Plexi Style Amp vs Plexi Pedal, can you guess which is which?

[@davidpitts7432]

Clearly it doesn't matter if you guess right. That is one convincing pedal.

[@danielabilez3619]

1 and 3 were the same... that is all I noticed. Very similar. Damn... Helluva pedal

[@Mojoman57]

Wow, I had them backwards. That pedal sounds terrific.

[@kxmrock]

I didn't Know But Liked #1 right from get-go

[@meesterdinglefritz2064]

Yeah, it sure does! That Bravado kicks ass as well.

[@datenimperator]

I also assumed #1 and #3 were the amp, which I liked much better. Well, there goes assumption.

[@HighSpeedirt1]

Wow, #1 and #3 sounded too good to be a pedal. #2 seem to have the slightest bit of fizz which fooled me.

[@dylanadams1455]

Me too!

[@michaelcottle6270]

Great job matching the tone of the Shaw. If anything, I prefer the pedal, it sounds "tighter". Also, the clean up when you lowered the volume was impressive. Good work, sounds like a winner.

[@Pandamasque]

That clean tone with the guitar volume rolled off is the best ad for the pedal. Fantastic job.

[@Bluebear2016]

Got them the wrong way around which surprised me. Pedal was much more articulate.

[@tiagocastrobl]

Yep, I agree. I thought the amp itself had too much bottom end in this particular take. Sounded great, though, of course, but I found the first take to be more articulate. I liked the tone when Brian droped down the guitar volume in the last take. Can't say for sure if it felt natural to the player, but it sounded pretty good to my ears in this particular video.

[@rahzark]

I liked the first clip the best! A tiny bit less "fizz" in the distortion, although the difference is very negligible.

[@AndrewNuttall]

I agree. Clips 2 and 3 sounded very similar to me, Plexi with presence up, it's a thing, but not my thing. First clip had less gain, presence, more clarity.

[@philipplindenstruth3897]

Yep, I thought so, too. 2 and 3 are more compressed with more gain, but sound really similiar.

[@StormdriverOne]

Yep. I could not tell the difference but I did hear a difference and I liked the first clip the most.

[@ValWillKay]

The fizz in the first clip was what made me think it was the pedal. More bass end in the second clip.

[@j.h.leonard587]

The difference between 1 & 2 is most easily discern able when leads locks are played. So... Plexi for rhythm, Clark's dale for low gain picks and a Pantheon stacked on a Tumnus for lead. Need more sustain? Got Ego?

[@garrettstiles7808]

Wow I could tell clips 1 and 3 were the same but had no idea if they were the pedal or the plexi amp. I actually liked them a little bit better than clip 2 of the actual plexi (esp on the low end response). Nobody would EVER tell the difference in a mix or live setting. Well done Brian.

[@leegollin4417]

I liked the pedal better, but what Im really impressed with is your guitar playing.....always a class act, muscular hold the flash. Love it.

[@wampler_pedals]

I appreciate that ☺️

[@CliveBarnesMusic]

I got all three right. Clip 2 had a "flubbier" (is that even a word) low end that I've experienced from time to time with Plexi style amps, I actually prefer how the pedal tightened that up slightly. I guessed the pedal into the Bravado mostly when Brian lowered the volume on the guitar it cleaned up (to my ears at least) a little differently than a Plexi would. Fantastic pedal... It's rare you can say this about anything but I can't think of a single Wampler product I've bought or tried that hasn't completely knocked it out of the park. Well done Brian !

[@mikes2270]

Same here. I’ve owned two Marshall plexi heads and could tell that the second clip was a tube amp. They’re beautiful. Sweet pedal though.

[@jamesrobinson529]

I didn't even try to guess. Neither did I skip. Just watched to hear some awesome tones. Which is why I watch any Wampler Pedals video.

[@hotglassbottles]

Yep...clip 2 had more rounded transients. The front of the note wasn't as clear as with the pedal. So I will always go with the pedal as it's far more articulate.

[@EversonBernardes]

Pedal lacks the sag/delay valves have on loud transients, they're too "immediate".

[@godfreydaniel6278]

@@EversonBernardes - Tube rectifier sag is what make tube amps tube amps - amps with solid state rectifiers might as well be solid state amps...

[@EversonBernardes]

@@godfreydaniel6278 while rectifier valves definitely contribute a lot to the sound and feel of a tube amp, the preamp and output tubes themselves also sag and contribute to the spongy, compressed sound. Valves are just kinda sorta slow, really. So it's kind of a spectrum, really, from all valve amps to all solid state amps, with everything in-between sounding and feeling kinda sorta different than either extreme.

[@godfreydaniel6278]

@@EversonBernardes - Kinda like the spectrum of generalities to specifics - no? I plead guilty as charged...

[@TL-angzarr]

@@godfreydaniel6278 what a crock of shit. Most of the beloved valve amps have solid state rectification. Tube sag is one of those oft discussed things that most modern players actually dont like when they truly experience it. Just having a tube rectifier doesn't mean the amp is sagging

[@fearnpol4938]

I reckon the second is the amp. I personally don’t think either actually sound like a Plexi but the amp was closer in its woody bass notes. And before anyone attacks I own an original 1969 JMP50 and a 1970 JMP50 both go into 1970 2X12 cabs. And yes both sound different!

[@boskostrings]

Yay! Got them all right, I literally said, "if im wrong and that second track is the pedal, I'm going out and getting a plexi drive stat!". Lol I like the overall sound of the amp a good bit better, but the pedals not too far off! Very cool video as always Brian

[@joerectifier]

Personally, I thought the pedal in Clip 1 sounded better than the actual amp in clip 2. The amp had a bit of a fizz to it whereas the pedal was sculpted frequency-wise perhaps to eliminate some of the sneaky attributes of the amp. I have still yet to hear a Marshall of any kind that sounds better than my ‘78 JMP - of course that is highly subjective and others might not feel that way. Your pedal here sounds very good!

[@Gamma870]

Yeah, great! The original Plexi-Drive is hands down my favorite dirt pedal! It even kicked my beloved OCD from its throne, and that says a lot! : )

[@kendevries3212]

My signal chain is Strat => Dyna Comp => XTS Tejas Boost => Wampler Plexi Drive => Reeves Custom 50 Head => 2 Marshall 2x12 Cabinets. This is the best tone I have ever had. The Plexi Drive is the best sounding distortion pedal I have ever owned. The XTS Tejas Boost kicks it up a bit for that Eric Johnson kind of vibe. The Plexi Drive is the BOMB!

[@RileySullivan]

The first sound was the pedal, because the Shaw amp was powered off. The second sound was the amp, because the amp was powered on in the background. But then I couldn’t guess 3, so I am impressed by how close they sound to each other.

[@bevo65]

And now we get to hear from the cork-sniffers. There are differences here, but nothing material. Nothing worth fussing about. (Well done, Brian!!)

[@blackie5566]

After watching this, I purchased that pedal. WOW, it's great. It cleans up at low volumes and gets dirty with higher ones. Love that. Playing a lot of Cream stuff, which goes well with this pedal. Thank you for a great product!!! Never had a better one.

[@flyingwondercat739]

My guess: Clip 1 = pedal through bravado(deluxe ish amp) Clip 2 = Shaw plexi amp Clip 3 = pedal and tone/presence rolled down Damn ok take my word for it The Plexidrive sounds really close! Killer sound. Thinkin bout buying one I don't know how you get the circuits so similar sounding lol

[@bentaylor2390]

Woo hoo! Got it! 1 & 3 were the pedal, and 2 was the amp! Great work, the pedal sounds ace!

[@BoomShiva9]

I think the 2nd example has a little more natural compression so I guessed that was the amp. Both sound great IMO.

[@jtcgtr71]

Tonally similar. The pedal was warmer/richer. I'm a fan. The amp was great and had that tube response that is unmistakable and immediately gave it away (and I didn't see the pilot lights). I don't know what else to call the tube response. Some type of upper or lower frequency compression? I've experimented with compressors to get close, but it's never exactly the same. It's hard to describe. I've built a couple tube amps, one a marshall style amp. Love the simplicity of tube circuits. Not a fan of the heat, inefficiency, reliability, and danger when tweaking on them. I want to learn and experiment with solid state circuits, class D amplification, and join the quest to diy the best solid state amp I can. The added benefit is I'm less likely to electrocute myself, ha!

[@georgeluna2476]

Bryan did it again!!! For me the best sound is clip1 . Lot of headroom and big open sound. Second, Clip 3.Winner for me: Plexi Drive Pedal !!! ..

[@picksalot1]

I thought Clip 1 sounded a bit compressed, so I guessed it was the pedal. I liked Clip 2 for its open sound, and Clip 3 sounded a lot like Clip 2. I enjoy these kinds of videos. Thanks

[@kathymccoy7548]

I just bought that pedal today (for Christmas). Can’t wait to try it out!

[@paniccleo]

I thought 1 was the pedal, 2 & 3 was the amp, so I guess you stumped me! Whatever the result though, the pedal sounds great. I was listening for the way the high end on big chords kinda sounds like glass breaking through a plexi, and sound 3 was totally nailing that, so wow!

[@AndrewWisler]

Haha, I can see the power light is off on the Shaw head over your right shoulder during clip 1, so I knew that was the pedal. The pedal sounds great, though, and I honestly wouldn’t have been able to tell the difference from the clips by themselves. Nice work.

[@maxonmendel5757]

im guessing clip 2 is the Shaw. edit: I guessed clip 2 because I could hear a little more low mids and it sounded less bitey and more boomy

[@hadeseye2297]

Yep. Same here.

[@stringtheoryx]

I already have a Plexi-Drive pedal. But I was surprised here. It actually recreates much of the dynamics of the overdriven Plexi amp.

[@coachcleats13]

I had them all right, The second one has more growl that would come from the amp and #3 just sounded like it was a pedal thru an amp. Good demo! I will be getting that pedal soon

[@therealmattmendoza]

I got all three right, there's something about the way that amps respond in the highs, it's like a "crispiness" in the presence is the best way I can describe it. The volume knob play was the part that sealed it for me, you can kind of hear the plexi-ish character disappear as it cleans up. All great tones, though.

[@JosipAngeloBorovac]

My hats off Mr. Wampler! Very close sound...mind you...in the 2nd clip Shaw light was on and in the first one it wasn't so that might have to give clue to some :-D For me honestly, it was very hard to tell...but I have to admit that clip no.1 was more pleasant to my ears! So you got me right there! Cheers and will look into getting this one!

[@marc_leblanc]

Glad to see the Plexi Drive make a comeback. One of my fav pedals.

[@shred5]

I had guessed that the second clip was the pedal only because it sounded like it had the gain turned up a little higher and with a pedal, turning the gain up a little too high to match the sound of an amp is easy to do. But the top comment mentioned the pedal cleaning up well which spoiled the third clip for me, and I thought that sounded more like the first. Honestly I think the pedal sounds a little smoother. Great job

[@JoeyColors]

I got all 3 right. I'm amazed that I could tell the difference. Maybe it was just a lucky guess, but the difference between Sample 1 and Sample 2 was noticeable. That said, the pedal sounds pretty good.

[@jefflancaster4423]

Me too brother.the pedal doesn't sound bad but there is no replacing an over driven tube amp

[@Broses247]

yeah man. me too. there was this satisfaction in the overdrive that just could have been the plexi haha

[@hkguitar1984]

Thank You for showing the amplifier settings/EQ.

[@andrewsrea]

Wampler Plexi Drive is probably the most favorite pedal on my board. I have a 100w Plexi and have repaired many over the last 35 years and can attest - this pedal through a Fender Blackface sounds indistinguishable. Thanks for the vid! BTW: I thought the pedal sounded better than the Shaw.

[@apdimaggio]

stoked for the Plexi Drive Mini! will definitely be picking one up

[@doctorskull8197]

I purchased a Plexi-drive after watching one of these videos. Was very excited about it. Returned it the next day. Not that good once I got it home. The Fulltone OCD I already had was far better (IMO).

[@MindDezign]

That was very good ,I felt the extra ,musical puff of sound in the 2nd clip. Hearing the third clip I could tell 1+3 were the pedal. Now compare price and that little puff of musicality , For every bed room guitarist, it's a no brainier ! Thank you ,a plain and simple straight shooting test.

[@johndcoffee632]

Had them backways. Would have liked to hear the bravado clean at the end just for context. Sounds amazing though

[@kevnote]

A quality, true assessment of a device or amp is never fulfilling or complete w/o hearing it in a completely CLEAN context, for all the obvious reasons- at least to most discerning musicians

[@hadeseye2297]

@@kevnote I agree.

[@percyhornickel]

A treble booster in front would sounds fantastic.

[@markslima1557]

At first I thought it was switched - that clip 1 was the amp, not the pedal. That pedal is AMAZING - beautiful grit and dirt tones, but also clean in a weird way.

[@ZetaFuzzMachine]

Love these short videos Mr. Wampler

[@ravenslaves]

I got them...but damn that wasn't easy. And I had to listen to them multiple times. It's hard to describe, but the pedals seem to have an extra "fizz" on the attack. Like the response is just a micro-fraction faster than on an amp. And if the wind changed direction I could have missed it all entirely. Well done!

[@edwardmonsariste4050]

Yeah I was right! The pedal has a slight harshness to the top end. A bit more grit. But great job overall mimicking the Shaw amp.

[@CBGypsy03]

Own the plexidrive deluxe and she is a monster.. great job Brian.

[@aquilarossa5191]

I'm at the third sample, paused and I'm going to stick my neck out making a guess. Third sample is the Wampler plexi pedal and the amp I would say. I am not going by tone. Turning the guitar volume down to clean it up gave it away. It seemed like you were showing how the pedal can do that like an amp. I'll add an edit when he discloses and see if I have egg on my face. Edit. I got it right. No eggs. I suspected the second clip was the Plexi amp because there was that brittle thing in the break up Plexi amps have, but I did not make a call. Nobody will believe I did not cheat. Oh well. I know. P.S. I have a JMP 50 clone. It does not saturate until about 8 on the high treble channel's volume, unless I boost it. This 50 watt amp outputs over 90 watts when I overdrive it that hard, which is around the limits of the Two Notes Captor 8. It overheats my Captor forcing it into overheat protection mode. It gradually shuts down giving me time to turn my amp off before it fries. I am considering solutions. A Plexi style pedal and running the amp cleaner could be one. Others could be a master volume, power reduction mods, or running a second load box to share the power of the amp. Not sure yet, so I am mostly just using plugin amps until I work out what to do. BTW. One thing I wonder about these amp in a box pedals is how they respond to being hit by an overdrive or distortion. My JMP 50 build fully saturates very low on the volume control when hitting it with a maxed out DOD 250. I wonder if the pedal would do similar.

[@halfwaytobedlam3234]

clip 2 is the shaw because the sound has more variation and idiosyncrasies in it compared to the first clip, which sounded more consistent throughout

[@Mr77pro]

I thought the first clip was the shaw....warmer and a little tighter compared to a little fizziness in the 2nd clip. Pleasantly surprised for sure! Great sounding pedal!!!!

[@igadiga9522]

I thought the second clip (amp) sounded looser than the first (pedal). But then I couldn't hear any difference between 2 (amp) and 3(pedal). Well done Brian, as usual.

[@SergeiVlassov]

I got it right, but cannot say I prefer one over another, all clips sounded great!

[@TavaresProject]

I could not tell the difference at all.... Excellent work Mister Wampler!

[@mauriciogambini]

Congrats Brian !!! Honestly, for me the pedal has a much better tone than the amps...

[@cdbrown30]

“Corporate wants you find the difference between these two (sounds).”

[@t-boog2173]

I got it right. Number 2 had the fullness, complexity & flubby low end when playing chords and it had the real Marshall "quack" on single notes. (I have a few MIAB pedals but they don't have the same fullness or dynamic quack as my Marshall tube amps).

[@virtuososo]

I guessed wrong! The amp had a little more fizz on the high end, and I'd usually attribute that to silicon vs tubes (or settings?). But they both sound killer. Great job on the pedal, Brian.

[@jt5326]

#3 was great IMO. It made the Tele sound great and cleaned up nice with the volume knob.

[@3l84r70]

got them right... there's some harmonics when you play they E chord (specially highest G B an E Strings) that to me I associate with tube sound which I think was what gave it away.. but MAN.. that is one really nice sounding plexi pedal... great job... very impressive

[@jb944]

Woooo Hoo, I got all 3 right. Pedal sounds really good and very close to the amp.

[@RickCalhounplus]

Sounds outstanding as always!!!

[@MatsDagerlind]

I heard the 1 and 3 clips were the same setup, but I got it wrong - because I thought the ptp built boutique amp would beat the pedal soundwise, and the 1 and 3 clips sounded better with more bite, more clarity and better string separation without nasty interference between frequencies. So I guess this is one more pedal I just need to have.

[@uniknot]

Sounds great! I figured the third one was the PlexiDrive when you lowered the volume on the guitar!

[@JbfMusicGuitar]

Honesty didn't know either way! All I though I could hear was a bit more clarity & mids in the 1st clip a bit more low and high end in the 2nd clip. Both sound great!

[@adbraham]

Both sounded good, and I was wrong, I thought the 1st was the amp and I was totally wrong! Fantastic pedal! One point tho; surely the success of any plexi pedal depends on the frequency response of the amp you’re plugged into? Your pedal would sound completely different into a Fender Twin Reverb, than into, say, a Vox AC30? The pedal surely accentuates certain frequencies at the expense of others, so the result depends entirely on the balsnce of what you’re plugged into in the first place? I own your earlier Plexi-style pedal btw, and was always impressed by its “thumpy” and decidedly un pedal-like tone! 😁

[@jsm3233]

I thought #1 and #3 were the amp and #2 was the pedal. That was very impressive. They both sounded great.

[@MarkPritchardGuitar]

I was wrong which is a good thing for the pedal. Sounds great Brian.

[@J4060]

Before knowing which is the pedal or the amp. I do like the first clip.

[@kevinedgeman8508]

Nice job Brian. Couldn't tell the difference...and I been pickin for 30 years.

[@TJRatfink]

that pedal rocks and I think I need one-good job, Brian!

[@JungiOlympia]

The Shaw has the tiniest bit more fizz. My guess was pedal, Shaw, pedal. But if I'd had to say which I preferred... I have no idea.

[@Mainstreet2006]

I got it right Brian and I prefer the pedal. Sounds great, and less brittle or harsh.👍👍👍

[@sirbergersworth]

It was fairly obvious to my ears. No mistaking that bottom end from the Shaw. The bass switch might add some of that. The PD sounds like it would sit in a mix very nicely.

[@masque1313]

great video. I guessed all 3 correctly. To me, isolated like they were the differences were fairly obvious. But I am impressed with the pedal and I think in the middle of a hard driving mix it would be really next to impossible to know which was which. great job.

[@JW-iw6ww]

i was spot on.. to my ears the pedal had a spikier high end which could be EQ'd and corrected... great sounding pedal...

[@Tapfool]

Great new pedal Brian!!!

[@lexist7]

I got it right because Wampler overdrive pedals usually have a little more bass. I think Brian makes pedals for guys like me who may need a bit more oomph playing at lower volumes. The extra bass was present in both my Pantheon and Tumnus. It’s a convenient boost for my Princeton Reverb to sound fuller at low volume.

[@MapleAudio]

1. Pedal 2. Amp 3. Amp As always I find that amps generally sound fuller and warmer, which I always am listening for and so I came to this conclusion. It is not a huge difference but I would say I like the sound of the amp a bit more especially when I hear it here without a backing track. BUT when I play with a band an amp often sounds to me a bit muddy in the mix and has to be EQd. That's an experience that I often had when comparing pedals, profilers and modelers (i.e. Kemper, Helix, pedals like yours) with the actual amp and I suppose it won't be different in this case. So for me it is a huge convenience using a small pedal or compact modeler when playing live. Not only because of its size but also because it cuts better through the mix without a lot of EQing and adjusting. Brian, can you or maybe the others in the comments confirm that impression?

[@kevinharrington4009]

Sounds Fantastic! Home run!

[@michaelmitchell5909]

Seen the amp off in clip one, on with clip 2, but my guess was the pedal was the first clip...thought you may have done that on purpose to confuse us brian!.....you make awesome pedals man...

[@MichaelZola]

I’m waiting patiently for the Plexi mini! I needed an overdrive for my Marshall combo for sometime now. This is the piece de resistance! Can’t wait for the release. P.S Love love love the Belle.

[@jc5512]

I liked the thickness and fuzz in the second clip, before I knew the order. but that's personal taste. the pedals also sounded good

[@alexcrouse]

The light on the amp gave it away for me. lol. But i actually like the pedal more. The Shaw has kinda flabby low end. The pedal was much tighter, but had all the right feel. I'd be interested in hearing the volume knob cleanup of the Shaw. The pedal sounded more transistor-y at low input, and was very Plexi cranked. Damn fine work.

[@ruthandthekernel8077]

I guessed correctly all three. I want to get this pedal, I use a UAD Apollo recording in to my computer and use their amp sims. On my basic pedalboard I have an eq into a Keeley 1962 and a couple reverb and delay. I think this will really up my gain stacking game. I mostly play a homemade Esquire style with one pup. Looking to slightly beef or girth up my sound and to roll back the volume for tonal variety. Go from clean even jazzy style on low volume to balls out on occasion with volume wide open.

[@inmemoryofin]

I totally knew after one note which was which. Although I admit the third example could have went either way for me. Thanks for the video!

[@marksguitars5617]

I got it! Nice pedal, low end sounds tighter than the amp, clip 3 had hear more sizzle. Good job!

[@EstelonAgarwaen]

The thing that matters is that both capure the plexi vibe. Both sound awesome.

[@stefannita3439]

cork sniffers: "only toobs are good enough!!!" boutique pedal builders: "here's a $200 amalgam of solid state hardware store components that sounds just like a vintage Marshall" cork sniffers: "yes"

[@gunkanjima3408]

lol ok. I agree that corksniffers are ridiculous but you can compare a SS amp and a $12 beringher pedal - to an all tube amp with a quality component pedal all day but we all know which will sound better

[@Anthony-nk4ky]

I just learned a new term, thanks for “cork sniffer”! Haha

[@mgynther]

I guessed right and liked the pedal slightly better! It's the driven power amp like top end fizz that made me suspect 2 is the amp. Great sounds all the way, would happily use any in a mix.

[@dangreving1094]

DAMN.... nice work Brian!! That just has to go on my mini board!

[@Louis_Rain]

Sweet video. I am usually pretty good at these blind tone taste tests, that was pretty tough, I was leaning toward the correct answer after 2 listens to #1 and #2, but wasn't sure about the third. Makes sense and is sweet that you threw in the pedal into the clean amp for those of us who run our rigs that way. Great sounding plexi pedal, you couldn't have done much better!

[@KipCount]

That was tough. Clip 1 definitely sounded less muddy, clearer, less bass takeover. Clip two had more accentuated bass and was a bit muddier than the first clip. I know you like your low end in your pedals, so I was mistakenly leaning toward clip 2 being the pedal, though I didn't think you'd allow it to be muddier than the real amp, so I leaned back to 1. In any case, pedal sounds great, and I prefer it to the amp in these clips!

[@jerryg7491]

Thank you Brian. There’s so much smoke blown about this and that most of it’s hype. It’s nice to hear some truth from the pedal whisperer

[@briancheetham9134]

I guessed right. To my ears the second clip had a little more low or low/mid (more balls). Not a ton, it was very subtle but noticeable. That said, the pedal is awesome

[@umasoundil9608]

The pedal sounds great. I got them right, felt that the 2nd clip felt warmer and less trebly - like an amp sounds. I also thought the little background noise at the end gave it away. I thought the 3rd clip was the pedal going into the Shaw :)

[@tiagocastrobl]

Cool, my answers were (1) Shaw, (2) Mini PD, (3) Mini PD. Apparently, as a listener, I could not tell the difference. I did feel the second take had more gain and more bottom end, I thought that it could have been the amount of gain dialed in the pedal. Nevertheless, all guitar takes sounded very nice. I tend to prefer fender amps, so a good and reliable pedal as a plexi in a box is always welcome into my pedalboard. I think Wampler really nailed it with the plexi drive, and I will be looking forward to the next video where the mini PD will be presented. Way to go. -- Oh, there is a comment here that mentions something important: how is the feel of the mini PD into a fender style amp to the player? Does it feel similar to a blasting marshall?

[@Elraurko]

#1 Pedal, #2 amp, #3 pedal. There is a certain sag to the amp in #2 that the pedal didn’t have in #1. Also I could hear more of that Marshall bark on the attack of the notes in #2 compared to #1 and the compression was more natural from the amp. The big give away on #3 being a pedal was Brian slyly turning the volume down on his guitar to demonstrate how well his pedal cleans up. Saying this I do think Brian has it pretty dialled with the plexi drive and in my opinion it’s definitely one of the better miab pedals out there.

[@GuitarWithGabe]

They BOTH sound awesome ... so on one hand I don't even care which is which. BUT I still love these videos. ;) Killer pedal!

[@thadsiphone]

I got the first 2 right! The Plexidrive is AMAZING! I will say this tho, on the first clip, the Shaw amp was turned off so I knew right away which it was. :)