Photoshop vs Siril vs PixInsight Comparison

[@ashleyfarr4810]

I'm so tired of these paid subscriptions for software - I might now switch to PixInsight, especially after these results. Very informative!!

[@deltaastrophotography]

@@ashleyfarr4810 I know! Whatever happened to owning things?

[@xchimnyx]

Just use GIMP. It's free. Or just sail the seas and get photoshop free. Adobe is scum and deserves it

[@toanthai]

Based on the images I've been seeing, Pixinsight is the way to go but the price keeps me staying with Siril haha.

[@ABCMO-bl5pi]

Walt, this might be your best video yet! Very well done.

[@deltaastrophotography]

@@ABCMO-bl5pi Thank you!!

[@captainfruitbatify]

Siril for me.... Looks like next version will integrate Graxpert and possibly Cosmic Clarity too.

[@deltaastrophotography]

@@captainfruitbatify I can't wait!! I love playing with new stuff!

[@nbw555]

Another great presentation, I personally use Pix and Affinity, I can see Pix charging an annual subscription soon, hope I'm wrong astrophotography is sooooo expensive already 😊

[@refetastro]

Perfect video

[@speedy-qk8id]

Pixinsight is in my opinion the best😊

[@glaurung666]

Siril+GraExpert+Gimp. Ultimate decision. It's not even about money, but about functionality. Siril is the leader.

[@rizen3467]

I bet Pixinsight with BXT would get you a better quality improvement for your dollar than most hardware upgrades, but $400 still is alot of money

[@ridetheliger4176]

Started using Pixinsight two years ago and never looked back

[@DSOImager]

Nice comparison. Yes! A camera raw filter like took in Pixinsight would be perfect. I'm surprised there isn't a tool like that in there already. I do most of my processing in pixinsight but use PS for camera raw.. and sometimes blending NB with BB.

[@ballashoes]

Pixinsight has quality add on scripts to add NB to BB.

[@DSOImager]

@@ballashoes Yep, I know. The NBRGBCombination script has been around for several years.. and its outdated IMHO. I typically use the continuum subtraction method for adding NB to BB (Adding Ha to Galaxies for example). I use the following pixel math equation to separate the Ha data from the red channel " Ha_Image-Q * (R_Image-med (R_Image))... where Q is a variable that has to be tuned (aka trial by error) ". Then I would use a different pixel math formula to create an enhanced red and sometimes an enhance Lum. Recently, instead of creating the enhanced red/lum I started using the NBcolormapper script to colorize the subtracted Ha and then use PS to blend the LRGB image with the colorized Ha image (or Oiii if that is what I'm adding).. usually using screen. There is a recent script that does the continuum subtraction for you instead of using pixel math.. but I still get better results using the pixel math version. There is also a "Blend" script in pixinsight which I believe will accomplish the same thing as blending the two in PS but I have not played with it yet.. partly because its easy to blend them in PS.

[@pattimaclaughlin8059]

I tried PixInsight and like some features, but I’ve worked with PS for so long, I decided to stay with PS.

[@christopherthomas3403]

Siril and Gimp for me at present as they're free. I'd buy PixInsight if I had the spare money. Photoshop can shove their subscription where the sun doesn't shine.

[@deltaastrophotography]

@@christopherthomas3403 😂😂 Amen!

[@Fishe.]

same

[@peterturner1919]

Siril for me,ease of use😂

[@deltaastrophotography]

@@peterturner1919 I think Siril is going to be the number one software for processing after a few more updates. And now that I'm finding out that Seti Astro has free standalone software, things are just getting better and better!

[@joelewandowski8232]

Siril and gimp are my choice easy to use and free.

[@Fishe.]

same

[@jesuschrist2284]

Cloudy a lot ? :)

[@deltaastrophotography]

@@jesuschrist2284 Had to get a canoe to get to my from my door to the car the other day. 😂 Finally getting some clear skies this weekend. Woo hoo!

[@JeffGraham-b2z]

Well, i don't get it. Everyone has a video to teach you the mechanics of taking pictures of the sky. Then, the whole System tends to break down. Use this program, it's free and the best there is. No, this one is better. My problem is, I'm retired, have lots of time, got good equipment, but having a hard time figuring out the processing of images. The language of processing is foreign to me and yet to find a program that has an instruction manual for starters that a newbie can understand.