PLAN A

[@Brad772006]

Strange game, seems the only winning move is not to play.

[@derppg3dpg3d71]

Yup but so far many people are joining severs and not many are leaving

[@Talley824]

Yep, so far that seems to be the biggest deterrent. It's this concept called mutual assured destruction. This guy Wilkie Collins said "I begin to believe in only one civilizing influence-the discovery one of these days of a destructive agent so terrible that War shall mean annihilation and men's fears will force them to keep the peace."

[@terrorcide]

How about a nice game of chess?

[@Алекскот-н4у]

Putin said that in the event of a nuclear war, strikes would first be made at decision centers, which are the United States and the United Kingdom. So this graph has nothing to do with reality. Many times more people will die.

[@immortalendling]

@@Алекскот-н4у, только он никогда не говорит правду, неизвестно, что у него на уме. В США и Европе все семьи этих чиновников, как и их деньги, так что вряд ли он ударит первым, если вообще ударит. Но с другой стороны, он сумасшедший, по этому вероятность есть.

[@OrianGrao]

Three years later we revisit this video with considerable dread.

[@Str8OuttaFrayser919]

And even 13 days ahead of this comment things are seemingly exponentially worse.

[@OrianGrao]

@@Str8OuttaFrayser919 terrifying, isn't it?

[@Countcho]

This video is unrealistic. It shows Russia having the capability to completely destroy Europe before anyone strikes russia back. And as we’ve seen, Russia’s capabilities are weak and being defeated by a small % of the US military budget.

[@sweetdisaster6339]

honestly, with the way the world is now and with all the things that are happening? this is unfortunately something that the people are most afraid of, since it is becoming more and more likely to actually happen.

[@nf4922]

Goood

[@grapy83]

What I can't stop thinking about nuclear wars is the fact that only "WE" have to die, and not those who decide to wage wars and atrocities. They would mostly be safe in their special bunkers and locations.

[@Warsie]

A lot of nuclear war scenarios assume said leaders get killed in the nuclear war. Like Cheyenne Mountain can be destroyed after all, it just takes large nuclea weapons hitting the surface close to the base.

[@Milo30066]

Whoever is left will do swift justice on those elites from the bunkers.

[@turn-n-burn1421]

They consider themselves chosen ones. And necessary for the continuation of the primate population. 😎

[@roygray6674]

Nobody will survive this.It doesn't matter if you have a bunker.The radiation will get to you.And if you did survive,what would be the point.All livestocks and food stocks would be gone.Cockroaches are excited though,evolution here we come!

[@motorbikez]

Same in any war pal, assholes who give the orders & their cronies never suffer.

[@HDInstrumental1]

Whoever made that music is a genius. Perfectly fitting for the madness of the situation.

[@ilhameldi5562]

Agreed

[@CC-hg9un]

Genius, not genious

[@silverbeach85]

@@CC-hg9un Maybe he speaks more languages than you and the fact is that everyone understood it.

[@CC-hg9un]

@@silverbeach85 Maybe he should learn correct English grammar because he’s in a written medium.

[@silverbeach85]

@@CC-hg9un Nah, you better be more empathic for those who don't have English as their mother tongue. The lack of knowledge of a language doesn't make people more stupid but shows the insecurities of those who attack them. You better learn some Russian or Chinese and whatever instead. This video was shared in different countries, almost no language needed the simulation... some of users don't even share the same alphabet and they are making an effort to be understood.

[@feridunyunus8187]

What a great time to be an Argentinian

[@edxander7169]

Hola vos

[@mrcerrgas-1]

New Zealander feel good too)

[@JustADoomer]

@@mrcerrgas-1 **Australia and New Zealand laughing in the distance**

[@DesimoneAmps]

here in Argentina we 've got massive destruction politicians, exploding in our pockets every day

[@raulae1]

@@DesimoneAmps that kind of weapon has much more destruction power than the nuclear bombs, just have to take a look at japan and argentina

[@stbagn]

2019: Nuclear armageddon begins with a war in eastern Europe? Pshhh no way... 2022: oh...

[@hamzamahmood9565]

You mean WW3 will break out in Europe? No way what a shocker!!!

[@finmueller7827]

*this is where the fun begins*

[@gawwad4073]

2022 showed that russia could almost certainly not succeed in a tactical nuclear strike. They can barely fly in Ukrainian airspace. They would not get anywhere within NATO.

[@LeanAndMean44]

@@gawwad4073 you are forgetting strategic nuclear weapons and ICBM‘s. Please don’t deny the nuclear threat.

[@LeanAndMean44]

@@gawwad4073 kzbin.info/aero/PLSJAwas-bYxuhdrd5CN9JITo__d3xqxxu

[@erufailon4723]

"I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert Einstein

[@yp9511]

Der wusste was geschehen wird.

[@ladiswashharoom]

ak47's will survive

[@grapy83]

I do feel like this will take another ww5 to bring weapons down to sticks and stones since modern weapons are in every nook and cranny of the entire earth.

[@cowfat8547]

@@kshms7674 sure he did.

[@cesrrr01]

@@piotr780 from Snopes website: Professor Albert Einstein was asked by friends at a recent dinner party what new weapons might be employed in World War III. Appalled at the implications, he shook his head. After several minutes of meditation, he said. “I don’t know what weapons might be used in World War III. But there isn’t any doubt what weapons will be used in World War IV.” “And what are those?” a guest asked. “Stone spears,” said Einstein.

[@mikeiswhite3]

Isn't it just so comforting to know that 2 people could start this at any moment?

[@Emma-zr8nu]

in Russia, the system is different, if the President orders the activation of nuclear weapons, all the generals must agree ( so it's not president who can do it alone ) , in America it is enough for the President to order and the generals follow the order

[@neige81]

atleast that nutjob trump doesnt have his finger on the button anymore

[@savagenerd1779]

Just one (in US).

[@JJohnson313]

It’s never one persons decision.

[@davidl1436]

Nope whoever is the real president in America

[@desmond-hawkins]

Watching this in March 2022 for no particular reason.

[@patriciapena213]

Suuuuure

[@Dablbabl]

:(

[@elis.p1]

shit times yeah

[@alessandrorossi5992]

August 2024, and some particular reason exist.

[@edwardtalbot5556]

September 2024...looks about right for today

[@caponer8249]

Poland: Ah shit, here we go again

[@Hermes_Agoraeus]

Last time--we promise!

[@9silentufo9]

all time

[@guscamilo9027]

KKKKKKKKKKK

[@AlexAponte]

:V XD

[@Констатаций]

drew attention to the fact that the territories of the USA themselves and the Russian Federation itself were not fired upon ... Are they going to hit each other in foreign territories ??? )))

[@TheMedicMatthew]

I don’t know what’s scarier, the warheads or this music

[@cephalopodx7587]

The music.

[@hubbletrubble7875]

It's horrifying to see simulations with these on modern maps. It's a reminder that this is still possible, not a relic of the cold war.

[@LoganSeacrest]

Glad to see researchers at Princeton finally discovered the game DEFCON.

[@MB-uf6xu]

The visual aesthetics are derived of the movie War Games.

[@danielmcgillis270]

I know right? I was thinking all they need is the creepy music to make it perfect.

[@slartybarfastb3648]

Could have bought DEFCON for $4.99 and achieved the same result. Probably spent tens of thousands on this instead.

[@Thlormby]

@@slartybarfastb3648 DEFCON isnt very realistic in terms of scale

[@WednesdayAddamsMW]

Who cares if DEFCON isn't realistic? That's what makes it so fun to play.

[@INMATE2468]

4 minute long answer to the Fermi Paradox

[@captainvanhorn773]

Maby even a 3 if were lucky

[@INMATE2468]

@@captainvanhorn773 meant the video lmao

[@jshepard152]

Spot on.

[@van6878]

at least I won't have to pay my student loans

[@jeffreyallen2759]

No. The Heads of our Government would be in their bunker, surely with Dept of Education, and their list, in tow. You'll continue to pay your student loans or be drafted with your pay going toward the debt. As dire as this scenario is its not enough for the US Government, who owns the debt, to let you off the hook. Sorry. In all seriousness its kinda F'd up to go from owing a PRIVATE entity with no authority over you at all, to having the US Government buy that debt, so that now you owe an entity that has the authority to throw you in jail, in a cage, enlist you in an army against your will, and the authority to kill people. THAT'S the entity you now owe. Quite a change in dynamics between creditor and debtor I'd say.

[@Datan0de]

@@jeffreyallen2759 I never thought of it that way. Interesting point.

[@edxander7169]

@@jeffreyallen2759 That's fucked

[@cestacruz]

Jeffrey Allen Money will have no value at all in this post apocalyptic scenario. Food will be the only currency.

[@NecrophagistGG]

@@cestacruz food and bullets

[@alexeymalyshev8945]

And the survivors would envy the dead...

[@angelica7265]

Exactly what the Virgin Mary said in apparitions to the world. She also said the war will get worse…

[@totallynoteverything1.]

the survivors would regret ever being a westerner, because everyone outside of the russian and western nuclear war is safe, the asians will inherit the earth

[@Airman1121]

@@totallynoteverything1. I mean, a nuclear winter earth.

[@totallynoteverything1.]

@@Airman1121 highly unlikely

[@fipo5110]

@@totallynoteverything1. willing to bet asia is gonna be in deep shit as well not just the west and russia

[@Electricfox]

*WINNER: NONE*

[@djjojo2681]

Winner is China

[@harrywillisdick8660]

China number #1

[@ocheretyanka6653]

Winner Africa ;)

[@prof.moriarty8711]

@@ocheretyanka6653 )))

[@kostybar7805]

Australia

[@sjh3217]

"In retrospect, it seems completely logical that once a weapon is invented it will be used. But we forget the blindness and obsfucation of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, when the most destructive weapons were regarded as walls of protection, and when the horror of Armageddon was seen as a deterrent no sane society would risk. But the nations were not sane - rational, composed, aware, but not sane...the Death, when it came, was completely earnest and open. Every weapon was used as it had been designed to be used." -Greg Bear, _Eon_

[@astraeanova4280]

Leaders are never sane, they don't care about anyone bar themselves.

[@gorkacg8462]

it was used in Japan tho

[@m.k.6805]

Categorically false. Nuclear weapons have already been used. A "bear" of a lie!

[@bodaciouschad]

​@@gorkacg8462 yeah, but just a lil bit. First and second times don't count.

[@hashylarry8524]

At this moment, this is closer than it has been in a longtime to coming to fruition.

[@jwalker3343]

We can only hope.

[@leoh3616]

Maybe as close as during Cuba. And though we have a reasonable guy in the White House, on the russian side I am not that sure of it.

[@fnln7073]

@@leoh3616 welp, Joe ain't launching 1st. At least that's for sure. > But what if Vladd does? How would the West respond? I think the answer to that question holds special significance now, given the current threat level

[@exantiuse497]

@Leo H In Cuban crisis nuclear exchange was one word from a Russian officer away from happening. A nuclear submarine that crossed American sea border was too deep for radio coverage when American fleet dropped small depth charges as a warning for the unindentified vessel to turn around. The captain thought the warning was an attack and that war had begun, and was going to launch a nuclear torpedo. A vice-admiral who just happened to be on board told him to stop and turn around instead. If he weren't there the captain would've started a war by mistake. I don't believe we're that close now

[@rain1956]

@@leoh3616 If Mr "if we have them, why can't we use them?' drumph gets back into the White House, all kinds of things could happen.

[@J_heterodox]

I love how the southern hemisphere is just chilling.

[@Chriscam2you]

Maybe so, but after Nuclear winter wraps itself around the whole planet, they might wish they had parished in the immediate attacks.

[@keal7668]

let's say no to war🇺🇸 скажем нет войне🇷🇺

[@МихаилМорозов-ц1г]

Too much propaganda on both sides to be heard

[@lionlinux]

"Скажем наркотикам досвидания" (с) День выборов

[@leynardlauz100]

Yeah I wish for them to unite

[@simo9482]

Только кебаб ремувер может нести такую хрень. Русские визжали за мир выпуская баллистические ракеты как сосиски. Кстати сосисок было мало, ракет много. Вообщем сербы ещё не напились крови. Сербы опять хотят пустить крови столько что бы утонуть самим.

[@LocutusMoW]

Встаньте против войны

[@filiprebro]

who's here because Putin activated his nuclear systems in 2022?

[@johnatasilva645]

Eu

[@hilalakkurt6856]

Me :(

[@hamidhamidi3134]

Again in 2024.

[@helenTW]

What a time to live in right now.

[@juansoto3066]

Its fucking terryfying , and we dont have the fault of any of that

[@marcopolo7604]

@@juansoto3066 Fear is the mind-killer.

[@football42241]

@@marcopolo7604 Yep, historically dictatorships have ruled via fear-based methods.

[@powerlink_provider]

@@juansoto3066 if you are a zoomer no, your parents do

[@falcy2889]

@@juansoto3066 ikr I just decided to go live my life to the fullest smoke cigs weed go to punk concerts etc If a nuclear war would have to come I don’t want to die as someone who always would sit at uni and studied while eating all the healthy stuff etc

[@jsmith3427]

People in the whole Southern Hemisphere: "Honey, Did you hear something?"

[@jshepard152]

"It's awfully hazy"

[@angelofiron4366]

Why is the television not working? Why is there no signal?

[@alexkliment4125]

promise me one thing. if this awful event happens, i want the sound design and music to be in good in real life as it is in this video. big up to jeff snyder.

[@Vr2Ld16]

Hihi se sera pas une guerre nucléaire ... mais des armes bien plus moderne , que venons nous de vivre ces derniers temps mondialement ... et ce n est qu un échantillon , y à encore bien pire ... les nanotechnologies et les découvertes scientifiques ( quantiques et autres ) sont des armes des milliards de fois plus puissantes

[@This_isnt_where_I_parked]

I really hope this is sarcasm, because if it is it is hilarious.

[@mordiskitos93]

So.... Do we begin to play it?

[@bobstravels]

I was college friends with his sister. I wouldn't have noticed him in the credits if I hadn't read your comment.

[@matvei_minecraftchannel7421]

​@@mordiskitos93 thats gonna be a strange game, because the only winning move is not to play

[@royshaft]

China , Pakistan , India , N.Korea ? This plan is 40 years out of date .

[@captainvanhorn773]

Actually, it's like 5

[@edsmale]

Yeah baby I want to see that sim

[@wakeupscreaming9883]

And Israel.

[@davidwright8432]

Fashion has nothing to do with it. All that's changed is the order of destruction.

[@1vaultdweller]

Wont change much. %95 of all warheads of the world belongs to USA-Russia

[@mariuszsienko]

No China in the equasion? I mean, really? ;))

[@trionghost]

Just as India, Pakistan, Israel and so on... Super-simulation from 60'-70'th.

[@Semiotichazey]

It wouldn't make any sense for them to join or for either party to draw them in.

[@isdeonf]

The best thing they could do is remain outside of the shitstorm. Just by being quiet China would raise as the new World Empire after a scenario like that.

[@AlexK-oh2se]

​@@isdeonf Several years ago the pentagon revealed nuclear war plans from 60-th. China was a target whatever they were allied with USSR or not. The thought you can stay aside a global war (in case your state has some economic worth) is naive at least.

[@samuelgalicia9269]

You want more if this happen with Rusia and USA the entire world could be destroyed.

[@brandenmanuel2037]

“Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.” -J. Robert Oppenheimer

[@NogabaHD]

This Bruh moment when there are US Military Bases around your house

[@jasondrummond9451]

Or you live on Southern Vancouver Island ....

[@WolfLykaios]

At least it should be quick for you hopefully.

[@eduardoADSL]

Living in Brazil doesn`t look that bad now.

[@carloslinhares474]

ãhn? pense no que tá hoje se multiplicar por 1000! Nosso país tá no rumo de Honduras, meu caro.

[@RicardoAlves-xm8wk]

Ninguém estaria a salvo, mesmo aqui no Brasil, seríamos afetados. Esse tipo de arma deixa resíduos nucleares, que se espalhariam pelo ar, oceanos, seria um desastre natural sem precedentes. Pensa no mercado global, q é encabeçado pelos EUA, pela Europa, ruiria junto com a nossa economia, a internet, enfim, seria, definitivamente, um retorno à idade da pedra. Sem falar q esse discurso de "estaremos a salvo aqui" é uma puta falta de empatia com as vidas que seriam perdidas, tudo isso em razão de uma ação desmedida de demonstração de poderio.

[@pegaebelenga]

Seria o começo do novo governo mundial que esses bilionarios globalistas tanto defendem...

[@MrEGODRUM]

@@RicardoAlves-xm8wk Não mesmo. Os ventos que sopram aqui, não sopram por lá. Não seríamos afetados. Mas o Brasil tem uma importância estratégica fenomenal nesse cenário, assim como outros países do hemisfério sul. por mais que pareça, também o norte não seria uma destruição total, haveria sobreviventes que procurariam refúgio. Proceure os videos do Coronel Enio Fontenelle que traz mais informações. Ele trabalhou em agências de inteligência.

[@RicardoAlves-xm8wk]

@@MrEGODRUMPossivelmente sim, há correntes marítimas e atmosféricas q se deslocam do hemisfério norte ao sul pelo Atlântico. Dá um Google ;). A natureza forma uma rede q funciona em um delicado equilíbrio e q liga cada canto do planeta, qualquer evento de tamanha magnitude afetaria a todos, direta ou indiretamente.

[@EmanueleMCT]

“Defeating the enemy without a fight is the greatest skill” - Sun Tzu. The "interesting" thing is that China would watch the show and then assume planetary hegemony without firing a single bullet (at least officially).

[@Mocha.]

Not very surprising that they are constantly pushing their soft power using propaganda and covert means. Whether militarily towards their neighbours, economically through quasi-slavery, demographically through mass migration, politically with bribes and also since recently biologically using virulent pathogens. Very convenient.

[@futmut1000]

Thats not going to happen, there wont be a nuclear war, right now US military is way too powerful for anyone, but they can destroy the US economically if Russia China and India unify against them

[@dennis3351]

on what? a nuclear winter planet. I doubt any one on earth survives. even in remote locations eventually. I would hope to go first.

[@foreignfat6009]

@@dennis3351 Non-sense. People would definitely survive nuclear winter. 95% wouldnt.. Rest would be thrown back into stone age for some time.

[@RikersStupidBeard]

irl both US and Russia will hit PRC to be safe.

[@paulsvid]

And to think 3 year later after this video was posted , now in 2022 we are closer to a world nuclear war than we have ever been before

[@azumishimizu1880]

Not true, a Nuclear war will simply never happen.

[@zbtx1144]

Hi, it’s now April 2023… It’s getting worse and worse!

[@Tattlebot]

@@zbtx1144 I think it's stable. The big question is what happens in terms of American social stability. The trends indicate that a civil war must happen at some point.

[@henrikpersson5420]

@@Tattlebot at which point a nuclear war might start. Civil unrest due to corruption would undoubtebly be taken advantage of, but the moment eastern world order is visibly interferring the nukes will start flying.

[@TheBlueCream]

@@Tattlebot stable ?..u in denial ?

[@TheseEyesSeeDarknessClearly]

South America, Africa, and Australia just chillin'

[@sebastian4238]

Canada too

[@ElectoneGuy]

@@sebastian4238 Except if the wind is blowing north...

[@sebastian4238]

@@ElectoneGuy yep oof 80% of Canada's population is up against the border with the US places like Detroit and Buffalo that get hit will annihilate the major urban centers on the Canadian side as well

[@paulsullivan1650]

"Wouldn't you like to just play a nice game of chess?"

[@zed6095]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/nqCyZmaiZcuIkJI

[@lysenko2a]

All Prigogsk bots have the name Paul? Putin is only a symptom, the whole nation is sick..

[@KrzysztofKarkosza]

prophesor Faulkner?

[@paulsullivan1650]

@@KrzysztofKarkosza Yeah man, you've got the right movie! Lol...

[@tolvajkergetok]

Apparently Canada is not a target, and neither Hungary or Poland. All were just bruised in strikes near or at their borders which makes no sense. Budapest and Warsaw are the biggest cities in Eastern Europe after Moscow, and both countries have important NATO bases.

[@Martin-hk5vb]

Honestly, I think whoever published this just stole it from an older project from before 1991 and simply re-defined the borders to reflect modern borders. Why would US/NATO bomb Poland which is a NATO member? This would only make sense in a pre-1991 setting which would explain why Poland and Hungary were ignored by Russian forces but targeted by US and coalition forces.

[@msheldon10]

@@Martin-hk5vb Also strange that a few places in England were targeted but not Scotland which is odd considering that the UK nuclear Deterrent and weapons store are housed in Scotland plus Glasgow is still making warships.

[@dueyramone]

Well, no one lives anywhere in Canada other than at the southern border for the most part. Larger settlements beyond that can be named on ones fingers. That said, it might be time to head to Grande Prairie pretty soon.

[@mrchristie49]

@@dueyramone Further north than GP that is for sure, the fallout would follow the jet stream and affect ... well everyone ultimately in North America. There was smoke covering the north pole in 2021 from Russian forest fires.

[@jorge9312]

Y Australia o cuba por ejemplo. Me alegra de que España solo Rota sea el objetivo.

[@soldatd3727]

Interesting that in this simulation NATO countries attack NATO countries. Blue planes are hitting Romania twice, somewhere in Constanta region that is where the coastal defense and a NATO base is and Bucharest. Very accurate.

[@albinetcristina8912]

exactly what I was looking at... no logic...

[@R26B-TURBO]

Romanians are essentially Russians.

[@soldatd3727]

@@R26B-TURBO 😂😂 You have no idea what you are speaking about. They were always against Russia. They were all the time persecuted by them and everything was stolen by Russia from them. They are basically a Latin based country in the region that is majority Slavic. Romania was the only communist country that publicly condemned the Russian invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968. They were under Russian influence because they were abandoned by the Vest not because they chose this.

[@albinetcristina8912]

@@R26B-TURBO clearly not :) we were under their influence, that's why in '98 we had a revolution against the leaders they imposed.

[@johnroach9026]

@@albinetcristina8912 Its probably assuming Russian forces had advanced into those areas of Europe, since this was before Russia discovered that their dreams of 7 days to the Rhine got stuck in the mud of Ukraine

[@Carlos-sl5tw]

Not sure what it's more creepy the music or to imagine this happening in real life.

[@scottmatheson3346]

Cool, now do "HONGKONG VARIANT".

[@валерийцебенко-з2з]

остров Крит ваще в гавно разбомбили, наверное чтобы уничтожить стратегические запасы оливкового масла и феты! :+)))

[@alorlov2449]

Ну и заодно 2 военные базы НАТО

[@валерийцебенко-з2з]

@@alorlov2449 базы НАТО на Крите??? смешно, учитывая то что Греция в НАТО и любая база в Греции это база НАТО, даже овощная!! )))

[@ВасерГоршков-ъ9е]

@@валерийцебенко-з2з Особенно овощная!

[@ВашеВеличество-в5б]

зато Аляску не тронули! по ходу пиодосы её нашим слили по тихой)))))))

[@War.Official]

Это же игра - лишили врага шансов на крит, дебафф, так сказать.

[@Brick_Wall_quote_Entertainment]

Everyone below the equator: "Huh, what was that sound?"

[@mbaxter22]

All of a sudden this became 100% relevant.

[@marcoventura9451]

It's not all off a sudden . It's long as hell, 40 years of dfferent simulation, based on strategic scenario and assets.

[@goodman7480]

Че то в Африку захотелось, ни когда там не был.

[@Melan_Xolic]

Мне тоже наверно та будет хорошо.

[@NPSpaceZZZ]

В Африке тебя убьют ещё быстрее, чем лучевая болезнь. В Африке акулы, гориллы и большие злые крокодилы, знаешь ли... Но убьют тебя вовсе не они =)

[@liparadize1987]

Лучше в Австралию!!!

[@ウラルグール]

В Австралии, опять же, змеи и куча ядовитых пауков. )))

[@Ovels_]

В себири вроде заебись

[@yaroslavmiroshnikov]

I can't believe we are standing very closely to this...

[@SweetCakeLover]

Van der Leyen is saying that they will add Ukraine to NATO so it's quite clear she wants an escalation of this level with Russia. I think it's a good time to start leaving Europe if possible. European leaders are nutters who have lost touch with reality and have zero respect for human life.

[@leoh3616]

@@tommyboman7735 Cuba was closer. Though less perilous.

[@samuelvamos8881]

The total casualties is incomprehensibly underestimated...

[@wilfridguadeloupe7612]

Putin is very smart. He knows there will be nuclear war. Therefore he wants to buy time and wait for winter to launch a big offensive against Ukraine with Belarus. Vladimir Putin for those who don't know, he scrupulously follows the doctrine of Mikhail Kutuzov (1745-1813), he says in his biography "that you should never face the European armies between spring and summer. To defeat Europeans, we have to wait until winter, that is to say the beginning of October, the cold and rough climate will give us an advantage because the Russian soldier is used to fighting in the snow and frost unlike the soldier who came from Europe which will not resist 5 days under a temperature of -10 degrees. Winter is our shield against Europe and the cold of the blades which will massacre thousands of European soldiers. Mikhael Koutouzov speech at the end of the war: "To repel the he antichrist Napoleon Bonaparte, we sacrificed hundreds of Russian soldiers to slow down his march on Moscow as soon as he arrived in kyiv, our objective was to hope that winter would arrive very quickly to counterattack. The Russian soldier will always have a ground advantage over the European soldier when winter comes."

[@Angel3Dx27]

Same thought. Even if the Russians use their lower yield nukes it's impossible to have less than 200 million deaths with the destruction of America and Europe

[@Brick_Wall_quote_Entertainment]

I think it's just the casualties from the bombings alone, not the nuclear winter and radiation that'd result afterwards.

[@billygowhoop]

My cousins moved to New Zealand a while ago. That's starting to seem like a pretty good idea...

[@ZackChimento]

I enjoyed the part where both sides attacked Poland for no reason at all.

[@carlosgarzon8900]

I laughed but you probably are confusing Kaliningrad with Poland, there is a Russian exclave where it used to be Prussia

[@qweasdzxc]

@@carlosgarzon8900 Watch again, first nuke is dropped in Poland by a red plane and at 1:45 the blue planes drop more.

[@stejskli]

@@qweasdzxc The very first hit comes not just into Poland but rather in the territory of "Dreiländereck" to punish Poland, Czechia, and Germany at the same time, and, by hitting the peripheries (maybe Görlitz, Liberec, Jelenia Góra, Zittau, Zgorzelec etc.), still hoping in no further escalation...?

[@difu77]

Poland being attacked in a world war? Actually not surprised

[@qweasdzxc]

@@difu77 Poland is in NATO so it being nuked by NATO forces is a very big surprise.

[@OlivierNovel]

1986 called, it wants it's scenario back...

[@Asko83]

That's way different. No Warsaw pact and the only forces taking part are NATO and Russia.

[@randyballweg6079]

@@Asko83 That's rite times have changed. Glad you know what the Warsaw pact was for most don't know or were born in the 70s or 80s.

[@TheLizardOfOz]

...and it's graphics.

[@lysenko2a]

Putin is only a symptom, the whole nation is sick

[@lifeforlove76]

@@lysenko2a ну, если твоими словами, Луценко, тогда Украина-это вообще метастаз??

[@katyc.8663]

I watched this and remembered the beginning of my education. I started elementary school in a North Dakota town in a the late 80s. I remember duck-and-cover drills to protect from potential falling ceilings. Is it odd that a kindergartener/first grader would know that the drill doesn't protect from radiation? The Cold War was a part of my life.

[@thebaron2277]

Minot? Just wondering because aperantly that would be one of the first places to be targeted

[@StefUllrichMusic]

And everybody will be killed while holding up a phone to get the best video.

[@edxander7169]

Right lol

[@cartylie335]

found boomer

[@edxander7169]

@@cartylie335 lol hey, but it's true though

[@jwaustinmunguy]

Brilliant!

[@alesynkin]

Only those men who will not try to save whores from Poland and Ukraine )))

[@Claauuhearts]

Bad time to live in northern mexico.

[@oscarsayago2422]

Prácticamente el hemisferio norte del planeta quedaría inhabitable por muchas décadas, sin mencionar la pérdida de vidas humanas, la pérdida de cultura y arte, así como de los recursos naturales, y después la radiación y el invierno nuclear: simplemente aterrador.

[@MrFeleru]

Queda inahibilitado todo el planeta, En suramerica estariamos cagados igual, ya me imagino a Venezuela y Cuba con algunos puntos de disparo en su tyerritorio asi que algunas nos caerian por aca, a venezuela, pero el impacto seria en toda la región.

[@devenirgameplays2152]

Y todo por los sueños húmedos de un tirano despota

[@CCQ75]

@@MrFeleru Serian mas afortunados los que muriesen rapido con el impacto que sobrevivir al mundo quebrado y contaminado que quedaria. Los que nu mueran esa dia moririan de hambre y por la contaminacion

[@CCQ75]

@@julioernestotellezbonilla2440 NO seas Animal! Despues de eso NO HABRIAN SOBREVIVENTES en Europa! Y la gente de aqui del hemisferio sur serian la mas desafortunada porque en vez de morir en un segundo con el impacto nos tocaria morir lerntamente de hambre y de radioacion a los pocos meses. Yo preferiria morir en el impacto que quedar vivos en un mundo SUPER CONTAMINADO DE RADIACION! Sin internet, sin comida ni agua NO contaminada. Estas loco!

[@jaimebondoza3710]

Voy a vivir en el Patagonia extremo sur entonces

[@scoogsy]

This to me seems like the most straight forward, and terrifying of all the nuclear war simulation videos. Cold, calculated destruction.

[@KI-nl3tu]

1:50, Riga (Latvia) would be destroyed by the NATO aviation? Very interesting.

[@СергейДиденко-ф8щ]

Бей своих, чтобы чужие боялись.

[@estland2768]

We are in NATO. How about Finland? When they come in?

[@WeFacePalm]

​@@estland2768 They don’t care that we are in NATO I served in the defense forces of Estonia, there was a conversation with NATO soldiers - I asked what they would do if the war started? They said - Quickly to planes and fly away from here - think yourself

[@77963349]

@@WeFacePalm don't worry: you are way past being welcome by Russia also. In case of conflict like this "baltic states" will be temporary occupied by Russia but only to deny NATO of foothold. Learn how to feed yourself. Russia is not doing this anymore.

[@olafursus7559]

@@estland2768 Это не вы в НАТО, а НАТО в вас, чувствуешь разницу? Неужели ты думаешь что кто то будет с вами церемониться? Спасать будут Французов, Немцев, Шведов, а всю Прибалтику пустят в расходный материал, как всегда это делали ваши западные друзья. Вас история второй мировой правда ничему не научила.

[@LMcars]

I do think there is too much to lose for this kind of war. I hope... Because this is terrifying

[@Charliechorizo]

*lose.

[@LMcars]

@@Charliechorizo thx :)

[@LeJohnnyBoy]

In a war, everybody loose.

[@LMcars]

@@LeJohnnyBoy I do think some industries don't lose so much during a "regular war ". But as for the most and ordinary people like us, you are totally right

[@Datan0de]

Unfortunately, the current leadership of both the US and Russia are sociopathic chest-beaters who care nothing for the citizens of the countries they're fleecing, and are closer to mob bosses than actual leaders. I see people in these comments from both sides angrily spouting about which side is worse and which is more likely to start a nuclear conflict. This plays right into the hands of our "leaders", who IMHO are the real threat. Break out of your programming, people!

[@matthewwilkes6065]

Absolutely terrifying that this is even a possibility.

[@matthewwilkes6065]

@King Waffi War is in everyone's nature, it is part of our human nature, not governed by race but by our greed for power or resources. We are all the same underneath this exterior that adapted for every climate on earth, underneath, we all bleed red.

[@zackmac5917]

This is a terrifying possibility. However. Truth is, in reality, death is a certainty for us all. That's our reality. Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through him.

[@ericmurphy9708]

That is comforting, but I don't want my children to meet the Father for some time... so maybe everyone could just calm the rhetoric down.

[@storms9023]

@@zackmac5917 I'll pass, thanks.

[@jimthecauctus2170]

People who think this will never happen. You underestimate the level of stupidity in humanity

[@asdfghjk684]

We would very much like to be excluded from this narrative. We still got a lot shit to do, after the two last ones. Sincerely yours Poland

[@slartybarfastb3648]

Agreed! -Ukraine

[@janoskovacs9406]

We will die together if we must. Best wishes from Hungary! ^^ Love Poland by the way, but i guess you already know! :)

[@xeniosm4549]

Just booked a one-way flight to Australia.

[@LeafyHaven2218]

Xe M Good luck with the giant spiders 😂

[@user-vu9ug4vb3u]

@@LeafyHaven2218 yeah. They scarier then nuclear war and radiation :)

[@cheshirster]

There are enough bombs to bomb every town in the world. Australia only needs two.

[@user-vu9ug4vb3u]

@@cheshirster but what reasons to attack Australia? They didnt have nuclear weapon, they didnt have strong army or fleet

[@julianjulian9973]

And hide inside kanggoroo belly

[@aim00ver]

WTF, why both NATO and Russia bomb Ukraine in this simulation!?

[@sergeykosterny6476]

у них наверное старые карты. Где у Украины еще второй или третий ядерный потенциал в мире...

[@zhbox2010]

@@sergeykosterny6476 пора запасаться таблетками йода

[@aim00ver]

@@sergeykosterny6476 В таком случае, зачем Россия наносит удар по Херсону. Больше похоже на случайное разглашение истинной доктрины НАТО:) Хотя, никогда нельзя недооценивать банального рукожопства.

[@sergeykosterny6476]

@@aim00ver портовый город. город корабелов. тракторостроительный, карданных валов, короче - военное производство. правда почему рососсия - это вопрос.

[@esspiquar]

The same reason East and West Germany would've gotten tons of tactical nukes from both sides had the Cold War turned hot - to preempt or halt a conventional invasion from east or west.

[@oreocatcat]

Saw this simulation on 2019 and scared me, now on 2024 i am shitting myself x100.000.000 times more.

[@АлексейКамбей]

Я не знаю каким оружием будут сражаться в Третьей мировой войне, но в Четвертой будут сражаться палками и камнями. Альберт.Эйнштейн I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Albert Einstein

[@august3411]

Дебил твой энштейн,мировая это когда весь мир воюет,а не племя на племя.четвертая будет,когда человечество опять поднимется до уровня 1914 года.

[@morgenmuffel733]

@@august3411 ..... Не согласен совершенно. Палками и камнями тут имеется ввиду-что чем то допотопным ,технологиями до 19-20 века. +дело в количестве участников и в том какую силу на международной арене в тот момент они занимали.

[@АлександрБатин-л1з]

@@august3411 он имел ввиду что в третьей мировой погибнет почти все человечество и исчезнет цивилизация следовательно четвертую будут вести оставшиеся одичавшие племена людишек,включай голову....это золотые слова сказанные Энштейном !!!

[@august3411]

@@АлександрБатин-л1з мировая война это глобальный конфликт, беспрецедентный по масштабу событий и количеству жертв.и поэтому следущая,очередная,будущая,100504-ая будет локальная, а не мировая.включи голову своему эйштейну,пока он не назвал войну между пещерами-межгалактической

[@GLO-CK]

@@ves-v-rabote Это ЕГЭшное августовское тело, не умеет размышлять аллегориями. Они ж конкретные пацанчики!))

[@eskercurve]

Some considerations for further refinement of this simulation would be: 1) tactical nuclear strikes against early warning radars in the north of the UK and in Alaska, or similar strikes from the US-NATO against radar sites in Russia. This would devastate one side's ability to detect launches and might cause a strike-first mentality. 2) China would likely join in and devastate Japan and South Korea, and might even nuke Taiwan. China committed this year to expanding their nuclear arsenal to 1000 warheads. 3) Some targets are absent, notably the pacific US navy assets. Hawaii, and some bases in Japan would likely be targeted to prevent naval air superiority in a post-nuclear exchange. Also don't forget that are mid-course ballistic missile defenses which would be targeted. One is in Alaska. Others would be AEGIS cruisers and Carrier battle groups.

[@GezenDeveloper]

In this Russia vs NATO context I doubt China would join. Why join when your 3 biggest competitors obliterating themselves in a nuclear war. Just wait it out, then do whatever, since no one will be able to counter you in a meaningful way. This is of course unless some party just nukes China first to force them join the conflict.

[@futmut1000]

Russia would lose a conventional war anyway, Putin also said that, but he also said that he can do alot of damage with nuclear weapons...Russia have the best air defence by a long shot, S400 and S500 wont let many planes or bombs hit Russia, but they can be destroyed if attacked in huge numbers..SO with a nuclear war Russia can do more damage due to better defence system, but then will lose afterwards, i imagine few bombs on New York area would do 15 million deaths alone, the area is very dense and bombs got very powerfull now

[@jordan2104]

Satellites. Both countries have advanced space programs which who know what they can do. I think before a nuclear war we'll see a space war. After that, maybe they'll drop the nukes.

[@TheHatori1]

It's hard to imagine that China would attack Japan instead of Russia. Attacking Russia makes much more sense.

[@gregoryoliveira3124]

@@TheHatori1 China would attack Russia just because they screwed up? One realistic scenario is that China would only hit Taiwan (but not with nukes, China still sees the island as a rebel province, not as non-chinese, "nukeble" targets) and wait for NATO do the wrong step against them first.

[@RealSebbor]

The music makes it even more terrifying

[@benedictearlson9044]

Who's still watching in 2024?

[@davidpeacock4091]

Would you like to play a game?

[@JNArnold]

And that game is called Defcon. It looks pretty much just like this video too.

[@rn-wilx3952]

@@JNArnold it's Defcon i recognize it from the first fighter jet, i think it's the best game i played.

[@Warrior4Hell]

NO :)

[@julienckjm7430]

There is defcon and also first strike! Awesome games!!

[@Datan0de]

Why does everyone get that quote wrong? I don't know that I've ever heard anyone casually quote it and actually get it right. Is there some kind of weird Mandela Effect happening around WarGames?

[@philbowl1442]

In the Czech Republic, it looks we are fine. Everybody are dead and we will be dying for years bcs of cancer -_-

[@iPE_ZA]

celý je to nesmysl ,protože Rusko nezaútočí první jak je to ve videu .

[@MusilekVladislav]

@@iPE_ZA Hlavně by mě zajímalo, proč Rusáci nakouří první raketu někam mezi Jelení a Zelenou horu. Tam je nějaká základna, nebo co?

[@slavecek]

@@MusilekVladislav V simulaci je jako cíl prvního úderu zakreslený radar (předpokládám protiraketové obrany) v Polsku.

[@SlimyBendy]

@@iPE_ZA na začátku je napsáno, že Rusko odpálí "varovnou" jadernou střelu v naději, že to zastaví postup jednotek NATO v klasické konvenční válce. Kdo zaútočil jako první, nejde z videa vysledovat. Klidně to mohlo být i NATO.

[@rey_nemaattori]

@@StoriedHistory1985 I don't think anybody in Europe is going to be even remotely fine, although Iceland, Ireland and the Azores Islands seems to remain relatively unscathed, which is nice.

[@KingKong-gx3qg]

Well… it was nice knowing you guys

[@adamwsaxe]

This is the best Princeton can provide?

[@draege626]

Flashback to childhood paranoia, that we all hid in a tiny part of our minds.

[@russelblacker2562]

Ever heard of Chehov's gun? Quote: "You can't put a loaded rifle on stage if no one means to fire it." If people made nuclear weapons they eventually will be fired. We all thought that the collapse of the Soviet Union was the end of the play, but in reality it was just the end of the first act.

[@GamerLuke651]

Well, to be honest don't shame me but everyday I think about a nuclear war is going to happen and I'm really paranoid about it I always search up nuclear bunkers around me n stuff. I do this because I am Canadian I think it is a high risk that radiation will get to me (I live in Windsor Ontario) because I am in a populated city and near the US. I am also 11

[@draege626]

@@GamerLuke651 No shame. I grew up next to nuclear strike target. Tbh I kissed my ass g'bye along time ago. I decided that if some maniac pushed the big red button. Ain't nothing I can do about it and refuse to let them live rent free in my head. Best hope is that we get rid of the nukes before they use em. No Nukes 🤟

[@TimperialBroadcastingAgency]

What was the procedure used to develop the scenario and its escalation? Limited-blind wargames, assumed escalation, communication between parties? Is there an accompanying paper?

[@andmos1001]

This scenario is based on both NATO and Russia doctrine of handling nuclear weapons, in case of nuclear exchange.

[@TimperialBroadcastingAgency]

​@andmos1001 Right, I get that--just asking for further information as to sources since that's a very broad statement.

[@wadimss6156]

я такую дичь в первом классе на задней парте рисовал

[@USSR2013]

*У них уровень образования 11 класс как у нас 5й класс. Поэтому они все тупые, как и автор этого ролика*

[@1973Orphan]

@@USSR2013 приятно быть тобой? Думать не надо, потому что нечем, говори что из ТВ услышал, а уж тебе подобные поддержат.

[@RockStarPCGAME]

@@USSR2013 ВНИМАНИЕ это кремлебот

[@ИванИванов-ж4г2з]

@@RockStarPCGAME Кремлебот или навальносос без разницы. Ракеты выпущенные вашим любимым нато всех нас убьют.

[@RockStarPCGAME]

@@ИванИванов-ж4г2з у путинской шайки кишка тонка

[@Dr.K_2012]

I don't know how World War III will be fought, but I know that World War IV... will be fought with stones and sticks. -Albert Einstein

[@justusbowman]

91 million seems a low estimate. I wish they would have said "at least" a certain number of deaths due to fallout. Thousands of nukes, but we lose fewer than 100 million? I don't know...

[@AlinNemet]

in the first few hours, tens /hundreds of millions more will follow in days/weeks due to radiation and chaos, lack of medical support etc nightmare 😢

[@marcos-ll2yr]

45 minutes dude is a lot, will have deaths after too. The radiation kills too. 91 million right away is not low, it's too high

[@yaboyrezz]

91 million IMMEDIATE deaths, meaning deaths from the blasts themselves. It's hard to tell how many would die due to fallout.

[@janoskovacs9406]

500 million if we calculate radiation. Ain't it nice?

[@AlinNemet]

@@janoskovacs9406 out of 7.5 bln it's a good fraction, but hardly enough to pose threat to humanity....Launch 🚀 🤣

[@neonemo761]

The current situation may have to worry about such a war. I'm really worried.

[@Jamezzus]

Уровень "экспертности" зашкаливает...примерно 1-2 класс начальной школы.Дураки не выродятся с земли никогда.

[@superhoy]

им главное распространить пропагандистский ролик о том, что россия в очередной раз агрессор )

[@predator5616]

и забыли про ПРО

[@АлександрБатин-л1з]

Это же пропаганда для жителей США.

[@sergejgladkih7087]

@@predator5616 ПРО не способно отразить массированный удар .. но вот первые минуты удар авиогруппы ПВО может отразить, хотя странный ход пустить одиночный самолет вначале .. потом группу .. и только потом уже ракеты, когда ракетное оружие быстрее привести в боеготовность ..

[@РоманМоскаленко-л6р]

вы не учитываете стратегический запас яблок у польши, из за которого и цены на нефть низкие и жить нам плохо. полюбому польшу надо бомбить.

[@MattSmith-rr2he]

By the looks of this, I think the most prudent plan is to antagonize Russia and Putin as much as possible.

[@horaweruh4234]

All of african and asian excep south korea and japan are russia supporter, but in this time they cant against west and us haegemony. When the war finished, west and us will be inferior countries

[@SnuggeryBuggery]

@Guido It isn't sarcasm if it is a rational analysis of current events. American weapons being used to attack Russian cities already. And we are antagonizing China with taiwan at teh same time... and Iran... and Syria... and even mexico...

[@trancewinston1027]

Yes, the US can't stop. They love it. The most irritating line throughout the last year has been 'If Russia had their way in Ukraine they would immediately invade other NATO countries such as Poland'. How the **** would they. They are in Ukraine because it's not Nato yet. People really think Russia has the will and the way to Blitzkrieg across NATO countries. Honestly )))))

[@amivaleo]

it should be exactly the opposite

[@7буквВестернгруппаДжессиДжеймс]

Тока не понятно, нахуя России нападать на Европу, ведь всегда Европа нападала на Россию)

[@unfr4gmeNt]

Чел, поучи историю, умоляю. Со свежего : раздел польши совковым союзом и Третьим Рейхом.

[@7буквВестернгруппаДжессиДжеймс]

@@unfr4gmeNt подучи историю сам) почитай как эти земли оказались польскими) и про пакт пилсудского-гитлера от 1934 года тоже почитай) а также почему черчиль называл польшу гиеной

[@unfr4gmeNt]

@@7буквВестернгруппаДжессиДжеймс аналогия не аргумент, аутист. Рашка за свою историю 54 раза первой развязывала войны, при этом не оправдываю Европу/США и т.д. Отрицать очевидное - лицемерие.

[@-lia7724]

Всего 54? Что так мало? Не ври, чел, раз 100, не меньше. Возможно, даже 200. Хотя, кажется, больше 300. Ну, как-то так. Ты учи историю: все войны в ивропе вообще. Я уж не говорю про АМерику! Одна война-за-независимость что стоит! Россия развязала!

[@Vladimir_Sh_]

​@@unfr4gmeNt какой еше раздел?) то что европейские нацисты перескубались между собой в 39ом это нас не касается. если б они передохли бы взаимно вообще было б замечательно но втянули в свои разборки СССР в 41ом твари. а СССР тогда вернул оккупированные польшей территории. вернуть свое у бандита и вора это правильно.

[@PatBatemanAtDorsia]

The starting scenario from Dr.Strangelove is more plausible for present times than this one.

[@ray4n395]

I’m in New Zealand, my family in Brazil. I’m in panic because, well, we not gonna get killed by the nuclear weapons, but what’s next? What’s gonna happen with the entire world? Honestly 😢

[@palealien]

"Can I sleep on your couch?"

[@chrisss3749]

Half the population will starve and you will go back to being peasant farmers trying to live off the land with no capitalism to bring modern comforts, probably dying in a few years of dysentery or one of the classics.

[@GabFrrost]

On March 18 an unarmed 8 tonne drone from Ukraine ("of unkonwn origin") flew over Romania, Hungary and Croatia for an hour without being identified. No warnings were given, no countermeasures launched. It almost destroyed a student college dorm in croatian capital Zagreb. It was luck that no one was harmed. Politicians and media just covered it up.

[@triplesixpluggin]

the fuck are u talking about xd

[@boT6674]

I beg to differ, I am from Romania ant thiese are the facts: (You can also check this out on the internets). The drone was brefly detected while entering Ro airspace, it was only for 8 minutes in Romanian airspace ( romania has lots of mountains that can hide radar signature) and was heading for Hungarian airspace. The RoAirforce did not intercept because the drone was fliyng too low , too fast and for too brief a time period in romanian airspace. The Hungarian airforce was alerted by the RoAirforce. The drone flew for a much longer period over Hungary (hungary is flat ground) but for some reason they did not intercept, furthermore it seems that the Hungarian airforce although they detected the drone they did not warn the Croatians about it's trajectory. It's really strange. Anyway, we saw the drone, but NATO was in no position to intercept. It happens all the time in mountainous areas.

[@ChrisZAUR]

Normally I would be upset living where I am but southern hemisphere seems pretty alright now

[@jshepard152]

Get ready for illegal immigration to start running the other direction.

[@josephastier7421]

Pretty much shows how once the nukes start flying, we all die.

[@SpencerAK74M]

Is there a Plan B?

[@AH-64-Apache_Attack_Helicopter]

Yup... Plan B is to seriously start to thinking about moving to Costa Rica.... or further south. I hope you speak Spanish.

[@billbusen]

I think we should at least look at it.

[@cgsonic1968]

Yes, move South !

[@josephaltman460]

PLAN-B FUCT!

[@Hodok]

Many more will die. No light, no fuel, no food. There will be a shock wave, radiation, tsunami.

[@aliozanerbektas]

The question we should be asking after all is that if we really wanna survive a nuclear war...

[@Soytupapihero]

Hazte una idea tocando por un instante algo muy caliente.

[@marble25]

*With such a nuclear war the deaths would be much much much higher than 91 mil. It's not just the first impact, but hunger, disease, nuclear fallout, economic collapse, gangs, conventional warfare, biological weapons etc: This would total some 500 million deaths and human advancement would stay still or even fall back for the next 100 years.*

[@packnsendhouston7871]

The total estimate death toll, after-the-fact, is around 5 Billion. We currently have 7.97 billion on the entire planet.

[@1patelianos1]

Well this video aged pretty well

[@Dhumm81]

As horrifying as this is, it still seems like it's severely downplaying reality.

[@zackmac5917]

Well, you don't get to see the aftermath here, what it looks like, and how things play out after what would be the complete collapse of civilisation, embedded within a nuclear wasteland..... That's what this scenario leaves you with. It just doesn't detail what happens next, what that means. 100 million dead, the entire Northern hemisphere destroyed in the first few hours, imo isn't downplaying it. That's bad enough.... This would be the total collapse of civilisation of course, which seals the fate of all those who remain.

[@koneeche]

It didn't even include the aftermath of nuclear fallout, so yes, it's downplaying reality.

[@andmos1001]

It’s just a simulation of a war that is designed to not come. It’s obviously not going to represent reality. Actually, this has yet to happen, so this warplan is fictional based on all war plans that both Russia, US and all other nuclear nations have publicly distributed for each other.

[@trancewinston1027]

Are you sure you know about the Pseudoscience of nuclear winter?

[@DrengrNL]

Crawl out through the fallout, baby You know what I mean Crawl out through the fallout 'Cause they said this bomb was clean

[@johnhardie9301]

Reading between the lines as to the implied policy recommendations re low-yield nuclear weapons: this simulation simply assumes Russia’s use of a low-yield nuke in the first place, which is precisely what U.S. low-yield nuclear capabilities, including the W-76, are intended to deter; knowing that the US can match Russia up the escalation ladder, with the possibility of leading to general nuclear war, makes Russian employment of a low-yield nuclear weapon less likely, not more.

[@RandomCoffee101]

John Hardie Russian military doctrine is that use of nuclear weapons is allowed only as a response to a NUCLEAR ATTACK. it's written on the fucking website of the ministry of defence. This video is either shameless propaganda, or the "professional" authors of this video don't know what they doing.

[@Warsie]

@@RandomCoffee101 The Russians kind've changed that recently. They talk about the right to escalate to nucear weapons preemptively if they're losing a conventional war badly.

[@RandomCoffee101]

@@Warsie no, I think they were talking about using tactical nuclear weapons

[@Warsie]

@@RandomCoffee101 yea tactical nukes, I don't think they meant whip out their city-killers.

[@gerardoliveras430]

@@RandomCoffee101 Looks like Putin changed a bit his mind, uhm? :)

[@antonvishnyakov1959]

And you forgot about the missiles that DPRK, Iran and China have. They certainly will not be silent in such a situation.

[@noviot]

@NPC #6822125 you are a moron, please do not procreate!

[@SaneAsylum]

What about India and Pakistan? Kashmir has been on fire of late.

[@alexduta7469]

China, Iran and DPRK would join Russia in wiping NATO off the map. Turkey might switch sides and also join the ruskies. India and Pakistan will just kill each other. Hm...adding this to the discussion, I'm starting to think that the USA will PROBABLY be outgunned. And the missile shields they installed all over the world won't do shit when the nukes start raining.

[@SaneAsylum]

@@alexduta7469 Sounds fun. When do we try it?

[@user-vu9ug4vb3u]

@@alexduta7469 Iam not shure about China. We have some kind of "friendship" with them, but... but this is China. May be they'll send their army to conqer siberia and became 3'rd person in this war?

[@w.p.958]

BTW, great video to convey the seriousness and danger of nuke war. The music score absolutely nailed it - adding to the theme of the video. BRAVO, WELL DONE!

[@АртемЕвгеньевич-е1л]

Скоро начнём, мир без России не возможен существовать

[@leogard8396]

@@АртемЕвгеньевич-е1л Что вы говорите, Россия всегда нуждалась в импорте.

[@АртемЕвгеньевич-е1л]

@@leogard8396 западный мир лжив, на западе были рабы, колонии, применили ядерную бомбу, западный мир является родиной нацизма... А виновата всегда Россия

[@jefftukangjeff]

@@АртемЕвгеньевич-е1л промой мозги. тебе этот бред путин вбил. до него россия существовала тоже, и мир тоже. и после него существовать должны. он просто хочет умереть с феерверком, о молодой генерации россиян он никогда не думал.

[@АртемЕвгеньевич-е1л]

@@jefftukangjeff ты лучше сынок скажи, когда Россия хорошо жила?

[@Goulmy86]

Nice work, just doesn't seem to take in the countermeasures that are not disclosed. Nor does it take into account the fighters being shoot down by regular means.

[@danpriest1020]

Yeah it's missing pieces

[@dixonpinfold2582]

Maybe it does, but those things just aren't shown in the animation. It's a schematic representation that would become massively overcrowded by rendering such things as missile interceptions and dogfights.

[@GabFrrost]

There are NO COUNTERMEASURES. At least not the ones that would work. "Shield" is a joke. Planes can not shoot missiles. And its 10 -20 missiles launched on any target. Sooo..... bye, bye birdie

[@starstorm5338]

Also, it is missing out on the actual communication between NATO and Russia, because after the first bomb drops, I'd bet that they'd immediately go to negotiations in order to prevent further nuclear exchanges.

[@Chybeef]

Gracias Jordi e Ibai, he venido a ver cómo nos van a dar por el castillo

[@Anton_Kalgin]

The video have a significant logical error. Russian nuclear doctrine only involves a retaliation nuclear strike, preemptive nuclear strikes are a part of US nuclear doctrine. Somebody did not make their homework very well.

[@cheshirster]

They have this plan and already announced it. tsargrad.tv/news/rossija-gotovitsja-k-oborone-uspokoitelnymi-jadernymi-udarami-foreign-affairs_164615

[@Anton_Kalgin]

@@cheshirster Read the article. The content is about this: "US analysts believe that Russia may start using preventive nuclear strikes and produces multiple tactical nukes". Nothing in the article is said about Russia "announcing" changes it's nuclear doctrine, or that Russia is actually producing them, just that "Foreign Affairs" thinks so.

[@Excalibursin]

Ah. So because Russia said they wouldn't do it, they'll never do it. Your logic and homework are flawless. I guess what Putin has been saying recently about using nukes preemptively is kind of odd, but at least he would never logically say it, so I must have imagined it.

[@oplolreplay]

“I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” - Albert Einstein.

[@houseofvenusMD]

If you saw "2001:A Space Odyssey" you would know how truly terrifying that statement is...we started all of this with sticks and stones. If WW4 is fought with sticks and stones then WW5 will have swords, WW6 cannons, WW7 back to guns, and the cycle continues...forever

[@tonydelgadilloes]

En Princeton no habían visto la película "War games" de 1983.

[@totalpacketloss]

Seems somewhat of a 1980's simulation. No Middle East escalation - even though one of the first strikes is Turkey. Guess the Israel thing is too political/sensitive to put into this ? Anyway, good to see that Yorkshire survives. I mean, there's no strike against Flyingdales nor Menwith Hill - and in fact, nothing near the majority of RAF bases. They must also assume the Royal Navy are all away on holiday as they leave the Naval bases alone too. Lets face it, Princeton has done that American thing of assuming 'London' = 'UK'

[@limenade444]

"No Middle East escalation - even though one of the first strikes is Turkey" Well because Turkey is not in middle-east

[@darthmortus5702]

Denmark broke off from Europe, can someone in Germany please glue it back on again?

[@Mibris]

It's already broken off since 11 months now but I'll see what I can do

[@Wintergael127]

this would be disasterous for fishing season

[@Donzuso]

So here we are.

[@ПётрПавловский-щ1х]

oooh nooo