Population of Europe Throughout History (1600-2020)

The past four centuries have seen great changes in the size and composition countries in Europe and the surrounding area. This data series focuses on what the largest polities were throughout recent history. Given the challenges of demography, the visualization begins in 1600 and details the numerous changes to population within the interim period. Europe today has eight times the amount of people it did just 400 years ago.
A wide variety of sources were employed in order to project the data. Tacitus.nu, Penguin Atlas of Recent History, various academic studies, and Eurostat provided most of the information. The population of colonies and holdings outside of Europe are excluded with the exception of the Russian and Ottoman Empires. Given the numerous changes in borders, the continental total can sometimes be erratic, shifting downwards or upwards for seemingly no reason. Generally, this is because various other nations are either no longer being recorded or diverging sources, not necessarily due to massive casualties. Examples include after the fall of the Soviet Union, where many former Soviet Republics are no longer included in the total, and the decline of the Ottoman Empire, with the loss of Egypt and North Africa. I've attempted to include as many states as possible, though there are a few excluded during portions of the presentation due to logistical difficulties. Obviously no data set is perfect, especially on matters so speculative such as population growth in the 1600s and 1700s, but I have put in my best effort. Please comment if you notice any serious errors so they can be rectified.
Thanks for watching! Please like and subscribe!
Pendulum Waltz by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (creativecommons.org/licenses/...)
Artist: audionautix.com/
Industrial Revolution by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (creativecommons.org/licenses/...)
Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-...
Artist: incompetech.com/
End of the Era by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (creativecommons.org/licenses/...)
Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-...
Artist: incompetech.com/

[@dimibyk6666]

Just realized that I spent 15 minutes looking at moving numbers with flags

[@irizuharbinger6358]

You should try playing Stellaris, you might like it

[@l3oncull753]

It's not just numbers, it's history

[@dave9282]

Didnt notice those were 15 min. thx

[@epochy]

so do I)

[@antoniocarlosmedeiros8974]

I tried to look at the numbers and the years i remenber with mayor Wars in 19th and 20th centuries. And tou linda understand the Power of countries and thirsty for land

[@felixk56]

Austria: once the second biggest empire in Europe, now people believe Kangaroos live there

[@silverbolbo]

Some people really hated the Austrians some time ago and were ready to kill some of them , not now ...

[@waterlemon4960]

xD

[@lordyaromir6407]

@@silverbolbo which is weird, of all the other European empires, Austria was the least genocidal, yet most people remember them for oppression and instability

[@SobaYatai]

Emu Empire

[@andrew7taylor]

@@lordyaromir6407 That was really only the function of Austria being the furthest away from the ocean and an access to colonisation out of all the empires, not an active choice. Their oppression of any internal dissidence and elevating people like Metternich or Bach into public office on the other hand, was an active choice.

[@ditlev5154]

The fact that you can see the soviet unions population decline during WWII really puts in to perspective how many soviet people died. Around 24 million soviets died

[@NikitosO-dl3nc]

It is very sad fact that most of people don’t know how many Soviet people died for win. Today in Russia everyone thinks that foreigners don’t know the loss of Soviet Union and Who really won in WWll

[@eliotguerin192]

I’m just as critical of Stalin as the next guy, as well as the Soviets’ initial cooperation with Germany in 1939. But the US should be thankful for the incomprehensible toll the USSR took to win the war. They nearly lost their country, but they persevered and turned the tide of the European theater. Maybe the Allies would not have won if the USSR didnt join Also, the Soviet invasion of Manchuria was another major reason the Japanese surrendered unconditionally. In addition to the bombs

[@pyth4701]

and war criöes

[@Apo22662]

They lost some countries that's why 😅 omg western propaganda...

[@ditlev5154]

@@Apo22662 Im sorry to inform you but the soviet union got bigger after ww2

[@sarahazvd]

I love every single detail they put into this.

[@Unwebonnn]

Spain every 30 seconds: I feel like changing my name and flag.

[@yoto8012]

French did it more often

[@oew7920]

You mean France 🇫🇷 right?

[@vgjl1824]

Im Spanish

[@oscarserrano9247]

Actually, the last flag is put isn t the actual flag

[@oscarserrano9247]

@Діма Базалюк im spanish I know It better than you

[@VremennyiGuest]

Ottoman population 1600. 25 million Ottoman population 1920. 14 million Turkey population 2020. 84 million

[@ThePatton9]

@Ahmet why not?

[@Meinrage]

​@Ahmet Your name is Ahmet but you speaking English ( no problem, just...

[@beliarek4595]

Turkey- 15000000 Kurds

[@talhaydz33]

@@beliarek4595 F*ck off

[@beliarek4595]

@King of the Lilin theu still Kurds

[@abhi5504]

Its incredible how Britain, who had the lowest population out of the superpowers at the time, somehow managed to expand and create a vast empire that conquered almost the same surface area as the moon

[@danonck]

Great video, especially paored with the music. I'd only have 1 suggestion - would be great to see some major historical events on the screen, especially when there are some major changes happening (partitions of Poland resulting in its disappearance from the list, fall of the Soviet Union, etc.)

[@gorje4511]

...

[@umuttopal6402]

Ottomans after 1699; "Mr. Sultan, I don't feel soo good..."

[@user-xr2jt7ss4o]

Remember, the defeat of 1699 wasn't because the weakness of the ottoman.. But rather, the weakness of european monarchies!! How ?? All of Austria would fall in 1683 without the help of the holy league! Conclusion.. There was no country in europe that could face the ottomans alone!!!

[@TinaPlayzAdoptMe]

@@user-xr2jt7ss4o yeah it is amazing how they declined. I guess technology + russians screw them over.

[@umuttopal6402]

@@user-xr2jt7ss4o I think Russians chould beat us alone, we were not good at tech or military. But you are right about Austria they were not do different.

[@user-xr2jt7ss4o]

@@umuttopal6402 If the ottomans remain strong the Russian couldn't defeat them alone... don't forget that the ottomans destroyed Moscow twice in 1571 and 1593 The ottoman empire got a good education system and was so powerful in military!

[@simonedaishi5290]

nobody in the Ottoman Empire ever wanted to be in it. (except for Turkey obviously.)

[@fugi_1564]

You will never know, why the dispute under this comment was start

[@deNATOfication]

@Joe McCan its fake. It was hunger, no holodomor

[@mrhaci7747]

@@deNATOfication brainwashed russian patriot

[@deNATOfication]

@Joe McCan I just know the history of my country

[@user-ex4kf1qs5l]

@Joe McCan who let you out of the dope house?

[@rovdey8961]

@Joe McCan dude chill

[@AlashCountryball]

it's very good dude! Keep working like this!

[@philliprogers4255]

Good way to roll through your old history courses and see the changes.

[@Levo_D_Angelo]

all Countries changing Flags Turkey: Nope, i like mys

[@justinblue1402]

*mine

[@Levo_D_Angelo]

@@justinblue1402 this is Honolulu english ;)

[@onurexe317]

Misused in the video. There was an Ottoman flag until 1923.

[@onurexe317]

I' m Turkish

[@kopekleselfiecekenkedi8543]

@@onurexe317 yaşasın ırkımız çine bedel 40mız

[@MsPaintMr]

Thank you for doing a video where the Geopolitical Entities change with history instead of being static.

[@clancywoods7728]

ikr. its so confusing watching a video where rhe data starts in like the 14th century and it shows modern countries

[@atillarustam6613]

Investigate Islam correctly 🕋🏜️

[@MsPaintMr]

@@atillarustam6613 Tell that to muslims and your religion would disappear overnight 😂

[@atillarustam6613]

@@MsPaintMr @mr ms paint I agree that my religion will disappear, but later than all religions. Only Islam is true until Qiyamah day .

[@Phily3bats]

@@atillarustam6613 is your real name realy Attila?

[@sabart5]

I like that this one is fairly accurate when it comes to the flags and the name of the states.

[@hanremLP]

Your music choices are always s tier

[@paulom8804]

Portugal exploring the world, setting up colonies and fighting wars in the indian ocean with just 1.5M people

[@Decordelights__]

now think about how impressive that is man , same goes for the dutch

[@kvothelamora1925]

Hahahaha that's not as impressive as it looks to be. Back then so many Portuguese soldiers were working for Spain Kingdom. Spain was gonna pay a lot to the soldiers that are attended to the exploring team and i don't even mention the glory they made. Also Magellan was portuguese but he was gonna get paid by spain if he could manage not to die. So Portugal wasn't the one explored the world and colonized the south america. If it was then Brazil wouldn't be the only country speaks portuguese.

[@Decordelights__]

@@kvothelamora1925 I think you have confused the exploring of indian ocean with the atlantic ocean missions , portugal had a syrong hold along almost all of the cost of west and east Africa , Yemen and India they also had colonies in east Asia like Macao which they held until the last century . all of this thanks to their impressive architectures who designed impenetrable fortresses

[@paulom8804]

@@kvothelamora1925 There was portuguese working for the spanish as there was spanish working the portuguese, and thats true for other nations as well. The guy who translated the between portuese and hindu was a polish guy, for example. I dont get yout point... In south America Portugal focused on its area imposed by tordesillas treaty, that included Brasil as cisplatina (uruguay) and they had to fight the spanish, dutch amd french there. In the indian ocean, oceania and on he far east the political situation was much more complex.

[@alexandremendes4730]

@@canyou7670 Magellan or Magalhães as we call him was Portuguese. This stats count with Portuguese Brazil and Colonies?

[@lorenzoschiavano3559]

Title: Population of Europe until 2020... But nobody saw that this video was posted in 2019...

[@666bambucia]

Good point

[@Pizza_-oy4do]

Yeah thats why Corona had no impact

[@indiankuttan401]

This is an entertainment.

[@CanaryMapping]

I suppose that they just took estimates for December and November 2019 and made the video be until January 2020.

[@mirzaahmed6589]

It's easy to project one year out.

[@Infernu5]

6:03 best harmony of a video with the music

[@MrDaeniboy]

thanks for the work and effort

[@casualsuede]

I'll be honest, this data chart is like watching a turtle race.

[@AlecsNeo]

There's one constant always tho , France and UK racing eachother

[@EnemyAtom65]

And Russia literally twice everybody.

[@G4nymedes]

@@EnemyAtom65 Yea because Russia is only partly in europe, but there is data for whole country. Same Turkey.

[@G4nymedes]

@Tg52s yea it is, but difference will not that big

[@eVill420]

@Tg52s I mean most of Russia's population is in its heartlands in Europe, siberia is very sparsely populated despite its size.

[@asmodeojung]

France in 1790: "I'm big!" Ottoman: "No, I am big!" Russian Empire: "Hold my kvass."

[@ddr3629]

Ou! you know about kvass, it's an excellent drink, we really enjoy it.

[@inhocsignovinces1327]

And u obese.

[@swamicoupet4355]

But the british empire had like 412 million in total, this is just british empire's population in europe.

[@xenotypos]

@@swamicoupet4355 What the heck are you even talking about, I hope you realize he's talking about 1790. Canada and Australia were more or less nothing and in 1800 even India had a total population of only 160 millions (and not a lot of India was under British rule at the time, only a small portion). It's mathematically impossible it reached something like 400 million. At most in 1790 I'd guess it was like 50 million, a lot of Indians in it.

[@NatureHeais2003]

I only know kvass because of Dayz lmao

[@luissandro5535]

Very good work thank you

[@cleverpenguin5009]

Interesting video!

[@xxxxGreenxxxxDayxxxx]

All of Europe: total mess Switzerland: chilling in the Alps Russia: MUST. GET. BIGGER.

[@technoimperialist9509]

Ask if my country Indonesia the capital of Island Java have a population as much as Russia And Java is pretty small

[@steveaguilar7510]

@@technoimperialist9509 I mean Java has better soil and didn’t have a large portion of its population killed by Nazi’s

[@technoimperialist9509]

Will we fight the Japanese we lost so many live fighting in Japanese

[@technoimperialist9509]

And also we fight so many live for for not being the colony of the Dutch

[@technoimperialist9509]

Not basically like you guys we are a colony for like many centuries

[@lokumftw2621]

It’s so surprising to see that at one point after WWI Romania and Czechoslovakia had bigger populations than Turkey and now Turkey is at 84+ while Romania is at 19-20 million and Czechia- Slovakia at 16.

[@stefanvasile1293]

Well , romania and czeho-slovakia both participated in ww2 and they both lost territories + a lot of men ... turkey was neutral .

[@esebeuimu1139]

And both suffered Kommunism for 40 years.

[@pawepioro2998]

...Turkey was neutral?! Since when?! XD It's one of the best jokes ever!

[@anordinaryboi9506]

@@pawepioro2998 yeah thats true. in ww2 turkey was neutral.

[@pawepioro2998]

@@anordinaryboi9506 In theory... Kinda yes. Throughout the entire period of WWII, Turkey was maneuvering, trying to stay out of the conflict. Why? Generally speaking, it did not pay off for the Turks to join the war on either side. There were several reasons for this: 1. Trauma after WW I, in which Turkey lost. They were concerned about the loss of more territories and possibly sovereignty. The example of Iran, occupied by the British and Soviets from 1941, cooled all enthusiasm. 2. Poverty in the country, Turkey at that time was underdeveloped, its arms industry was dwarf, everything was bought abroad. 3. Military weakness - in 1939 the Turkish army had 20 infantry divisions, 3 mountain brigades and 1 fortress brigades, and 5 cavalry divisions, aviation - 370 aircraft, mostly obsolete. Fleet - powerful on paper, in fact larger units (Yavuz battlecruiser, Mecidiye and Hamidiye light cruisers) completely obsolete and used as hulk, 4 relatively modern destroyers, 8 OPs and some "trinkets". Until 1941, the army was expanded - it had 43 divisions and 3 independent infantry brigades, 2 divisions and 1 independent cavalry brigade and 2 mechanized divisions, the aviation had about 400-500 aircraft, some equipment was purchased from the Germans, Americans and the British (including 2 destroyers and 2 OP for the fleet), but that was still not enough. The army was underarmed and had no combat experience. Turkey had great problems with maintaining this army in peacetime, so it was difficult to think about hostilities.

[@ThisSheetB4RealYo]

Awesome to see. Thank you

[@yannickdrmda5295]

As an agricultural power and politically unified country, France had a early population boom. But the 19th century was a nightmare demographically speaking. IIRC if it had the same birth rate as England from 1815 to the mid 20th century, it would be above 100 million people today. But since the post-WWII reconstruction era, the pro-birth policies (social welfare, daycare, union laws) made it among the highest birth rates in the developed world.

[@HANDSOMELYS]

Germany : *I'm going to be second* 14:01 Turkey : *I don't think so*

[@ParleLeVu]

Turkey: I'm not even a part of Europe.

[@TheKarahisar03]

@@ParleLeVu Turkey: Maybe I am a part of Europe.

[@ParleLeVu]

@@TheKarahisar03 Turkey: Good thing I occupied Constantinople so I can claim to be a little European.

[@TheKarahisar03]

@@ParleLeVu I think u mean Istanbul

[@stenovitz]

@@TheKarahisar03 Istanbul - Constantinople - Byzantium. Same same, just different names in different eras :-)

[@mariuszeqq6306]

Poland: *disappears* Me: ah shit, here we go again

[@Piczu223]

@@jsmrfuture7928 I like bread

[@ananttiwari1337]

@@jsmrfuture7928 ok

[@idkbutokay]

pzdr polska xd

[@michaeldemus6666]

Jeszce Polska nie ziegraly I think that is what they say. :-)

[@Piczu223]

@@michaeldemus6666 "zginęła" often our language is hard for ourselves too (no joke)

[@JackyVSO]

The masterstroke is that the music is in time with the changing of the years

[@rxotmfrxotmf8208]

The moving numbers and bar chart is strangely mesmerizing.

[@shaunbrowne9870]

>Random nation suddenly jumps several places in the rankings. "Someone went a-conquering."

[@Jonsson474]

Mostly due to new alliances and older nations bending disassembled though.

[@JacksSpiralShape]

The European way to gain people!

[@yougoslavia]

Mostly Prussia.

[@runningfromabear8354]

Sometimes nations unite voluntarily. ..... Not often, but it happens on occasion.

[@mirzaahmed6589]

England didn't conquer Scotland in 1707, it was a mutually agreed union.

[@iriasu2138]

That turkish comeback at the end doe

[@nelsondesousa8873]

Turquia país fantástico😃😃😃👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

[@erdniealinik]

Yes 15 million of it is probably Syrians and other refugees who constantly give birth And im also pretty sure that each day more Syrians are given birth than Turks which is kinda ironic

[@iriasu2138]

@@erdniealinik yea no wonder anti syrian/arab sentiment grows many think turks have been arabified and should return to turkic culture

[@erdniealinik]

thats not really possible considering the dictators intention to turn Turkey into a islamist arab country

[@iriasu2138]

@@erdniealinik thats why hes losing popularity especially from right wing/conservative young people

[@TimeMeddler]

Really cool!

[@user-gt1kw3rz4q]

Дякую за роботу 👍

[@markusz4447]

France: I'm number one finally. Time for a REVOLUTION

[@galaxystar8232]

Prussia around 1870: Im gonna do something thats called a Bismarck pro gamer move

[@aldunlop4622]

My ancestors in Prussia emigrated to Australia about that time. Thank fuck.

[@nrw64]

@@aldunlop4622 what should this mean ?

[@Lassemalten]

I thought Germany(Saxony and Habsburgs pop) would go down during the 30 years war. But according to this it increases. I always thought this was true: "During the war, Germany's population was reduced by 30 percent on average; in the territory of Brandenburg, the losses had amounted to half, while in some areas an estimated two thirds of the population died. Germany’s male population was reduced by almost half. The population of the Czech lands declined by a third. The Swedish armies alone destroyed 2,000 castles, 18,000 villages and 1,500 towns in Germany, one-third of all German towns. "

[@boerekable]

Take the video with a grain of salt.

[@maxwell5159]

awesome, thanks

[@arthurschopenhauer7990]

This is called "Turkish comeback"

[@oguzkarabolu9525]

😂😂😂

[@seyyarsatc1082]

@@oguzkarabolu9525 nabıyon la

[@oguzkarabolu9525]

@@seyyarsatc1082 Ne

[@parthenope.]

This is called Nazi Erdogan

[@oguzkarabolu9525]

@@parthenope. Nazi ? Do you know anything about national socialism?

[@ZeroNitroMan]

10:37 Finland be like: We are here!... Oh, bye then!

[@TheLassenman]

Same with Norway haha :P

[@TheLassenman]

@William S. D. Albertsen Yes

[@eVill420]

surprised we even touched the list, it's so empty here in Finland, everywhere else in the world populations are exploding meanwhile here: 1919: 3 million 2020: 5 million at least once overpopulation starts becoming a problem elsewhere we'll be fine here.

[@Armor3d0ne]

@@eVill420 Nah, once the Africans and Arabs fill up Western Europe, we will be sure to send them up to you guys.

[@eVill420]

@@Armor3d0ne idk bro not many people want to live like this, Finland's population is like 90% in the southern part of the country and 10% in the northern half and I live in the northern parts. humans aren't made for this shit.

[@andrasszabo1570]

Interesting as soon as you know your history and can deduce why the numbers change the way they do. One small mistake: you wrote Austria-Hungary from 1848, but that isn't so. Hungary became effectively independent in 1848-49 (so you would want take their population away from the two-headed eagle) then reintegrated into the Habsburg Empire after the lost war of independence. Austria-Hungary is only after 1867.

[@wildwilly356]

I love how long turkey of all places was at the top

[@AnishChari]

The timing of the 1812 Overture is absolutely perfect, well done.

[@fahoodie1852]

6:40 Napoleon: *this is where the fun begins*

[@laytonjr6601]

What country can take over Europe? Italy: I did it 2000 years ago France: I did it many times centuries ago Ottoman empire: goes brrrr Nazi Germany: all descendants of German should be in Germany including Celtics from France and UK USSR: is the second most powerful country in the world and has half of Europe Portugal, Spain and UK: don't care about Europe and take over the world instead

[@ricomyxledeuxieme1657]

@@laytonjr6601 in colonial times, whoever controls Europe, controls the world.

[@leeroberts1192]

Any chance of doing another one but this time the population per square mile?

[@kanxaxa]

Turkey first :Haha die kidz! Turkey at end:Umm.. literally nothing changed.Right?

[@COPROO]

germany be like: oh we are splitted, lets get together oh we are together, lets get splitted oh we are splitted, lets get together

[@starseed8087]

hahaha

[@TmanMoneymanISSUPREME]

Spilt stick spilt stick

[@refox0537]

You dont know what happend right?

[@COPROO]

@@refox0537 I do know, I'm from Germany and we do have history, but thanks for asking mate :)

[@refox0537]

@@COPROO Dann bist du einfach dumm

[@theorangeman5005]

11:00 its so freaking weird that someday in the past czechslovakia used to be more populated than turkey

[@zisispit]

dude back in 30s turkey was 2 times bigger than greece.. now its more than 8! they are just booming and booming

[@m.b.8282]

Problem wit Turkey was that it wasnt industrialized. That is why you see a population boom. If Turkey had industrilized at 1750-1850 it might have been bigger than Russia today

[@think9747]

@@zisispit no it is getting slower and slower the max will be around 100 million and then decline

[@xxxxxx-rg6qr]

@@think9747 hayır 2060 ta 110 milyon olup zirveyi görücez knk

[@k0pafti401]

@NAMEKSİK not just ww1 Tripolitanian War, Balkan Wars and then ww1 with internal disturbances there is no way to see population grow

[@Fitzgerald934]

I find it rather weird that the population of bavaria continues to increase while all historical data shows that up to 33% percent died there during the thirty years war.

[@grasarlia]

It's interesting how Belgium used to be quite larger than the Netherlands, but now the Netherlands has roughly 6 million more people now.

[@markdeblij9258]

Thats because of migration! We have in the Netherlands 4,6 million not-western people.

[@VinnyUnion]

I call those hogs.

[@ferminalit3590]

Just for the comparison, today Istanbul has the number of entire population of 1950 Turkey or 1700 Ottoman Empire

[@awakefortwoweeks4770]

Also count the illegal settlings

[@KinnyRiddle]

I like how you timed the climatic fanfare of the 1812 Overture exactly at 7:00 when the map shows 1812.

[@AapoJoki]

Or as Tchaikovsky himself called it, "the drop".

[@halilibrahimaydin6264]

🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷❤❤❤TÜRKİYE!!!!

[@hudson5244]

Nobody : France : let’s change my gouvernement and my flag every month

[@sumargaet6346]

😹😹😹

[@neceon4586]

Germany copied that behaviour

[@inhocsignovinces1327]

The fact is France will change only during 19th century (except a little part 1940-42)..

[@mattgomes7762]

Heureusement que tu n'apprend pas l'histoire de France en cours, car j'en garde des souvenirs par sa complexité xD

[@Flash4ML]

No, just the government. For some reason they kept the same flag over and over lol

[@giannisaliev]

Double the speed, save 7 minutes of your time.

[@BSKdefis]

Watch the 14 minutes, save your love to music

[@telmanmammadov9475]

i slowed down the speed to understand which countries go and which come

[@47.f.02]

I actually did because I have to get up at 4.30am tomorrow and it’s 21.30 and I wanna sleep but can’t

[@bahadrkelesoglu618]

I wish to read it before i watch :(

[@giannisaliev]

@@bahadrkelesoglu618 It can also work for future videos ;)

[@user-cv9mv4yj7v]

どうやって調べてるんですか？ めっちゃ気になります！！

[@callsigndd9ls897]

Interesting, very good work.... With the exception of Prussia, Saxony and Bavaria, the more than 30 small German states did not appear in the list for a long time and then suddenly in 1871: Zoooom, German Empire second place in Europe.

[@GreatPolishWingedHussars]

Not a very good work! Really not! Because the founding of the united German state in 1871 was a gigantic catastrophe for Europe! The unification of the various small German states into a united German state was a terrible catastrophe for Europe! Actually the forerunner of the worst catastrophes of all times in the 20th century. Because without this unified Germany, neither World War I nor World War II would have happened. This united nation would not have had the opportunity to commit various genocides before WW1 and during WW2. If Prussia had not existed and thus also no unified Germany, then there would not have been also almost 50 years of communist oppression in half of Europe. The communist victory in the fallen Russian Empire was the result of the First World War caused by Germany and Austria so the communist rule over the areas of the fallen Russian Empire would never have existed without Germany like the later successes of the communists after the 2nd World War with the occupation of half of Europe and force the nations there into Communism. Even if one denies the German-Austrian war guilt, the First World War would not have happened without the united German state. The result would be the same. So NO world wars, NO genocides, NO immeasurable destruction and NO strong communism. This multiple NO would be the result of the destruction or considerable weakening of Prussia. Because Prussia made this German state possible in the first place. That was actually the only relevant achievement by Prussia! Unfortunately, when the Poles had the opportunity to do so, they did not destroy Prussia! Too bad for Europe! Others also had the opportunity to destroy Prussia or to weaken it decisively. The French in the 19th century and the Russians in the 18th century had the opportunity to destroy Prussia or to weaken it decisively. Unfortunately they didn't use the opportunity to destroy Prussia either.

[@callsigndd9ls897]

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars Hmmm, I think you're simplifying the story a bit. If Germany had not existed as a unit, other states might have waged wars against each other. Especially in times of colonialism, no state begrudged the world power to the other. In principle, the German Reich had existed for 1000 years, just not yet united as a state. Eventually, the unification was triggered by Napoleon, who was able to occupy one weak German state after the other almost without resistance and turn them into puppets. After Napoleon's defeat, this feeling of powerlessness in German-speaking countries led to the founding of the North German Confederation, the first sub-confederation that was formed and defended itself against further greed from other states. The misfortune you describe was not necessarily the unification of Germany, but that the March Revolution of 1848 failed and the state did not become a democracy from below, but an authoritarian empire founded by Bismarck, in which the nobility could continue to rule under Prussian leadership. A harmful breeding ground in which nationalism could grow.

[@GreatPolishWingedHussars]

@@callsigndd9ls897 Yes, nobody doubts that there would have been wars even without the Germans. But not such wars driven by utter barbaric and racist megalomania. There would certainly not have been a total of 70 million victims caused by 2 world wars and the various genocides and this immense destruction. Incidentally, it is a fact that all this gigantic misfortune would not have happened without the founding of the German state in 1871. No matter what caused this founding of the state. Because all this could only happen because there was a German state. The equation is very simple. None of this without the German state! But you are right about one thing! Without the Bismark state, Nazism would not have existed. The Bismarck and Kaiser state was politically completely backward and the nucleus of Nazism! This state was anti-democratic. Nazism did not fall from the sky and the German population was not replaced in 1933 when the Nazis came to power. Also the German population was not replaced after the First World War in 1918. I am also not claiming that Bismarck was a Nazi, but a forerunner of Nazism like the entire German population of his time. That is an original quote from Bismarck on Poles: "Do the Poles hit that they despair of life, if we want to survive, all we can do is exterminate them ... ". That was also the attitude towards Poles in the Nazi state of the 30s and 40s. This was an anti-enlightenment attitude that was widespread among the German population. The origin of the Nazi ideology was actually already Prussia which was continued in the German Kaiserreich! The term used by the Nazis for "living space in the east" ( "Lebensraum im Osten" ) which was an important aspect of Nazi ideology was also developed in the 19th century especially in Prussia. This idea was then spread from Prussia to all the German small states. With reference to the medieval conquest of German-speaking settlers in the Baltic States, the idea of ​​German colonization of Eastern Europe became increasingly popular. The idea was widespread in German society from the German natural right to rule and colonize the Slavic and Baltic areas east of Germany. In this context, the Germanization of Poland was propagated as the highest goal of Prussian politics. The idea of ​​solving the social problems and the supposed overpopulation of Germany by gaining new settlement areas in Eastern Europe was expressed with the catchphrase “people without space”. The German war aims in World War I were also shaped by the idea of ​​conquering large areas in the east. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk clearly testifies to this urge to expand to the east, in which the Bolsheviks who ruled Russia were forced to cede vast territories to Germany. In the First World War there were already clearly formed structures that can be called forerunners of Nazism. The by Germany occupied areas called Upper East (Ober Ost) in the 1st World War was the forerunner of the Nazi nation's General Plan East ( German Generalplan Ost)which aimed at various genocides in occupied Eastern Europe. A kind of blueprint for General Plan East! Regarding the genocide of the Slavic nations and the colonization of the conquered areas in Eastern Europe. Because with the Ober Ost policy, which was not only practiced in Ober Ost but also in other occupied areas of eastern europe, the germ Nazism was clearly recognizable as early as the First World War. These areas of Ober Ost were brutally exploited, including forced labor. After defeating the Russians with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, the Germans planned to extend this method of power from Ober Ost, which was very similar to Nazi methods, to all conquered Slavic territories. Those were only a few steps to Nazism! So there would have been a Nazi state even with a German victory in World War I, but instead of a "Führer" in government with a German monarch. In this anti-enlightenment spirit in World War I, the German army then systematically waged a completely brutal war against all war conventions, including many massacres on civilians. A completely criminal warfare that was very similar to the warfare of the Nazis, including various massacres of civilians as early as World War I. Not only did the infantry massacred civilians, but also the German artillery with shelling on civilians, the German Navy with the shelling on civilians with ship artillery, and the German air force with with bomb raids on civilians. With this many massacres of civilians many children were also murdered. Mind you, already in the 1st world war. In fact, German warfare in World War I was reminiscent in many aspects of German warfare in World War II. This is not surprising since it was the same nation that fought both wars. One war was waged by the forerunners of the Nazis, and the other war was waged by the fully developed Nazis!

[@GreatPolishWingedHussars]

@@callsigndd9ls897 By the way, in the 20s after the First World War there was in the German population a virulent longing for a leader like Bismarck. The German historian Hans Ulrich Wehler writes in connection with the rise of National Socialism that Hitler was able to benefit from the longing for a "new Bismarck" as a dictatorial leader. In their detailed studies of the Bismarck myths, the German historians Richard Frankel and Robert Gerwarth emphasize that the Nazis used the Bismarck myth to expand their following. That helped that Voters turned away from the classic right-wing parties - above all the DNVP and had flowed to the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP). Hitler in particular had the “political potential of the Bismarck myth” used and to stage itself as "the second Bismarck" or at least as his heir. Even after the Nazis took over power in Germany, Bismark continued to be used as a model. Hundreds of Bismarck monuments had been erected, anniversaries such as Bismarck's birthday on April 1, 1815, and the anniversary of his death on July 30, 1898, offered an opportunity to approach the myth every year appointed. Bismarck also uses phrases like "blood and iron decides the questions of the time" in reference to his policies, which fit the Nazi concept very well. It is also clear that Bismark was a forerunner of Nazism because of his contempt for Poles. He was a Poles hater! Original quote from Bismarck on Poles: "Do the Poles hit that they despair of life, if we want to survive, all we can do is exterminate them ... " The Germans then did that under the leadership of the Nazi government with the general plan East (German Gneralplan Ost). This plan involved the annihilation of the Polish nation as well as all Slavic nations. The Generalplan Ost was the plan for the genocide and ethnic cleansing on a vast scale, and colonization of Central and Eastern Europe. It was to be undertaken in territories occupied by them during World War II. The plan was realized during the war, resulting directly and indirectly in the deaths of 20 million ethnic Slavs by starvation, disease, ethnic cleansing, mass murder, or extermination through labor.

[@bloo_too2704]

When you think that your country is losing a large amount of it’s population but it’s actually just another révolution

[@lachlankeddie7]

...or a plague outbreak

[@Callcdm]

Ireland : yes but actually no

[@czowiektutejszy6241]

or you are just polish

[@Opposition2]

If you ever feel like your life is worthless, then remember that you contributed to population count of your country

[@aradanat231]

Unless you do something in your life more productive than watching random numbers on youtube floating, then not really, you're just vegetating on other's people expense.

[@somedude0921]

@@aradanat231 the points still holds tru

[@kyo7686]

@@aradanat231 it hurts, but let back to work

[@ryanholder7728]

Nice to know I’m part of overpopulation

[@watmosphere]

@@ryanholder7728 if you (will) have less than 3+ children you are part of underpopulation

[@Ixusllllow]

Could you do the same but in relation to the m2 landmass they occupied ? so in short a population density instead ?

[@sven8219]

TURKEY ISN'T in EUROPE.

[@derscalsyorum9720]

3% is in Europe, that is, both in Europe and in Asia.

[@yolomannetje6777]

2:45 The Ottoman Empire reached ALMOST the 30 million, but failed

[@plamenjekov4568]

they have nothing to do with european civilisation!!

[@kaganayhan8437]

@@plamenjekov4568 Well. Almost 40% of the entire population was european balkan so...

[@plamenjekov4568]

@@kaganayhan8437 what u mean exactly ?!?!?

[@migorpresents8991]

It did. If you watch on x0.25 speed

[@blackfrost3581]

@@plamenjekov4568 europe is a continent dumbass, everyone on the continent is european. There is no such thing as "European civilisation"

[@sadfuck666]

Nobody: Republic of Turkey: i am speed

[@furkanunsal5814]

We have so many population we have even exported them to foreign countries. with an agreement. to solve unemployment problem. in exchange of money.

[@xypaisb8026]

@Emre no it was because of mass migration

[@DoofyGilmore1299]

Thanks to syrian in a syria family you must do minimum 5 child

[@ebruuu9343]

@@DoofyGilmore1299 Refugees are not Turkish citizens

[@DoofyGilmore1299]

@@ebruuu9343 no the government of Turkey to win votes giving citizenship to Syrian refugees

[@sn9starship272]

9:09 That Spain's flag is not from the 1st Spanish Republic (1873-1874), the flag they used was pretty similar to the red-yellow-red typical flag. The tri-color flag is the one of the 2nd Spanish Republic established in the early 1930's

[@iranbek]

You should've added memorable events like wars, pandemics, collapses of empires or unifications of lands etc so that the reasons of rapid growth or fall would be more obvious. Apart from that - perfect video!

[@mcfcfan1870]

1:38 Cromwell's invasion of Ireland

[@perpetual_suffering1458]

It's completely whacky that the population of ireland was halved TWICE in the last 400 years. And yet I unironically know british people who think that britain colonizing ireland was actually good for ireland

[@biohita]

@@perpetual_suffering1458 there are brits, specially English, who think the empire was good with its INVADED territories.

[@eggrollsoup]

@@biohita They mass starved indians

[@niono1587]

There's a reason they put his head on a stick

[@perpetual_suffering1458]

@@niono1587 the only thing 1600 ireland and 1600 england agreed on is that they both hated cromwell

[@tysonmou1]

This was nice. I would've liked to see an overlay of the events that took place during major shifts in population. ie, flood, famine, plague, war, or other

[@beageler]

Every major increase was because of territorial gains. Only in the last decades were territorial changes not much of a thing in europe (besides the USSR). Every major decrease was because of the same. I'm just a diletant in history, but I was looking out for the wars I knew more than the names, and the fighting itself didn't seem to change anything. Only territorial gains/losses.

[@GreatPolishWingedHussars]

This was nice. But also with some mistakes. Nobody is perfect. So it is completely nonsensical to call this country Habsburg Spain. This was Spain and the Habsburg Austrians were completely irrelevant. Also the term Poland-Lithuania is wrong because it was a Polish empire. Using the term Poland-Lithuanian is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Actually Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is also mostly used, which is also incorrect for the same reason as Poland-Lithuania because it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! By the way, the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! So the designation for this state as Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth but also as Poland-Lithuanian is completely wrong. If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire. Here is an addition to the Polish Empire because the term is rarely used. An empire is usually a very large in terms of area multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. According to this definition was Poland an empire in the 15th, 16th and 17th centuries! This already proves the enormous size of the territory compared to other European countries that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong.

[@giovanni-8522]

​@@GreatPolishWingedHussars да всем плевать на Польшу, как при всех её разделах

[@GreatPolishWingedHussars]

@@giovanni-8522 Это ошибка, брат, что ты враждебен мне, так же как ошибка, что наши славянские народы сегодня враги. Кстати, я поляк и панславист. Для меня все славяне мои сестры и братья. Так что, конечно, русские тоже мои славянские братья. Сегодня разлад между славянскими народами! Это факт! Украинцы и русские даже воюют друг с другом военными средствами. Но так не должно оставаться. Поляки и чехи/словаки сто лет назад были врагами. Сегодня это дружественные страны. Сто лет назад Польша тоже воевала с Украиной. Сегодня эти два славянских народа тоже хотят дружить. То, чего достигли эти славянские народы, может быть достигнуто и другими славянскими народами. Во всяком случае, я обнаружил, что славяне всегда хорошо ладят. Даже русские и украинцы. Или хорваты и сербы. А также поляки и русские. По моему опыту, в личном разговоре, эти славяне с юмором воспринимали неприязнь и не хотели быть врагами. Я никогда не чувствовал, что разговор и диалог невозможен. Суть всегда заключалась в том, что вам нужна дружба и братство, а не конфликт. Вы можете ясно увидеть, что если присмотреться, у славян сильное чувство единения. Панславизм не умер! Это хорошо видно на KZbin! например, видео под названием «This is Slavia» или панславянское видео под названием «Slavic peoples». Второй комментарий в списке @David Trivic звучит следующим образом: Мечта об объединенной Славии никогда не умрет. Люблю всех моих славянских братьев:🇧🇦🇧🇬🇧🇾🇭🇷🇷🇸🇵🇱🇲🇪🇷🇺🇸🇮🇸🇰🇺🇦🇨🇿🇲🇰. Остальные комментарии на самом деле все братские. Вот почему я считаю, что в будущем будет Славянский Союз.В будущем, кстати, будут массовые конфликты в Западной Европе и Германии из-за неуклонно растущего мусульманского населения, что ускорит формирование Союза. В Германии и Западной Европе возникнут хаотические условия, которые перерастут в гражданские войны. Радикалы уже обустраивают склады оружия и планируют вооруженную борьбу за свержение правительства. Солдаты и полицейские уже сегодня такие радикалы. Xаос и радикализация резко возрастут в будущем, пока не возникнут восстания и гражданская война. Я знаю это, потому что долгое время жил в западной стране. В СМИ также много сообщений о росте насилия.Дело в том, что с обеих сторон уже нарастает насилие с гибелью и ранениями. С обеих сторон нарастает радикализация. Мусульманское население в этих странах составляет всего около 10%. Очевидно, что ситуация полностью обострится, когда будет 30-40% мусульманского населения. Может быть, даже с 20% мусульманского населения. Из-за более высокой рождаемости и иммиграции число мусульман в этих странах вырастет до этого уровня и продолжит увеличиваться. Германии и различных странах Западной Европы обречены! Хаос и гражданская война - будущее этих стран! Уже сегодня в этих странах происходят большие конфликты туземцев против востоковедов, хотя востоковеды достигли лишь около 10% населения этих стран. Только небольшой процент ассимилируется. Большинство хотели сохранить свою восточную самобытность! На самом деле, большинство из них чувствуют свое превосходство над местными жителями из-за своей религии, которая также препятствует ассимиляции. А если 20% или 30%? Из-за этого в этих землях будет хаос и гражданская война за господство. Мусульманские могилы оскверняются уже сегодня. Ориенталов убивают уже сегодня. На лагеря мигрантов уже совершены тысячи нападений. Восточные тоже снова и снова совершают насилие включая терроризм. Все это приведет к гражданским войнам за господство в этих странах. Эти страны точно этого не переживут! ЕС и НАТО тоже перестанут существовать. Я хорошо знаю, что в России тоже около 10% мусульман, но в России нет такого массового прироста, как в Германии и западноевропейских странах. Кстати, из чеченского конфликта они поняли, что бросать вызов русским - ошибка. Почему бы этому славянскому союзу не существовать? Все вовлеченные славянские народы только выиграют в очень смутные времена. В то время, когда безопасность всех этих государств находится под огромными внешними угрозами. Между прочим, Славянский союз был бы не созданием большого славянского государства, а объединением равноправных славянских государств. Уверен, славяне научатся на ошибках ЕС! Не предпринимается никаких попыток создать единое славянское государство. Это будет федерация равноправных наций, в которой одна нация не может господствовать. Это будет объединение независимых государств, но они будут тесно сотрудничать на экономическом уровне. Будет ограниченное политическое сотрудничество. Однако в то же время это будет и оборонительный союз. Хотя у славянских государств не будет таких проблем, как у западных государств, хаос там затронет и славянские государства. Будут экономические потери, потому что экспортные рынки исчезнут. Могут быть беженцы из этих стран. Могут быть даже пограничные инциденты. и т. д. Это автоматически приведет к сближению славянских народов. Однако создание славянского союза требует укрепления славянской идентичности в славянских народах. Поэтому необходима прославянская кампания, чтобы панславянская идея получила широкое распространение среди славянских народов. У славянских народов должно возникнуть стремление к славянскому союзу, от которого выиграют все славянские народы в этой трудной ситуации. Я продолжаю свой комментарий ниже.

[@GreatPolishWingedHussars]

@@giovanni-8522 В связи с этим, конечно, тоже есть проблемы. Но все эти проблемы можно преодолеть, если славяне будут работать вместе. Например, Россия - гигант по сравнению с другими славянскими странами. Поэтому существует риск полного доминирования России в Союзе. Таким образом, Россия сможет участвовать только в том случае, если Россия согласится с тем, что в Союзе существуют механизмы, предотвращающие доминирование одного государства. Кстати, у России не будет проблем с этим согласиться, потому что не будет существенных ограничений суверенитета вовлеченных государств, как это имеет место в ЕС. Россия также получит возможность, как и другие государства, проводить собственную внешнюю политику. Но почему бы государствам Славянского Союза не поддерживать друг друга во внешней политике? Будет Славянский Союз! Это только вопрос времени! Сегодня славянские народы все еще разделены, но ситуация в будущем будет совершенно иной из-за массовых опасностей, которые возникнут из-за хаоса на Западе, а также из-за стремления славянских народов окончательно примириться. Конечно, до создания славянского союза еще далеко, и необходим общеславянский поход, который укрепит позитивный прославянский дух в славянских народах. Потом, вероятно, будет несколько общеславянских конференций, на которых потом и славянские народы примут решение об объединении. Однако обязательным условием является наличие воли к примирению, потому что сегодня, как известно, некоторые славянские народы фактически являются врагами и два славянских народа фактически воюют друг с другом. Как я уже писал выше, если полякам удалось помириться со словаками, чехами и украинцами, то почему бы и другим славянским народам не сделать то же самое. Конечно, это не произойдет в одночасье, но через 30 или 50 лет ситуация будет совершенно иной. Кстати, неславянские народы точно не захотят быть в славянском союзе, потому что будет автоматический процесс ассимиляции. Я уверен, что ни один народ не хочет быть ассимилированным славянами. Но я уверен, что будут ассоциированные привилегированные члены. Венгрия и Румыния, безусловно, примут приглашение стать такими ассоциированными членами. Для такого ассоциированного членства было бы много экономических выгод, таких как доступ к славянским рынкам без тарифов. В любом случае это было бы очень полезно для Славянского союза, так как была бы сухопутная связь с южными славянами. Возможно также, что Греция получит приглашение к такому членству. Однако беспорядки в этой стране помешали бы этому. Таким образом, решающее значение будет иметь ситуация в Греции. Хотя интервенция могла бы умиротворить страну. Еще одной страной, которой будет предложено такое ассоциативное членство, будет Казахстан. Казахстану «попросят» согласиться на ассоциированное членство из-за большого славянского меньшинства. Следует помнить, что это будут не мирные времена. Славянский союз также был бы оборонительным союзом, и эти ассоциированные страны также могли бы быть союзниками Славянского союза. Для меня в любом случае славянский союз в будущем вполне логичен. Желаю тебе всего наилучшего!

[@daryus9064]

Imagine the guy that had too manually go to every country and count everyone he saw

[@themonarchyofeigengrau9165]

Never ask a Woman: Her Age A Man: His Salary Germany: *why their population tripled in 1940*

[@sammysserendipity1744]

🤣😂

[@pertturuuska2987]

It was just really exciting trying to recognize all the major events from the time lapse. Also, I love the sound design!

[@emanuelfigueroa5657]

This is how historic charts should be made, with the existing coutries at the time, and how do they change.

[@xenotypos]

So true, even if I wonder how accurately the borders are counted each time it changes. Nice work though.

[@rurik_the_second4696]

The Russian Empire appeared in 1721, and in 1600-1721 there was a Russian Tsardom

[@HorusHeresist]

*Tsardom, not Kingdom.

[@rurik_the_second4696]

@@HorusHeresist I just didn't know how to use the English Tsardom

[@Gunnl]

where do you get these numbers from ? E.g., watching the population of Portugal in 1755 ... there seems to be no single casualty due to the Earthquake + tsunami that alone in Lisbon is estimated to have killed 60.000 people ...

[@vibingonvibes8630]

Love how the end of 1812 overture aligns with Napoleon's defeat

[@azopeopaz3059]

That mainly because in that moment france prety much lose 1/4 of his teritory for exemple belgium , luxembourg and 2/3 other region was french teritory.

[@vibingonvibes8630]

@@azopeopaz3059 yeah, I know, that has nothing to do with what I said.

[@stanislavnovikov8880]

He is talking about the song

[@unscgrasshopper9413]

For Russia and Spain to ever have had similar populations is mind blowing

[@EdgyMemer_]

Or France to have a larger population than Russia

[@juliosalazar6924]

Yes, but remember at that time Spain included southern Italy, Sicily, Sardinia, Milan, Luxembourg, Belgium and the French regions of Artois and Franche-Comte

[@skland1619]

That's what exponential population growth and demographic changes do! Africa had 1/3 of Europe's population in 1950 and now it has around 60% more people, and in 2100 it will have over 3 times Europe's population

[@yolomax]

@@juliosalazar6924 they really had all of that in 1695 yeah, no

[@Pedrinho8080]

@@skland1619 normal, europeans dont want kids

[@tomlxyz]

I like how this counts per individual when there's no way we have that data

[@twojnarrator7576]

It's preety intresting how you can see population change in Poland-lithuania during sweden with sweden and partitions

[@hachimaki]

I'm genuinely surprised that Sweden managed to stay on the list from start to finish, totally expected us to dip out early on tbh.

[@whyparkjiminnotridejimin]

I read "from start to Finnish".😂

[@TheBarser]

I am surpised they had almost twice the population as denmark-norway when denmark had the whole of sleswigh and southern sweden. I dont think the numbers hold op.

[@StormcloakGuard]

@@TheBarser Also, Norway lost 60 % of its population to the black death so they could'nt help much with the numbers either

[@maximkretsch7134]

Probably because the Swedes killed enough civilians elsewhere in the Thirty Years War and later on.

[@Cecilia-ky3uw]

I was surprised sweden was more populous than brandenburg prussia

[@fethidede7709]

Ottoman Empire in 1881: Well, something big is coming.

[@Yagiz.Ozturk]

Yalan gardaşım yalan, Abdülhamit bir karış toprak vermemiştir yalan bu veriler sjjsshskhd

[@tictacktictack818]

@@Yagiz.Ozturk git biraz araştır

[@Yagiz.Ozturk]

@@tictacktictack818 Bu yaptığım şeye ironi deniyor aptal herif.

[@abdullahcoskun3236]

@@tictacktictack818 Abdülhamit zamanında kaybedilen topraklar Tunus Yunanistan Romanya Kıbrıs mısır Sırbistan Karabağ Girit Bulgaristan toplamı Türkiye'nin iki katı ebatında ve başka hiç bir padişah Abdülhamit kadar toprak kaybetmedi. Ekonomi hiper enflasyon ile karşılaştı. Azınlıkların hepsi ayaklandı. Ki hala o ayaklanmaların etkisi devam ediyor ayaklanan azınlıklara kavgamız bitmedi ve bu yönetimi çok iyi yönetim diye yutturabiliyorlar. Tarihi objektif yansız kaynaklardan öğrenmek yerine dizilerden öğrenince insan bu şekilde düşünebilir tabi sen de haklısın.

[@tictacktictack818]

@@abdullahcoskun3236 normalde sana uzun uzun aciklardim ama kapasite az olduğu icin anlaman imkansiz, sen böyle devam et elinde sonunda hem turklerden hemde kiclarini yaladigin ingilizlerden dislaninca anlicaksin aptallığın cezasını ve kimsenin umrunda olmicaksin

[@gaymur1]

Turkey and Germany's switch was so good

[@MappingEagle]

As a Dutch person, it feels weird that Belgium used to have double our population. Though it dors makes sense since they were decades ahead in industrialisation.

[@RedRocketthefirst]

And everyone only knew the Belgians exist

[@agag6414]

Can we just take a moment and appreciate how many times Poland went off the list and still managed to make it in the end

[@beorlingo]

You figure right now is the end (of time)?

[@thsimpsonsguy]

@@beorlingo exactly. history has a tendency to repeat itself

[@DreamWalkerVl]

Who care

[@INecr0]

@@DreamWalkerVl I do.

[@piegorgioni4931]

@@DreamWalkerVl me

[@user-yr3yc1uw4z]

Throughout the history of europe: starts in 1600

[@logannslm1593]

Probably an American dude who, as always, thinks the world has waited for America to exist to start existing too.

[@leguman5289]

@@logannslm1593 comme d'habitude avec de pays répugnant

[@thetimelapseguy8]

"throughout history" is NOT the same as "throughout the history of Europe" Obviously population counts weren't accurate before 1600

[@seanbrummfield448]

@@logannslm1593 Now that's an ignorant response. Nobody thinks that you silly fool. What he was trying to say was that the data could've began in BC or something like that. You took it to another extent saying, "Probably an American." The guy has a Greek name as well. Now that really shines the ignorance on you.

[@logannslm1593]

@@seanbrummfield448 Idiot, my first comment was referring to the dude who broadcasted the video, not the Greek dude I replied to.

[@Preacherjonson]

The UK feels so crowded save for a few notable areas. Trying to imagine it with a tenth of the population is really difficult.

[@dennisengelen2517]

Your UK has 100 less people per square km than Belgium and 200 less than the Netherlands. Mayby in big cities but in just normal municipamities (or whatever you call it over there) it should be way less than here lol.

[@Quesnoo]

​@Dennis Engelen England is comparable to the Netherlands tbh, but yeah the UK as a whole not so much.

[@Boredoutofmywits]

You tried a bit too hard replacing the Spainsh flag in the I Republic period 1873-1874, with the SECOND Repubic flag. Love it though.

[@anurdaburmancitizen]

Switzerland deosnt like changing switzerland likes how he is forever

[@76eaglesonthesky39]

Lets all be like switzerland and love ourselves

[@jupix7]

(Me, just an ITSY BITSY tiny bit Swiss) *Yes, why don’t we?*

[@lifefan1]

@Alexander Ortiz NONSENSE!

[@tommeiner9983]

@Alexander Ortiz Who tf cares?

[@SilencedButNotForgotten]

Very interesting and informative. Thank you!

[@trygveplaustrum4634]

*I love how France and Spain keep switching as they change regimes every few years.* *Ah, you two... never change. As in, never stop changing.*

[@Speedster___]

Where do you get population from?

[@abubakrad-dagestani8540]

Germane: Oh nice, am second! Turkey: get back to reality …

[@wotblitzcoltilkisi]

Türk gücü!

[@wotblitzcoltilkisi]

Şakşuk!

[@YsaTR1905]

Nazi germany spawn 100m in 6 month Everycountry:wait thats illegal

[@corentincaspers8229]

*steal

[@Antarctide]

*conquers back

[@wigglytoes5929]

@@Antarctide *No

[@vincent_hall]

That's some acceleration! Don't worry, we took their colonies and everything. Made them nice. Now they are brilliant, still near the top of population and productivity.

[@FiNN--]

@@vincent_hall Du bist aber auch ganz schön stolz deutscher zu sein hm

[@Frenchaboo]

Me, a Pole, watching the Poland-Lithuania bar go up just before the 1790's: "Honey, you got a big storm comin' ".

[@tugayercanli5939]

Republic of Turkey 82m people + 10 m syrian

[@page.elifipek]

Maalesef

[@aleynamehmetoglu4212]

Cidden ya maalesef

[@alikoc5739]

Onlar nüfusa kayıtlı Değilki😶 Türk Kürt Nüfusu Ve TC vatandaşı sayılan Suriyeliler değilmi

[@masumbirtilki3176]

84,5M TC vatandaşı var en fazla 3-4M Suriyeli var

[@Roland.Deschain]

@@alikoc5739 Suriyeli mülteciler nüfusa kayıtlı değil. Sadece ikametgahları var.

[@anastasiakomar8927]

It's devastating to watch millions go in the years of WWII... In a span of seconds from 190 to 170. And people still dare try to overwrite history

[@AnimeJuggz_]

can someone explain why at one point the french empire and napoleonicfrance were both present? is this some history bit i missed

[@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714]

Fun fact when population started to boom at the start of industrialization the elite predicted starvation. For the pattern in history was smaller population -> plenty of recources -> population grouth -> large population -> lack of recources -> population decline. What they failed to take in to consideration that progress had stopped moving at a snails paste as they had trouth all of history with generations living basically just like their grandparrents to instead the engines of progress spinning at full speed. Machinery had boosted city population as people where needed to run the factories, but soon enough people realized that machinery could be used in agriculture aswel. So rather than there being starvation food became more abundant than ever before.

[@tayfunyildiz7815]

Son yüz yılda attığımızı vurmuşuz nüfusu 5e katlamışız.

[@resulkardes]

Savaş dönemlerinde her daim nüfus artar. Şu an Suriyelilerin nüfusunun bu kadar artması gibi. ABD 2003 te Irak'ı işgal ettiğinde 16 milyondu nüfusu. O kdr insan ölmesine rağmen 18 yılda 42 milyona çıktı nüfusu. Neredeyse 3 katına çıktı nüfusu. Bizde de öyle oldu. Birinci Dünya ve kurtuluş savaşı sonrası çok ciddi erkek nüfusunda azalma oldu. Allah'a şükür bu günlere geldik.

[@jesusdontlikethatimgaybuts9493]

free kurdistan

[@jesusdontlikethatimgaybuts9493]

@@titanyumkullanc1392 free armenia

[@canozmen]

@@jesusdontlikethatimgaybuts9493 free your mind

[@ggoddkkiller1342]

1. Dünya savaşı ve Kurtuluş savaşında 3 milyon insan kaybetmişiz, savaş, kıtlık ve ispanyol gribi yüzünden. 1922de Anadolu'daki Müslüman nüfusu 11 milyona kadar düşüyor yani tam doğru değil bu tablo ama bir hayli yakın. Zaten bu yüzden 2. dünya savaşına katılmayı reddetmişiz zira memlekette 17 milyon insan yaşıyor neredeyse 8 milyonu 16 yaş altı!! Savaşacak kadar yaşlı yada genç kimse kalmamış ki hangi güçle bir başka dünya savaşına katılıyorsun. Valla bir kitle küçümsemeye çalışıyor ama Kurtuluş savaşında savaşan kahramanlar olmasa bir manda olmamız veya Anadolunun çoğunu kaybetmemiz çok ama çok kolaydı zira bazı kolonilerin nüfusu bile bizden fazlaydı..

[@skorpius2029]

Looks like Turkey is going back after its first place

[@xxxxxx-rg6qr]

of course after erdoğan start house erdoğan and become sultan and khalifa 😂😂😂

[@okanylmaz1666]

@@xxxxxx-rg6qr selen ne dıyon kız :D

[@risus]

@@xxxxxx-rg6qr abla lütfen yorumu sil. Aksi takdirde bu yorumu gelecekte okuyacak olan insanlar çok ilginç şeyler yaşayabilir.

[@baron2282]

@@xxxxxx-rg6qr selen rezil ettin kız bizi :))

[@xxxxxx-rg6qr]

@@baron2282 neden ki gerçek gelecekte olucakları söyledim sadece xD