POLICE SERGEANT ABUSED POWER: LIES TO TRY TO ARREST ME!

[@James-yx1om]

Example of police never letting evidence getting in the way of abusing their powers.

[@JohnHodge-o8d]

What a waste of everyone's time..... Get a life.... 🤔

[@AnthonyHalliday-dq6qo]

STOP ENGAGING HIM. His reason for arresting you is the testimony of a colleague. It's his move.

[@davewarren2849]

He needs sacking

[@johnross7630]

you can't sack him he's sackless !!!

[@radoll8404]

They talk like robots

[@sheffieldzamo7444]

Every video like this just reinforces the feelings of distrust and hatred towards the police.

[@adriancoppin977]

Police is an anagram of Scumbags.

[@stevetaylor7132]

Standard procedure is to act unlawfully.

[@guitarboy1965]

Any officer who fabricated evidence to facilitate an arrest should be dismissed. He could have asked the sargent to come out and make the accusation to him.

[@robba1234]

100% and get jail time when caught doing it in court, and I have seen it (Case dismissed after a Judge couldn't ignore the inconsistencies) lies is what he meant

[@gray100]

Or he could have just watched the video as was offered. But that would mean his details gathering would have been compromised so he refused that option. He should be punished but no way will he be. They're corrupt and see it as us against them as we the public do.

[@derekcosgrove6594]

The liar should be personally fined a minimum of £1 million.. And the pig who forced him to give his ID when he could have seen the evidence. But refused to should be sacked and also heavily fined.

[@johnferguson-l7m]

Swearing at a cop is not an offence and she should be sacked and sued.

[@darrenedwards5051]

Yes it is you can't swear at anyone check your facts

[@martinbiddell4540]

​@@darrenedwards5051 wrong

[@Dazzle627]

​Actually it's swearing in Public. If someone in Public hear you but their has to be people about. You can do it out in the open as long as its not heard by anyone. Plus if it's to the officer it doesn't count. Police arnt classed as public

[@mavicmeister29]

@@darrenedwards5051: It has been ruled in court that the police have a higher tolerance to anti social words, and therefore cannot be offended themselves by swearing, unless a member of the public is within earshot of those words. High court ruling.

[@ryannorton7938]

@@darrenedwards5051I suggest you check yours first. A officer cannot make a public order complaint for himself, a member of the public has to have heard it. When on duty police officers are not classed as “public”. Imagine being so confidently wrong.

[@PJ-wm9nq]

He's just digging a very large hole everytime he mentions arrest for non ID. Abuse of power in abundance! (He's twisting his OWN words!)

[@clivesmith2886]

That officer who lied should be sacked, this is our police today . Disgusting behaviour.bring them to account retired lifeboatman

[@joseph-ge5om]

Any Arrest under Section 50 or Section 43 must automatically go to Police Conduct Authority for investigation to ensure the Police action was legal and then apologise on TV if the Police were wrong example a female police should not search a male when there uniformed males available the Police always complain about why the Public dislikes and mistrusts us two reasons the blatant use of sections 43 and 40 against people with cameras for a start we are not the enemy

[@robba1234]

And criminal abuse of public order laws (and actually not understanding them)

[@phillipowens5380]

Police officers telling lies to make a arrest i hope this man will take further action against these corrupt police officers and a police officer a woman police officer telling lies what a disgrace these corrupt police officers in this day and age

[@mathew8581]

He should never of given details, take the arrest and sue for more , he not willing to see evidence proves he don’t want to see truth

[@davewarren2849]

Useless cop doesn't know the law

[@Assimpleasthat100]

He's taks about terrorists me thinks he'd have more luck finding them if he started with his bosses.

[@fireskycam9889]

SGT doesn’t even want to see the recording because he doesn’t want to back down on the decision he’s already made

[@OyVeh3734]

ID is like crack to these clowns . Let him arrest you then sue his lying a$$

[@Allan-th4uv]

Smirking from the start of his conversation ,

[@ChineseGordon1956]

Never give your details sue them

[@daviddurham6349]

FOXTROT OSCAR comes to mind.

[@steveacaster6326]

Pee off is not swearing it’s telling them to go away. The police person is talking CRAP he is wrong.

[@simondarvill5941]

Should of taken the arrest!

[@Bangkokinformation]

Typical standard of detaining you without detaining you. The reason they don't want to answer that question is because they know legally they have no grounds to detain you. They have to have reasonable suspicion that a crime has taken place.

[@ianhill4585]

That was copper bingo. It went from sec 43), to sec 4(a) . Eyes down- here we go.😅

[@pmarmify]

I would say arrest the female cop for misconduct & for lying

[@brianmcculloch6341]

That's 4 minutes I'll never get back.

[@OhHeyItsLeeGaming]

What would you do with those 4 minutes if you could get them back?

[@brianmcculloch6341]

@@OhHeyItsLeeGaming Do something more productive. Like watching paint dry. Or, being a keen gardener, watch the grass grow. Have a great life.

[@robba1234]

@@OhHeyItsLeeGaming Watch a better one?

[@pebble1955]

@@robba1234 and how would you know it's a better one, are you psychic?, if so give us next weeks lottery numbers 😀😀

[@MikeEves]

Awww diddums....

[@SylviaHolloway-kq1ko]

They make me sick...they wouldn't be so keen to unlawfully arrest if the fines came out of their pockets.

[@thisainturs]

This is why they cost the public purse millions in compensation claims each year.

[@johnscott4693]

LEGALS "POTENTIALLY you're committing an offence"... "you're potentially detained"... meaningless word salad. From an officer who refuses to examine the evidence. legal crap.

[@ultradawg1]

They dont care because its not them that pay.

[@woodyforest7308]

If ya gona play the game.Take the arrest

[@tonywatson1412]

Told by a fellow officer...yeah....! right ....😅

[@jayhow997]

Your evidence trumps his suspicion but alas they didn't want to see it.

[@P_E_P_1966]

Proof of NK-policing !!!

[@gordonhunt516]

Take the arrest and keep quiet. All he wants is your details. Otherwise, he'd want to see the video

[@JamesGamby]

There are some really good professional police officers out there I met one last night traffic cop name James Thank you sir ❤❤❤

[@pjb2836]

Does not want to see the evidence, isnt that part of the investigation, only reasonable grounds of suspicion, so basically wasting time and tax payers money, only going by what another person said, so in fact anyone can accuse anyone and they will get their details BS, I do hope you sued them, I can imagine female officer will not write a statement stating you verbally abused her because you have it on camera and that will be perjury, male officer will be hung out to dry and thrown under the bus by colleague 😊

[@jamiemarquiss6065]

Why would they let solid evidence get in the way of a good story......

[@benjaminmajor5144]

no crime, no ID.

[@MRVMRV-nm1bj]

Suspect or suspicion is NOT a crime .

[@neilbobbett]

1:32 all the police do is lie

[@kevingilchrist2029]

Corrupt as.

[@msmrepo3271]

I don't know until I speak to you, said the copper! Quote Pace Code A 2.9 Reasonable grounds for suspicion however cannot be provided retrospectively by such questioning during a persons detention or by refusal to answer any questions asked.

[@ivancounsell4077]

I have heard police shout the 'F' word at citizens.

[@Nomad-wv4oe]

Too late he’s got your nome !

[@darylstephens]

Straight from the Hermann Goring school of policing!!!

[@JL-yg8gl]

"Potentially". What a plonker. This copper is an embarrassment to his employer, ie, joe public.

[@atitnac598]

DO NOT WATCH THIS - THERE IS NO ENDING ! ! ! !

[@hi-tech55]

Really, all of the law and order problems we have, this pathetic police officer decides to waste tax payers money arguing and threatening.

[@Whiteandpolite21]

Very good so needed in this day and age of double standard policing. New sub

[@pauljames970]

"You do not have to say anything " ring any bells ???

[@DarrenDJV]

police dont count as "public"

[@dr_dr]

If there were no members of the public around then it wouldn't be an offence anyway. No details should be given without actual arrest. BTW, if obtaining details had been his real reason for arrest, he would have had to de-arrest as soon as he got them - the payout would be much higher.

[@BowlingCrony]

Should have held out for the arrest

[@badgermcspoon11]

The offence of swearing, ever get the feeling your taxes are wasted. Look how he investigates the feelings of his fellow officer while speaking in riddles. He is always too busy for the burglary at the grandads care home.

[@bondsan]

2020 a man attacked me inside of my home, I am a 50 year old disabled man in need of abdominal surgery, the police ignored his finger prints, boot prints, and my Cctv. No action taken against him, I was arrested for defending myself inside of my kitchen. This happened in Lancashire.

[@neeechtnie437]

PARANOIA OFF THE CHARTS !!

[@Nonegiven14582]

Hearsay isn't reasonable suspicion of an offence being committed. I would have said, as a policeman. To the off duty officer. You deal with it, if he's sworn at you. As I can't be sure he has.

[@fredbear-sf9st]

Doesn’t want to see the video that would either prove or disprove the grounds. What a genius? It is little wonder people think they are not fit for purpose but just 💩for brains. Now for a payout which will tie up resources and cost a great deal more than £1000. The resources could have been used in doing real police work.😂😂😂😂

[@roy9816]

Folded like a cheap deckchair.

[@g3zdm]

What was the conclusion ? Did you ultimately give your name and details or did you walk off without disclosing these ? Did you set up a formal complaint or lawsuit ?

[@janhudson4501]

I was under the impression that hear say was not grounds for arrest.

[@bobdylan7120]

All he had to do was watch the video but he'd rather lie and abuse his 'powers', and they wonder why they've gone from being respected to being despised.

[@ianfisher7360]

Its only a prick, a small prick but it can potentially ruin your life .......

[@offgrid5817]

If your being verbally abusive??? An officer cannot be offended. Isn't labeling someone as a terrorist verbally abusive base of no facts ??? But just a lie and coercion in order to hard sell to public by a commercial contractor?

[@doshay6422]

Id have took the arrest

[@ronwharton086]

I thought a police officer could not be the complaintif it has to be a member of the public that makes the complaint .Making it a public order offence ?

[@justindawson6724]

Why is Mr Potato head so familiar 😂😂😂.

[@danielcuddihy4273]

Telling a copper to piss off is not an offence. Public order doesn't cover the old bill clues in the name PUBLIC.

[@glennturnbull5652]

Why didnt the female police officer arrest him if he swore at her???????

[@am-jddr]

She's too is a liar

[@mikewalters1115]

Liar liar liar

[@johnphill4694]

Surely these coppers must have to have fitness tests state of some of them their a disgrace

[@jonathonwheatcroft754]

They can't be the complainants fool

[@micscottjr]

Tell them you do not understand and walk away.

[@gray100]

This officer is just like the rest. He claims he has reasonable grounds to demand details based on what he claims the sergeant said to him yet refuses to see the video which would have cleared the whole matter up, either way, which may have enabled you to walk away without giving said details. There is a clear case here for compensation and for this officer to be punished accordingly. It's doubtful he will be punished though as they are trained to be "details vultures".

[@ronaldmasters1225]

How does the giving of your name and address equate to proving that you have committed an offence.

[@clivewiddall3430]

You engaged with them too much stay silent stay alert!

[@jaylamb477]

You buckled under threats from that bald tyrant.

[@paulocavalaria9674]

I would sued the first police and this last one because he didn’t do a complete investigation, you offered him to see the video and he just didn’t care. He is not doing his job. Make two complains.

[@BG-ef8sk]

This sounds like Michael ,news now Yorkshire he always caves in and gives details 😂

[@ninianmacmillan-keith7435]

You should not have given your details. Let them arrest you and let them deal with it

[@paularcher5413]

Not another cop telling lies. Wow, who would have believed it 😮😮

[@ivancounsell4077]

I appears that the policeman is trying to get the 'suspect' so wound up that he does give a reason for arrest ? I'm not sure I could keep my cool under that situation ? I guess it's all part of their training ? They don't even put their hats on ? I'm sure the police have to do so ? I know they used to do it.

[@daved95]

LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE

[@werhold]

I am pretty sure that they cant demand your date of birth for public order offence, dont give them your details and let them arrest you, the charge will get thrown out of court and then you can sue them through the civil courts for unlawfully arrested and unlawful detainment, if they had put handcuffs on you then for assault as well

[@mardigra1916]

Dear GOD

[@Ron.S.]

To be fair, he did say “potentially”… you should have continued along those lines

[@dejavoue88]

So typical Gestapo at it again

[@TC-qd1zw]

Allegation is not proof. He is not sure what to say or allege. Allegation is it proof.

[@brianbickle7395]

Mummy will be so pleased you got attention

[@realcooking1833]

I'm warming to news now Yorkshire

[@StevenStone-b4q]

Can't believe you gave details to a living thug

[@wilfredwood2636]

Seems the police need to know a lot more about law, before going out on the beat, or driving around in their cars.

[@richardlord9616]

Police cant be the complaint

[@ozone1959]

He's the terrorist as he's terrorising the the guy

[@francispaul5621]

You were conned into giving your details….

[@steve-w9q]

Another one blah blah blah blah blah.

[@Dazzle627]

So hell arrest you so he can get your details. So if he arrest you how does he get your details. Unless you have some I'd they can find on you bank card or driving licence. If you don't can they read mind🤔

[@norbertfricke7116]

Whoever is responsible for the subtitles is committing an offence against the English language !!!!😂