The process of producing solar photovoltaic panels in a Chinese factory

[@Suavache]

I was shocked to see the most modern solar panel production line, mainly robots working to handle humans, just simple tasks. Thank you for sharing.

[@markliu9698]

这个只是最后的组装部分。 希望看到拉硅棒，切片，蒸发电镀，分割等流程。

[@vrajvariya8413]

Thank you dear team 🙏🙏✨

[@stanleybest8833]

I buy squarish 4 X 3 100 watt panels of 21 volts. This is really nice work in any country.

[@concepcionramirezrodriguez1575]

Muy bien 👍👍👍👍👍

[@joseluispetro2003]

Excelente fabrica ,debe de estar una de esta en colombia de América central o colocarse gracias

[@anoopm6204]

Proud of you ❤

[@emilianogabriel9613]

Why in US solar panel was so expensive most of the companies that installed those already bankrupt

[@Thanhvo27070]

Quy trình sản xuất công nghiệp hóa không biết giá thành có giảm hơn nữa không

[@eddysuprapto6387]

great solar panel 👍

[@mflo1970]

Se nota claramente por la velocidad de producción que la fabrica esta en China, esa misma fábrica en europa iria a cámara súper lenta

[@Yury-Baranovskiy]

你好

[@andre_s.]

Wie ist denn die Lebensdauer der Module? Können sie Recycelt werden oder sind sie dann Sondermüll?

[@kb-elmo]

Die durchschnittliche Lebensdauer moderner Panele beträgt etwa 25-30 Jahre. Danach haben die (sofern sie nicht beschädigt wurden) immer noch ca. 80% ihrer ursprünglichen Leistung. Damit sind die zwar für große kommerzielle Solaranlagen nicht mehr rentabel und werden dort meist ausgetauscht, für kleine Balkonkraftwerke erzeugen die dann aber immer noch ausreichend Strom und halten dort bei guter Pflege teils bis zu 50 Jahre da Solarzellen nur sehr sehr langsam abnutzen. Die verwendeten Materialien lassen sich zu ca. 95% recyclen, da die Panele größtenteils aus Glas, Aluminium und Silizium bestehen. Lediglich ein kleiner Teil der seltenen Erden für die Beschichtung der Siliziumzellen selbst kann nicht zurückgewonnen werden.

[@Nguyenphu81]

Bạn nên quay về thời kỳ nguyên thủy mà sống. Bạn không thích hợp sống ở thời điểm hiện đại như thế này. Vào rừng hái hoa quả mà ăn lấy lá cây làm quần áo.......... Trong thế giới hiện đại này có cái gì là không có nguy hại kể cả bạn không ăn uống hay mặc gì trừ khi bạn vào rừng săn bắn hái lượm ví dụ như ở rừng nguyên sinh Amazon Brazil

[@Suavache]

Thank you for letting everyone know the lifespan of solar batteries if they don't break they can be used for a long time now I see solar batteries are much cheaper than before I don't know if the quality is still the same as before 0

[@Nguyenphu81]

@@andre_s. Bạn không nên sống ở thời điểm hiện đại như thế này

[@معاذعثمان-ح1خ]

​@@kb-elmo كلا صحيح

[@IronHandTech2024]

Can these panels be recycled?

[@johnhornblow4347]

Yes

[@stanleybest8833]

In 30 years

[@amandagrant4331]

Great

[@omarabid]

the background music is very annoying.

[@pishpash75]

at 14:28, looks like one of the heads is unplugged :)

[@Angelo-k6z]

All das während auch hier möglich, wenn die Menschen miteinander sprechen und nicht gegeneinander arbeiten würden! 😢

[@puneet9628]

Solar and nuclear energy are the future

[@beyondfossil]

Solar definitely is the future for powering our home world. 🌍🌄 But nuclear power not so much... unless you're in deep space or are the military.

[@ProductionEfficiency1]

🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@JOHO-j2d]

Zur

[@peterjaniceforan3080]

🌝

[@GlobalistJuice]

Solar fields/farms are the stupidest idea I've seen so far for this type of energy, one good hail, rain, wind, dust storm will render the ENTIRE field inoperable, and the maintenance required to keep the panels clean from normal debris is a labor cost that might very well eliminate any profit to be had. Individual set-ups for individual home owners, or even small community neighborhood builds are the way to go, same goes for those huge windmills littering the landscape for miles and miles, constantly breaking down, constantly requiring diesel powered "help", all connected to the power grid and never really giving a return of investment - individual smaller solar or wind powered devices are a better way to go, the only alternate fuel where BIGGER is a benefit, is water power, everything else not so much.

[@Angelo-k6z]

Du hast noch nie etwas von Ökonomie gehört? Wie während es mit ATOMKRAFT? 😊

[@GlobalistJuice]

@@Angelo-k6z I agree Nuclear power is superior, but what I'm talking about are the already natural producing sources of sun air water and the lame-brain schemes the global warming fruitcakes developed such as solar and wind fields, with water hydro-power the only source they haven't screwed-up! haha ha! Nuclear IMO is the most economical and something global warming enthusiasts hate!

[@beyondfossil]

So wrong. Solar farms (along with residential) will dominate the grids. Solar (especially utility-scale solar) has reached historic low costs per MWh hour and getting even cheaper! The world has never seen energy production costs so low. Not saying its impossible, but an entire solar farm will unlikely not be wrecked by a storm. Its spread out so wide that only portion will take a hit from the worst of the storm. Because if given advanced notice, the panels can will be tilted vertically or flat as needed to reduce damage further. Even then, the damage is not guaranteed. Look at residential solar panels regularly survive hail storms when the sides and windows of the house are smashed. You can stand in the middle of one and bounce a little bit and they'll not break. The specialized glass is made to survive all but the worst baseball sized hail.

[@beyondfossil]

Also, solar farms are the least expensive to maintain. The newest largest farms will be cleaned by robotics with dry brush. A small team can spot clean any extremely dirty areas. Even if there was only a crew of people, the cost is minimal as it is mostly unskilled labor doing a repetitive task. On the other hand, look at the enormous complexity of thermal power plants (coal, natural gas) with *miles* of piping along with intricate control valves, thermal- and pressure-dynamics, turbines and other physical machines. These plants need a constant never-ending stream of fuel to so their footprint extends for hundreds and thousands of miles away to source their energy. The most expensive is nuclear energy with all the problems of thermal and a whole lot more. Solar is unique in that it produces its power with quiet and completely sealed solid-state electronics without any moving parts! Even if a farm took some damage, the damage is not that hard to repair. Panels are very cheap and getting cheaper by the year. After an engineer clears and plans the work, all the work can be done by mostly unskilled labor all at ground level. All other energy production needs skilled technicians at minimum to do any of the work.

[@beyondfossil]

​@@GlobalistJuice Sorry no. Nuclear the slowest to build and most expensive form of energy. The next 10- to 20-years will be critical to avoid the worst of climate change yet it takes 10+ years to build a single nuclear power plant. Any new construction of nuclear now actually will slow down the global energy transition. Look at the entire history 70+ years of history of commercial nuclear to see the failure that it is. Anyone believing that nuclear will save us is living a 1950's dream. If commercial nuclear hadn't failed us as much as it did, we would *not* be so far down the climate change hole we're in now. A true nuclear fan will look upwards as the free 173,000-terawatt nuclear *fusion* reactor we have in the sky. Significantly less than 1% of the world's land surface in current generation solar panels can power all the world's grids. It's also inevitable that the bulk of our entire civilization's energy needs will be solar. There is no other power source even remotely close to this within 4 light years from us (Proxima Centauri). Consider also nuclear and fossil fuels combined on Earth would amount to drop in an Olympic sized pool or two of water in comparison. If we considered the entire output of the sun which is 3.9×10²⁶ watts of power, that all is actually a drop in all oceans of Earth multiplied by a few thousand. Solar is growing *huge* in leading economies like US and China. US solar is some 250TWh annual generation but growing at a large 30% compound annual growth rate (CAGR). China's solar production growing even faster at some huge 70% CAGR. China is currently installing the equivalent of 5 nuclear power plants a week worth of solar capacity! Even with a 20% capacity factor, that's a solid 1 nuclear power plant a week! The world has never seen energy growth at this rate. All the economics and science tell us that solar power will dominate our home planet. The power arrives freely and cannot be stopped by blockaded, sanctioned, or tariffed. Not all the energy needs to photovoltaic and can also be capture thermally as well. In 50 or so years, we'll see commercial nuclear be all but gone on the grid. It simply the wrong tool for the job. Nuclear will continue though in small-scale applications where it excels in like military, scientific and deep-space exploration.