PlayStation 5 Pro VS RX 6800XT - F1 24 - Ray Tracing

[@stennex]

RX6800xt at $400 is still a beast🔥🔥🔥 The lateset sofware updates by AMdD has also helped .

[@BPMa14n]

I wasn't convinced until you got to the "how I would play" reminder that you can customize way more to what each player values on PC

[@TerraWare]

Exactly.

[@Nanako__]

At this point those who have a ps5 pro are people that just doesn't want a pc even if that means paying anything

[@TerraWare]

@Nanako__ Yeah, i get the appeal of console. My approach is mostly curiosity driven not to promote one over the other. Obviously I'll be a bit biased towards pc as is my platform of choice but yea

[@AdAstra78]

That's sums up my potion perfectly, you're absolutely right.

[@verdadesnasuacara]

YOU are right For us console gamers, Pc is absolutetly crap

[@robertbolzicco9995]

@@Nanako__ wrong. I own a pro, and two great PCs.

[@caliginousmoira8565]

nope. i have two pc's and i'm getting a pro for christmas.

[@TerraWare]

This was something I was curious to look into becsuse the PS5 Pro is still a bit of an enigma. Share your thoughts down below and let me know if you find this at all interesting.

[@Buccitalksthatish]

@@TerraWare you should use a cpu equivalent to ps5 pro to get a better comparison.. bro awesome video from I get did a video a few days ago talking about this.good work im glad you got the hardware to do the test. Only thing just making it closer by getting the cpu to run test cuz ps5 pro needs to use power from gpu to help with frames so it’s really power loss so by using a cpu closer with better results which will force you to compromise because of FPS drop simulating what the pro is experiencing now with older zen 2 cpu🫡

[@TerraWare]

@@Buccitalksthatish I have a Ryzen 3700X, it's what I've used in the past. I didn't prioritize it here because F1 isn't a CPU demanding game and I watched performance reviews of the PS5 in this game it was locked at 60 during game 99% of the time. I get it though. Next time.

[@Buccitalksthatish]

@ Okk so you do that’s good. Cuz must videos I see it’s always some other cpu and not the one we actually need to see. It’s crazy cuz the pro haves more bandwidth then rx68/68xt/77xt so with RDNA 4 it should be better then both only thing I could think of is AMD maybe hasn’t released whatever software or like you said these are all rushed patches. I believe we gonna see another ps5 moment where people wear saying it was a rx5700xt 2060s and 2070s but it was more like rx6700 and 3060. Bro need more videos when patches drop

[@VGFightSchool]

Thanks for taking one for the team. I owe you a beer? Or maybe an alternative...

[@Jr552wwf]

@@VGFightSchool amazing comparison. I saw you talk about it being a 6800 too. I hope you do a video on this one.

[@OniiXGaming]

NXGamer did Dragon Dogma one too. But he didn't say anything about his visiuals specs. Great video brother

[@TerraWare]

Well I can tell you last time I looked at DD2 in the city its very CPU bound on PC still, whereas the PS5 Pro maintains 60 somehow. My 3700X or 5900X couldn't. Funny coz I've seen a couple people on Twitter using NX Gamer's RX 6800 footage to show how the PS5 Pro is faster than a Ryzen 5600X and RX 6800 lol.

[@OniiXGaming]

@@TerraWare exactly LMAO. today alone i have see so many screen shots of LG OLEDs Frame counters and PSSR Balance or Quality. consoles gamer out here looking like PC gamers lol

[@stangamer1151]

​@@TerraWareI think the main reason why PS5 Pro performs better (CPU-wise) is absence of Denuvo. CPUs in PCs have to work with DRM as well and this slows them down.

[@chadwolf3840]

Great stuff. I was super curious about this.

[@tomislavfilipovic7690]

Pro is using zen2, you used top of the line zen 4 which has double the performance in F1 (using performance upscaling). I would love to see a comparison more in line with PS5 Pro performance.

[@TerraWare]

Sure but that wasn't the focus of the video anyway as I was mostly focused on locked 60 anyway. The Pro maintains a locked 60 99% of the time based of DF's review. I do have an AM4 platform and a Ryzen 3700X which is what I've been using as a sort of equivalent. It's not really an equivalent in every case though, sometimes it can run worse than the PS5 in rare cases like Dragons Dogma 2 seems to be better optimized on the CPU front on console than PC

[@jacooosthuizen3593]

Before you also spread false information as almost Linus they corrected it. At 7:40 we incorrectly wrote that the PS5 PRO has RDNA 2 Architecture when it actually has RDNA 3 Compute Units and RDNA 4 Ray Tracing Hardware (essentially RDNA 3.5). We've blurred the 2 but are keeping this comment pinned to reflect that. Their test used a AMD 7800xt and struggled in some games so PS5 pro is priced accordingly. kzbin.info/www/bejne/imXbcoR9rNWCZ5I

[@thecarl1013]

Keep in mind that xess on non intel gpus have higher computing cost. So on amd gpu you will have worse performance with xess than fsr. And i believe they uses medium or custom/tweaked settings for rt, lower than pc high. So with native ps5 pro settings you would have even better performance. 1224p is similar to balanced upscaling quality. Still great job for 6800 xt. Curious if announced fsr4 (ai based) will work on rdna 2 and rdna 3 gpus.

[@TerraWare]

Yeah I did actually test FSR and XeSS to see if there was a higher performance cost. It was quite similar actually.

[@travisjacobson682]

I think FSR 4 will work on RDNA 3 and newer GPUs because they support hardware accelerated matrix multiplication (Wave Matrix Multiplication Accumulate or WMMA). It's possible AMD will have a software workaround for FSR 4 to support GPUs without dedicated hardware for WMMA (similar to what Intel does with XeSS), but it would likely not perform as well. I don't think Sony would have needed to develop PSSR if FSR 4 was going to be supported on RDNA 2, but we won't know for sure until it's released.

[@JackJohnson-br4qr]

XESS Performance mode upscaled to 4K no longer uses the internal resolution of 1080p, but only 939p. 1080p is now used in Balanced mode. And Quality is only 1270p. Ultra quality is 1440p.

[@SKHYJINX]

RTAO Ambient Occlusion is really nice in this game, nice video, curious what other games you will tackle.

[@TerraWare]

It can be quite transformative.

[@XDDX_NZ]

Great video. I made a similar video just yesterday looking at AW2 on the 7900XTX vs the PS5 Pro settings (that we know of) on my channel. The RT performance does seem a bit disappointing on the PS5 pro after all the rumors of RDNA4 and all that. It doesn't seem like that's a real thing, but maybe games just need to be optimized more for the PS5 pro since all these games right now are just quick and dirty patches. Would like to see an AW2 video on your 6800XT too since I think RDNA2 doesn't do too well in that game with RT, so that would be another point of comparison on RDNA2 vs RDNA4 or whatever PS5 Pro is.

[@TerraWare]

That clip at the very end of my video should be what the PS5 Pro is doing based of what we know but it doesnt seem right that I am getting 70 FPS. We've heard the PS5 Pro in it's RT mode uses the PS5 Quality mode settings, which is what I am using. Alex of DF went through the equivalent settings and than I set transparency RT to High. At 1440P with FSR set to quality thats 960P. PS5 Pro is upscaling from 864P from what we've been hearing. I havent tested the fores during night time though, it can be much more demanding there so maybe the Pro can get similar FPS to mine in the town. Hard to say.

[@XDDX_NZ]

@@TerraWare Yeah the PS5 has to lock to 30 or 60 even in demanding areas so in some areas there might be a lot of headroom. I gave the PS5 the benefit of doubt and put it on the high preset since the blog post by Remedy said they improved some of the settings. I was only getting around 70fps on the XTX too with RT so not sure where the actual PS5 settings are within the presets. I saw footage of the RT on the PS5 pro having a lot of pop in of objects too, but I haven't double checked if that happens on PC too.

[@XDDX_NZ]

Just compared it gamingtech's video where he shows the RT reflections and it looks like it is using Path Traced indirect lighting, because with just transparency RT on, the puddle reflections are just SSR. If it is using Path Traced Indirect Lighting, the quality is indeed lower than the lowest setting on PC because there is no pop in on PC even on Low settings. Also just saw you were using 1440p on the 6800XT which makes sense as to why it was running so well. I think it's better to try 4k with FSR balanced since the resolution is close enough to the PS5 Pro and it costs more to upscale to 4k, which is what the PS5 Pro is doing.

[@jdjdjdjdjd8490]

Alan Wake 2 is not a great exemple its not well optimized for consoles

[@JackJohnson-br4qr]

@@XDDX_NZ Easy just turn RT of. If you don't have like 100 FPS in the forest on High, the PS5 Pro can't have stable 60 there and even with RT on as the 7900 XTX is actually 80% faster in raster. I have an RX 6800 XT and in the forest I'm getting locked 60 FPS with 4K Performance (1080p) High preset and RT off and stable 70-75 FPS with Ultra Performance (720p) High preset RT off. The 6800 XT is even 15% faster at raster than the Pro. The Pro should have around 52-60 FPS without RT. So how could it be possible that the Pro has less FPS with RT off than with RT on? The PS5 Pro 100% not using High with RT on. Not even close.

[@ricco123tube]

F1 was made with the standard PS5 in mind, and a few patches will not push the new soc to the limit. While the Pro isn't a beast, we have not seen what it can really do just yet.

[@TerraWare]

Ya it's still too early.

[@bfhandsomeface409]

Interesting comparison for sure. I may pick up a PS5 pro and I have a 6800xt in my PC at the moment, so it seems fairly close to that.

[@TerraWare]

In this one game yeah. I suspect first party titles will be best case scenario.

[@jouskehigaskita8835]

@@TerraWare can you test other games ?

[@troyphillips6481]

The ray-tracing performance may be harder to get a read on given the pro may be more in line with a yet to be release amd Gpu with ai upscaling.

[@TerraWare]

Yeah I agree

[@TheMichaelparis]

I don't know if it is comparable. F1 23 with 4080S : 4k ultra + all rt on : native 50-58, dlls Q 94-116 and dlss P 160-200+

[@OmnianMIU]

Yes it is and you have a way different gpu

[@TheMichaelparis]

@OmnianMIU yes i know just to show what a real rt gpu can do..

[@gamingoptimized]

I was going to compare my 4060 to the PS5 pro, due to the use of RT, the 4060 is much closer than I expected

[@reviewforthetube6485]

Def looks more like a pc image which shoes how far off base people were with the ps5 looking similair. Even reviews comparing the console vs pc yet here you see these differences making it out as if it was the pc vs ps5 again at that level. Proving how fqlse and how bias review comparisons are. Wether its wanting the console to seem better then it is or downplaying the pc. Pc was clearly much further ahead then people made out. This ps5 pro proves that. Also something you cannot account for is the reduction in textures and half pf the other srttings missing due to optimization and or reductions so you cant touch them to keep performance consistent. Which is why you can never do an exact comparison! Between pc and consoles. Its sad how this isnt brought up yet always should be. Texture reductions are massive on console to keep it from being bogged down to much. But clearly the headroom on even the 6800xt is more then the ps5 pro. Yet people online saying 4090 killer hahs. Hilarious right? And you cant use ultra high on everything on console. You just cant so it many still missing. So you still grt a better experience and performance with graphics on a 6800xt over a ps5 pro.

[@D71Gaming]

I did my own testing with a RTX 3070 in several games using either optimized settings or console equivalent settings and the results were pretty on par or higher in certain games compare to what I've seen the PS5 Pro offers.

[@oktusprime3637]

The Pro should crush it in ray tracing.

[@TerraWare]

Based of what we know so far, it should be faster, I don't know about crushing. The 6800XT does have twice the ray accelerators of the PS5, it clocks higher and has other advantages like Infinity Cache but that's why I am curious about these comparisons. To see and discuss the differences.

[@avantewatson9793]

For the love of god, do Dragon's Dogma 2. This is by far the craziest improvement of every single game out there and literally no one is showing or talking about it keep up the good work Terra.

[@luism8130]

DD2 was recently patched.. the performance improved across all platforms.

[@TerraWare]

I've benchmarked Dragon's Dogma quite a lot, about a month ago too after that big update. When compared to the PS5 Pro version by the looks of it the game is a lot more CPU heavy on PC, unusually so for whatever reason. PS5 Pro can maintain 60 in Vernworth with it's 8 Zen 2 cores and I couldnt even with a Ryzen 5900X which is noticeably faster CPU in every other game. I may take another crack at it though.

[@avantewatson9793]

@@luism8130 yes, I know this and as Terra replied, there's something funny going on with CPU utilization, we already know that on PC it is hammering CPUs and therefore it should not be possible for it run the way it is on PS5 pro. It's the most curious and interesting game on the pro so far. How in the world is it maintaining 55-60fps even with RT in Vernworth on the pro? It's confusing the hell out of me.

[@asdtyuv]

I’d love to see more videos along these lines of PS Pro vs PC equiv. GPU

[@TerraWare]

Yeah I like doing these. Will do more of them as we find out more about the PS5 Pro and most importantly what the PC equivalent settings and resolution targets are.

[@asdtyuv]

If i can, id say check out Horizon Forbidden West since it doesn’t use PSSR, Hogwarts Legacy since its notoriously stuttery unreal engine on PC and TLOU1

[@TerraWare]

@@asdtyuv Yeah in due time. I wanted to look at Alan Wake 2 next if possible. Already know the PS5 Quality mode graphical settings, I show a brief clip at 17:13 I'd like to know more about the resolution other than just 864P. Waiting on DF to make their vid

[@billclay2701]

Imagine being a gamer and focusing on ray traced blades of grass in a game lol.

[@MB_Tat]

PS5 Pro is a very minor upgrade. PS4 Pro was way more powerful than the base machine, and it wasn't $800 with a disc drive....

[@FJTabb]

You say that bc you don't have one. I don't remember pS4 running games in 8k or upscaling any game to 4k at 70 to 120 fps. Dude stop the dam cap already. Your looking at a compressed video, seeing it in person there's a huge difference in some games. We still have new games coming out that will really take advantage of the pro.

[@MB_Tat]

@@FJTabb I had a Ps4 and a Pro. I have a PS5 and played the Pro, but I have a Pc much more powerful than the PS5 Pro which does make a difference. Whereas the gap between Ps5 and Ps5 Pro is really small compared to the previous generation or a fast PC. Obviously you didn't really understand the point or read the comment properly but I guess that's the internet for you

[@itsatrap4986]

Let's be real now. For the asking price is highway robbery. That's a lot of cash, with a low bar, just to target 60 FPS when you can already do that on a desktop PC with an old 2017 Ryen 5 1600 and a RX 6600. The PS5's CPU is capped at 3.5ghz is such a huge performance loss when full blown 3700X boosts up to 4.4ghz. @@FJTabb​

[@FJTabb]

@itsatrap4986 just to hit 60??? Have you even watched videos on the pro, and not Xbox channels talking about the price. 3 games can hit 8k, most games upscaled running anywhere from 60 to 120 frames! Resident Evil Village runs near 100 fps at 4k image. Dude what are you talking about!

[@itsatrap4986]

@@FJTabb OMG! FRAME GEN AND FSR DOESN'T EXIST ON PC!

[@SamoSloga]

Days gone ps4 game on a ps5 pro is looking unbelievable when i have it compared to my ps5 slim.

[@TerraWare]

Did that get a patch? Or is it just dynamic res maintaining closer to or native 4K from the GPU boost?

[@SamoSloga]

@TerraWare no pro patch. Just remember to toggle in video settings on a pro console boost ps4 games. I didn't believe my eyes how clear and smooth gameplay is. I know this because I play this game on my ps5 slim. And I have it on my pc.

[@SamoSloga]

@TerraWare sony voodoo magic

[@adriadri3624]

​@@SamoSlogaHmm so after a year will pro be costing a bit less cuz it's around 900dollars where live for a digital version so disc plus base2k monitor would cost me around 1200 dollars if I wait for a year would the ps5 pro atleast go for 750 dollar 😐

[@Kapono5150]

Instead of wondering what RNDA number it is, why not just believe Sony. In the Pro presentation the top corner of the screen it’s states “RDNA 2 with RDNA 4 features.

[@TalkingTech-x6y]

good stuff

[@wingedhussar1453]

Here is why pro is worth it. Most devs unless they are pc only make their games for consoles first not pc. Your all getting console ports for base ps5 and this gen.unless you are playing pc only game you cant even tout graphics becayse those games are made for ps5 graphics

[@TerraWare]

I never said Pro wasn't worth it. That said the majority of games scale well beyond what's on the base consoles, be it framerates, resolution, graphical settings, ray tracing, frame gen etc. The Pro takes advantage of this same thing. It's a GPU upgrade that's unfortunately stuck with an aging CPU.

[@prem3548]

PS5 Pro is RDNA 2 with RT and AI cores from RDNA 4 that is possibly shrunk to 5nm. Still, I am disappointed with it overall. I expected the RT to be between an RTX 3080 and 3090. That could have been a game changer. However, with this, RT seems to be at best an RTX 3080. Given that the RX 6800 XT has RTX 3070 tier RT.

[@TerraWare]

In all honesty I thought it would've been around a 3080ish as far as ray tracing and to be fair I can't say for certain what the equivalent is. I think it's too early. I'd love to know what's in the silicon in an official way. Maybe someone can donate a Pro to Fritzchen Fritz so he can take a high res die shot lol

[@NextgenPL]

Pro has only ~17 TF rx 6800 xt has 20 , so Pro seems to to hit a little above his belt depsite not very hight TF number am I right?😅

[@jouskehigaskita8835]

@@NextgenPL it has to be a different architecture right ? Rdna 2 16.7 teraflops shouldn’t out perform rdna 2 20 teraflop

[@udaria6696]

nah the RX 7900 XTX has a RT performance close to 3070/TI. The RX 6800 XT is around RTX 2000s series in RT performance.

[@prem3548]

@@udaria6696 LOL, go look at reviews that are not from shills. The 7900 XTX is faster than an RTX 3090 Ti in RT on average. In Nvidia games like Cyberpunk it matches an RTX 3090. In more optimized games like Avatar, it matches the 4070 Ti Super. In games with UE5 Lumen RT, it matches the 4080. 6800 XT matches an RTX 3070 but, in titles where its VRAM becomes an issue, the 6800 XT will be much faster because it has double the VRAM.

[@konvictz0007]

With ray tracing on the PS5 bro quite easily beats 6800 xt and 7800 xt. PSSR is a lot better than FSR - Digital Foundry have said this. Don't forget PSSR hasn't even been out for a week, it's good already and it will only get better. Only a 4070 with DLSS can really match a PS5 Pro. 6800 xt doesn't even get close to PS5 Pro.

[@MaxPowerThe]

😁😂🤣

[@thibs8801]

Lol...

[@moto6981]

Ray tracing performance on PS5 Pro is equivalent to RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

[@那人冷靜一點]

@@moto6981 wow that is bad

[@udaria6696]

lmao keep the cope. They only turn RT reflections on most of the games. Its closer to the 4060 than 4060ti

[@那人冷靜一點]

@@udaria6696 either way, that's bad for $700 😅

[@wingedhussar1453]

​@@那人冷靜一點bad?

[@brichardson342]

bro just making up hes own facts

[@DsLmaNiaC]

What about your cpu? Is it a Ryzen 3600? Also try Xess instead of FSR. FSR performance is bad and also 6800xt performance in raytracing is very bad.

[@redcold莉扣]

nice

[@HenkBrandjes]

This is where the ps5 pro stand out 🎉 you can never build complete pc with a rx6800xt for 699, and definitely not with a 7800x3d 😂💪🏼🔥

[@thedarkness6652]

Why should I build a PC with the features of a console when this is worse in every aspect? It doesn't make any sense.

[@itsatrap4986]

TF are you fanboys yapping about?

[@charizard6969]

Ps5pro runs at high settings with ultra texture, not ulra on all

[@luism8130]

PS5 pro is a weird system, anyone that cares about the improvements is most likely already gaming on a pc.

[@aaronclay4665]

thats not true at all, sure, i built a pc that cost me 1,4k but i also got a pro, and at least 4 of my friends got a pro but dont even have a pc at all....the pro is the samething as pc gamieng casual console games do not care haveing anything over a 1080 gpu casual pc users do not care.. and thats 80% of BOTH , pc and console, id say about 10 to 15% of ppl care about this on the console side( playstion said about 15 to 20% bought the ps4 pro out of the 120 million playstion sold, so thats about 20 to 30million users) less than 1% of pc "gamers" have a 4070 or higher there prob is a mid build of pc users wiht about 10 to 15% using below a 4070 to about a 3070 but about 80% to 75% are budget one game casual pc users who game sometimes but use it for other htings and only play like LoL, fortnite and other games that take nothing to run and run on crappy gpus. in either case, if you are in the top 15% of either, you should own BOTH...........IF YOU CAN AFFORD A 700 BUCK MID GEN REFRESH, you can get a 1.5k + pc, and if you can spend 1.4kish on a pc you SHOULD have a pro..... this is not even a debate, if fyou spent all your money to run a mid to high end pc build but cant afford a 700 buck ps5 pro then you need to down grade till you can afford both the best console and a 1.4k or more pc, because if your a real gamer its not worth missing he sony exclusives or wating 2 to 4 or never infin years for games(if i didnt have a ps4 i would have STILL never played bloodborne) if your just a pc enthusist who likes to play games then sure just get the best pc, but im a gamer, i play games, not just care about spects(i could give less than a fuck about anything over 120 fps...........)

[@Whreck11]

​​​​@@aaronclay4665 Casual gamers wont even buy the pro. The pro even struggle to hit 60fps on some games and yet quite some games still running at 30fps because the cpu bottleneck of zen 2 2019 cpu,dont even mention 120 fps there are only few games which can run at. Only a high end pc like 4080/4090 can play over 100-160fps on 4k with dlss,between 30-60fps and 100-120fps+ there is way big difference to notice,if you dont feel that you might be blind or casual af. I own a 4080super/ryzen 7800x3d 2k$ pc and i get those results dont want to talk even about 4090,even if i own a base ps5,this console is a scam,not the whole globe is USA where you get it at 700$ here in Europe is over 1k€ with the disk drive,just throw out a ps subscribtion there for online play there you go.

[@alphaj9]

@@luism8130 I agree I bought a pro and have a gaming pc. My PC is mid and basically used for mmo games I can’t find on console. Console is for lounging and hooking up to a surround sound system and decent sized screen

[@initialfd-3716]

Yup same got a 7900xtx rig still bought the pro, if you have the disposable income it’s worth having both

[@AdAstra78]

It's not weird at all unless you're considering upgrading from a PS5. In my case, coming from a PS4, this Pro makes perfect sense. PC gaming isn't even remotely of interest to me personally.

[@itsatrap4986]

Sony fanboys does not understand how gimped the consoles are and for the price point, is just not worth it. The CPU is capped at 3.5ghx where as the full desktop 4700G/3700X can boost up to 4.4ghz. A Ryzen 5 1600 from 2017 and a RX 6600 will give you 60+FPS on high/ultra details. And this is why, for about $750, you can build a legit PC with a Ryzen 5 5600 and 6800/7700XT. Forget ray tracing outright. It's just not worth it. All gimmicks and marketing.

[@spriggangames]

No la ps5 pro equivale a una rx6800 a secas ... FP32 (float) 16.17 TFLOPS la rx6800 computo total (FP16 (half) 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) la Rx 6800xt tiene 21.29 TFLOPS computo total (42.58 TFLOPS (2:1)

[@RJTHEGAME]

Sony lie a lot in Marketing as we've seen in the past Wouldn't surprise me if it's just PSSR being the main difference and not using RDNA 4 at all They've obviously upgraded the graphics however

[@travisjacobson682]

I think they are using the RDNA 4 RT cores but not getting the full benefit due to architectural inefficiencies/limitations elsewhere.

[@TerraWare]

Well I don't think they'd lie about the ray tracing being designed by AMD and not being out yet in their GPU's. I'm sure they could get in trouble for something like that and it also implicates AMD as well. Marketing is more about manipulation and bending the truth but not technically a lie. For example, having 8K on the box, that's not a lie, it can technically output 8K or Phil Spencer saying it's FULL RDNA 2. It is, but how much difference does that make.

[@RJTHEGAME]

@@TerraWare They are never fully transparent with their specs either for the console, even for the base PS5 it's still a bit of a question mark to the specs of that lol

[@RJTHEGAME]

@@TerraWare True but i'm sure they said every game would be 60fps and it's not is it ? Alan Wake 2 is 30fps with RT I think & then all they have done is use the old fidelity mode from the Normal PS5 as performance mode I think Suppose they don't lie but they don't half manipulate the truth with it I always knew AMD were involved with their upgrade and still believe PSSR is likely FSR 4 but slightly different. I believe AMD developed it for Sony but Sony likely pushed AMD hard for AI Upscaling I won't be surprised when it gets compared & it looks like for like tbh The PS5 PRO lots will be happy with but it depends on the person

[@crestofhonor2349]

@@RJTHEGAME Sony can't force every single developer to maintain what they said. Developers will target whatever they want and if that's 30fps, then they will do 30fps

[@Isayahcox]

You mean ps5 pro vs 7800

[@SouthFacedWindows]

I don care about racing games that much that I will buy a 700 dollar device

[@valonfazlija889]

Your settings are all wrong on ps5pro or even ps5 they use max settings other vise this is a video I love great job man I hope u do more vids like this 🎉

[@TerraWare]

Is there a source or comparison for this? I tried to find information about this Digital Foundry didn't make a PC comparison with equivalent settings.

[@valonfazlija889]

@@TerraWare if I remember correctly it was either DF when they did F1 2024 for regular ps5/Sx there they sead that it was "without RT other wise it's maxed out" only anastropfiltering was at 4x or 8x don't really remember but yeah or maby it was NX gamer but anyway the game without rt is easy to run so why would that not be at max settings on console 🤷

[@brichardson342]

@@valonfazlija889 the console is barely holding 30 and 60 fps with low to medium ray tracing and without upscaling it would be unplayable

[@MaxPowerThe]

More testing games

[@antares3518]

Ps5 pro costs 400$ to make yet sony fanboys still defend it 💀

[@ricco123tube]

That's not even close.

[@robertbolzicco9995]

How much does an RTX 40 anything cost? Way over what it should.

[@mrX666-s9p]

fsr looks like shit that is the thing pssr is almost at dlss quality.

[@TerraWare]

From what I have seen PSSR can be hit or miss right now. It just came out after all, good implementations show a promising future but close to DLSS or XeSS it is not. It is better than FSR in general but not always in every aspect. Perfect example is this game, PSSR has some visible ghosting issues and finer details like chain link fences are not visible in some cases.

[@mrX666-s9p]

@@TerraWare Nah I have the console it just looks so good on most game especially first party crazy good image quality I am very happy with the console.

[@thibs8801]

Pssr look like shit... my dlss is way better...console need upscaling for hit 60 fps, my pc needn’t!

[@mrX666-s9p]

@@thibs8801 Cope harder why are you here this is about ps5 pro

[@BryceCzirr-jz7ju]

So, a $250 - $300 GPU? Not impressive.

[@adriadri3624]

A 4060 ti maybe or close to 4070 at best ?

[@hypno18s]

​@adriadri3624 More experienced PC guys said 4060 16gb not quite on par with a 4060ti 16gb

[@brichardson342]

@@adriadri3624 a 4060 is entry level 1080p card and the 16gb would be the only reason why it can even run 4k let alone without upscaling it would be completely unplayable . 4060 cost 280$ with 16gb would be around 350 if it was ever a real card. a 4060 ti 16 gb is a better entry level card capable of 1440p gaming but excels at 1080p . 60fps 1440p is bad and 30fps at 4k is worse and i would not recommend running any game at those resolutions at those frames. its 2024. 30 fps and 60 was 10 years ago.

[@Clownworld74]

LOL ITS NOT A 6800XT ITS A 6700XT

[@valonfazlija889]

The performance say different

[@aaronclay4665]

cope

[@jouskehigaskita8835]

Even when the ps5 pro is running at its lowest it’s on the level of a 3070. Which is faster than a 6700xt

[@udaria6696]

@@jouskehigaskita8835 lmao the RTX 3070 can run higher settings except due to VRAM limitations. Its more like a 3060ti

[@colinbrydon7659]

Is it not equivalent to a 6800 (non xt)