Phymaths podcast # 37 || Dr. Nirmalya Kajuri

[@dibyajoytidas3743]

Being a student of IISER Kolkata, really felt good as you asked him about IISER 😅

[@theorist_2]

You are doing great job, in the field of physics communication, Appreciate your work from India. Good Luck brother

[@Phymaths]

Thanks

[@Saswatosen]

Kirill Krasnov maybe is another person who has worked on both LQG and some stringy stuff. He was primarily a LQG person who did some work on computing YM amplitudes using string inspired stuff.

[@Phymaths]

Yeah, I am sure there are many more people like that. I just didn't know about anyone other than Dr. Kajuri. By the way, he was not an LQG person, but H. Ooguri was responsible for the idea of spin foam that is used in LQG. That is one example that I am familiar with.

[@Saswatosen]

@@Phymaths Yeah you are right, Krasnov is more of a relativist who tries understand different formulations of GR.

[@JAYMOAP]

Nice interview once again

[@Phymaths]

Thanks

[@JAYMOAP]

@@Phymaths appreciated your efforts especially covering aspects of string theory

[@FermionAP]

Great

[@vaibhavgupta5339]

Hi bring Arjun Bagchi.He is asst prof at IITK done phd under Ashoke Sen.

[@neerajkabirsharma]

great job , I will be perusing my phd in physics I am not sure of which topic I will be studying but I am sure of the college that I will persue phd Princeton , right now I am doing my BS in NIT Agartala

[@batuhankaynakacar834]

It seems ironic to me that some of the biggest crtics of string theory are the loop quantum gravity people. A theory that is not grounded on any physical or a mathematical basis and has none of the predictions that one would want from a quantum gravity theory. While string theory on the other hand provides deep mathematical and physical insights. Even if string theory has little or nothing to do with nature it is still fruitful to study string theory as a toy model.

[@jalsiddharth]

Abhijit Chavda is culture grifting. :)

[@Phymaths]

Of course