Oof - sorry for the flickering image. I accidentally recorded in a different frame rate that doesn't play nice with the lights. And double sorry if you didn't notice it until I pointed it out.
@aaronhector4 ай бұрын
Thanks Preet, great explainer! PS - do you have a classic red telephone booth in your flat? Amazing.
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
Thanks! It’s actually a wooden replica which serves as a whisky cabinet 😊
@marcn57334 ай бұрын
A glitch video would be great fun!
@IllWeeZee4 ай бұрын
I agree
@kevin-jm3qb4 ай бұрын
someone made billions on those trades. 15 seconds is an eternity.
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
It looks like the trades got busted (meaning they will be reversed).
@Okok665674 ай бұрын
Casinos don’t let the big catch just walk out my man
@TheGuinever4 ай бұрын
Cancelled
@MyMathProfessor4 ай бұрын
I remember when they told us that the Flash Crash in 2010 was fake, just a fat fingered mistake. (But that was a lie.)
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
@@MyMathProfessor It does seem like a better way to police LULD would be to trigger a guardrail halt before passing the information through the SIP, as opposed to waiting for a trade outside the prescribed band. Something doesn't smell perfectly alright, but as a matter of scale, so far this seems quite minor compared to the flash crash so I don't know if we'll hear much more about it.
@littleninjai2224 ай бұрын
Well you answered all my questions in this video. Didn't even notice a glitch. Can't wait for the next. Video...not glitch. :)
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
Thanks! I think my next video will likely be on my Canadian channel... but we shall see 😊
@Slicknick726364 ай бұрын
Can you explain the settlement times piece I think many people don’t know that purchasing stock has a settlement time of T+2
@cococarnes4 ай бұрын
If I buy a few shares at a price of 168, do I still ask to return them?
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
If the trades get busted, then it will be like your trade never happened. No one will ask, it’ll just happen.
@Paintotheworld114 ай бұрын
46 stocks were sold at 185. Any updates on those
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
Yes - NYSE confirmed that any trades at or below $603,718.30 would be busted.
@NiklasAndersson74 ай бұрын
I guess this is one of the reason we avoid market orders. A video on glitches might be interesting. I understand that this case was a clear technical error, but I guess the famous 2010 'flash crash' was legit, because it was triggered by actual orders, and the trading bots went haywire when the stop-loss orders triggered one another like the 'Kessler Effect'... :-D
@dianelili85984 ай бұрын
What happens to people who made money in this situation by trading CFD?
@TheLostDude74 ай бұрын
Ok I have a question about gme shares, since technically none exist. What is that considered? A glitch? Do those who bought recently actually have these shares? We all know there's no more gme shares behind the scenes
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
I’m not sure I understand: are you saying no shares of GameStop exist?
@TheLostDude74 ай бұрын
@@PreetBanerjee yes
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
@@TheLostDude7 Do you have a credible source for that?
@TheLostDude74 ай бұрын
@@PreetBanerjee the people who were shorting, where were they getting those shares? What are synthetic shares?
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
@@TheLostDude7 Ah I think I see what you are asking. A synthetic share is when you use a combination of instruments (like derivatives) to give the same payoff as a position in an underlying security. In other words, you could create a position using a combination of options that would perform the same as just holding short the underlying stock. The existence of synthetic shares does not mean there are no actual underlying shares. So there can be actual shares that exist as well as synthetic positions.
@cherylhurst4 ай бұрын
Is there a glitch that makes me a millionaire..?
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
Not having kids
@ShortBudgetProductions4 ай бұрын
How? There are no glitches just revalue.
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
Why revalue if there wasn’t a glitch to cause a misvalue?
@ShortBudgetProductions4 ай бұрын
@@PreetBanerjee the ting you call a glitch is the revalue
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
@@ShortBudgetProductions So the class A shares dropped 99% but the class B remained normal. Are you saying this isn’t a sign of a glitch?
@novaordemdesantiago18904 ай бұрын
Basically we can lose everything with a click os a button
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
Luckily the glitch was caught and corrected within a few hours
@BenoitStPierre4 ай бұрын
If you make a video about historical glitches for fun - I will watch it for fun 😃
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
Deal!
@brandonserna11774 ай бұрын
Cool so you can lose everything but when you finally win they say hey not valid because you won too much too fast....
@lindenmeyer114 ай бұрын
It’s about time to turn the stock market into Block Chain transactions…
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
It seems that is a good use case for the technology for sure
@MrRellgrant4 ай бұрын
Man I got a few of them at 185 and they got reversed 😭
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
Must have felt pretty awesome for a minute… but not so nice to see it reversed :(
@MasterTactics4 ай бұрын
I wonder if the stock jumped to $10 million a share and someone bought it. And then it went down 600K, would they reverse it and call it a glitch.
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
@@MasterTactics If the reason for the jump could be linked to a clearly erroneous execution reason, then it would likely get cancelled yes. For both the person who who bought and for the person who sold it.
@AteamerHFF4 ай бұрын
Did anyone make money off this??
@PreetBanerjee4 ай бұрын
All trades below a certain amount (I think they said it was about $603,000) would be cancelled. To the extent that an HFT firm or algo shop were trading down to that threshold, there might have been some anomalous gains. Beyond that, I don't know if anyone would have made outlier gains from the situation.