Palaeontologist Reacts To Jurassic Park Dinosaurs

Watch a dino expert react to the original Jurassic Park movies. We got Joe Bonsor, a PhD student and palaeontologist for the Natural History Museum London and the University of Bath, to react to various Jurassic Park dinosaurs and Jurassic Park clips shown in the Jurassic Park Trilogy. From the iconic T-Rex scene in Jurassic Park to the deadly Jurassic Park 3 Raptors and their stolen eggs, Joe gives us his expert opinion on just how realistic these dinosaurs are in these memorable Jurassic Park scenes.
Do you have suggestions as to what our Dinosaur Expert should look at next, films, games? Let us know in the comments below!
00:00 - Intro
00:29 - Excavation Site
02:25 - Brachiosaurus
04:02 - T-Rex
06:27 - Dilophosaurus
07:38 - Velociraptor
09:42 - Compsognathus
10:26 - Raptor Pack
11:07 - Life Will Find A Way
12:09 - Raptor Eggs
14:00 - Spinosaurus VS. T-Rex
15:42 - Closing Thoughts
#IGN #Movies #JurassicPark

[@IGN]

Massive thank you to Joe for lending his dinosaur expertise to this video! What other dinosaur related movies or games would you like for him to react to? And for even more videos like this one, make sure to check out our Expert Reacts playlist! kzbin.info/aero/PLraFbwCoisJDJlDKavZ05eNKT9jb7wOrO

[@anishchoudhury8537]

He did Jurassic park trilogy it's only fair to do Jurassic World trilogy now

[@vinayakvr06]

React to Jurassic world Dominion trailer and Jurassic World Triology

[@CRUELLANDER]

He isn’t a Dinosaur expert because he doesn’t even know or say why the Velociraptors look drastically different from the velociraptors from Mongolia

[@yamidachannel]

Joe who

[@hurensohn240]

Wrong bro they find 2 Meter raptor but OK And? They modified U read the books 👍😂 No dinosaur is the real one The spinosauros Form the 3 move He is total modfi 😂👍 But in the movies they don't tell it so much But the books my homi red the books And accept testify from the maker hahaha

[@juliaraymer2533]

FINALLY!!! A paleontologist who mentions the Utahraptor! You sir are my hero!!!

[@bmwconative]

THANK YOU FOR ACKNOWLEDGING that first initial bite from the T-Rex in Jurassic Park 3 would've severely injured and possibly even killed the Spinosaurus. FINALLY JUSTICE for Rexy!

[@suda_lifts]

to be fair that wasnt rexy and was probably another rex ingen made on the other island. And it looked like a juvenile

[@GaryHamad]

@@suda_lifts Movie Extra literally said it was a Sub-Adult

[@diogod2347]

Rexy also would probably bleed to death in reality from all the strikes from Indominus in JW...But only Rexy deserves justice right?

[@zayah4838]

To be fair that spino shouldn't have won that to begin with. Just Jack horners anti t-rex propaganda lmao

[@jiajungoeh2187]

@@zayah4838 it's a movie, a rex cant even chase a jeep . whole movie will be ended in 45 min since rex's outbreak .

[@ModernDayGeeks]

Hopefully we'll get to see Human Expert Dinosaurs reacting to Dinosaur Experts, right?

[@Voltaphonic]

Lol.. Like who? Barney?

[@CJCroen1393]

You got me picturing like, a parrot in a tiny labcoat or something XD

[@clankers8929]

Now, eventually you do plan to have dinosaurs on your dinosaur tour, right? Hello?.. Hello?

[@kevin_catv6889]

@@clankers8929hello!

[@HiddenDarkHM]

A man that gorgeous could explain dinosaurs to me for hours and hours and I'd never get bored.

[@gawainethefirst]

Keep in mind, even in the movies and books, they acknowledge that due to Cloning process and subsequent genetic engineering the dinosaurs seen in the story are not exactly “authentic.”

[@TheGrayster]

And Wu literally said in the novel that they are making monsters, not dinosaurs, due to the added aesthetics.

[@GaryHamad]

true, even in JW is told himself said, "These Animals would Look Really different if they're Pure, but you don't want authenticity, You Want MORE TEETH"

[@meganlyb83]

Actually, in the original JP book, Wu goes to Hammond and says that they actually do have “real” dinos, but Wu doesn’t think that it’s what the public will want to see. And he recommends to Hammond that they should basically “dumb” them down and make them more like what the general public expects to see. And Hammond emphatically tells Wu no. He wants them authentic.

[@meganbishop7539]

@Arushi Mittal exactly! And Wu actually gets kind of excited in the books that the dinos are able to reproduce in the wild because it means he really got it right if all of the "hardware," shall we say, is able to work on its own in the wild.

[@flightlesslord2688]

also the raptor fossil is also inaccurate sooooooo. That has no in universe explanation, it has the out of universe explanation of some palaeontologists applying deinonychus to the velociraptor, but that was pretty much a fringe theory. But Crichton thought it sounded more dramatic, which it did to be fair.

[@bongo_baggins]

8:18 has got to be my favorite of the raptor vocalizations in the films, that braying trumpet of a roar followed by that chittering still sends a chill down my spine to this day, in the best possible way haha such cool sound design.

[@OneTrueNobody]

8:04 - In fact, the reason Jurassic Park's doors have HANDLES instead of KNOBS is because during the making of the film, they did enough research to know that Deinonychus couldn't have turned a knob, so they had the doors use handles that it could push down without turning its wrists. The more you know!

[@TennyConductor]

So nice to see such a passionate expert who can balance corrections and education with an appreciation/ understanding of the source material.

[@PalaeoJoe87]

Thank you, that's very kind

[@TennyConductor]

@@PalaeoJoe87 Thank you as well!

[@grizzleg8729]

Typically apex predators have extraordinary eyesight. The fact that the T-Rex had minuscule upper limbs only means it relies more heavily on its other features. Which are the powerful jaws and it’s eyes. So the idea that t-Rex 🦖 couldn’t see stationary objects as prey is absurd.

[@glumboy4229]

Seven hunnid on KZbin is the best KZbinr rn

[@MrTroodon_Official]

When ya have a bite force around the 6 tons, yeah arms ain´t really necessary

[@dalem8878]

The don't move thing actually came from the books because of the new DNA. The books have some really wild ideas compared to the movies.

[@dalem8878]

@@MrTroodon_Official what's crazy is that they current estimate is that those tiny arms could still manipulate objects up to 400lbs. So while little and probably not used often, they could still be dangerous.

[@MrTroodon_Official]

@@dalem8878 Oh indeed, they still could tear a person face with them

[@ethansoderstrom8287]

I’m glad this paleontologist realized Spielberg just and crichton reversed the names with deinonychus. The last paleontologist react with “Insider” never brought that up and just assumed it was just an exaggeration of the actual velociraptor. This happens way to often and it’s a little irritating. Everyone always thinks the velociraptors are based off the real thing and in truth they were actually modeled after the closely related dromaeosaurid Deinonychus. The movies, and book, Steven Spielberg and Michael Crichton felt to swap the names between the two species because, everyone felt “velociraptor” sounded a lot more dramatic.

[@scottb3034]

it wasn't reversed per se. He used deinonychus, Grant digging in north america gives that away, it's just Spielberg used the same sources Michael Crichton did in Gregory S Paul who was testing out new genus nomenclature. What Paul did is just rename Deinonychus antirrhopus to Velociraptor antirrhopus since Velo was the "patriarch" raptor species between the two in the fossil record--aka the first known. Paul even provided artwork that was used in the film in Grant's trailer. Paul abandoned the practice a few years later and people forgot this is what the filmmakers and crichton did back in the day. Btw, no, in the novel they were also called velociraptor because crichton used paul as well in addition to that purported "better sounding name" story.

[@knuckles2494]

@@scottb3034 yes.

[@laszlobencebari8677]

also, at the time of Crichton writing the novel, some popular dinosaur books featured 'Deinonychus' as a sub-species of 'Velociraptor' (classified as 'Velociraptor antirrhopus')

[@joshuapalmer265]

Funny enough that Utahraptor was named as the movie was filming. Of course Utahraptor would still be even bigger than the raptors in the film with a total length of 20-25’+ and weighing as much as a adult polar bear! Since then other giant dromeosaurids have been described such as Dakotaraptor, Achillobator, Austroraptor and few other unnamed species known from scant remains. I’m sure there where still even bigger dromeosaurs that awaits discovering and description.

[@mrloqqe1610]

@@joshuapalmer265 utahraptors as pack hunters, with the behavior/intelligence and aggression likeJP raptors, would be absolutely devastating.

[@captainvinno]

Well I'm just happy that the iconic noise of the velociraptor is passable. Thanks.

[@nathancaldwell5443]

In the novel, the excuse behind the Trexs vision being based on movement was actually the result of the tree frog DNA as frogs can only see in the movement. Grant theorized this after the following morning, the kids saw a parasaurolophus eating from the thicket they were hiding in but it didn't see them despite being right in front of it. Also, there was a juvenile Trex with Rexy, but she on the other hand could see just fine.

[@Josie-6]

Tree frogs can see movement. They wouldn’t be able to function if they couldn’t. They are SPECIALIZED at picking up on movement and reacting to it quickly, but they can see things that don’t move.

[@SleepySloth2705]

8:30 Most of the sounds used for Velociraptor were actual sounds of birds, particularly geese and penguins

[@sslocke]

My only problem with people critiquing JP is they don't take into consideration that they're genetically modified. None of them are 100% so they have gain some extra traits from the animals used to fill in the gaps in their DNA.

[@Aceroxx02]

Came here to say the same thing

[@TheGrayster]

And some dinosaurs were made genetically to made to look cooler. The dilophosaurus frill was most likely frilled lizard dna in it, and the venom most likely being a mixture of spitting cobra dna and other animals.

[@TVJUNK85]

Doesn't stop the franchise from pretending that they are 100%. Afterall, all the "Dinosaur Rights" characters are saying "de-extinct", as if the animals are exactly the same as they were millions of years ago. The criticisms are valid.

[@muhammedzayan4399]

@@TVJUNK85 actually..... no! These films never pretend to be real. Wu just spits out the facts in 2015.

[@TVJUNK85]

@@muhammedzayan4399 They really don't. Claire even has a big speech in Fallen Kingdom about the "first time you see a dinosaur", as if seeing the skeletons in a museum isn't seeing an actual one, but seeing the cloned variation is. Further, the Dinosaur Protection Group again repeatedly says "de-extinct" and refers to the animals going "extinct all over again". That sort of language would not apply to genetic experiments that do not entirely match their genetic ancestors. So again, the criticism is valid.

[@SleepySloth2705]

7:27 Note: The only known possibly venomous dinosaur was Sinornithosaurus, based on pockets inside the upper jaw that might have contained glands that connected to the grooved upper teeth.

[@namik0644]

this is proven false as of now, Planet Dinosaur has a lot of outdated theories and ideas on dinosaurs

[@dustanglx50]

Possible toxic saliva like the bacteria in Kimono Dragons , or forced vomit like the bird, European Roller.

[@neozk_official]

@@dustanglx50 komodo dragons. kimono is a japanese clothes

[@OperationSpider]

The noises the raptors are making are mating turtles lol

[@bardylon]

JP3 came out in 2001. Only took him 21 years to react

[@animezilla4486]

So this paleontologist but me to believe that the spinosaurus being bigger than T-Rex only ate fish and can't take out another dinosaur

[@Handle...This.]

Can you imagine a 20 foot dilophosaurus running towards you with that vicious screaming shriek 😱 Edit: Also, can we get this guy in the next jurassic park movie to play Grant's long lost son?

[@velociraptor4you3291]

I'd like to see what paleontological insight Joe gives regarding the fictional Skull island dinosaurs from Peter Jackson's "King Kong" now.

[@animezilla4486]

Probably will criticize that movie as well even though that's totally fictional

[@velociraptor4you3291]

@@animezilla4486 Maybe not. But if he were to criticize, he'd approach it from a scientific standpoint, not with the intent to be harsh.

[@SacRoScz]

More videos about dinosaurs with Joe pls. Ty ;)

[@jackozilla4172]

1:30 This is one of the biggest mistakes people have on these movies, the Velociraptor found in this place called Montana used to be called Velociraptor antirrhopus, now rightfully known as Deinonychus antirropus, the reason why the famous dog sized Velociraptor is confused with the Jurassic Park Velociraptor is because they are two different species, this is because the dog sized Velociraptor was found in Mongolia, NOT Montana, that beingsaid, the Jurassic Park Velociraptor is a Deinonychus antirrhopus and the real Velociraptor is called Velociraptor mongoliensis.

[@Chuck0856]

Actually given that the door handle is in that shape all they would have had to do push down on it.

[@travtravis2917]

In the book the dilophosaur is bigger. It picks him up by the head and carries him off. The reason its smaller in the film is so it doesnt take the limelight from the raptors and t rex

[@oryanadin]

They intentionally made the Dilophosaurus smaller to help the audience differentiate from the raptors.

[@DensApri]

Sounds disingenuous since dilos were mid-sized animals much bigger than raptors, so they were already different enough. They probably just thought making it small and unassuming would enhance the shock effect of the sudden reveal of the frill and venomous spit

[@HandsOfCinderblock]

“Angry geese.” Legitimately terrifying.

[@skylermoore8320]

The reason why the T. rex and Jurassic park can't see movement is because it has froggy in it because they found the mosquito and the & amber samples but they didn't have the complete Ginam and they need something else so that used frog diner don't feeling ditty and sequence caps

[@joshthemigpro1733]

Frogs can see movement

[@skylermoore8320]

It's a movie genius

[@CD-Gaming]

To be fair, in Cricton's original Lost World novel, that whole "eyesight based on movement" comes back to litetally bite the poor sap who tried to utilise this idea! And most plot points in 3 were recycled from unused plot points from Cricton's two novels anyway! The river boat, the raptors at the beach at the end, raptors & eggs, a second apex predator and even stealthy carnotaurus!

[@harrysi481]

5:19 lol

[@Raj-ee5kl]

Ross must be happy for this guy as paleontologist

[@TheBlkKat]

Naw, Ross would have fit and pouted that *he wasn't picked to present the video, lol

[@Cramblit]

I'm surprised this guy supported the idea that raptors hunted in packs, and kept referring to it being very credible and believable. Since not a single raptor fossil has actually been found with others, unlike many other fossils. This would suggest that they did not hunt in packs, but were more like lone hunters, hunting independently.

[@SankofaNYC]

1:53 Whoa so that little kid at the excavation scene in the first movie was kind of right lol 🦃

[@Gaia_Seraphina]

Actually the author himself is responsible for that misconception about Velociraptors.

[@reubencaldwell8494]

At the time it was hotly debated whether or not deinonychus was in the same genus as velociraptor.

[@TheBlkKat]

@@reubencaldwell8494 *Thank you* Someone that mentions that part.

[@Stories-ji7lz]

Dinosaur experts react to monster hunter monsters part 2 when?

[@ethancoolbro18gamer86]

How come most people don't acknowledge that the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park aren't 100% real dinosaur? Yeah, they have dino DNA in them, but other DNA in there too. Dr. Wu even says in Jurassic World that if they were 100% real dinosaur some of them would look quite different.

[@Mavrock954]

the dilophosaurus frills only make sense if its small like in the movie. If its 20 meters long it definitely wont have that as a defense mechanism lol

[@LittleSixx]

Or if they did have frills, would most likely be used to attract mates or compete for mates.

[@azrasashima3733]

the t rex fence wires snap from the ground up when if it walked into them itd be from the top to bottom.

[@Inkbleedful]

Wait didn't they say now that the T. Rex may have not been covered in feathers or if it had such it was sparsely covered?

[@MrTroodon_Official]

Atm the best approach to feathers on Trex would be something similar to elephant hair, small not very visible filaments all through the body. It was a really big animal so large amounts of big feathers are very very unlikely

[@dalem8878]

We have a skin imprint of the Rex now. If it had any feathers the were small a few.

[@richardhesutton]

@@dalem8878 The skin impressions we have are the size of quarters and sparse lmfao

[@jdick91]

@@richardhesutton putting "lmfao" at the end of your statement like it's some obviously well known fact just makes it seem like you just googled it real quick to try and sound smarter than other people

[@scottb3034]

@@richardhesutton they aren't small or sparse. it is all over the body and some are close to a foot in size. the skin samples also have been known to be pebbly/scaly for nigh on 20 years (a sample was attempted to be sold back in 2003). you just sound daft with your response.

[@brotherben4357]

So where do Adam and Eve fit in here?

[@bandigustin1038]

Now make him react to Ice Age 3-5-6

[@HOTBOYHOTFINDS]

Rator is the size of a dog wtf now I'm not so terrified

[@WallabieMcDee]

"Open the door. Get on the floor..." "That's not how a dinosaur walks. The footwork is all wrong."

[@blaze556922]

Fun fact, many animals can open doors like that and it doesn't require wrist rotation. That is just the way humans do it. That's like saying "X animal can't open this because it has no fingers." As the octopus opens the jar right behind them lol

[@Kcr33per16]

The raptors sound that they make are cute

[@jaydonn4664]

Lion crocodile and an elephant were used for the t rex sounds

[@olliesstopmotion6481]

Not trying to be mean, but the reason the velociraptor was to big is because that’s how big it was in the novel. And same for the rex, it was also like that in the novel.

[@benlussetto7443]

Also at the time the novel was written deinonychus was referred to as velociraptor antirhopus (not sure that’s entirely the right word) as opposed to modern velociraptor being velociraptor mongoleinsis (not sure that’s spelled right) Also the velociraptors held their hands that way because of the limitations of a person controlling the puppets for the claws

[@olliesstopmotion6481]

@@benlussetto7443 ahh… ok thank you

[@scottb3034]

@@benlussetto7443 you are 99.9% right. antirrhopus with 2 Rs...but besides that absolutely correct. Also mongoliensis. first person i've come across that got these particular facts right.

[@FearlessCrusader100]

One thing really that they messed up, but didnt know at the time, is spinosaurus was actually quadrapedal, not bipedal. A few years after this movie came out, they discovered a more complete speicmen with more intact leg bones and thusly we found they would have been far more squat. We know that as the egyptian estuaries dried up, they began to move inland and compete with extremely large theropods for more terrestrial prey, from tooth marks in local herbivores matching spinosaur teeth. So they might have had an idea how to tangle with a T rex, but the T rex was far more suited for fending off a spinosaurus than a spinosaurus would be able to handle a T rex.

[@zacharyolerich7521]

That's debated whether spinosaurus was bipedal or not

[@franciscozapata7625]

Spinosaurus was bipedal

[@FearlessCrusader100]

@@franciscozapata7625 thats what we used to think. But then we found more complete spinosaurus fossils and it was a more squat, quadrapedal predator. Which makes the fact that it started venturing out onto land to hunt large prey when the estuaries and swamps of egypt began drying out all the more crazy.

[@franciscozapata7625]

@@FearlessCrusader100 the quadrupedal spinosaurus is no longer valid since the discovery of the tail, are you still in 2017?

[@FearlessCrusader100]

@@franciscozapata7625 what? The tail is flat and paddle shaped, tha has nothing to do with the leg structure. You telling me crocodiles have to be bipedal because their tails are flat?

[@thegeop5906]

Actually the JP"Velociraptor" is rather a Deinonychus

[@plushbros9506]

The Velociraptor skeleton image that the Editor shows is The same size as the Raptors in Jurassic Park!

[@patriot459]

It’s actually an embarrassment how the movies after the lost world just turned the Dino’s into cliche movie monsters vs them just being animals doing their thing.

[@joshderuiter6488]

where are the animated scenes from??

[@dylansearcy3966]

we have an idea of what the parasaurolophus, velociraptor, and T. rex sounded like

[@rayzurgaming]

Hello Dr. Gellar!

[@croc560]

Utahraptor wasn't discovered until the film was in POST production, so it was discovered AFTER they made the large ones for the film

[@dustanglx50]

The best bit of writing in Jurassic Park was the "Frog DNA Splicing" because they knew that what we know about dinosaurs was always changing. This can account for most present and future inaccuracies. In JP3 Dr. Grant even called them "Monsters" and said they where not dinosaurs.

[@limoucheu8522]

The confusion between the Velociraptor and Deinonychus comes probably from a book. If you read the (still) excellent "predatory dinosaur of the world" of Gregory Paul, you see some curious classification (Daspletosaurus-Tyrannosaurus, Yangchuanosaurus-Metriacanthosaurus and more interestingly for us Deinonychus become Velociraptor anthirropus. We now know that it seems that Deinonychus seems to be more likely Dromaeosaurinae not velociraptorinae. The Paul's classification is than doubtfull. All the best.

[@TheRealRip-Tide]

Do ppl in this comment section know what a “palaeontologist” is or are they all little fetuses who play Fortnite?

[@Felix_KS]

Fun fact: in the original novel for Jurassic Park(1992) it was stated that the Velociraptor was actually Deinonychus.

[@Cruithneach]

There's a significant number of anti-intellectuals posting here. It explains so much about the world today

[@michaelonak3356]

New evidence shows that trex might not have been covered in feathers. More like quills or fuzz but not explicitly feathers. Maybe a combination of the two or three

[@scottb3034]

just scales at this point.

[@nettorak]

Important question: If dinosaurs were brought back to life like in Jurassic Park, would they still get as tall as they were back then?

[@reggie5577]

5:35 actually used an elephant sound for that

[@scottb3034]

the rex overall had gator/croc, lion/tiger, baby elephant and a few other miscellaneous sounds.

[@SvElAdKe]

What's the game they keep showing?

[@irldeadlycommander]

Jurrasic world evolution 2

[@skylermoore8320]

And also it's a movie they didn't wanna have a T. rex as it sounded like Crocodile

[@scottb3034]

yet the rex had croc sounds.

[@ichigokuroski5076]

So when the next superhero movie come out, are you going to get a superhero expert to react to it or no

[@felixschrodinger7533]

Are you implying dinosaurs aren't real?

[@recklessripper3782]

Ross geller is that you

[@wyattmilliken3320]

The jurassic park movies are just monster movies with a dinosaur skin. They don't treat them like actual animals

[@MellowGrunt10]

Have you not watched the movies? In the T-Rex breakout scene, the T-Rex is exploring its environment like any other animal would. In the second movie, we see dinosaurs protecting their young, examples being the stegosaurs and the T-Rex pair. This argument can be made in the cause of JPIII, but for all of the other movies, there is usually a completely valid explanation for an animals behavior. These movies have done a lot to portray these marvelous animals as something other than monsters.

[@zayah4838]

@@MellowGrunt10 you are correct about 1 and 2 but every movie past those to turn them into movie monsters.

[@travisruth3611]

The Utah raptor was discovered a year after the jurassic park film came out

[@azrasashima3733]

in the novel the compy's were poisonous lol.

[@mcsmaria28]

8:09 - so what you’re telling me is that they had Barbie doll wrists. 🧐

[@wheelmanstan]

wow, so it might have been better to switch the raptor with the dilophosaurus..

[@erichzahn3926]

I’m waiting for the “real serial killer reacts to serial killing in movies”

[@vinayakvr06]

Can you have him React Jurassic World Dominion trailer

[@SecretPolicePodcast]

Geese are always angry

[@dylansearcy3966]

11:40 that's supposed to be geosternbergia

[@GoFigure]

Daredevil.

[@alandoren4953]

What about the air content, would dinosaurs be able to breathe fine in our world? Or vice versa?

[@richardblazer8070]

It's very likely they could

[@richardblazer8070]

@BurningSaints Our oxygen would be fine for the vast majority of dinosaurs, if not all. Not only does oxygen content not effect active respirators in the same way it does passively respiring organisms, which are often conflated, dinosaurs also had far more efficient respiratory systems than mammals.

[@Kasilyn_S]

'angry geese' ??? Is there any other type of geese?

[@chris.3711]

Nothing in Jurassic World is natural! We have always filled gaps in the genomes with the DNA of other animals and if there genetic code was pure many of them would look quite different but you didn't ask for reality; you asked for more teeth! -Dr. Wu

[@sjoerdwillemsen7946]

Dinosaurs lived sixty five million years ago. What is left of them is fossilised in the rocks, and it is in the rock that real scientists make real discoveries! What John Hammond and InGen did at Jurassic Park is create genetically engineered theme park monsters! Nothing more and nothing less. -Dr. Alan Grant

[@TheMightyN]

A quote with such a deep meaning yet is completely ignored in the upcoming sequel.

[@aananthbalachandran]

Congratulations, you repeated a quote that isn't relevant in the slightest to the video.

[@ImVeryOriginal]

Why does he say T. rex was mostly covered in feathers when we have actual skin imprints that clearly show it was largely covered with scales? It had cousins that lived in colder climates that were feathered like Yutyrannus, but T. rex isn't generally thought to be feathered today.

[@matthewevans3543]

That's not Gav Murphy

[@mohdimansaifullizan6193]

Choose your side Jurassic park or Jurassic world

[@scottb3034]

JP. JW is utter garbage.

[@zayah4838]

Jurassic Park is way better then the new crap, it treats their dinosaurs as animals and not movie monsters

[@mohdimansaifullizan6193]

@@zayah4838 so you dont like Jurassic World too right?

[@jessefisher3038]

Easy Jurassic park

[@mohdimansaifullizan6193]

@@jessefisher3038 easy Jurassic World

[@Kp2fresh]

AGAIN!!!!!

[@Adam-qv2bd]

This guy looks a lot like James A Janisse.

[@OceanForest]

❤👍

[@agetec89]

How accurate was the information used at the time the film was made. Original Jurassic park was made in 1993 If you say the movie is wrong because of something learned in 2014 that's not really fair.

[@alexvega1009]

for the most part especially on the T. rex it was mostly accurate, but they did take some hard creative liberties especially with the raptors

[@MrTroodon_Official]

Changes from one dinosaur to another, as mentioned above the Tyrannosaurus was pretty up to date, even the "velociraptors" were fairly accurate.

[@yewtewbstew547]

It's not supposed to be fair, it's supposed to be educational.

[@rainhoo4096]

T-Rex was fine. Velociraptor was the wrong species of theropod. Dilophosaur is not even close.

[@TheOriginalGabberjaw]

Reacting on the built in camera of a TOASTER.

[@telorceplok5147]

2 paleontologists include him say t-rex beat spinosaurus..

[@irldeadlycommander]

They never met so you dont know... Carcharodontosaurus fought with Spino and that was pretty much 50-50. So if Spino could ever meet rex it would also be 50-50.

[@jipke]

@6:14 Isn't this still under debate? Skin impressions have been found that suggest they were at least partially unfeathered.

[@jacobcox4565]

There's no direct fossil evidence of Tyrannosaurus rex having feathers. The main reason why it's plausible T. rex had feathers is because Yutyrannus huali was a Tyrannosaurid with direct evidence of feathers, since Yutyrannus is related to Tyrannosaurus, it wouldn't be that far of a stretch to say T. rex also had feathers. However, there's no fossils of T. rex feathers, and it wouldn't be likely T. rex had a feathery coat covering its body.

[@whylikepie15]

Animals break other animals necks all the time

[@Axio95]

dont care what he is saying but , just on the spirit of dominion trailer release : just speechless for the trailer , been waiting for it and man just wanted to see it now , just no words !!

[@zayah4838]

If you don't care what he's saying why watch the video

[@munehboi]

Congratulations on making the 1000th video on 'Dinosaur expert reacts to Jurassic Park ' video lol!!!!

[@goobybear792]

6:13 it's actually been very recently confirmed that T-Rex did in fact not have feathers.

[@richardblazer8070]

It's somewhat up in the air, it could, but if it did it would be a very sparse covering, like hair on elephants

[@G1itchin.0ut]

It was a juvenile dilophosaurus just so you know

[@commissardamian]

The book explains a lot of the things mentioned.

[@selva279]

Wheres Ross Gellar

[@imwastingyourtimealexxd3579]

On a break

[@camilosuarez6300]

Why not just react to the Books. Whole T-Rex vision is explained in the novel.

[@npatu2003]

Where’s Ross?

[@kingshadow8782]

😅😂🤣

[@andreasivan3701]

in my knowledge t rex skin not covered in feather most likely to resemble elephant with few more feather in some area and if you want imagine what dinosaur sound just hear cassowaries most likely what we got close to reality

[@KhrisMiddletonFitnessOfficial]

Incorrect. Tyrannosaurus skin impressions depict large, spherical scales. Not very elephantine.