PCGS Crossover Unboxing - Toned Coins 👀

Follow me on Instagram www.instagram....
PCGS, or Professional Coin Grading Service, is renowned in the numismatic world for its expertise in authenticating and grading rare coins. Over the years, PCGS has established itself as a trusted authority, providing collectors and investors with confidence in their acquisitions. The introduction of PCGS Crossover Services further underscores the organization's commitment to enhancing the grading process and ensuring accuracy within the coin collecting community.
PCGS Crossover Service is designed to facilitate the transition of coins from other grading services to PCGS. This service is particularly valuable for collectors seeking a second opinion on the grade or authenticity of their coins or for those who simply prefer PCGS's grading standards. The process involves submitting coins encapsulated by other grading companies to PCGS for reevaluation and encapsulation under the PCGS holder.
The decision to utilize PCGS Crossover Service can be motivated by several factors. First and foremost is the assurance of accuracy and consistency in grading. PCGS is known for its strict grading standards and consistency in evaluating coins, which can provide peace of mind to collectors who may have reservations about the grading standards of other services.
Moreover, the crossover process can potentially increase the market value of a coin. PCGS holds a strong reputation among collectors and dealers alike, and coins encapsulated in PCGS holders generally command higher prices on the secondary market compared to coins graded by lesser-known or less trusted services. Thus, crossover to PCGS can enhance liquidity and desirability for coins intended for resale.
The process of submitting coins for crossover involves specific guidelines set forth by PCGS. Coins must meet certain criteria to be eligible for crossover, including being in their original holder from the other grading service and not having previously been crossed over from another service to PCGS. PCGS carefully evaluates each coin for authenticity and grade consistency before encapsulating it in a new PCGS holder.
One key advantage of the PCGS Crossover Service is the transparency and integrity of the process. PCGS employs expert numismatists who possess deep knowledge of coinage and grading standards. This expertise ensures that coins submitted for crossover are evaluated with the highest level of scrutiny and professionalism.
For collectors and investors, the PCGS Crossover Service represents an opportunity to reaffirm the quality and authenticity of their coin collections. By leveraging PCGS's expertise and reputation, collectors can navigate the complex world of numismatics with confidence, knowing that their coins are accurately graded and authenticated by a trusted industry leader. The added marketability and prestige associated with PCGS holders further solidify the value proposition of the crossover service.
In conclusion, PCGS Crossover Service is a valuable offering within the numismatic community, providing collectors and investors with a reliable pathway to validate and potentially enhance the value of their coin holdings. Through rigorous evaluation and encapsulation under the PCGS brand, the service exemplifies the commitment to excellence that has defined PCGS as a leader in coin grading and authentication.
#coincollecting #rockysramblings #silvercoins #coingrading #silver #morgandollar #coins #tonedcoins #pcgs #coingrading

[@5t3phen]

GSA Carson cities are worth more in their original plastic holders. Should have opted to keep them inside of the holder followed by PCGS's holder holding the holder. Nobody really cares if it's in a normal pcgs slab with the GSA logo slapped on it.

[@rockysramblings]

The original holder was cracked and I didn’t know this at the time. Everyone has let me know since the last one I did a video on haha But really the price doesn’t seem to be all that much better anyway. I’m kinda surprised by that

[@nickfrost9771]

@@rockysramblings in this video, you said you use PCGS and ANACS. Why do you not use NGC? I have alot of coins I want to get graded and sell. ANACS said they do not grade coins of value like mine. I already have had an issue with PCGS on my first submission. About to go with NGC. What's the deal?

[@rockysramblings]

@@nickfrost9771 I just haven’t used them yet. I started off with PCGS and they disappointed me greatly. ANACS I’m very happy with but for resale value, they catch a lower price. I do not sell my coins so I don’t mind using ANACS. If I want something in my registry or if it’s more valuable I will crossover to PCGS. As of now I have heard good and bad about NGC, but mostly good.

[@nickfrost9771]

@@rockysramblings I recently became a member of PCGS. I sent in a few submissions. One has already been completed. I sent them a well documented 1955DDO RB which should have been a 64-65. I have pictures and stills under an electron microscope. Sent it in for restoration hoping to clean it up to get a 66RB, or even in the red category. Got the coin back as a genuine AU. They said the coin has been cleaned. This coin has been in the family for a while. We never cleaned it. Now, the coin is a darker brown color. I documented everything and forwarded it to them asking to escalate the situation to a higher supervisor for review. They ruined a potentionally $30k coin in their restoration department. Have you ever had an issue such as this with them? If so, how to resolve?

[@EricBynog-zd4rd]

@@nickfrost9771 was the 55 ddo in a slab before if not you have no leg to stand on and if it was in a holder that was 64 rb then you have to request a minimum grade which you will except and that grade can not be higher then other slab says so that tells me you must have sent in a 55 ddo which you thought would come back a 65 or 66 and restoration will not bring the coin back from rb to red or brown to rb and matter fact it’s a known thing in coins not to restore cooper cents at all because that is what will happen it will go brown and if they had a coin in slab with a grade and then it becomes genuine and you told them to restore it I don’t think they are liable and from what I can tell if said coin was raw and you ask them to restore and grade by all means they did what you ask I know that is not what you want to here but send coin to anacs and see if they think it’s been cleaned but pcgs said it’s AU so that is way off from ms66 to AU thanks

[@followedd]

Greetings Beautiful coins indeed. Thanks for another video! Very interesting as usual.

[@rockysramblings]

Thanks for watching

[@jerridhawkins8133]

83CC is the most beautiful coin I have ever seen. Great 🪙

[@keymbord]

Keep that 1881-S in the soapbox

[@sonnygunz9207]

Beautiful coins. I like the 80-S and 83-CC too. 😎🔥

[@numismaticstacker]

I think ANACS grades more accurately. Yeah the 1881 is maybe cleaned however i could see anything. Gorgeous morgans all the way

[@rockysramblings]

Thank you!

[@marthab4172]

Your voice sounds like Matt Damon's. Cool coin talk , congrats!

[@coinstruck6079]

Very good results. Perhaps the 1881 has been whizzed? The portrait on the obverse just looks flat.

[@rockysramblings]

I’ll have to take a closer look but in person it looks great. Someone said to take it out, restore and resubmit. Its a good idea I think but I like the old holders 😪

[@coinstruck6079]

@@rockysramblings yes there is value in the old holders as more and more coins get cracked out.

[@chaddcox5360]

Hi buddy, been awhile since I've commented. So the "cleaning" PCGS is calling out, would be that grey tonning look. As well as where the few toned spots have been discolored from a previous dip. Crack it out, run it through your process and resubmit it.

[@rockysramblings]

Interesting. Thats a good idea but for now I’ll probably just keep it in the old holder. I like those holders anyway. Maybe I’ll pick a better one for my registry. But I’ll keep that in mind if I ever decide to! Thanks!

[@lpandy21]

Cool coins.

[@rockysramblings]

Thank you

[@StephenYagilnicky]

It's cleaned...obv. lower jaw. Watch the cartwheel.

[@rockysramblings]

It’s in my hand. I look through scopes and loops. When you see it through the video it’s altered

[@spartanumismatics8165]

As much as pcgs can be annoying, they and ngc are the ones that get the most traction and sales. I wish i could love anacs, other than their older holders, the current yellow holders look so goofy.

[@rockysramblings]

It’s true unfortunately. It’s funny that the biggest complaint I hear about them is the holder color as well. Wish they’d go back to the old blue or green ones. They should give a retro option and do the old soapboxes again

[@Stocksnowball]

I like the decision on the holder. Don’t like the massive holders… even the originals are ugly.

[@rockysramblings]

I agree

[@alfredparsons6811]

The 81s doesn’t look cleaned to me. I have the 83CC and 84CC in GSA. I would be lucky to get MS60 on both. Since I only paid $50 each I’m still ahead.

[@rockysramblings]

Definitely you paid a good price!

[@erikbermudez4622]

See how the anacs coin looks more dull then the ms 66. S mint should look like that one. That’s a way to tell if a coin has been cleaned

[@erikbermudez4622]

/over dipped

[@typeviic1]

Toning will dampen the luster. The soapbox coin has no cleaning.

[@erikbermudez4622]

The anacs coin is cleaned it has hairlines

[@erikbermudez4622]

Definitely not die striation if you look

[@rockysramblings]

The dullness is in the holder tho

[@preyingmathis2517]

You know, registries are not really a good thing lol