awesome!!!!!!! On behalf of everyone, i would like to thank you for taking the time out of your day to help us!
@MichelvanBiezen11 жыл бұрын
Roberto. Thank you for this positive feedback. I started making videos a year ago and because of comments like yours I am planning on adding many more in the future.
@runescapegodsword11 жыл бұрын
keep helping more and more students take that first step into string theory, Eulers equation, and relativity
@frankdimeglio82162 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen A great breakthrough in physics. The gravity of WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground is BALANCED WITH and by WHAT IS E=MC2 (AND TIME). Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Great. What is E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY and necessarily represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Now, carefully consider WHAT IS THE EYE; AND consider what the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Magnificent. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. Consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Absolutely magnificent !!! It is mathematically proven. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@ebiosh20327 жыл бұрын
the sound of marker hitting the board is satisfying to me for some reason :,) great videos!!!!
@healthiefreake14559 жыл бұрын
Thank you so, so, so, so, SOOOOO much for your wonderful videos! They help so incredibly much and I'm so grateful that you took the time out of your day to help students like me :)
@barryhayden6732 жыл бұрын
You can also calculate geosynchronous orbit using Keplerian physics. P^2 = K A^3. K = 1/Me -> P^2=A^3
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Yes. We have videos on that in the astrophysics playlist on that channel.
@bekalutadesse89482 жыл бұрын
Why the orbital velocity doesn't equal to zero. B/c they are in a circle. So they back where they started?
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
If we were considering displacement, you would be correct at the moment, and each time, when the satellite reaches its original starting point. But that is not the case with velocity.
@bekalutadesse89482 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen i didn't get you.
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
The orbital is continually changing (not the magnitude, but the direction). At no time will the velocity be zero. In a circular orbit, the magnitude part of the velocity will be constant, but never zero. The direction of the velocity will continually change.
@bekalutadesse89482 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen thankyou .
@nicholasurlacher42679 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your incredibly helpful videos. I stumbled across your channel while searching for videos that show how to calculate "Satellite Mean Orbital Radius". I'm attempting to teach myself Johannes Kepler's Third Law of Planetary Motion, as well as the above mentioned Satellite Mean Orbital Radius and Planet Mass. I decided to start with Kepler in order to understand why our moon doesn't fall into the earth. I understand from Einstein's General Relativity that objects with significant mass bend the space-time fabric around them. Where I seem to be having amateurish trouble is understanding what keeps the moon from crashing into us. So here I am seeking to understand Kepler"s Third Law in the hope that with a better understanding of orbits I can better understand our planet-moon orbit.
@MichelvanBiezen9 жыл бұрын
Nicholas Urlacher You may also want to look at the playlist: PHYSICS 6 NEWTON'S LAWS AND ROTATION and the playlist ASTRONOMY 3 MOTION OF THE MOON
@alitn5887 жыл бұрын
very informative. thanks
@anzatzi5 жыл бұрын
I see the math here but I can't get the concept. Isn't there a geosynchronous orbit at h=0? and of course. h==22, 246 mi? couldn't there be others in between?
@MichelvanBiezen5 жыл бұрын
There is only one place where you can have a geosynchronous orbit.
@anzatzi5 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen Thanks--got this when I realized a person standing on earth has a tangental velocity far less than a satellite in an h=0 orbit. Great series!
@omaradel2102 жыл бұрын
Good man 👍
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Thanks ✌ Glad you liked it.
@nickmanning355510 жыл бұрын
Why don't the satellites follow elliptical orbits such as planets around the sun? Is it because the two objects orbit the center of mass which is basically the center of the earth in the sattelite-earth system but not the center of the sun in the sun-planet system?
@MichelvanBiezen10 жыл бұрын
Nick Satellites are moved into the orbit desired by the aeronautical engineers.
@aamirazam52298 жыл бұрын
But how is that possible? I mean they cant alter Earth's gravitational force can they?
@pipertripp7 жыл бұрын
no, but by using thrust they can circularize their orbits (see Hohmann transfer orbit on wikipedia). During the application of the thrust, Kepler's laws are not valid, but as soon as the thrust stops, his laws are applicable again.
@Qman5097 жыл бұрын
Why would you use 86,164 seconds instead 86,400 seconds relative to 1 day?
@MichelvanBiezen7 жыл бұрын
One rotation of the Earth takes 86,164 sec (about 4 minutes less than 24 hours). (That is a sidereal day - one rotation relative to the stars)
@ItzzBrandonn6 жыл бұрын
Where does the number come from?
@joshuaoriendo778110 жыл бұрын
I love Gravity and Magnetic Fields xD Thumps up (Y) (Y) :D
@CaptainCalculus7 жыл бұрын
That's also why spy satellites tend to be at that height...
@ptyptypty32 жыл бұрын
velocity of that satellite is roughly 6,789 mph ... YIKES!!
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Yes, they move very fast!
@ptyptypty32 жыл бұрын
just curious, but how does a satellite orbit a Flat Earth ?? (you KNOW I'm kidding!! lol ) :) Hello Michel and Wife...
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Hi Philip. You would be amazed. I once met an airline pilot who believed the world was flat.......
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Philip, if Earth was flattened like a plate then the satellite would go around the outer edge of plate. ;) - Wife