PIERRE PAULIN Chronograph Review - Best Affordable Mechanical Chronograph Under $300!?!?

s.click.aliexp...
Thanks so much for watching this watch review on WatchAddictionReviews - I hope you enjoyed it please SUBSCRIBE and Like/Share/Comment if you can it does help out a lot , May your watch Journey be a pleasant one!
My Blog
bit.ly/2iMt8u7
5 watches I recommend to my new subscribers who are just getting into watches and also reviewed on this channel due to the constant question of what is the best affordable watch I can get under $200
Oceanica Reef Diver 200M
bit.ly/3cGLbgO
Seiko SNZH55
amzn.to/2C3ycmR
Seiko SNZF17
amzn.to/2zuY34o
Invicta 8926OB Pro Diver
amzn.to/2lawUP9
(Amazon Affiliate) Check out the OCEANICA Barracuda Diver - LIVE on Kickstarter Now
Link: bit.ly/3xtLFjW

[@hugoscott8569]

Nice, I have heard good things about MK

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

good to hear 🙏

[@major7551]

Hi quick question. I received this watch a few days ago and while the start/stop button has great tactile click, the reset button has no tactile click and is just springy. Do you remember if your version had the same "non clicky" reset pusher?

[@ThePutrta]

It should be..since it has the same movement with the Sea-Gull 1963. It also has the same, or at least similar, case with that.

[@ramspencer5492]

Yeah. I like this one. It's on the list... Probably this reverse panda

[@korathu73]

Purchased the panda dial watch correctly for the manufacturer in China. It arrived today, used the timer twice, and it broke. It's a great looking watch. However, it becomes useless if broken. Your viewers should be aware that the manufacturer's website has a disclaimer not to use the timer, unless necessary. Noticed it when I was on their website to initiate the return. Sad that I have to send it back. Not sure if you have any suggestions? Great video.

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

I reviewed this watch , it worked great, of course you can use the chronograph - perhaps you received a defective watch, accept the return I guess, this happens sometimes

[@korathu73]

@@WatchAddictionReviews Where did you get the watch from?

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

Same plce as you Merkur

[@tanneradams717]

Thats a ggreat looking watch!!

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

thanks! glad you enjoyed the video señor

[@cartoonpete407]

Another Seagull 1963 variation. I hv that one. Do check that the tension spring on the chrono seconds hand is in place.

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

dont even have it anymore :-)

[@UnburdenedByWhatHasBeen]

Very easy with polywatch if they arent deep scratches. Love the way acrylic looks but hate worrying about my crystal getting scratched. Also, these chinese watches are cheap for one main reason - chinese labor costs. If you pay your employees $20 a day your manufacturing costs will be very low. Besides that china has been putting out some decent watches as of late.

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

very true, they pay the factory workers like 5$ a day usd

[@JPTRAN]

Be aware that some of these chronograph watches come with some bad quality problems and serious defects. Some shouldn’t have passed quality test and are send to customers anyway. I received one with some serious chronograph adjustments. Central second chronograph hand was running chaotically, minutes chronograph hand tended to jump back when passing the next minutes. I had to adjust 2 eccentric screws to correct bad adjustments. One of the eccentric screws had a damaged head. The guy who did this crap used an inappropriate screwdriver. He also broke one tooth of the clutch gear wheel next to it. The so called swan neck has a screw that is not long enough to keep the index steady against the swan neck spring when in a delay position. Case back was not well screwed. Found some dust an residues inside.

[@andrewlogan9556]

does anyone know how to order the reverse panda? its only the regular panda on the website

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

probably oos

[@andrewlogan9556]

@@WatchAddictionReviews yeah maybe

[@Gisae]

Isn't this just a Seagull 1963 but with a different dial?

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

i dont think so

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

the case is way different

[@blitzmansch]

How do these hours behave after half a year? can you tell us?

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

sold it

[@ThePutrta]

I still have it...the movement is still superb and reliable

[@domokun938]

the promo code doesn't work

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

perhaps its over

[@goteckwah]

tempted but acrylic crystal is a turn off

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

I think it looks very vintage like

[@goteckwah]

@@WatchAddictionReviews Agree on the vintage look and it's really appealing, but not practical as a daily wear due to risk of scratching that beautiful crystal.

[@flip97gt]

At 38mm, that watch would be fantastic when rocking a bund strap on smaller wrists.

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

perhaps so,'personally not a big fan of the bund

[@tomking9681]

For the price it is really unbeatable....

[@WatchAddictionReviews]

Yep 10000% my man