it's people like you that give me hope for humanity
@ilikechess110 жыл бұрын
To any future viewers: it's Dx + E because 1 + x^2 is irreducible.
@merensow2007 жыл бұрын
!
@OkieDoke4058 жыл бұрын
Lot of profs have a way of complicating relatively simple concepts - don't know where I'd be without you. Thanks for taking the time to do all these. Saint patrickJMT lol
@patrickjmt8 жыл бұрын
+Malcolm Lewis ;)
@Neverdii15 жыл бұрын
thanks for being one of the only people willing to volunteer their time to help others with math! I wish there were more people motivated by helping others instead of by money like you...it's a huge help man, thanks a ton
@blackcard0014 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. You talk to me rather than repeat from the book and show answers, unlike my professor. It is much easier to pay attention and stay awake to. Thanks a ton.
@patrickjmt14 жыл бұрын
@MillerTivo x is a factor of x^2, so there is an 'x' factor
@patrickjmt16 жыл бұрын
yes, absolutely. a few others pointed this out; i have added annotations pointing out the mistake. thanks for pointing it out!!
@patrickjmt14 жыл бұрын
@DashofDosh you can use either method
@patrickjmt14 жыл бұрын
@pricesalem no problemo
@patrickjmt16 жыл бұрын
that is the partial fraction decomposition for linear factors... i have a video on my website explaining that step if you feel the need to check it out!
@bryandPR15 жыл бұрын
no patrick no! theres a few of us who are really thankful for these videos!
@patrickjmt13 жыл бұрын
@janedoherty101 do you mean a square root instead of a squared expression? if so, that totally changes the problem. it just depends on the problem at that point. in the case you mentioned though : (x+1)^1/2, you can do a rationalizing substitution in some situations
@patrickjmt13 жыл бұрын
@Kratos0909 glad you like it ; )
@Ichneumonidae213 жыл бұрын
@AlecWangable When decomposing anything raised to the second power you have to repeat the variable. So, if you were decomposing (x+1)^2 it would be A/(x+1) + B/(x+1)^2. The reason you do this is because if you only write one fraction (e.g. A/x^2 w/o also adding constant raised over a denominator "x") you will be missing a factor of whatever is being raised. Try decomposing 1/x^2(x+1) by only writing A/x^2 + B/(x+1). You'll come up with the wrong answer b/c you would be missing a factor of x.
@k0tiak16 жыл бұрын
Are you sure the last term isn't Dx + E in the numerator? Usually if (b^2 - 4ac) for the factor is negative, you use Dx + E (or whatever letters/variables your using) rather than just a D. (0^2 - 4(1)(1)) = -4 which is < 0. For (x^2+1)
@alexprocel918 жыл бұрын
Anyone know why he used D instead of Dx+E at 0:32? I thought you only use a constant variable when it's a linear factor.
@brunocalander19078 жыл бұрын
yeah I tought it was Dx+E too.
@bravosix81714 жыл бұрын
The factor is linear take x² as (x+0)². So the easiest way to do is to treat it as repeating linear factor
@GuaranteedPurity9 жыл бұрын
there are only 3 terms in the denominator but you added extra one why is it
@sirsideways14 жыл бұрын
@MillerTivo it is considered a repeated factor, giving A/(x) and B/(x)^2 as with all repeated factors, however in this case the factor (x) is x itself instead of something like ax + b. It is not a linear term, or an irreducible quadratic hence why that expansion would be incorrect.
@djtsuna1910 жыл бұрын
i started watching your videos last semster its differential calculus, and now im on integral calculus. hopefully you can help me for the my last two math subjects. differential equation and advance math. thanks patrickjmt! you're a real help! im taking bs-ece btw. :D
@gotahope14 жыл бұрын
Thanks mate, this is such a good help 3 days before my HSC exam :)
@patrickjmt14 жыл бұрын
@wintermonie ok
@melisamani42997 жыл бұрын
when X^2 is in the Deno don't we need BX+C at the Numerator?
@the_eternal_student Жыл бұрын
I had to look at Nancy Pi's channel to see that this involved a tangent substition and why. I came to this channel based on her featuring your channel, but although you provide more content, so far I think you can learn some things from her about explaining everything.
@anyoutubehandle10 ай бұрын
nah
@nataliatkalangula9049 жыл бұрын
Thanks Patrick. your video are of much help for my studies.
@suplex5710 жыл бұрын
could you further explain the arctan rules and where can i find them?
@buddydog195614 жыл бұрын
I'm studying for the FE Civil.... thanks for your videos! my favorite, nonetheless was ODE's! ... PDE's (don't ask!!! they're killers!) But Keep the work coming, You're the Man!!!
@ahsanshah76266 жыл бұрын
This video is so helpful!
@sierraalbin46699 жыл бұрын
This has helped me so much! Thank you for sharing your knowledge!!! Is there a link to look at the answer with the Dx + E
@mrapollo138 жыл бұрын
For anyone wondering what the integral of the final dx+e term is, if my math is correct it should be: 1/4ln(1+x^2)-1/2arctanx. treat the brackets as absolute value signs.
@festexi2414 жыл бұрын
Thank god for this video, it looks so simplistic but the lack of variable up top just sent my head spinning!
@jonpbody15 жыл бұрын
i've learned so much from you man, thanks so much for making these videos for us.
@axelasdf16 жыл бұрын
... I did it all without the "trick" at the start where you set x=0 and x=-1, where I just multiplied it all out and solved using equating of the coefficients, and after all was done, I got "1/x^2+-1/x". Did I carry this out correctly? Would you have gotten the same if you had multiplied out completely / didn't substitute in your values that you got from your "trick"?
@patrickjmt14 жыл бұрын
@ryezizzle none. i studied.
@the_eternal_student Жыл бұрын
Why did you use arctan for 1/1+x^2? Is this some trig function you have memorized or was it deduced?
@aimanal-akwaa1109 жыл бұрын
You are the best, do you have the link for the corrected Dx+E Thanks
@TayIsCray8 жыл бұрын
is the updated video on the account? I do not understand the Dx+E.. SOS(:
+Jem Celespara oh wait I think I see your question 1/x^2 => a/x + b/x^2 that's a rule called "repeated linear factors", therefore if you had 1/x^4 you would get => a/x + b/x^2 + c/x^3 + d/x^4
@jemcel03978 жыл бұрын
+Ben Cruse oh. I get it now :)
@smitpatel40228 жыл бұрын
Hey it should be Dx+E instead of D at 0.36 sec. Please confirm same.
@bravosix81714 жыл бұрын
Nope it is not a quadratic eq. Take it as a linear equation (x+0)².
@Alive4Metal13 жыл бұрын
where does the single x term come from? im confused
@DashofDosh14 жыл бұрын
Okay. sooooo I used Dx+E in the beginning, so how would you go about solving for A, D and E later on in the problem? Do you use elimination or substitution?
@jasvinsingh938311 жыл бұрын
Why isn't it Dx+E instead of just D? It's the denominator one polynomial higher?
@WorldOfDeepThought11 жыл бұрын
I solved it with Dx + E and got: A = -1 B = 1 C = 1/2 D = 1/2 E = -1/2 Can anyone confirm this? My solution for the integral is then: -ln(|x|) - 1/x + (1/2)*ln(|x+1|) + (1/4)*ln(x^2+1) - (1/2)*arctan(x) + c
@Dalton129411 жыл бұрын
No, 1+x^2 cannot be reduced by the method of reverse foil, the roots are imaginary Proof: x^2+1=0 x^2=-1 x=sq rt of -1 x=+or- i
@kathleeneusebio447 жыл бұрын
does the roots is applicable even your numerator is a polynomial as well?
@dante48388 жыл бұрын
What if your given limits in the integral? Like the integral from 1 to 5 sqrt of 3? Then the fraction.
@danagamer12 жыл бұрын
Since the original rational expression has three products in the denominator, could you have split it into three fractions, then integrated them individually ?
@The3jji14 жыл бұрын
@lilyvoon10 @lilyvoon10 Well, the denominator has a (1+x^2). So, the nominator should be (D x+E) Refer to previous videos if you don't understand
@axelasdf16 жыл бұрын
Where Can I find the corrected video?
@anwarabdulkadir4461 Жыл бұрын
@patrickjmt at 7:41 when i took A+B =0 i got A = -1, why?
@rolito22435 жыл бұрын
is wrong. the factor must be (DX+E)/(1+x^2)
@patrickjmt15 жыл бұрын
ha. i often find myself disliking humanity so much, i wonder why i make these, and wonder if one day i will just take them all down... : )
@KioraNaidoo9 жыл бұрын
Seriously thanks a million!!! Actually understood!
@King-ue4dg8 жыл бұрын
Thanks dude you,re video is really helpful.
@lilangel007213 жыл бұрын
@chadbowman0 I took calc 2 last year...and it was easy, this also happened to be the easiest part in the whole course. Just because u found it a challenge doesn't mean it is one.
@MultiMoe9113 жыл бұрын
is the corrected video available? if yes please link me, appreciate it :)
@marforiyaa11 жыл бұрын
why didnt you make D, Dx+E?
@matmadara39 жыл бұрын
not Dx+E??
@beckwilde8 жыл бұрын
+Mat Madara why is it Dx+E can someone explain
@jorinnahuang4758 жыл бұрын
+Mat Madara yea..that's what i'm thinking... anyone knows why?
@matmadara38 жыл бұрын
***** i forgot why it should Dx+E XD
@diaagamel79468 жыл бұрын
+Rebecca Chen bcuz the X is to the square power , when its 1+x^2 we should use Ax+B for example but if it is (1+x)^2 (the whole bracet squared then it goes like A then B and so on ..
@beckwilde8 жыл бұрын
+diaa gamel thank you everyone for the explanation
@siana2nv12 жыл бұрын
heyy, just a quick question!! how do u make/record these videos?? like whats the setup?? plz respond, thanks!
@JONATHANGOPIE18 жыл бұрын
keep your good work up man
@janedoherty10113 жыл бұрын
what if instead of the denominator having a squared expression it had a squared one? ie (x+1)^2 vs. (x+1)^1/2?
@shiftanimations15578 жыл бұрын
Sir patrick you are the star!!! But there's something bothering me about my professors teachings... usually if the denominator is a quadratic equation then the numerator is for example Ax+B right?cuz that's how you, the book, and my stock knowledge does it... but why did he said it should be : if the denominator is x^2+1 take the derivative of it which is 2x then use that instead which he means it'll become A(2x) + B...is that wrong? pretty sure it is but please let me know your thoughts about this or let me know as well if i had not explained the situation clearly
@JessicaViduya7 жыл бұрын
Since Dx+E isn't included, I tried to find them myself. I got A= -1 B =1 C =1/2 D= -1/2 E= 1/2. Is that right?
@patrickjmt7 жыл бұрын
i'm too lazy to work it but maybe someone else can verify!
@rutwolvaardt7927 жыл бұрын
I did the calc and got the following A= -3/2 B = 1 C = 1/2 D = 1 E = -1/2
@pricesalem14 жыл бұрын
good example, very helpful, clear and concise explanation. THANK YOU!!!!
@lzwanlsmail8 жыл бұрын
why it is that '1+x^2' is equals to tan x? i forgot the rule.. can someone explain why?
@saswatmishra69178 жыл бұрын
It doesn't equal to tan x,it equals to the arctan x. If you differentiate arctan x, you get 1/(1+x^2). You just have to memorize what happens if you differentiate arcsin, arccos, etc. I don't know the proof of how you get from one to the other to be honest
@Reinout9510 жыл бұрын
I owe my Geology degree to you. :)
@patrickjmt10 жыл бұрын
ha, but none of my videos are about rocks!
@EconAtheist9 жыл бұрын
patrickJMT BRO, MATH ROCKS #sorrynotsorry
@tlotlegomokalake63475 жыл бұрын
😅 I'm also doing Geology.
@hyky6815 жыл бұрын
ehh so.... in the beginning, why do we need to have the a A/x term when there's really no single x value in the original equation?
@mohibfayyaz45824 жыл бұрын
somebody helps me. Whats going on after 6:35 ????
@patrickjmt4 жыл бұрын
you are doing what is known as 'equating coefficients'. on the left side, there is no x^4 term which you could write as 0x^4. You take the coefficients of the x^4 term on the right side, which are A + C and set them equal to the coefficient on the left side and so you get A + C = 0. you do the same with the rest of the terms. rewatch it as i explain this :)
@mohibfayyaz45824 жыл бұрын
@@patrickjmt i got it .. Thanks
@mohibfayyaz45824 жыл бұрын
@@patrickjmt i might be wrong but... in previous videos you told that... when there is quadratic function in denominator, Take (Ax+B) in numerator. But in this video you take simply (D) over (x^2 +1) Please explain if i am wrong.
@iPooAlotz11 жыл бұрын
wtf just happened
@silversteel91617 жыл бұрын
Layzi HAHAHAHAHA !
@SehamArad11 жыл бұрын
i think it was a genuine question by @monie otanuho...dont think they realised there is so many other Patrick videos explaining how to do partial fractions...Patricks response was hilarious though..these vids are great!!
@taymurahmed71199 жыл бұрын
+patrickJMT I just love maths.... cause u made me to think that way Patric Sir !!! :)
@patrickjmt15 жыл бұрын
ha! do not worry : ) 99.99% of the youtube comments have been so amazingly nice that my faith in humanity is being restored : )
@anzatzi6 жыл бұрын
This is a good problem which requires solving amicable x vals and solving with coefficients. The amount of algebra is nearly overwhelming (for me)
@KalCrazyFJ11 жыл бұрын
what if we had dx as the numerator for eg. dx dx x^3+x help please?
@lucile101015 жыл бұрын
whou you're so cool! that's gonna help me alot when im being lecture tomor. ='DD PS;/ I love your writing!x
@lilangel007214 жыл бұрын
@chadbowman0 there's waaayyyy harder stuff in Calc 2 involved, this stuff isn't only easy by comparison but it IS the easiest this class is gonna get...honestly take it from me, if u can't do this, don't bother with the rest of the course.
@lilyvoon1014 жыл бұрын
why would it be Dx+E?
@puteracamaro16 жыл бұрын
I agree with what you are saying.
@adityachaudari43212 жыл бұрын
2x/(3x^2-2x+1) esko kyase expand kare ?
@trevort88815 жыл бұрын
why isnt it just D?
@martymcfly3475 жыл бұрын
He isn't lefthanded. He learned to write in mirror images and then he just flipped the video. You can do it too!
yea, partial fractions is a long procedure unfortunately! hope it makes sense though!
@lilangel007214 жыл бұрын
@wintermonie r u serious? he was to the point and explained it nicely, plus this is the easiest stuff u're gonna learn in calc, if u don't get this then maybe u should reconsider ur classes.
@nealogz14 жыл бұрын
OMG thanks a lot.
@emilrusev455211 жыл бұрын
definite integral b=1,a=0 x^2sqrt(1-x^2)
@patrickjmt16 жыл бұрын
ops yes,i will have to fix this!
@Me6342210 жыл бұрын
shot buddy. You should apply to be a lecturer at some top notch university. Maybe university of pretoria. hint hint. Would make my life a lot easier.
@patrickjmt10 жыл бұрын
almost impossible to get a job without a phd. if you manage to find one, the pay typically sucks and you only get a one year contract if you are lucky. after that, you may be back on the street again. of course, not many jobs have security, but at most of them, when you get hired, you can expect to be there a while unless you are a total screwup or there are massive layoffs.
@Me6342210 жыл бұрын
oh well. this seems to suit you fine as well.
@Hco173210 жыл бұрын
patrickJMT you should tutor on insta edu !! ...please haha
@No_Englaisy10 жыл бұрын
patrickJMT Oh my God that is depressing. Then why am I studying? What are you doing for a living if you don't mind me asking.
@wynandvanwyk98619 жыл бұрын
The Ginger Man Tuks of Niks.. ;)
@dizsun74288 жыл бұрын
shouldn't a/x be ax+b/x since the x is squared. then the next term be cx+d/x^2
@ryezizzle14 жыл бұрын
what god did you pray to to get so good at math?
@lilangel007213 жыл бұрын
@chadbowman0 then why r u searching this video? i see they didn't teach u well back then.
@jacqulynchristian429911 жыл бұрын
I dont get Partial Numbers At All :(
@noepineda16734 жыл бұрын
Great
@metalfreak189215 жыл бұрын
heyy mann... im a guy so i cant marry you..but i'd hook u up wid one of my female friends.... that helpedd soooo muchhhh THANKS
@fttank15 жыл бұрын
nice stick people drawings :D
@chadbowman014 жыл бұрын
@lilangel0072 That's total BS, this stuff is a bit complicated. Because of the algebra involved.
@marwaniii11 жыл бұрын
patrickJMT > Khan academy
@Wind_slash010 жыл бұрын
oh how i loathe partial fractions... makes integration easier, but finding A, B, and Cx+D is a pain >_