Playing Pauper: Mono-White Heroic

This week we're playing a deck that has taken Pauper by storm over the past couple of months: Mono-White Heroic. The main plan of the deck is pretty simple: we play some one and two mana threats with heroic or prowess, and then cast a bunch of cheap spells to pump our creatures and get in huge chunks of damage, hopefully closing out the game before our opponent gets a chance to recover. While the deck plays a lot of cards that look janky, hopefully this is one of the deck where the synergy between the janky-looking cards makes the entire package more powerful than the sum of its parts. Just how good in Mono-White Heroic in Pauper? Let's get to the videos find out!
► Read more about this deck (full article): www.mtggoldfis...
► View this deck with the latest prices: www.mtggoldfis...
◼ Purchase this deck (paper): mtg.fish/jpEDk
◼ Purchase this deck (Magic Online): mtg.fish/98QPt
Match 1: 3:28
Match 2: 15:23
Match 3: 21:33
Match 4: 40:11
Match 5: 46:39
Wrap Up: 58:16

[@TheAepread]

I don't understand why everyone is shitting on Seth for not knowing pauper when for ages, the line from MTGGoldfish has been "We don't have anyone who knows pauper so we aren't going to make pauper content" and we only get Playing Pauper because Seth has agreed to make it and play some pauper, despite not really knowing the format very well because so many people wanted to see pauper... Give him time - he'll be making ridiculous combo decks soon enough.

[@sessmurda]

Seriously, people need to learn patience.

[@dakotabeal70]

Amen.

[@zachgeraets910]

Still... It's hilarious to listen to him be so concerned about daze

[@dakotabeal70]

Zach Geraets every pauper game: “well i hope this doesnt get dazed”

[@brewbrewbrewthedeck4138]

Well, the weird thing is that MTGGoldfish got tons of offers from people who were up to take Jake's place (and knew the format, mind you) but for some reason that never went anywhere. This development with Seth himself taking over is even stranger given that he constantly bemoans how little time he has to do extra content.

[@MichaelSmith-nd2zc]

"Dust to Dawn" cracks me up. Good video Seth, don't worry too much about not knowing the format great yet, I appreciate the extra content!

[@markwalker8846]

For reference, having at least two Frogmites in the top 10 and at least 3 Enforcers in the top 11 happens approximately 1 in 500 games. I'm sure some of those don't have proper lands or other artifacts to cast them all. Probably 1 in 600 or 700 chance to get that draw to work.

[@PalPlays]

Mark Walker Upvoting this comment to the top. Thanks for doing the math!

[@markwalker8846]

Hypergeometric calculators are awesome! ;)

[@evanerickson194]

Standard Bearer is great in the Mono-blue matchup because their "removal" comes in the form of bounce spells. Forcing your opponent to bounce Standard Bearer instead of real threats, only to replay the Standard Bearer at some point in the near future is fantastic. Also, Holy Light is for Elves primarily, though it can work well in Delver matchups if you can catch multiple Faeries or unflipped Delvers. It can also blow out some other mono-colored non-white lists in combat.

[@BrunoCasagrandaNeves]

There is no Boogeyman in pauper, and that is awesome! So nice to see you playing the format, keep it up, please! Thanks!

[@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761]

Bruno Casagranda Neves there is always a bogeyman

[@darkencroix6412]

Delver is Pauper's bogeyman

[@SonofSethoitae]

@@darkencroix6412 Even Delver is only, like, 20% of the meta. It's pretty diverse.

[@trentparker7426]

Its actually really cool to watch someone go through the process of learning the format. Thanks for the great pauper content!

[@ubermatteo]

Love the pauper content, I'm new to the format too so I enjoy seeing someone else who's new to the format playing it. Great video!

[@Srcsqwrn]

Hey Seth! I love Pauper content so much. I'm very glad you've been picking up Pauper very much! Thank you for the extra work for Playing Pauper! It's going to be sweet seeing you evolve from someone who knows Pauper alright, to an expert like Modern. I can't wait to see you see a land and instantly say "Yup, it's [x] deck" and be on the nose. I'm learning more from how you play though. You chose lines of play I would not have thought of, and I've seen you do this for Standard and Modern, but I understand a lot more easily with Pauper. It's my main format. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Please keep up the Pauper content! By far you are my favourite to watch for any MTG content, and I very much appreciate it! I feel like I don't say this enough, or comment enough on your videos. Just mainly not finding the time when I'm watching [At work, on the bus, etc.] But I'm saying ti now! Thank you for being amazing, and awesome, and a HUGE inspiration! You let me know that being a jank brewer is a POSITIVE thing! Unlike what I hear often enough. You're awesome, Seth!

[@dannewhall1776]

Love the Pauper content Seth!

[@ashtonbrockway9312]

Holy Light is for elves

[@ericd1022]

This deck looks really fun. Great thing about pauper is that you can buy competitive decks without breaking the bank. Also in regards to Seth’s voice- it might be strange at first but it really grows on you. Mtggoldfish pumps out a lot of good content and it’d be a shame if his voice scares you away.

[@singedlesurfeurincurve5396]

Can't wait to see bogles in pauper !

[@MTGGoldfish]

It's a deck, not sure if I'll actually play it though :)

[@singedlesurfeurincurve5396]

MTGGoldfish sure . Big up! continue vids !

[@PalPlays]

MTGGoldfish Play Bant Bogles to make is spicy. Cartouche of Knowledge is great.

[@peterklein3354]

I play soul sisters for over two years in my mono-white heroic deck. They are good in many match-ups (affinity for example) and I wouldn't play without them. They also raise my creature-count which is very usefull against black-control, a very popular pauper deck where the totem aura doesn't do anything. Also pollen remedy is a very sweet card in my deck. For anyone who gives the deck a try - check out these additions. After playing the deck for a long time (I started at the beginning of the raise of pauper and mono-black pestilence and heroic were the decks that came into my mind immediately to brew) my deck looks like this: 4 Wingsteed Rider 4 Lagonna-Band Trailblazer 4 Akroan Skyguard 4 Soul Warden 3 Pollen Remedy 1 Allay 4 Defiant Strike 3 Ajani's Presence 2 Pentarch Ward 1 Artful Maneuver 2 Shoulder to Shoulder 4 Hyena Umbra 2 Shelter 1 Emerge Unscathed 21 Plains SB: 2 Standard Bearer 1 Pollen Remedy 1 Allay 1 Enduring Victory 2 Abzan Advantage 1 Shoulder to Shoulder 4 Raise the Alarm 2 Holy Light 1 Emerge Unscathed The list works for me, although I might raise the land count. It has play against many of the big staples in pauper, althought elves and mono-black are tricky to win pre-sideboard.

[@PalPlays]

Peter Klein How does Totem Armor not protect against Victim of Night and Tendrils of Corruption? Sure, it doesn't dodge Edicts, but it's by no means useless. I also have Snuff Outs in my sideboard.

[@peterklein3354]

That's true they do something - and as you can see I play them in my main. Yet they are weak against black and will be sided out. The deck offers plenty of protection against victim and especially the tendrils. As you said, they are weak against edict-effects and that's why I made that remark. Obviously a good card in many matchups.

[@kithkindeck]

in the delver game, you missed two damage by leaving emerge up on turn two during game 1. Your opponent beat you at 2 life. If it is blue-black, you have totem armor for the doom blades and the cartouche token for edict so if you're putting your opponent on dimir then pushing damage there was the correct play.

[@waynefeller8824]

"Chow Mein-oos" blessing! I nearly pissed myself laughing! Love ya, Seth!

[@evanerickson194]

Seth, it would also be cool to see you try out the UB splash green Mystical Teachings deck. It's full of super fun one-ofs that don't see a bunch of play elsewhere, and it plays Sprout Swarm! A personal favorite "rogue deck" of mine.

[@zhdude]

I agree, you should totally play a Tortured Existence deck. It's kinda like a super grindy midrange deck with a lot of value lines like old Modern Pod decks. Super fun.

[@888ian2]

Old pod without as much winning

[@YaleStewartArt]

Wouldn't Standard Bearers have been a good sideboard option on the mono-blue deck? You could redirect any of their bounce spells towards them, preserving your buffed creatures, right?

[@MTGGoldfish]

It might be worth it.

[@YaleStewartArt]

Also, gave this a rewatch, and there were a few plays against Mono-U where you could've just bounced Deftblade against Augur using it's 1W ability to fog damage that would've bought you some time. Just something to keep in mind. Keep up the great content!

[@joshuastamand7653]

Hey Seth, you can cycle Defiant Strikes on your opponent's creatures to try and find land drops. It would have made you a turn faster in game 2 of match 1.

[@rasmussgaard2596]

Your last opponent not cracking Evolving Wilds when seeing a useless land on top with Delver was painful to watch. Well done however! Love the deck! :)

[@MichaCnk]

Great video man. I really like your attitude. Heroic was my first pauper deck but with a slightly different config containing Gods Willing and Artful Maneuver and after a bit of play testing I also cut the Armors for Lifelink and Spirit Link. There is nothing like a 12/16 Trailblazer with First Strike and double Lifelink :D

[@MTGGoldfish]

Thanks!

[@vesok]

I' so happy to see playing pauper back!

[@stormcrow1685]

First two affinity games were so miserable:/

[@888ian2]

I feel like seth could have enchanted deftblade and ate all the board

[@greatdetectivefurudoerika1589]

Don't let Seth's win against Affinity distract you from the fact that he kept a one land hand with a 17 land deck.

[@pauperer1067]

Heroic can function perfectly fine off of one land hands.

[@Jonzin4BeatzNYC]

Fluff the haters. I'm playing in my first pauper event this weekend because I don't fox with mtgo and there was no where to play. Keep up the good vids Seth. Whiners gonna whine. Get em a Waambulance!

[@WilliamLimao]

Thank you so much for the content!

[@dmany13]

That afinity draw for both games. Yea that happens,more often,then,it should in pauper.

[@GakisStylianos]

dmany13 But he lost both times so?

[@baileyrose6459]

...so bad playing on the Affinity Players part

[@PalPlays]

dmany13 Why,did,you,use,so,many,commas,?,

[@Jude3333]

I really liked splashing blue in this deck, mostly for hidden strings. 2 heroic triggers a turn is pretty sweet

[@fanhoop187]

Delver lists usually don’t play daze, bouncing lands is bad in early turns for that deck because it puts you farther away from double spells and gush. Also paying 2 for daze is also worse when counterspell is also at 2 and spellstutter sprite is a flyer that shares a creature type with miscreant. Pauper lists may have changed since I last played but this was my understanding. Am I wrong?

[@MTGGoldfish]

I'm actually not 100% sure. I'm just sort of learning the Pauper meta as we go :)

[@jonbolme6457]

I play Daze in Mono U Delver and always seem to play against it. With so many big threats at 2 and 3 CMC, being able to get Delver or Faerie Miscreant down or use the cantrips AND counter your opponent's early drop is a gigantic tempo swing.

[@pauperer1067]

Some people play Daze. However, generally speaking, it's a bad idea to fear that your opponent has it. Worst case, your spell gets countered and you trade 1 for 1, and cost them some tempo. If you constantly fear Daze and play around it, you're sacrificing your own tempo even if they may not have it. Make em have it.

[@melissagrenier2200]

This almost looks like an iconic masters draft deck. Seeker at common was so absurd in limited.

[@benlittle5543]

Yes! Keep the pauper coming.

[@dimak134]

Burning-Tree Emissary is in pauper too since iconic masters (or such)

[@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761]

dimak134 it's in my pauper humans list.

[@stephenlofton5403]

What do you think about splashing green for travel preps/rancor? Losing mono color is harder on the one drops but as long as you don't run any green creatures on the curve it seems okay. The spells are incredibly powerful and virtual card advantage.this deck is pretty sweet.

[@MTGGoldfish]

The consistency of Mono-White is nice, but maybe the extra power from green would be worth it.

[@RoPinh]

Wizards should put more of those nice uncommons and some rares in pauper imo. Seeker of the Way looks nice in heroic. Vile Manifestation would be too ( that black uncommon he opened in the chest) as would be Auriok Salvagers. I wouldn't mind seeing them reprinting those cards and others as commons, even as magic online only sets would be ok. Nice played .

[@MTGGoldfish]

With more Masters sets on the way I'm sure we'll see some more sweet commons!

[@user-pp5oh9ee1k]

It's back, with Seth.

[@austinwoodward8829]

*sees holy light* "don't know what this hits" idk maybe the reason electrickery is played

[@wmcduff]

If you're not playing a lot of Pauper, you may not get blown out by Elves or Tokens enough to know why it's in the sideboard. :)

[@Srcsqwrn]

I mean, there's an argument against having Holy Light against Spellstutters. That's a situation that I'm not sure Aggro wants to lose pieces for. But, it's something I think you COULD sideboard for. I don't think you always NEED to sideboard for Spellstutter, regardless of how great it can be. High risk, high reward.

[@drop2736]

Keep up the good work seth, love your content

[@AL-sw6im]

Who needs sleep. Sleep is for the weak.

[@iwakuralain3064]

Yay pauper!

[@bryantan4228]

This is like when Seth tried to play the heroic deck in modern.

[@anonymoususer69]

Bryan Tan except this went 4-1

[@femalekangaroo]

I used to have a UW heroic similar to this

[@Entropic_Alloy]

Holy Light is okay against the wide creature strats with 1/1s like Elves (before they pump like crazy, but that is what Standard Bearer is for).

[@IliaSkyhopper]

6:38 Note that you can attack with defblade and provoke their last creature, forcing your big guy through (as you did the following turn). 8:53 I would've cast defiant strike here eot simply to draw another card. You were stuck on 1 land so getting an extra draw was worth it imo.

[@mitchellbrady7448]

depending on the build of delver, holy light can be a two or three for one. i would probably sub them out for prismatic strands. holy light blanks their faeries in a grindy match where you can hold up 3 cmc, like your second izzet delver game.

[@Spayroe]

I need this deck in my life!

[@ianmcabee8036]

Hate playing against this deck, good content anyway

[@MTGGoldfish]

Yeah, it seems really annoying to play against.

[@bryantan4228]

54:35 Never have I ever seen someone deserve to get hit with a Daze more than this moment right here

[@jellosapiens7261]

I feel like a GW version with Rancor might be worth trying.

[@stormcrow1685]

40:30 I think it’s kuldotha boros not tokens

[@joshuadelp253]

Upvote for pauper!

[@Gabrielmariz1998]

Excellent video... I don't think this deck is good against mono U delver, what's the best side to it? I didn't know that protection can remove attached Auras!

[@MTGGoldfish]

I actually think we should be pretty good against Mono-U Delver, especially if we win the die roll. If we can get Cho-Manno's Blessing on any creature it should be hard to lose.

[@JM-nothing-more]

Frogmites... Always two there are; maybe more, no less. One for 1 mana and one for free.

[@notanetdeck5264]

OnnaJ ReverT Did you just write a poem about Frogmites

[@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761]

OnnaJ ReverT beautiful

[@MrTandtrollet]

At 6:40, isn't all all out attack leathal becasue of the provoke ability?

[@FTWDanzig]

Last delver deck should have shuffled between delver triggers with evolving wilds.

[@iniksbane]

Holy Light is for the elves and goblins matchups. It can just blow out an elves deck.

[@DarkApocalyptiaX]

Mind revisiting Dynavolt Tower? I'm sorry but the deck seems just alot better with Opt and Flood of Recollection just sound too awesome, it's essentially a pseudo snapcaster as a spell that nets you 2 energy when you cast it, to put something like let's say harnessed lightning back into your hand, to net yourself 5 more energy for just playing harnessed again. Glimmer being in the deck still, adding 4 firebrand archers and just 2 riddleforms. Riddleform is a pseudo tower, and the archers deal damage over time to your apponent as you sling your spells. If you can get multiple archers out or multiple towers out your card advantage is simply tpo much for apponents to handle. Please brew into this. Thanks

[@BrunoCasagrandaNeves]

Dynavolt Tower really deserves another chance!

[@MTGGoldfish]

Dynavolt Tower is sweet, maybe we'll give it another try.

[@baileyrose6459]

The problem is that Abrade is currently the most common removal spell in Standard

[@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761]

Bailey Rose I though it was push.

[@baileyrose6459]

Louise Drake, that's also in the running. The problem is, I think the two current best decks are HazoRed and Mardu. HazoRed generally has maindeck abrades and Mardu occasionally does. Fatal push is more common in Mardu, although

[@brighamschellinger147]

Where are Chaz and Richard to make theros jokes?

[@myztik5716]

For the love of god, you can block with Deftblade Elite to fog damage

[@KnowArt]

PAUPERRRRR

[@Indomakio]

Hey Seth, I hope you're reading the YT comments so I can say PLEASE PLEASE PRETTY PLEASE DO A PHOENIX TRIBAL DECK FOR MODERN! :D

[@MTGGoldfish]

Sounds fun!

[@Indomakio]

Hell yeah!

[@stifle97stifle55]

Would you consider playing 1 land spy on against the olds?

[@BeCurieUs]

I loved that blue deck, it was mega annoying...my favorite version of magic :D

[@stephenlofton5403]

Christopher Willis we didn't get to see it but toetured existence is meeeeega grindy as well. Super powerful but the lack of instant speed removal always makes me iffy.

[@BeCurieUs]

Ohhh wow, ya, that is a crazy ability paired with dredge!

[@MrShivedragon]

play the pauper infinit combo deck of last weeck whit inpact tremor insted of blue

[@lukecapashen]

i noticed that you took out cartouches for standard bearers yet you didn't put lifelink (the aura enchantment). Lifelink is really great when racing against other aggros.

[@keithdiaz6147]

Holy Light vs elves

[@guybrushthreepwood8174]

Deck seems sweet wish I would bought cho-manno when it was 0.05 lol

[@fanhoop187]

po1980 yep I was kicking myself I was datamining cards a while back for my budget commander decks and I bought the other two cho-manno cards but not blessing lol noooooo

[@stanmeyer2581]

defiant strike frogmite

[@ComradeArthur]

Huh. I just noticed that Lifelink in the sideboard. That's the same as Spirit link, right? Wow, if there's a substitute for lashknife barrier my spiritlink/Cryptrat deck can be played in pauper!

[@DarkCurow]

Arthur Kimes They are not quite the same due to wording. Lifelink is a static ability while spirit link is a triggered ability.

[@PalPlays]

Arthur Kimes They are not the same. Spirit Link uses the stack and stacks WITH Lifelink. Lifelink (the card) does not stack.

[@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761]

PalPlays spirit link can also be put on opponents creatures so you gain the life, gaining you a bit of life and pacifying them

[@darkencroix6412]

But if Lifelink works, so can Vampiric Link.

[@patrickashton3557]

i made this deck exactly the same 2 years ago

[@midnalight6419]

Says he hates boggles; plays boggles...

[@choppero21]

ATO Modern Jeskai Heroic!

[@dumbledalfthewizard9486]

existence player should have mulliganed to spore frog its like leyline vs burn - almost guaranteed auto win

[@sessmurda]

Deftblade's other ability can fog attacks.

[@MTGGoldfish]

Yeah, definitely a mistake in the one game against Delver where we could have potentially stopped our opponent from putting Ninja into play.

[@AlessandroAllegri]

Why didn't you bring Holy light against mono blue Delver? Almost the entirety of that deck instantly dies to that card..

[@buzzsaiyan]

Hey gang! Check out my take o the Mono White Pauper Deck! kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y5uZen2fZpqXZs0

[@arcrides]

W_A_O_W

[@connerriley3575]

why no apostle's blessing

[@GeorgeMaj15]

demonitized... probably because you have the title 'white hero' I swear youtube...

[@thegreenrobby7402]

I'm seeing ads on this. Is this still demonitized?

[@tettsui255]

lol

[@reloadpsi]

I currently run this deck and I've had the worst run of draws ever with it :P

[@lonsmithicus]

Could've more easily won first game by provoking the first atog and mutagenic growthing depending on artifact sacs.

[@firstandlast.1254]

Go Blazers

[@ip3625]

deck needs one forest 40:03

[@alexpoobum]

mutagenic growth is a uncommon, i thought pauper could only be common?

[@MTGGoldfish]

It was actually originally a common in New Phyrexian (later upgraded to uncommon in Modern Masters 2015).

[@alexpoobum]

oh ok, thanks for the clarification

[@PalPlays]

MTGGoldfish I think that you should only show the common printings of the cards to avoid this confusion.

[@darkencroix6412]

PalPlays The fact he's playing in a Pauper format game on a program that enforces basic rules like that should clarify that. There are some fringe cards where they have common printings online that are uncommon or higher in paper where I could see that though.

[@alexpoobum]

yeah i know but i thought for a moment that pauper perhaps allowed uncommons or something, im new to the format and not 100% sure, so i was put off by the uncommon....

[@loganunger4910]

Hey seth

[@lancer4224130]

AHHH PAWN ENT, BLAUKS ... jesus, valley girl much?

[@xElMery]

Paper is cheaper than online? Lol wut?

[@adrason8339]

Pauper is more popular online and there are some old common cards that are sinfully expensive online for some reason (like Cho-Manno's Blessing).

[@zhdude]

Same reason Mono-Black Control is like $150 in paper. There are some obscure pauper playables like Cho-Manno's Blessing and Oubliette that are expensive in paper for no reason other than limited supply.

[@PalPlays]

iggyboy Don't forget Chainer's Edict!

[@kennethritacco6959]

Mana tithe bro!!!

[@PalPlays]

Kenneth Ritacco Mana tithe is worse in Pauper than in Modern due to the reduced speed of the format.

[@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761]

Kenneth Ritacco is it a common?

[@kennethritacco6959]

Louise Drake yes

[@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761]

Kenneth Ritacco I'm now making a uw control deck for pauper

[@rochobodato]

PONENT

[@thundurus7935]

*I m i s s J a k e . . .*

[@waynefeller8824]

jpint7 - I enjoy Seth's content, but I miss Jake, too.

[@hallt13]

What happened to him? Is he not working with mtggoldfish anymore?

[@Xerlic1212]

I tweeted at him a while ago to ask him if he still made content for goldfish and he said he does not.

[@W4llh4k]

Hey seth a nice brew me and a friend did based on your prowess rangers deck (temur prowess but we called it prowess rangers) www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/952833

[@theovertyrant2620]

I wonder how long you could actually do a playing pauper series based on the lack of decks

[@revotor8142]

Troy Laureyns, I think the pauper metagame is actually quite diverse... Plus, with each new set comes new potential commons, so maybe even more decks. :)

[@Icenri]

Like, 3 or 4 playable commons at most.

[@PalPlays]

Troy Laureyns Pauper is an immensely diverse format. Basing your comment on fact is a better way to make people believe what you say.

[@stormcrow1685]

Why don’t we have graveyard hate?

[@kithkindeck]

Your wincon against graveyard decks is to kill them before graveyard shenanigans are relevant.

[@cloudmane4159]

There's gotta be a new pauper deck besides mono white heroic...

[@mitchellbrady7448]

Jason Zimmerman A lot of new tier 1.5 or 2 decks. Its a legacy format, so there's always new decks.

[@ianmcabee8036]

Jason Zimmerman enchantment control hope

[@oogaboogabe3464]

Ugandan Knuckles: Do u kno de wae? Seeker: I seek de wae.

[@shawndiaz7528]

You're not sure what Holy Light is for??? C'mon Seth, pretend you know something about Pauper

[@Cangaroombi]

He always said he is not a Pauper expert, so it's normal that sometimes he misses something. He is still doing a good job in my opinion. -even though I still miss Jake, I was one of his (few) aficionados.

[@MTGGoldfish]

They don't seem like the kill that much, especially if Delver flips. Is it worth it to bring it in to kill Spellstutter and Miscreant, even if it misses Delver, Ninja and friends?

[@albaniaalban]

MTGGoldfish Isn't it also a big blowout against elves?

[@Entropic_Alloy]

MTGGoldfish People play Electrickery for that very reason.

[@shawndiaz7528]

MTGGoldfish it's good against Faeries, Elves, greedy Tireless Tribe players, Midnight Gond combo, etc. X/1s just make up a very large percentage of the format. This deck also produces incidental 1/1s so you can use it to gotcha a 2/2 in addition to 1/1s every now and then but that hardly comes up

[@sleighte]

I like the actual decks/content and love pauper but I cannot take the cadence the narrator speaks with. I can feel my skin crawling off while I'm listening

[@waynefeller8824]

sleighte - so leave.

[@GakisStylianos]

*posts some constructive criticism without being offensive or swearing* - so leave

[@waynefeller8824]

Stylianos Gakis - "Constructive criticism" doesn't include phrases like, "feel my skin crawling off". Also, Seth's cadence is his natural speaking voice. I doubt there is much he can do about it. As he can do nothing about it, it is not constructive at all. There are dozens of Pauper channels and vloggers he can listen to, if he can't tolerate someone's voice. I just find his comment petty and useless. He can not expect someone to change their voice patterns for him. It clearly bothers him and hinders his ability to enjoy the video. As such, it seems his only recourse is to leave. In hind sight, if his voice is an irritant, you could also watch the videos on mute, with the subtitles on. Bear in mind the subtitles are done by KZbin, so are rife with misspellings. Another option would be to skip the videos and simply read the decklists and articles on mtggoldfish.com . They give a recap of how the deck functioned, as well as suggestions for changes. In either case, complaining about something one can not change is fruitless.

[@MTGGoldfish]

Sorry :(

[@firstandlast.1254]

sleighte Your comment is comprised of the following pieces, in this order: -Compliment -Opinion -Hyperbole No constructive criticism. The guy telling you to leave actually seems more constructive than anything you said.