Professor Andrew Bowie defends Heidegger

[@alastairmoody798]

Heidegger starts with human finitude and the every-day.I am very glad to have had opportunity to hear Andrew Bowie lecture on Adorno, ecology, art, and continue to get a great deal from his writing. Rudiger Safranski's biography of Heidegger is one I'm sure Andrew Bowie has endorsed, and which I found through his work. I recommend it.

[@JimKanaris]

Enjoyed this very much. What needs to be fleshed out, I think, is that Heidegger's poor judgment should be simultaneously differentiated from his philosophy and associated with it. It must be differentiated from it in the sense that fascism is not inherent in his philosophy, as those who refuse to read him argue. And it must be associated with it in the sense in which his advocacy of finitude as the basis of thinking doesn't exonerate his poor judgment but explains it: Heidegger is finite, like most of us! It should also be associated with his philosophy in the sense in which Heidegger, as most who have read him know, has negotiated, successfully in my opinion, the need for humility in thinking and in our judgements about faulty decision making. The luxury of hindsight is not afforded historical, temporal beings. We do not know infinity nor can we reason from it.

[@DanielHettenbach1]

Thank you Dr. Bowie : )

[@michaelboylan5308]

Oh no,,,I used to joke about the absurdity of literary festivals,,after all everyone can read,,,by imagining a philosophy festival where punters paid to watch people think ,Never in my wildest dreams,,,,6mins 46secs to prove MH the most important philosopher in World History, Incroyable,Magnifique, At poetry readings Flann O Brien put his fingers in the corners of his mouth and tried to pull his face off,,,what does this fatuity deserve

[@chriswebb3179]

If only you were drinking wine and listening to flute girls while making these speeches, then you'd really have yourself a philosophical gathering!

[@Thomasrice07]

Nothing eternal in Heidegger. LOL

[@hurdellift]

Cool.

[@datinsky69]

Heidegger was not useful as a thinker and this defense is horrible.

[@bebeezra]

I agree with your description on this defense, it was horrible. However, I disagree with your assertion that Heidigger was "not useful as a thinker". Not withstanding his indefensible affiliation with the Nazi party, and his unfortunate absence of repudiating that relationship, to read "Being and Time" and say he provides no utility for thinking is a discredit to all thought.