The Nikon Z9 doesn't have a mechanical shutter; it just has a sensor protector. So why isn't it highly reflective, which would entirely mitigate the potential for overheating or even burn-in?
@Frodofoto0122 сағат бұрын
Good point. But as the burn mark is nearly in the middle of the sensor protector, the camera was facing directly into the sun. He probably lay the camera on its back with the sun overhead, which is asking for trouble. Wouldn't have happened if the sun was not in the frame.
@yummm87752 күн бұрын
Not sure about Nikon cameras, but Canon gives a warning about direct sun exposure each time I power down my camera.
@siddharthchakravarty20992 күн бұрын
That is VERY GOOD idea.. Nikon doesnt have that. I am a 10 years nikon shooter. And this is a very easy to make mistake about. so I think every camera should have this
@jamiesondean2 күн бұрын
I always wondered why Sony mirrorless cameras close down the aperture when powered off, until today
@niclasbagenheim718111 сағат бұрын
I´ve had this happen to my Z9, but I mostly contribute this to one of my older lenses wich keeps the aperture open even when the camera is off. Luckily my camera works fine and I´m now not letting the camera face the sun with my older manual lenses attached. I´d rather damage the curtain than the sensor. Perhaps they cuold make the curtain reflective or made of asbestos ;-D to make this a bit more safe?
@z352kdaf83242 күн бұрын
Protector? That's the shutter!!! My Sony A7R5 has on screen warnings about this.
@AndyTychon2 күн бұрын
@@z352kdaf8324 it’s NOT the shutter. The Nikon z9 has an electronic shutter. It is a curtain to protect the sensor.
@z352kdaf8324Күн бұрын
@AndyTychon ok thanks. Sony has only a shutter you can melt 😆
@nevvanclarke92252 күн бұрын
MY GFX thankfully doesn't have shutter curtain .....they are plain stupid 🙄 dumbest ideas Yes if you shoot directly into sun 🌞 and do long exposures into the sun ..you run a risk And yes I'm a working professional in Western Australia
@josdenis36842 күн бұрын
Very prudente but you will miss at least one (maybe unique) shot, grabbing your camera and see nothing more than a black screen. But yes, it’s a risk.
@masanthar2 күн бұрын
Gear is expensive, babying a bit at least is a good idea.
@brigittekumar87213 күн бұрын
Very interesting 👍🤗🙏
@AndyTychon3 күн бұрын
@@brigittekumar8721 thank you
@notjacknicholson22252 күн бұрын
Reminds me of Ken Rockwell, who proudly says, "I never use a lens cap, I put on a UV filter instead, so I'm always ready to shoot".🤦
@AndyTychon2 күн бұрын
@@notjacknicholson2225 a UV filter protects from mechanical/shock or impact damage. The idea being that the UV filter breaks instead first instead of the lens glass. It won’t protect from sun burning through the lens, which I’d liken as similar to a magnifying glass effect.
@notjacknicholson2225Күн бұрын
@@AndyTychon What I actually meant was that it's very bad advice not to use a lens cap (and it's even worse because it comes from someone with a very large audience!). Personally, I use both..! A UV filter because I'm always bumping into people, branches, water mist, etc., and a lens cap whenever the camera is just sitting there, on a table, on a tripod, or elsewhere. Thank you for your video, I think this is too often overlooked.