Indonesia ... with a small production scale. You're really wrong. And the funny thing that you insist too ...

[@derbagger22]

Exactly. Not a micro brand. If you're owned by Fossil YOU'RE NOT A MICROBRAND....

[@TheNomadsLens]

Your research is wikipedia 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions on the heel

[@dee-ker5867]

i heard the swiss selita copy movement sucks, please, anyone tell abouot the experience

[@FWYGANOWSKI]

Reading the comments is an experience. Such a combative reaction from the youtuber.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Yes most youtuber kiss up for views and link. Oh the joy of triggering trolls 😀

[@FWYGANOWSKI]

@@TheNomadsLens yes you are the libtard destroyer not the bellend you really are.

[@TheNomadsLens]

And?

[@FWYGANOWSKI]

@@TheNomadsLens And?

[@TheNomadsLens]

Yes and?

[@jfalconc]

As per your point of view, Zodiac must be the oldest microbrand since 1882…please do more research.

[@TheNomadsLens]

research? What research would you do to see if the quality is no better than a £250 watch? When did Zodiac close after 1882 and then reopen?

[@MementoMorituri]

In 1953 the first three dive watches ever released were the Blancpain fifty fathoms, the Rolex Submariner, and the Zodiac Seawolf. To say this brand has no heritage when it literally put out one of the first dive watches (not to mention that unlike the previous two it was released for the general public) is either uninformed or willfully ignorant.

[@TheNomadsLens]

I think we all appreciate your insight on a watch that you don't own. Where did you get all of your reference points from Wikipedia?

[@kevinong1735]

@@TheNomadsLensAnd what if he got his reference points from Wikipedia… or Teddy Baldasarre… or The Mad Watch Collector… or any other YT personality? How else is one suppose to learn about a brand’s history/heritage?

[@TheNomadsLens]

I got my info from owning the watch and not from begging brands for watches like Teddy and others where they have to kiss up to them for free watches. reference points from Wikipedia is a good thing? You could just buy the watch and not just look at the past to tell you if it good or bad. Have you bought this watch?

[@kevinong1735]

@@TheNomadsLens I don’t think Teddy has to kiss up to Zodiac (or the Fossil Group, for that matter) for free watches. Teddy is a retailer who sells Zodiac and many other brands, and is pushing the brand with his videos to spread knowledge of the brand and increase sales. Most of the reference points that folks here in the comments section are mentioning and that you are accusing them of gleaning from Wikipedia are Zodiac’s history and heritage. When I purchased my Zodiac Super Sea Wolf (Reference #ZO9209), mine didn’t come with a little booklet that detailed the heritage of the company or the watch; it only came with an instruction manual. I bought my watch because of Zodiac’s past, specifically with U.S. military postal exchanges. As for MY watch, I enjoy it, but I will admit that I was a little bummed about the lack of adjustability in the bracelet and to see that the manual did not recommend diving with it, despite its 200m water resistance rating. Now I realize that Wikipedia is about as reliable as Wiktionary, where people can make up words, but I believe the information about Zodiac producing dive watches alongside Blancpain and Rolex to be fact-checked and genuine. BLUF: I’ve been reading the posts here and I think you are confusing people’s objective comments about the brand as attacks on your subjective opinion on your watch. I don’t think I’ve seen anyone counter your opinion on your watch; just your opinion of Zodiac being a micro brand. No reason to get defensive by posting snarky “cut and paste” comments about Wikipedia, watch ownership and IG inquiries, and boos.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Oh is he a retailer for Zodiac? hmmmm why would he not say the watch is junk? Whats your insta I would like to see your watch. Yep cut and paste save time with fan boys. Thanks for the long rant it keep people on my channel.

[@Watchandcutgearchannel]

Well I’m completely on the opposite on this watch then you… I think you lost me when you brought out the Seiko 5 gmt 😂 These thing are subjective I guess.. you definitely sound educated but I think 🤔 I was waiting for the part where you mentioned a broken history…where’s the follow up to that statement? You mentioned faults but you never pointed out any faults You made the movement sound generic but you never pointed out why… better then just throwing the typical sw200-1 in there like most🤷‍♂️ I think if you make statements you should show us more why in your videos.. For example you say “the problem is, we’ll it’s a good thing no crown guards”then go with “it’s hard to use the crown” Maybe if you didn’t rush your research and looked a little deeper and might have a better appreciation for it and not have picked the plainest one that they make. Zodiac Super Sea wolf fans usually look at this brand for its vibrant colors and special editions .. that’s the most boring one they make.. just saying 🤷‍♂️

[@TheNomadsLens]

"Your desire projects onto ephemeral space time events

[@Watchandcutgearchannel]

@@TheNomadsLens ephemeral more describes the weight of you statement

[@TheNomadsLens]

Fundamental reality constructs subjective brightness

[@nickbandz009]

Dude micobrand ? They came out with the the first diver in 53 along with and Rolex its a swiss legacy fossil hasn't messed with brand by changing its builds its a great watch for then price point considering its competition is in the 3 to 5000 category

[@TheNomadsLens]

considering its competition is in the £350 to £500 category that has the same build quality. This is over priced at £1500.

[@nickbandz009]

@@TheNomadsLens you think a seawolf is in the same category as a quartz bulova ? $1200 for a dive, watch with a sapphire crystal automatic movement and that kind of horological history to boot is a pretty good deal I spent more than that on my seiko

[@TheNomadsLens]

Why yes I do. Why is it worth more? The dead brand name that was bought.

[@Tonysoprano497]

Think history of watch brands is a very tenuous . The quartz crisis obliterated the industry and many were dead on their feet bought over by multinationals and bare no real relation to the original company . I think with companies such as zodiac and Doxa you either buy in or you don’t . Personally love both love the bright colours 50 and 60 designs and see no problem with build quality with either . The motivation for colour is the fact that 50 60 s and 70s skin divers were often colourful . Personally I have essentially two parts of my collection my higher end pieces which is Rolex heavy and my vintage inspired retro divers essentially zodiac and Doxa . Personally feel I get more fun and value from the latter . The great thing about watches is we are often inspired and impressed by differing aspects .

[@RNRBeliever]

Micro brand? Really?

[@TheNomadsLens]

Yes and yes.

[@derbagger22]

Owned by Fossil and called a microbrand. In one statement has discredited himself...

[@TheNomadsLens]

Yes. Do you own this microbrand?

[@RNRBeliever]

@@derbagger22 Be careful when asking a question. You get a "snob: response such as this. "Discredited"? Yea right.....

[@TheNomadsLens]

And?

[@han7902]

Overpriced is true. But worth 400 pounds is bit under estimating the value of zodiac. If zodiac has quality issue, then shame on zodiac, but it has dome sapphire with swiss movement and big history on diving watches industry.

[@TheNomadsLens]

What history?

[@adityadheerajkalabarigi1260]

So let me lay it out for you point by point. 1) Zodiac is a micro brand? Do you know their history at all? They have been around from late 1880s. 2) The groundbreaking Sea Wolf that was released in 1953 is a stellar piece and was commissioned to be used by many militaries. It was the most reliable dive watch. So you know more than the defence industry 3) The Sea Wolf when it was released was $100 and Blancpain's Fifty Fathoms was priced at $90 at that time. 4) They use flashy colors because they are hiding something? What about Doxa (they are ugly watches) ? What about Tissot with their PRXs? What about Citizen with their Tsuyosas? What about CW? What about blingy Rolexs, especially the rainbow watch? Do you know watches at all??? 5) You are comparing Zodiac with immense history and a watch brand that has is own identity with its designs now with Spinnaker which is an actual micro brand. Zodiac never speaks of AR coating, I do not know where you got the idea. 6) You do not like bracelets? Well most watches come with it. Put on a tape and wear it then. If there was a stand up based on watches this clip will surely give a lot of material. I think you did not get a Zodiac watch from the brand on a free or they refused to loan any sample for review. That may be it.

[@TheNomadsLens]

I guess you bookmarked wikipedia. My view point is from a owner and yours is from where?

[@caliberto5087]

That's not a microbrand and that watch is not overpriced. Not so sure about your competences.

[@TheNomadsLens]

I can only imagine the vast ocean of knowledge you must possess from owning every watch in existence. Your watch collection must be so extensive that even the Time Lords envy you. I bow to your superior competences, O Watch Connoisseur! Please forgive my mere mortal attempts at discussing timepieces. In the future, I'll be sure not to consult you for all my horological insights, as clearly, you are the gatekeeper of all things watch-related. Until then, may your wrist be forever adorned with the most exclusive and elite timepieces, handpicked by the Watch Gods themselves. 🕰️✨ BTW why don't you own this watch?

[@caliberto5087]

@@TheNomadsLens I see the truth bothers you, and that only means one thing..

[@TheNomadsLens]

I see the truth bothers you, and that only means one thing. You don't own this watch.

[@caliberto5087]

@@TheNomadsLens I did, and I got it because of the story of that brand. It's a great and special one. But you have no idea about what we are discussing... Try to study on the internet.

[@TheNomadsLens]

hahahahaha absolutely! Stash it in the safe next to your Ferrari, right? What's your Instagram? Let's take a peek at your watch collection, haha. Let me guess - no Instagram? So, why the strong affinity for a watch you don't actually own?

[@haseebur-rehman3218]

Not a good purchase. Required a full service within a month of purchase. It started losing time after a few weeks.

[@rsheaney]

I am fine with your critique of zodiac, I probably got this video in my feed because I been thinking of getting one, but I can't take you serious, when you call a brand owned by a large company a microbrand.

[@TheNomadsLens]

So if I sell my microbrand to fossil and the case, hands, dial, strap still made in China and they get the same movement from the same supplier I used ( the movement is available in the open market, then ship all the parts it to england put it together in Yorkshire then is it still a microbrand. The only thing thats change is the owner.

[@rsheaney]

@@TheNomadsLens that's correct. A microbrand watch is a wristwatch made by a small, independent watch company. Zodiac has never been a microbrand. The original Sea Wolf use to out sell the Rolex when they both came out.

[@TheNomadsLens]

The spinnaker is not a microbrand? Its owned by a Chinese company that has 10 brands under it belt, so all there watches brands are not microbrand? I bet if you add all of the watches the group spinnaker make will out sell Rolex. With prices for $100 to $1000's I'm sure they do. What do you think of the qaulity of finishing on the Zodiac? With £1600 or $300?

[@TheNomadsLens]

My micro brand watch factory tour. kzbin.info/www/bejne/e3vKnZ1ohbllh80

[@rsheaney]

@@TheNomadsLens correct, although spinnaker is often mistaken for a micro brand it is not. Its owned by the Dartmouth group.

[@billyfalk9376]

I think you need to read some more about zodiac. The pricing is far from high

[@TheNomadsLens]

Why? I think you need to buy the watch then you will know how over priced it is.

[@Josue-411]

It seems, based on the comments, that almost everyone disagrees with your review of the Zodiac. That might be a sign that you should look are your review process and your assessment methodology.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Or it might me the fan boys who don't own the watch are upset. Look at everyone when I ask do you own this watch.

[@Josue-411]

@@TheNomadsLens Zodiac has issues, primarily with QC, that you mentioned. That is a fair critique that is well documented. I think were you went wrong was calling it a "micro-brand" and implying it doesn't have an established history. Both of these statements are clearly false and 5 minutes of research on Google can proves this. Also, attacking people in your comments that called you out on these two points wont help you grow a channel. Just my 2 cents.

[@TheNomadsLens]

What history? The swiss watch industry is full of old dead brands that you can buy the naming right then make a watch in China put a swiss movement in it. I can make this watch with the same movemnt (anyone can buy) and sell it for 70% less. You're paying for a dead brand name. If thats what you want then you do you boo. Have you bought it? Sadly all the fan boys of attack me for not like a watch they don't own need to first buy the watch then comment. Maybr you should put your 2 cents into buy it.

[@Josue-411]

1) You can Google the history but you refused to do 5 minutes of research before putting out a video a video with ignorant opinions. 2) The history has been told to you by many people in the comments yet you refuse to listen. 3) I’m not a fanboy. I have handled several Zodiacs but I don’t currently own one. It’s hard to be a fanboy if you don’t even own a Zodiac wouldn’t you say? 🤔 4) The brand has QC issues but it isn’t a trash brand with no history that you try to make it out to be. 5) You need to Google the definition of “micro brand”.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Hey there, keyboard warriors! Let's address the plethora of ignorance flooding my comment section, shall we? First off, if you bothered to peel your lazy selves off those dingy armchairs for just five minutes and did a quick Google search, you might actually learn something before spewing your nonsensical tirades. But no, that seems to be asking too much from the geniuses of the internet. Clearly you don't know anything about the brand. Secondly, your self-righteous attempts at educating me on watch history are laughable. Do you honestly believe regurgitating comments qualifies as an education? If so, I suggest you reevaluate your standards. Oh, and to the self-proclaimed non-fanboy who's so desperate to defend a brand they don't even own, allow me to bestow upon you the prestigious "Captain of the Obvious" award. Bravo, my friend, for stating the utterly obvious. But let's get real here, how can one be a fanboy when they don't even own the darn thing? It's like trying to claim you're a die-hard fan of pizza without ever having taken a bite. And to those clutching their precious Zodiacs while foaming at the mouth over my critiques, let's set the record straight. Yes, the brand may have its fair share of quality control issues, but I never once labeled it a "trash brand." Your comprehension skills seem to be on par with a damp sponge. I simply pointed out its shortcomings, which apparently bruised your delicate sensibilities. Oh, and before you go preaching about "micro brands," perhaps you should acquaint yourselves with the definition. Here's a hint: it doesn't mean "instant immunity from criticism." So, in conclusion, if you're going to come at me with your half-baked arguments and unwarranted hostility, at least have the decency to bring some substance to the table. Otherwise, kindly take a seat and let the grown-ups continue the conversation.

[@AlexK-sn9ss]

TBH the OP has couple of fair points...the watch should be much better at that price or if Fossil is targeting the premium market. What is the point to use sapphire glass and downgrade the bezel to acrylic plastic? That brushing on the sides is appalling. Micro-brand- Compared to the examples shown,(Hamilton, Longines, Oris, Tag H... ) Zodiac is a micro-brand. History- Yes, very rich history back in the 50-60'..but then, it all went downhill. Remove the branding from that Spinnaker and the Zodiak, does it really look like a watch 5x the price?

[@Barefoot12]

I found a 1970 square mystery dial at a estate sale for 60bux. I have worn it occasionally for 30 years and it loses a minute a day. The second dot doesn't move perfectly smooth but I wear it when I don't a fone around. There will never be better mechanical automatic watches than Swiss. Took it for service for 250. The watch guy said he would not even wear it personally because of the rarity. It's worth a few k but that's not enough for me to stop wearing it. Actually fossil is a micro brand. I love the zodiac because the faces aren't as big as the new automatic seiko divers . I will start wearing the seikos for more frequent use. I don't wear watches at work because I am a machinist, fabricator and landscaper. I'm not time obsessed but men gotta have reliable and durable tools for keeping time.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Oh, the horological connoisseur has spoken! Two whole brands - you must be drowning in wristwatch sophistication. Your discerning taste in crystals has truly elevated you to the echelons of watch snobbery. Hardlex versus sapphire? It's practically the Clash of the Titans in the watchmaking world. And kudos on the astute observation of the date function; who knew such groundbreaking analysis existed outside of Nobel Prize-worthy research? As for my video, I'm sorry my opinions didn't align with your divine taste. Clearly, my lack of self-awareness is as glaring as your collection's superiority. I'll be sure to consult the Watch Illuminati for guidance next time.

[@georgefotiadis3787]

What is exactly the point of these videos? Im guessing trash talking watches that people love from a toxic person

[@TheNomadsLens]

The point is to get a view from a owner and not someone who was given a watch by a dealer.

[@georgefotiadis3787]

@@TheNomadsLens and to trash talk about every watch in the world

[@georgefotiadis3787]

@@TheNomadsLens your channel is junk not the watches

[@TheNomadsLens]

urely thou Hast not brusheth thy teeth upon the rising of the sun on this day flee from my presence for thy stench can and nostrils no longer continue to Bear What's your instagram? 😀 This is fun, can't wait for tomorrow. 😋

[@WINDINGCROWNS]

Those wild and wacky color are historically correct. You said they are gimmicky? Dude! You do absolutely NO research. They have been around way longer than Oris. I love Oris (been around since 1904 and also have history )but Zodiac have more. The seawolf doesn't take a hit when flipping any more than Oris. I should know i am in all the discords including Random Robs. I see what they sell for among watch enthusiasts

[@TheNomadsLens]

How much do they sell of among watch enthusiasts? When did the wild and wacky color of the water mellon come out? Tell me more about the zodiac brand as you know so much? how many years did they stop trading? I like my oris but don't love it, I love my family and not a watch.

[@WINDINGCROWNS]

@@TheNomadsLens look it up. That's what you should have done from the beginning which is the point.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Don't you know? I don't buy a watch for historically value, if I did I would buy vintage. Sounds like you don't know much about the brand. My video come from experience owning the watch, yours comes from discords and wikipedia?

[@WINDINGCROWNS]

@@TheNomadsLens You "don't buy a watch for historical value"? Yet you mention history in your video? 😂 That makes sense. You're just throwing a tantrum like a kid. You made a video claiming Zodiac had no history....wrong. You said the wacky colors were them trying too hard..... wrong. That was their thing since 1953. You don't know but pretend to know. Now you keep arguing? No matter where I get my info. Discord or Wikipedia. At least I looked it up. Something you should have done before opening your mouth. 😂😂😂😂😂

[@WINDINGCROWNS]

@@TheNomadsLens by your comments on this video, I see you argue with everyone who disagrees with you or corrects you. You are so humble when proven wrong. 😆

[@London_Ron]

I was at London’s WatchPro event in 22/23 and the Zodiac stand was pretty much ignored. So many overpriced watches out there, but I get it, price up as much as you can get away with. ALWAYS go for the discount with certain (almost all) watch brands, you got a great discount. Watches have become something where a LOT of money can be made.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Always big discounts on Zodiacs. They're normaly 40% off from the dealers. Buy steinhart which is just as good if not better at 75% less.

[@Stevenhufnagel]

Virtually everything is made in China so to even bring it up as a negative is redundant. By Swiss law only 60% of a product has to be made in Swiss to qualify as Swiss made and that goes to watches as well, yeah Rolex too.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Yes. And?

[@JG-qb9gd]

You referred to the watch as a micro brand. When the company was founded in 1881 and very popular and main stream through its history up until the 90's when It was miss managed and went bankrupt. Despite the bankruptcy it was acquired by TAG HEURE and never actually stopped production of the core models such as the Super Sea Wolf and the Marine life. Further more comparing a watch that innovated the dive watch and was worn by the navy seals in the 70's seems like a bit of a stretch. You refer to a cult following? The reason the watch as you claim has a "cult following" is because they make great watches. In fact the ZODIAC SUPER SEA WOLF CERAMIC ZO9595 is a chrono certified 200m dive watch made with ceramic that sells for 1,180 pounds in some places. This value proposition is pretty hard to beat by any standards. If you think the bezel action is bad (which it is most certainly not) you can go try any Seiko's at the same price point, which generally speaking are far less accurate unless purchase on the JDM and have as you mentioned spec of dust in the dials, miss aligned bezels etc. You then compared the Seiko 5 GMT with some of the most horrible bezel action in the business (I do love that watch by the way) and with a Seiko 4R34 movement with an between +45 / -35 seconds per day. While the Zodiac is using a STP1-11 which has an accuracy of-3s/day to +7s/day on average. Really seems to me like you didn't like the watch and are trying to find excuses to discredit it which is fine and you're in your right to do so. However claiming the bezel action is bad when its basically equivalent to most 5k+ Breitlings and basically better than any Seiko seems a tad disingenuous, not to mention claiming it is expensive and the finishing and fitting is bad while you made a comparison with a Seiko 5 GMT.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Oh, forgive my unworthy existence in the presence of a true watch connoisseur! Your impassioned defense of the Almighty Zodiac, the beacon of perfection in the horological realm, has left me in awe. I must have missed the memo that owning a calendar that predates the birth of most nations automatically elevates a watch brand to the status of infallible deity. And thank you for enlightening me about the mystical history of the Navy Seals donning Zodiacs in the '70s. I suppose that's where they learned the covert art of bezel alignment - truly a crucial skill in their line of duty. My apologies for daring to compare it to a Seiko 5 GMT, a watch apparently so unworthy that it's only fit for the wrists of peasants. But fear not, oh Watch Guru, for your defense of the Zodiac's bezel action has set a new standard in the world. I'll be sure to cherish the image of you, surrounded by your impressive collection of 5k+ Breitlings and scoffing at the mere mortals with their Seikos. Your insights have forever altered my perception of the timekeeping universe. What a time to be alive!

[@dado380]

The way you don't get it with the Zodiac (Zodiac is so legendary brand)watches I feel the same with Tudor, Tudor is just Rolex hommage brand with cheap bezel, plain looking SUB copy,boring flat case and QC issues. I just don't get it,4000$ for a Tudor is way overpriced,for f... sake for that money you can buy the Grand Seiko which destroys Tudor in every single category except braclet.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Whats so is so legendary about Zodiac? I think you will find if you hit a Tudor with a Grand Seiko its the Seiko that would be destroys destroyed but why would you do that anyway, not hammer around? Tell me more about the history of the zodiac brand you don't own.

[@dado380]

@@TheNomadsLens Yes LEGENDARY,Zodiac sea wolf was the first true dive watch along with fifty fathoms,Zodiac killer infamously wore Zodiac watch and used their LEGENDARY logo,even today in Manny cities you can see that same logo on the 🧱 as graffiti. Green berets and navy frogman used exclusively Zodiac watches back in the day because they were reliable.

[@TheNomadsLens]

HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa.... HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa Where did you get all of your reference points from Wikipedia? Which LEGENDARY diver used it? What LEGENDARY thing did it take part in? "first true dive watch" in what way? Green berets and navy frogman used seiko also. And? I think we all appreciate your insight on a watch that you don't own. truly we have suffered the slings and arrows of Misfortune by the stench that dwelleth in the deepest pits of thy gums.

[@heisenberg470]

Zodiac is a microbrand ahahahahahaha very funny

[@TheNomadsLens]

Yes amazing how many people fall for this fosal group microbrand hahahahahaha very funny

[@matteagle42]

Thanks. At 1500$ I'd rather look at the Oris Aquis

[@TheNomadsLens]

IN Uk they just up the price by 50% its now $2000

[@yavroy]

For slightly less, a Hydroconquest from Longines is way better...

[@Lozaable]

Hahahahhaa... Dude! Zodiac is not a microbrand. :)

[@TheNomadsLens]

Why?

[@EDHBlvd]

Thank you for this video. I love the Aquamarine Dream version of the Super Sea Wolf, but I was having reservations over the price, for what is sort of a cheap watch. I agree, if this watch was $799, I’d pull trigger for sure…but at $1495, I think I’ll pass.

[@georgefotiadis3787]

Its a shame to pass on a watch like this that easily,to justify the price you should keep in mind that zodiac has rich history with watches.The seawolf was first made in the 60s and was in the same league as the rolex submariner and the blancpain fifty fathoms.Of course the decision is yours so is the money but please reconsider buying this watch.I know i sound like a salesman,but i wrote all this because i used to own a zodiac watch.

[@518Regulators]

Interesting take. Why is it you consider it a microbrand? Brand awareness, sales volume, or something else? From the MSRP in USD, the Super Sea Wolf 53 Compression runs about $1500 and $1200 for the rubber strap version. So the bracelet alone adds $300 to the price. I'm guessing you wouldn't feel the bracelet alone is worth that. Teddy Baldassarre did a good video on the history of the Zodiac brand. While I'm sure he has some bias given his company sells them, the information itself is still valid. Although at about 13:30 in his video he does go over some criticisms. He explains that the bold colors were something the brand was doing early on. Now then, this having been said, I have a Super Sea Wolf Pro (Model ZO3554) on order and should be delivered tomorrow. The Pro model adds ISO 6425 and COS-C certification, greater depth rating (30 ATM), mineral (instead of acrylic as with your sample) capped bezel, and uses a Sellita SW200-1 movement for a couple hundred dollars to the price. To me it was the look of the watch that sold me. Particularly the overall coloring and shape of the hands. Unfortunately, the closest dealer is a 4 hour drive and they don't even have my desired model in stock to look at in person. So I took a chance and ordered one online (from an authorized dealer) but at a discount putting it under the price range of the 53 model. The 53 model just didn't do it for me with the shape of the hands and indices--too many rectangular patterns. In 24 hours though I'll know if it's the right watch for me.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Didn't you watch the full video?

[@518Regulators]

@@TheNomadsLens Yes. But that doesn't answer why you think it is a microbrand and based on the following leads me to believe you either don't know what a microbrand is or are simply misusing the term. I'd like to think it is the latter. At 2:00 you state it is a microbrand, relying on it's history. Microbrands aren't known for history. Nor is a price range or overall quality indicative of a microbrand. Some are an order of magnitude more expensive than others. The Sea Wolf is actually in line with many micro prices. Micro's are typically small independents with low production numbers, not large multinational companies having been around since the 19th century. At 11:50 you allege that it's a micro based on overall specs, even comparing it to the Spinnaker. Specs alone a micro does not make. So if that is your assertion on what a microbrand is, then that would be incorrect. If that was the case a Hamilton Khaki Field Auto would be a micro per what you lay out. I'm not going to disagree with you in that you don't like the watch. I don't care much for then looks of it myself. Perhaps a better description would be that it is simply overpriced for what it is. As to crown accessibility, I don't see it an issue on mine, the Pro Diver variant, that also has a crown guard. Screws in and out no problem. A correction to your claim at 7:39: the bezel is not acrylic but in mineral glass, so it'll resist scratches much better than the acrylic. One thing I would have liked to see on the Pro model would be the quick release pin system you showed at 9:04. The bracelet is nice but I'd also like a NATO strap that adds a touch of complimentary color and would make it more wearable for diving with even a thin wetsuit. I'm not saying your opinion on the watch it without merit or value. It's simply your wording and delivery of it. Much like on the subsequent video about selling your Seiko GMT that you criticize for having a difficult to remove bracelet because you simply don't have the proper tool for it.

[@TheNomadsLens]

What history? Do you know who owns Spinnaker? They make more watches then Zodiac. Zodiac was independent untill it was bought out. Is Spinnaker a microbrand? If they got bought buy fossil will they stop being a microbrand? When did zodiac start, 19th century? What makes a microbrand? Hamilton Khaki Field is better made the zodiac is not bater made then any watch in this video kzbin.info/www/bejne/aqiulJhpptl3qdE If you like the watch so much then buy it. No need to get triggered that I don't like it. I will not go on a crazy rant on your video when you buy it and tell everyone how much you love it. Do you boo.

[@dangerosos3594]

Dude almost every single watch brand with some history attached to it is overpriced (some more than others), it's just something that comes with the hobby 😅. New microbrands have no history to use as selling points, so they have to use specs as incentives. That being said, even though I personally like the design of the Sea Wolf, I do agree that it light be a couple hundred dollars more expensive than it should be.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Yep watch bands have history, Rolex GMT made for panam Breitling used by pilots Tag heuer (Heuer really) used in motor sports All the Dirty dozen brands Doxa used by jacques cousteau Zodiac? As we agree its over priced for what it is.

[@Dewi666]

@@TheNomadsLens Used extensively by US service members during Veitnam. More than likely the inspiration for the logo of the zodiac killer.

[@TheNomadsLens]

There are many brands used at that time. And? Like most brands they went under, if fossil hadn't bought zodiac it would be a dead brand. Would you feel the same if a chinnese brand had bought them out? If movt watch brand had bought them who make watches in China would it still be a great brand? Its a brand in name only if that somthing people watch to buy then do you boo. Its not for me.

[@Edua1111]

@@TheNomadsLens Well Zodiac supposed to be used by a still at large maniac... If it was suitable for 50 years unidentified serial killer, then it should be good enough for an average everyday lunatic too.

[@TheNomadsLens]

@Edua1111 What?

[@echoesmyron6827]

"Zodiac is a microbrand". Huh?

[@TheNomadsLens]

Is it not?

[@echoesmyron6827]

@@TheNomadsLens 🤣

[@TheNomadsLens]

And is it not?

[@marvelmarcus103]

I guess the Zodiac killer was wearing a microbrand..

[@klrshthead2906]

@TheNomadsLens I own 2 brands primarily first being seiko (SRPK17/SKX007)and the second being zodiac (JEToMATIC/SSW/Rallygraph) a few references of each brand. I find the zodiacs to be a much higher level of fit and finish. Sapphire crystal compare to the hardlex is night and day. The date function on the STP is far less clunky compared to the Seiko and I can't stand hollow end links. I actually watched your video before I bought my SeaWolf and I gotta say I think you got this one wrong. That being said everyone is entitled to their opinion but the way you react towards the other comments on your video shows a real lack of self awareness. Some of your responses border on childish.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Oh, the horological connoisseur has spoken! Two whole brands - you must be drowning in wristwatch sophistication. Your discerning taste in crystals has truly elevated you to the echelons of watch snobbery. Hardlex versus sapphire? It's practically the Clash of the Titans in the watchmaking world. And kudos on the astute observation of the date function; who knew such groundbreaking analysis existed outside of Nobel Prize-worthy research? As for my video, I'm sorry my opinions didn't align with your divine taste. Clearly, my lack of self-awareness is as glaring as your collection's superiority. I'll be sure to consult the Watch Illuminati for guidance next time.

[@klrshthead2906]

@@TheNomadsLens Lol, the fact you can’t take any criticism including constructive shows what a turd you are… you’re getting a lot of comments disagreeing with you and what do you do instead of having a discussion, you insult your viewers... Smart, your opinion is worthless. Good day.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Oh, I'm sorry, did my inability to embrace criticism shatter your illusion of a perfect world where everyone agrees with you? I guess I missed the memo that said constructive criticism was supposed to come gift-wrapped in rainbows and unicorn stickers. But hey, thanks for the valuable input on the worthlessness of my opinion-I'll be sure to treasure it alongside other profound insights, like "the Earth is round" and "water is wet." Your contribution to the marketplace of ideas is truly unparalleled. Good day to you too, oh wise and benevolent purveyor of internet enlightenment!

[@TheNomadsLens]

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things, I have ever heard. At no point, in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything, that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

[@klrshthead2906]

Lol did u delete one of my comments? You stink.

[@KacyKnight]

This guy is clueless.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Hey there, keyboard warriors! Let's address the plethora of ignorance flooding my comment section, shall we?

[@blethook]

I have the same exact reference, and I think it's a good beater watch. I do like the stretchy feature on the butterfly clasp, but I would have preferred a standard dive watch clasp.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Glad you like it but its not for me. Life would be boring if we all liked the same.

[@tariqjoseph3562]

Probably the worst reference you can get though. Zodiac is known for their more colourful watches. I have the Liberty London version purchased from liberty limited to 300 pieces and paid £750 for it. That extra purple with the purple lume glow, and comes with two extra strap as well as the bracelet. They are overpriced, but not bad watches at the right price.

[@piotrszmidel]

A 4 hundred watch quality?A 2 hundred Spinnaker is better?Wow,what a ignorance.Im hearing such things for the 1st time,usually seen only complaints about the movement😬Plus I know people who collect them and have like 10 or 15 different SeaWolfs,also have Seikos,Doxas and Black Bays,so if the quality would be that bad they would stay away I think..As to Spinnaker,there is a similar mushroom brand Heritor(dont remember if from Dartmouth factory too),which makes SeaWolfs copies in 45mm diameter.1:1,all these crazy colourways..

[@TheNomadsLens]

"A 4 hundred watch quality?A 2 hundred Spinnaker is better?Wow,what a ignorance" Why?

[@piotrszmidel]

@@TheNomadsLens That kind of bracelet costs minimum 150€ elsewhere(but normally,with this stretch system would be more).So the watch is worth 250€?Like 2nd sort of AliExpress brands?As to Spinnaker its a factory brand,like You said and shown in the vid(these Chinese people)all from catalogue parts,You can swap the brand logo with their 8 sister brands and would be no difference.I think most parts for Zodiac are custom made.

[@TheNomadsLens]

The bracelet cost few $ to buy from factory. DO you think Zodiac are buying from AliExpress and paying $150? which parts are custom made? Do you know you can have a custom made watch in china with the STP movement? I help people do it all the time.

[@piotrszmidel]

@@TheNomadsLens Yes,but were looking from a retail buyer perspective,not as a brand owner?I know You can easily create a micro without even any assembling or any QC,dont even need to take China route,in Europe theres Chrono Ag,with infamous Ronda150 and Helium Escape Valve😜There was many such brands before and will be much ahead.But for a simple watch collector like me its hard to even assume how much it can cost for the brand.I can only guess.Would need to be really deep in this bussiness to know actual rates/prices,know good factories which make custom and good quality products.I think You agree that Zodiac bracelets are not just random catalogue stuff from TaoBao?I know only few brands in +-2000$ segment that designed something innovative in terms of clasps,something which isnt seen anywhere else-Formex,Zodiac,maybe Halios from what I remember.And I highely doubt the Zodiac bracelet costs them a few bucks lol,even in China they dont give such rates🤪As to custom parts I believe most of the parts is indeed custom.Just look at the indexes for example on many models,do You saw some other watch with similar indexes like in mine ABTW?(besides Heritor,lol).Or know any other models which use the same cases as Zodiacs(not only SeaWolf models,SeaDragon,Olympos etc).

[@TheNomadsLens]

Why are you looking from a retail buyer perspective for the bracelet? I know the cost to make watches thats why I say its over priced. You're wrong about the bracelets its just a normal catalogue bracelet, The clasp might not be for now but once it out there everyone will have it, then it will die like every other clasp. What about this watch that come on rubber, should it be half price as it not got this clasp? I don;t get your point about index on the dial. just about every micro brand has its own index. Which Zodiac did you buy and how much did you pay? Tell me about your experience as a owner of a zodiac watch. Which microbrand do you own?

[@1991tommygun]

You get alot of watch for the price with Zodiak. Mircobrand LOL not likely

[@TheNomadsLens]

What do you get? A movement costing $100 and chinese case for £1500. Have you bought yours yet?

[@julienfroidevaux1143]

Thank god somebody said it , they've gone up quite a bit recently.

[@jamiesmith2934]

I make a point of not buying things I don’t like🤦‍♂️

[@TheNomadsLens]

How do you if like it without trying?

[@fakenewsisthenews3542]

Hey turkey, I'll give ya 400 squid for it!

[@TheNomadsLens]

You can have it for £2000 unless you don't think it worth it. Do you think it better then £400 micro brand or not? £2000 is it then. Put your money where your mouth is.

[@gnomaz15]

I already thought this man was delusional when watching the video, but then I read his replies in the comments.Yikes.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Thank you for helping me spread the word that these watches are rubbish. With every comment it helps with the engagement algorithm pushing my video further with the recommendations. Please feel free to add more comments. I really appreciate your help and support in making this video a success. 💏

[@Lorenzodial]

Zodiac is not a micro brand!

[@TheNomadsLens]

The quality is of a microbrand. Didn't you find that when you bought your Zodiac? What do you think is a microbrand?

[@Lorenzodial]

@@TheNomadsLens Your question yes and no. I have a really good zodiac and one that is OK. I have a few Seiko watches Very good!! and some that are OK. but they’re both or not a microbrand. My definition of a microbrand is like Raven, Traska, Weiss, Dan Henry, and Brew, Lots of Microbrand started in the early 2000s Very low overhead and only sell on the Internet. Zodiac goes back to 1882! And I own a Sea Wolf back from 1953. But I like micro brands I have a few some of them perform better than my omega.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Sure sure you have all the watches you said LMAO. Did you know you can buy Zodiac online? OMG does that make them a microbrand? Whats your Insta I would like to see ALL the watches you think you own.

[@taeketsu]

Zodiac is not a microbrand. Everyone in your comments section has told you this.

[@TheNomadsLens]

You mean the people who don't own the watch that are saying its not and yet the pesron who owns the watch say its no better then a $200 watch who do you think is right?

[@Gh0stShadow-q6v]

Lol this guy is a joke 😂😂

[@TheNomadsLens]

And?

[@dollarmenu168]

So you selling it cheap then ?😎

[@TheNomadsLens]

Nope sold it to a fan boy for £895 Ka-Ching! Thats the problem with fan boys they don't see reality.

[@dollarmenu168]

​@@TheNomadsLenskeep up your shtike it seems to be working

[@TheNomadsLens]

Will do. If you want to buy one let me know I can still get then for under £600, Yours for £895 plus shipping.

[@justdoit4348]

The Super Seawolf was once more popular than the Rolex Submariner, yet our dude tries to roast this brand which is rich in history. This happens when research is done wrong.

[@TheNomadsLens]

You siad it once more popular than the Rolex Submariner, yet you didn't back up your claim, This happens when research is done wrong.

[@justdoit4348]

@@TheNomadsLens I back my information based on the statement of the famous watch KZbinr Nico Leonard. Just search it up and don’t bitch on me. My god. 😨

[@TheNomadsLens]

Back my information based on the statement by owning the watch. famous watch KZbinr Nico Leonard was given the watch to do is kiss kiss video so sheep like you would buy it. Oh wait you didn't buy it. I guess the free watch was not worth it.

[@justdoit4348]

@@TheNomadsLens First, how can you know what watches are in my collection? Second, Nico has got - unlike you - a very acknowledged reputation in the watch industry. He literally made a video about zodiac history. You should look it up for yourself. Third, Nico is just one source of information and there are multiple ones to name here. Please don’t get me wrong, I don’t want to bitch with you but as it seems criticism isn’t a thing you can deal with.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Oh, show me your watches, go on rub it in my face that you own this over pricred micro brand hahahahaha. It's amusing how you assume I can't deal with criticism while you get so defensive over a watch you've never even experienced firsthand. First, it's obvious you have no clue about your own collection if you're parroting someone else's opinions. Second, it's laughable to think that name-dropping Nico somehow makes your argument credible. Sure, he's got a reputation, but it doesn't magically make you an expert. Watching a video doesn't compare to actually owning and experiencing a watch. And third, if you're trying not to 'bitch' with me, maybe you should rethink your approach. Stop pretending to be an authority on something you clearly have no real knowledge about. Grow up and get a clue.

[@NOMACD]

I guess negative engagement is still engagement, but damn dude you're earning all the hate lmao.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Yep is almost like I did it just to trigger the fan boys.

[@corndog2835]

This guy is a clown, lol.

[@TheNomadsLens]

And?

[@j1spen736]

This boy has got to be trolling, i've never seen so many bad takes in one place. Even the comments, every single one of them perfectly deconstructs the nonsense coming out of this man's mouth 😂

[@TheNomadsLens]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@ricknelson7157]

Dude, I suggest you make videos on something you actually know something about. A watch can only say "Swiss made" on the dial if it IS fully Swiss made. It can say "Swiss movement" if other parts are from somewhere other than Switzerland. 2nd, ALL Swiss watches are over priced, including Rolex, of which I own 3. Yes, the movement IS "in house" if the parent company owns it. General Motors makes all the engines for Cadillac, Chevy and Buick, so all the engines are "in house." We get it you have buyer's remorse on this watch, but it's actually a very well constructed fully Swiss watch that is far more interesting than either the Seiko or micro-brand (exact Rolex wanna be designs) you reference, both are quite boring.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Dude, I suggest you buy the watch before saying somthing about a watch yu don't own. Is the BMW rolls in house? A watch is considered Swiss when it has been developed in Switzerland, it uses a Swiss movement, is assembled and controlled in Switzerland by the Manufacture d'horlogerie and when 60% of its manufacturing costs are Swiss. So you're paying for 40% Chinese

[@ricknelson7157]

You really are totally without a clue, aren't you. No Zodiac parts come from China. I actually own 2 Zodiac watches (current models) and they are excellent. I also own 3 Rolex, 1 AP ROO, 1 GP 18K Oracle, 1 Zenith 18K perpetual calendar, 2 Carl F Bucherer, 2 Bertolucci and a Corum 18K with meteorite dial. @@TheNomadsLens

[@TheNomadsLens]

You really are totally without a clue, Don''t you. Sure Sure you own 3 Rolex, 1 AP ROO, 1 GP 18K Oracle, 1 Zenith 18K perpetual calendar, 2 Carl F Bucherer, 2 Bertolucci and a Corum 18K with meteorite dial. Whats your insta? Let take a look at the watches you don't own.

[@gregoryrogalsky6937]

All I got out of your video is that your cheap and the Zodiac Super Sea wolf is beautiful watch.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Then why haven't you bought one? All I got from your comment is you don't have money to buy a over price microbrand.

[@gregoryrogalsky6937]

@@TheNomadsLens I am more interested in vintage Zodiac but like to see what is being made in modern times. From what I can tell this looks like a very cool watch. The term Micro brand ... is that your way of disparaging Zodiac? So according to you unless a company produces millions of copies it's unworthy ?

[@TheNomadsLens]

Then why haven't you bought modern microbrand Zodiac Super Sea wolf if you think its beautiful watch? unless a company produces good watches at good prices then its a microbrand. BTW do you know the comapny that owns Spinnaker watches, owns 10 other brands and makes parts for fossil which are then shipped to swiss and scrowed together? Buy one I dare you. LMAO

[@gregoryrogalsky6937]

@@TheNomadsLens Like I said, I am interested in vintage Zodiac dive watches. The term Micro brand is yours and not one I care to use. I dont care how many companies Zodiac owns. Why would I ? Seems to me your a watch snob.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Like I said, you should by this microbrand Zodiac Super Sea wolf if you think its beautiful watch? Don't you like it anymore? Glad you agree its a microbrand. Zodiac don't own they're owned just like you. Seems to me you don't know about watch.

[@mirkobeehive7449]

Really microbrand you say😂😂😂. Overpriced your Channel 😂😂e

[@TheNomadsLens]

Overpriced your Channel? Did you pay to watch?

[@taeketsu]

Why would you make videos if youre going to argue and insult the people who watch and comment?

[@TheNomadsLens]

Its almost like I made the video to annoy the fan boys who don't know anything about the brand.

[@robertnorth1681]

Judging appropriate pricing in watches that say Swiss Made is a bottomless rabbit hole. Where do you start? Where do you end? What do you do with Tag? Or IWC. Is an IWC Type A Flieger worth thousands, when you can get a Laco for a tiny percentage of the cost, etc? As i said, where do you start and stop on this discussion? Anyway, I don't think you "get" Zodiac. Because what you don't like, quirky design, colors, is what fans like. Better to stay away from Zodiac, because it's clearly not for you.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Yes they not for me. They just went up 50% in UK without changing anything. Even Rolex scam there buyer with small 3-8% per year but 50%

[@robertnorth1681]

@@TheNomadsLens Yes, that is atrocious. Haven't seen that in the U.S., but haven't paid that much attention.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Maybe they just trying to rip off the brits hahahaha I'd rather have a seiko with real inhouse movement and real history. Seiko Watch Prospex Heritage Turtle 1968 Re-Interpretation RRP £860.00

[@josmo506]

Im in agreement with you, simply it doesnt worth the high price, too generic, it does not offer any special feature, Zodiac is the product of marketing

[@piotrszmidel]

Generic?I would say in category of divers they stand largely out from the crowd with such many great colourways.Theyre just fun colourful watches,maybe not Aquis or Captain Cook quality,but try to find one around SeaWolf price nowadays.Indeed msrps are a bit high,but also You can get discounts here and there.This black colourway from the vid is around 1000-1200€ here in EU.In that price range its hard to find a better diver besides Seikos.I have ABTW Cosc version,bought it for 1165€ last year and its my favourite watch,worth every penny.Any special feature?Show me the 2nd brand which makes bracelet with that stretch system..Besides ABTW I also have a SeaDragon(bought it heavily discounted at 560€),the quality and finishing on the case there is outstanding

[@TheNomadsLens]

Fun how? I never understood when people say fun. Seiko Prospex SBDC129 Marathon GSAR NGM Squale 1521 YEMA Superman + Navygraf Marine Nationale Doxa SUB 200 Longines HydroConquest TAG Heuer Aquaracer Don't forget to reply to your other comment.

[@piotrszmidel]

@@TheNomadsLens Fun in terms of aesthetics,playing with colours,as for me I dont like black divers much and an ideal black diver is a tool watch,for example O&W P104.From Your list I would add to my box only Sub200,but to be objective it also have weak spots-weak lume,weak clasp,not to mention they want 250$ for a rubber strap.Longines and Tag is on the more expensive side than Zodiac,at least if You dont count quartzs.Squale 1521 dont do much for me,it looks like many other Sub homages(I know Squale have history with making cases for big brands,so maybe cant say its a homage).I would consider purchase of 50atmos but its big and chunky.Yema have its own movements so finding a replacement would be impossible,also they are one of the worst brands in terms of QC and CS from what Ive heard everywhere..

[@TheNomadsLens]

How is that fun? like a clown? so its a clown watch. Yep I can see that it a joke. Nope all the watches in the list are the same RRP are the zodiac. Which Zodiac did you buy? Whats your insta? I would be intrested in looking at photos of a fan boy.

[@piotrszmidel]

@@TheNomadsLens Yeah?Show me any Aquis nowadays under 1500€(at least which isnt an old couple years stock on a black rubber/black dial and only neon yellow/neon pink etc indexes),indeed You can buy a Hydroconquest on the same price level,but are You sure its such a fantastic quality watch?Did You read about the bracelets?Also a Powermatic is for sure a good movement,but repairing it after the warranty can cost quite amount and depends only from official service?No,thanks,I prefer Stp/Sellita/Soprod which Zodiac use..Theres no automatic Tag for under under 1500€(I like this brand too😜)

[@steelsteez6118]

Great video!! I want to thank you for your very honest opinion. We need more honest reviews like this. I honestly had a lot of reservations about certain things and you helped me confirm them. Cheers mate!

[@TheNomadsLens]

Glad it was helpful!

[@mariosiaven2965]

Overpriced, you pay for the design, overall subpar quality for the price paid besides, the caliber is held in place by a plastic insert, yack!

[@Apophisad]

You're talking out of the bottom ,mate. Do your research before posting, not after ;)

[@TheNomadsLens]

Why are you so insistent I should like a watch you're no willing to buy yourself?

[@Apophisad]

@@TheNomadsLens oh you're also lacking in the intellectual department, I see. I figured as much :))

[@TheNomadsLens]

So why you so insistent I should like a watch you're no willing to buy yourself? You did the research and found the watch to be a junk watch? I think you can't afford it. I figured as much mate 😂😂😂😂

[@sanjayhiro]

Seems like you made this review, only to shit all over it? Maybe im wrong.

[@TheNomadsLens]

Seems like you only reviews that only say good things about a over priced watch, Maybe I'm not wrong.

[@lawhitey]

Interesting comment section😮

[@TheNomadsLens]

yes

[@antsfur]

Too many enterprises making money oit of that watch thats why its expensive

[@bking82]

Micro brand??? What 😂😂😂😂

[@TheNomadsLens]

yes

[@N7Sound]

I'm surprised, always thought the Zodiac had great finish and quality. Thanks for saving my time. The Hydroconquest seems a better deal.

[@Tonysoprano497]

That’s only one opinion .. I like many other seasoned watch enthusiasts own and love them and see no problem with quality or finish . Would never go with one opinion there are a lot of reviews available online ..

[@JG-qb9gd]

It does I've owned several and was very happy with all of them.

[@kerokero3082]

Owned by fossil using STP movements for $1500, it's definitely overpriced. Sort of like invictas buying glycine, it lost its pedigree

[@giusepperocchi2979]

Or Swatch buying Blancpain and Omega

[@darthvisor9289]

Zodiac is not a microbrand

[@TheNomadsLens]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@Kurtis4hyr]

Good review....I have 2 Zodiac Sea Wolf models and I was underwhelmed by both of them....visually nice, but the fit and finish is clumsy, clasp sticks, and edges too sharp....

[@copedipper772]

Forget about watches get yourself a good helmet.

[@TheNomadsLens]

ok. And?

[@Ludovicode]

Zodiac ha fatto la storia dell'orologeria con il primo Sub Diver nel 1953 e con il primo orologio automatico nel 1930. Questa è stata ZODIAC