Theoretically you could put each package manager in its own container to not interject with one another. This would require duplicated configurations and installations for a lot of software but it should protect you from breaking everything.
@ltex34243 жыл бұрын
thats what bedrock linux does but the packages share dependencies
@yash11522 жыл бұрын
> _"thats what bedrock linux does but the packages share dependencies"_ @@ltex3424 nice, thanks for sharing
@coffee-is-power2 жыл бұрын
try bedrock linux...
@thefearlessgeek8 ай бұрын
3 years later, but now we have Distrobox. :)
@windowsagent9814 жыл бұрын
Super useful. I'm heavily considering gentoo, and this helps me better make a final decision!
@marioschroers73184 жыл бұрын
@Kendall Koontz And here! ☺️
@itsgalaxy24074 жыл бұрын
@@marioschroers7318 and here!
@larikkin4 жыл бұрын
@@trtrhr Gnome is not even an OS
@marioschroers73184 жыл бұрын
@@trtrhrMake your choice. ~ John Kramer 😀
@laurinneff43044 жыл бұрын
@@trtrhr i like gnome
@fawzanfawzi99934 жыл бұрын
This channel is one of the best channel to learn Linux from.
@gadgetguy994 жыл бұрын
I remember trying to do this when I first made the switch from ubuntu to fedora. Learning was fun though.
@hanro504 жыл бұрын
I mean... I've had troubles running software that was clearly optimised for Ubuntu on Fedora in the past... Seeing as Fedora stores some of its own internal libraries in slightly different places compared to Ubuntu
@spankroy4 жыл бұрын
Man, my first Linux exposure was back in 97 or so with RedHat. This was pre YUM and DNF, so you would quickly run into dependency hell when trying to install some program that was in the RPM format. Good Times™
@neonfuz_4 жыл бұрын
@@trtrhr he wasn't abbreviating, these are the names of the package managers for redhat and fedora based distros. YUM is the old package manager, DNF is a newer improved one. RPM is the actual package format, if you can find a RPM for some software you want you can download it and install it on redhat based distros.
@spankroy4 жыл бұрын
@@trtrhr Sorry for the confusion, YUM was the package management system that used to be the default for RedHat Linux, very similar to the apt system used in Debian based systems. DNF is the replacement system for YUM that was adopted a few years ago I believe. RPM is the format of the packages that these package managers themselves work with, and is specific to RedHat/Fedora Linux. The Debian equivalent would be a .deb package.
@nykal15104 жыл бұрын
@@trtrhr Your fault n00b
@user-rg1jp2us4o4 жыл бұрын
Everyone knows Microsoft store is the best package manager.
@Henry-mc5yq4 жыл бұрын
After I install gentoo, the first thing I do is get rid of portage and get the Microsoft store. Honestly it’s just common sense
my Microsoft store is curious corrupted, I literally can't play Microsoft flight simulator or forza horizon which I baught
@末茶984 жыл бұрын
better than winget?
@VaDR3d3 жыл бұрын
@@末茶98 yes
@lucas70612 жыл бұрын
The RPM package manager can also be installed from the main repos. I didn't install any software but when I tried to it did warn me about missing dependencies so it should be possible as well.
@nikkehtine4 жыл бұрын
Mental: "pacman is more human readable" Pacman update command: pacman -Syu
@favor944 жыл бұрын
whenever i do update on my arch i simply imagine one of my favourite guitar player with sama name -Syu
@wikiddikdik13524 жыл бұрын
pacman -Syyyyuuuu
@ahmadradwan74293 жыл бұрын
Pacman -Sy(stem)u(pdate) Is how I remembered it when i first started out.
@primefactors8882 жыл бұрын
S for sync y for yes , #dout u for update And apt be like apt update Not done yet, that was just checking apt upgrade
@primefactors8882 жыл бұрын
Jk
@TheoParis2 жыл бұрын
i see that no ones talking about LFS - what if you build your own "distro" and then install pacman on top of that? Isn't that better than using an existing distro alongside pacman? and you can create your own pacman repository to solve systemd issues as well
@СаўлоРубусарбаро4 жыл бұрын
I was trying to use pacman on Ubuntu, but I couldn't. Then I moved to Gentoo and I will try this
@btwiusearch12844 жыл бұрын
Just use arch or artix runit/openrc...
@nemonada35014 жыл бұрын
Is it just me or do you really enjoy technical challenges?
@BurgerKingHarkinian4 жыл бұрын
He probably wouldn't be using Gentoo if he didn't, don't you think?
@leonardo92594 жыл бұрын
On a few months he will be printing his own circuit boards and pull some BS reason to do it without sounding redundant
@alkaupadhyay76504 жыл бұрын
And he will provide, one day, his ssh to us so we can ssh into his computer and use his cores to compile programs faster
@JR49964 жыл бұрын
Maybe he is going to made the next temple OS by itself
@gabrielcoronelcascante91114 жыл бұрын
8:02 I guess you mean terminal emulator, your shell is bash.
@Jojtek224 жыл бұрын
Huh, I did something similar recently. I installed and configured dnf on openSUSE to use it instead of zypper (I really missed transactional update history). So far haven't had any issues with it but after this video I feel a little anxious.
@hanro504 жыл бұрын
Considering OpenSUSE is based on slack Linux... I don't think you have much to worry about in that specific instance. Slack's default package manager doesn't automatically resolve dependencies...
@MpSniperM19114 жыл бұрын
i thought missing dependencies was "enough" for the dependencies hell, but i guess i'm wrong
@JerryTu09164 жыл бұрын
In the Windows world, missing dll files and/or getting the wrong version of them could disable a program. When a program expect a dll file that the devs thought was bundled with default Windows installation, but got a newer version of the "same" dll, it will cause a lot of issues. Some old games probably died because of this dll hell.
@MpSniperM19114 жыл бұрын
@@JerryTu0916 i had to reinstall rocket league 5 times because of some missing DLL, the solution: install every dll possible to the system32 folder (or sub-folder)
@JerryTu09164 жыл бұрын
@@MpSniperM1911 I have got multiple versions of D3D9.dll to shove in and out of a game's root folder before it can work correctly... Good times
@MpSniperM19114 жыл бұрын
@@JerryTu0916 even in the native OS which most games is written you still have those kinds of bullshit. And i still have a custom d3d9.dll to make custom DLC run on Rocksmith 2014
@uiopuiop34724 жыл бұрын
im emerging from above
@MyReviews_karkan4 жыл бұрын
sudo pacman -S nano 5 seconds later, oh it is done. Let's get to work. sudo emerge nano "See ya in two weeks" I love Gentoo 😂
@matthewrease23764 жыл бұрын
I like pacman, but the lack of a similar feature to apt's `autoremove` really bothers me. When I install a package with extra package dependencies, I expect those deps to be removed (if unused by other packages of course).
@octavylon90084 жыл бұрын
pacman -Rns
@matthewrease23764 жыл бұрын
@@octavylon9008 I actually stumbled across this a few hours before you commented, and I felt like an idiot. Thank you though. I only used -Rs, so I'll check out what -n does when I get the chance.
@antikommunistischaktion4 жыл бұрын
Chromium doesn't work because the chroot can't connect to your X server. Bedrock Linux works around this enabling even GUI software installed in different "strata" to work.
@destiny_024 жыл бұрын
Random fact : temple os iso is 16mb
@Rojfos Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@suriyas145610 ай бұрын
Thanks
@JohnNiemand4 жыл бұрын
Do you use any patches for your font rendering on Gentoo?
@ocsanik5022 жыл бұрын
Thoughts on using pacman to handle artix's init specific repositories to get access to more precompiled binaries on gentoo?
@tacokoneko4 жыл бұрын
I heavily use a large collection of workstations and servers that mostly run either Debian or Arch and, being honest here, I've learned that pacman and apt-get have almost exactly the same features, except that the *apt-get build-dep* command for Debian is a feature apt-get has that pacman/Arch DOES NOT HAVE, so you have to make do without that feature when using Arch. Besides that I think they are functionally equivalent when used as intended in respective default native OS
@tacokoneko4 жыл бұрын
if you use Arch Linux + AUR and you use an "AUR helper", and if you're not familiar with Arch Linux and how to fix/avoid problems involving AUR packages, then it's easy to encounter issues similar to those caused by using multiple package managers because some AUR helpers function similarly to a secondary/supplementary package manager to pacman. The solution is either be prepared for these issues and know how to avoid/solve them, or don't use AUR packages and only use official recommended Arch Linux packages from the official repositories
@grobislav4 жыл бұрын
What about nix or guix package managers? :)
@alerikaisattera14654 жыл бұрын
They store all files in a separate directory
@radiicall4 жыл бұрын
i actually got pacman installed on MacOS High Sierra somehow, i didnt even try, i added repos to it because the repo list was empty and every time i try to install something it gets mad because a directory "already exists" then it errors out. I think it was a dependency for one of the packages i installed with brew but im not sure
@victorprokop22404 жыл бұрын
You dont just extract tar balls to / and keep track of packages writing them in a notebook Normie
@benjaminbras74754 жыл бұрын
Huh? You still write it down? Just remember it in your head. It is much easier as it removes the need for paper.
@MrRenanwill4 жыл бұрын
You can make a .txt file with the root beeing the owner Hahah
@alkaupadhyay76504 жыл бұрын
Alien
@mrcrackerist4 жыл бұрын
if your gentoo was running systemd would the packages work better?
@justinsuvoy4 жыл бұрын
Great topic!!! Thank-you sir!
@1aminepro4 жыл бұрын
>video released two minutes ago >Video 12 minutes long >Comment 1 minute ago Hmmmmmm
@egg54744 жыл бұрын
Not related, but do you know if there's an easy way to network portage through to a local server and return the compiled binaries back over to the original computer? (meaning POS pc runs gentoo but then emerge is ran on a much more powerful system)
@skittlesvampir84004 жыл бұрын
distcc
@yoursred3 жыл бұрын
@@skittlesvampir8400 CC=distcc
@yoursred3 жыл бұрын
You can get and EPYC 7551P, 64 gigs of ram, and a board for a thousand buckaroos
@MpSniperM19114 жыл бұрын
i always read the font name as "Iconoclasta" instead of ICON-SOLATA
@hexa33894 жыл бұрын
Its inconsolata actually.
@MpSniperM19114 жыл бұрын
@@hexa3389 i know, i can read, it just me reading wrong
@JustSomeAussie14 жыл бұрын
Sorry to inform you but i think you may be disabled
@____-gy5mq4 жыл бұрын
@@JustSomeAussie1 nice way to give someone a heart attack
@MpSniperM19114 жыл бұрын
@@JustSomeAussie1 maybe it is dyslexia
@seppa16714 жыл бұрын
Recently, when I tried to download Artix Linux, it had all wrong SHA256 hashes on their website and I think its user base is not so big to get reactions and fixes soon. Is Gentoo the same?
@airdog46x4 жыл бұрын
Torrent it. Then you get the good version
@larikkin4 жыл бұрын
Not sure about Artix, but been using Gentoo for the last 10 months. Whenever I got a problem had to resolve it fast I hopped on to their IRC and someone pointed me in the right direction in a few minutes. There's also a forum and subreddit, either of which I've yet to try, but I'd assume they lively.
@seppa16714 жыл бұрын
@@larikkin thanks.
@FennecTECH4 жыл бұрын
There are very spesific situations when you want to install pacman on a non arch system. And the only one is if your using devkitpro’s spesific Pac-Man
@shreyasr74694 жыл бұрын
I love this channel.
@uuu123432 жыл бұрын
This is a fantastic resource for if you're trying to install pacman on a brand new Linux From Scratch build tho
@destiny_024 жыл бұрын
Another fact : Temple os Lite iso is 2mb
@dallasupton4 жыл бұрын
What forums should I go on that aren't pozzed I used to love 4chan but it's been infiltrated
@joaoqueiroga34043 жыл бұрын
I have dpkg on gentoo. There is just 1 package I need that isn't available on gentoo. I really don't use dpkg for anything else.
@mikezamayias4 жыл бұрын
Excellent video, super useful
@forloop77134 жыл бұрын
Video on the recent cyberattac?
@robertsaac2383 жыл бұрын
That moment when you run out of disk space because you have 4 competing version of glibc install from different pkg managers.
@sdafasfF2 жыл бұрын
What are your configs? And where can I get a copy or similar version so I can config my own mainly terminal and your bar they look bad ass man
@РустемФахрутдинов-ш8ш4 жыл бұрын
But it's possible to use nix package manager on any linux distro
@cannedeals4 жыл бұрын
Same with guix
@LeonidBraynerMyshkin4 жыл бұрын
I don't get it. How can you use dwm and not st? I switched from urxvt to st before switching from i3 to dwm.
@NerdistRay4 жыл бұрын
He uses both
@ohio24404 жыл бұрын
hey outlaw, will you ever use pacman-src?
@kaysersozze4 жыл бұрын
you dont need overlay for libressl, for firefox to compile you just need nodejs compiled with -system-ssl
@skittlesvampir84004 жыл бұрын
But _IF_ I am in dependency hell, I can just delete that chroot folder and everything will be fine again, right?
@rahilarious4 жыл бұрын
If you're in chroot then it doesn't matter whatever you do inside, it won't break out of /var/chroot so no fear of dependency hell
@marcs94514 жыл бұрын
thanks mr Gentoo
@nebulium66414 жыл бұрын
Cant you install dpkg on arch?
@hanro504 жыл бұрын
Yes... should you? Not unless you're crazy
@caleb22lr2 жыл бұрын
could you install pacman on lfs?
@antarctican52844 жыл бұрын
Are you going to make a video on lto-overlay?
@rahilarious4 жыл бұрын
I think he already did one. LTO+GRAPHITE+Pgo or something
@NodokaHanamura4 жыл бұрын
brb, gonna install pacman, aur and apt on hannah montana linux
@Iknowrealtv4 жыл бұрын
How would you classify yay that's basically built off pacman
@hanro504 жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly... isn't yay a tool that allows you to connect to the arch user repository to download software not available in the official arch repository?... If so then it's just... it's analogue is probably either PPA's for Ubuntu based systems or Copr for Fedora based systems. Just in that you don't manually need to enable a set repository or download a config option via the terminal for it to function.
@Iknowrealtv4 жыл бұрын
@@hanro50 yea you are kind of right. yay is like life.
@alerikaisattera14654 жыл бұрын
One can use pacapt, a pacman-like wrapper for other package managers, instead
@PatrickOuthier4 жыл бұрын
Or if you don't want to break everything but keep your muscle memory try pacapt or pacaptr. If you like apt for some strange reason try sysget.
@alkaupadhyay76504 жыл бұрын
Bruh apt becomes your memory when all you do is play with apt. Apt is pretty good
@universeindex66512 жыл бұрын
brb running xbps pacman portage dpkg and pkg simultaneously on windows 98
@milescrew26213 жыл бұрын
Is using pacman on LFS a good idea tho?
@Justanoobcoder3 жыл бұрын
same question. compiling source code is not a problem for me, but managing packages and dependencies is hell on LFS
@hermannpaschulke15834 жыл бұрын
DevKitPro (a toolchain for nintendo devices) actually uses pacman for installation on all systems
@enrott85602 жыл бұрын
What happens if you dosudo Pacman -Syu
@perz1val4 жыл бұрын
What about Bedrock the distro then ?
4 жыл бұрын
Is it a distro?
@yash11522 жыл бұрын
8:14 part 2 of this video starts here (though, it's part 1 of the title)
@fwingebritson4 жыл бұрын
Rats! I thought it was going to be "pacman: the distro" Like the Hanna Montana distro. So, is it that hard to make a distro like Hanna Montana distro?
@cunningham.s_law4 жыл бұрын
how about nix?
@hydrophobicwalrus7494 жыл бұрын
My thoughts exactly.
@twb01094 жыл бұрын
Nix is distro-agnostic
@rahilarious4 жыл бұрын
What about it? What are the benefits other than "one dotfile for system" and "downgradable packages" ??? I've got lvm snapshots in case power goes down while installing. Once you go gentoo nothing else impresses you
@hedgeearthridge68074 жыл бұрын
Pacman is the main thing that fuels my hatred for Arch. It's so devoid of so many packages, for no good reason. And the AUR is a sketchy band-aid fix for it (and has borked my Arch systems twice). And it doesn't help that Arch can't use deb or rpm packages. So I abandoned Arch, and now use openSUSE Tumbleweed for rolling release systems. But my heart still belongs to Linux Mint, my first love...
@slavko56664 жыл бұрын
Is Pacman faster than xbps tho? Checkmate atheists
@gabrielcoronelcascante91114 жыл бұрын
I think so... But at least in xbps you can install from source
@____-gy5mq4 жыл бұрын
@@gabrielcoronelcascante9111 well you can do that using abs eh? Also xbps syntax is a cluster hell to me.
@alkaupadhyay76504 жыл бұрын
Opensuse YaST is fast as fuck
@Kocotian4 жыл бұрын
@@gabrielcoronelcascante9111 ABS also can install from source
@laurinneff43044 жыл бұрын
@@gabrielcoronelcascante9111 on arch you have the AUR, which makes that possible
@nly82864 жыл бұрын
There was FreeBSD with the pacman PM
@asedonii-chan84662 жыл бұрын
have u tried bedrock linux? it solves this
@kuma-bw1we3 жыл бұрын
real question: Why would there be a dependency problem? If program 1 need dependency A, B, and C, when program 1 is downloaded and installed , it should put all dependency in program 1 folder. If program 2 need dependency B, C, D, when program 2 is downloaded and installed, it should put all dependency in program 2 folder. Folder for program 1 and folder for program 2 shouldn't conflict with each other at all. Each folder should be independent of each other , they shouldn't conflict at all. Each package manager should download and place dependency in completely different folders. ??????????????????????????????? I just don't understand. Maybe linux package manager work differently then npm
@Justanoobcoder3 жыл бұрын
okay, how about this situation. program 1 needs A, B, C (B version 1.0). program 2 needs B, C, D (B version 2.0). now which version of B should be used? that is the conflict. different required version can cause some issues. and a system which has the same packages installed is bloated.
@drishalballaney4 жыл бұрын
how about bedrock linux then..?
@logangraham29564 жыл бұрын
what id do with this is i'd use it for chroot environments using the pacstrap command.
@MrRenanwill4 жыл бұрын
Why not chroot?
@daol034 жыл бұрын
crux packagemanager is fast as well, with pkgmk or prt-get :)
@kirschitz644 жыл бұрын
DevkitPro would like to raise an objection
@tokiomutex41484 жыл бұрын
pacman on something != Arch -> dependency hell nix on something != NixOS -> no problem
@fParad0x_4 жыл бұрын
And what about bedrock?
@ЕвгенийОстровский-н8х4 жыл бұрын
How lucky Шindows users must be, so they don't have to deal with any "dependencies", especially with portable programs
@hanro504 жыл бұрын
I mean....they have the same issues just with DLL files...and the fact that older software didn't understand that doing certain things like placing files into protected directories on a whim... wasn't a good idea.
@TheLukemcdaniel4 жыл бұрын
If you want to use pacman, install a distro that has it by default. You're only begging for issues to happen when you try and shoehorn a different distro's package manager into a different distro. It's not like installing arch or gentoo are that difficult. It's not something I would suggest someone that's a linux virgin try, but once you're comfortable doing anything in shell, it's just a matter of following instructions. Unless you're the type that had trouble following directions on those worksheets they give out in middle school(you know the ones where it's a list of 20 items, the first is read all instructions first, and the last one is just do items 1, 5, and 11?) it's not that fucking hard.
@veto_57622 жыл бұрын
kinda funny heard people loving arch for pacman to me since i used first on windows with MSYS2
@mavhunter87534 жыл бұрын
The first time I ever used Pacman was on Windows (through msys2).
@alephcake2 жыл бұрын
Just last week I realized pacman is just short for *pac*kage *man*ager.
@cestarianinhabitant58984 жыл бұрын
Why would anyone think this is a good idea? If you want pacman, use arch or arch based distro (like manjaro, manjaro is a fantastic solution for people who want pacman, but not all the hassles that come with regular arch)
@marcello42583 жыл бұрын
of you want to use Pacman with arch packages better use a chroot
@darkoneforce24 жыл бұрын
I use yay and/or bauh.
@stayfunsteven22072 жыл бұрын
8:27 flashbang
@majorskies70914 жыл бұрын
Or using Manjaro. I used an Arch Based Distro btw oMo
@ari_archer3 жыл бұрын
bedrock linux resolves that kind of dependency hell
@s92091222224 жыл бұрын
Pacman is definitely not more human readable than other package managers, although I'm using it.
@foolishshepherd79734 жыл бұрын
But tho good idea👍
@waterbird26862 жыл бұрын
1:23 I'm crying in pip
@imzesok2 жыл бұрын
erm.... why.... why would you find anything other than the version libraries you need? they're using the same repositories, right? that wouldn't make sense. unless . . . unless you didn't edit your pacman config files and it's pointing at the arch repos instead of
@BeethovenHD3 жыл бұрын
Alpines apk rocks xD
@randomforrest41994 жыл бұрын
I use Alpine Linux on my laptop for school, and there are a bunch of programs that I need for school that can't be installed with apk. So for me, it was a dealbreaker to be able to use pacman and the aur on Alpine.
@dachd4 жыл бұрын
Does it work OK pacman on alpine? Wouldnt getting the deps yourself from sources be easier and safer?
@clerickx16423 жыл бұрын
Imagine installing gentoo without using emerge
@serio03672 жыл бұрын
I use apt on my iPhone.
@amalirfan4 жыл бұрын
pacman is better than apt. cuz of speed?, apt and debian feels original, same reason windows feels original for some people.
@Skelterbane692 жыл бұрын
Jokes on you, I'm in dependency hell all the time cus of slackware
@GIGACHAD-qh1yi4 жыл бұрын
The easiest way to get pacman is by installing manjaro or arch
@JR49964 жыл бұрын
Idk man but manjaro is making the jump from windows to linux more easy than using ubuntu or linux mint and in the process i can learn 1 or 2 things daily about linux