Chemical Equilibria and Reaction Quotients

  Рет қаралды 723,864

Professor Dave Explains

Professor Dave Explains

Күн бұрын

Many chemical reactions don't just go one way, they go forwards and backwards. Once there is balance between the two, this is an equilibrium. And we need to be able to predict how much stuff there will be at equilibrium! Get ready to bust out those ICE boxes, folks.
Watch the whole General Chemistry playlist: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Study for the AP Chemistry exam with me: bit.ly/ProfDav...
Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
Classical Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Modern Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Mathematics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
PATREON► / professordaveexplains
Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

Пікірлер: 413
@Gaammee_Media
@Gaammee_Media 6 ай бұрын
Anyone in 2024?
@ThelmaNgoma
@ThelmaNgoma 6 ай бұрын
✋✋✋he has just nailed it
@fayezmapandi1057
@fayezmapandi1057 5 ай бұрын
sup
@givenmulongoti9381
@givenmulongoti9381 4 ай бұрын
Here
@samstudiosofficial
@samstudiosofficial 4 ай бұрын
yup
@naodnati1742
@naodnati1742 4 ай бұрын
Here I am
@helium4045
@helium4045 4 жыл бұрын
we seriously need this type of teachers in india sir please come in INDIA i really appreciate it
@decoayubi786
@decoayubi786 4 жыл бұрын
this dude is a teacher, we call these guys wizards cuz they are beasts.
@edutalib290
@edutalib290 3 жыл бұрын
Covered most of the things of the topic in short time. This is good one.
@retroarthanadi1626
@retroarthanadi1626 2 жыл бұрын
Hi Professor Dave, for the answer 0.12, I know in the table it's 2x so 2 * 0.06 would be 0.12, but the question asks for NO2 while in the table is the concentration for 2NO2 so shouldn't that be divided by 2 again and get 0.6 (NO2) as the final answer? Sorry for my bad english
@reddragonemperor1623
@reddragonemperor1623 10 ай бұрын
No , if 1 mole of n2o4 gives 2 mole of no2 so in total moles of no2 will be 2 moles not 1 mole
@hofnihangula1816
@hofnihangula1816 6 ай бұрын
@@reddragonemperor1623 Bruv Im getting the same anwser but my X is 0.949 Isthere a problem. pls help
@tez0999
@tez0999 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@mariamoine75
@mariamoine75 7 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave I love you
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 7 жыл бұрын
i love you too!
@modernscientist5465
@modernscientist5465 5 жыл бұрын
SUBSCRIBED The channel well explained sir....
@hadeelallaw7848
@hadeelallaw7848 3 жыл бұрын
How did you put the concentration in mole?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 3 жыл бұрын
a mole is a number, not a unit of concentration
@hadeelallaw7848
@hadeelallaw7848 3 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains thank you for your explanation
@devverma8412
@devverma8412 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for teaching me jesus
@phyuhninnaing380
@phyuhninnaing380 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Professor Dave. The most unique thing about your lessons is...there is always a comprehension check test at the end of it. It makes a significant difference because most of the time, I have been watching all online lessons and I thought I understood, but when it comes to problems, I dont know how to use the theory I learnt. But now, with your videos, I can learn what kind of problems will come up for the theory I learnt which is very helpful. Thanks again.
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 7 жыл бұрын
happy to help!
@jimmytorres7232
@jimmytorres7232 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you professor Dave for a very clear explanations about Thermodynamics and Chemical Equilibrium. I really appreciate it.
@andredemetrius6083
@andredemetrius6083 3 жыл бұрын
i dont mean to be offtopic but does someone know a tool to get back into an Instagram account?? I stupidly lost the login password. I would appreciate any tips you can give me.
@themathguy5492
@themathguy5492 2 жыл бұрын
@@andredemetrius6083 bruh
@zoe-hc6nf
@zoe-hc6nf Жыл бұрын
@@andredemetrius6083 LOL
@MrMustardYellow
@MrMustardYellow 7 жыл бұрын
I swear my chem professor is the worst at teaching
@user-po4dv9sp3n
@user-po4dv9sp3n 6 жыл бұрын
blueberry yup and so as mine ... she’s the reason why i lost my key to future tho 💔
@AsmaelFarsi
@AsmaelFarsi 5 жыл бұрын
No , mine is worse 🙂💔
@mjdxp5688
@mjdxp5688 5 жыл бұрын
My chemistry teacher doesn't even teach us...
@valarmathiselvaraj8517
@valarmathiselvaraj8517 5 жыл бұрын
My science teacher too..
@adarshsaraf4932
@adarshsaraf4932 4 жыл бұрын
My chem teacher is completely under qualified.
@mniayb
@mniayb 5 жыл бұрын
I’ve learned here in 6 minutes what I’ve been confused about for the past week. Thank you!
@RasmeyKyo
@RasmeyKyo 3 жыл бұрын
Damn
@kapilmamtani8676
@kapilmamtani8676 5 жыл бұрын
This guy is awesome and sits among very few in the league of educating / Tutoring KZbinrs.
@AvnishKumar-gy5nh
@AvnishKumar-gy5nh 3 жыл бұрын
Visit Unacademy JEE KZbin channel and watch India's highly experienced and qualified teachers educate students FREE OF COST to crack entrance exams and they also provide pdf of notes
@skcenior4227
@skcenior4227 3 жыл бұрын
@@AvnishKumar-gy5nh of course brother but in only in hindi it is like the qualified teachers are always belongs to the people who speak hindi Wright isn't brother??
@bruh__9696
@bruh__9696 3 жыл бұрын
@@skcenior4227 yes bro
@preethamjee6022
@preethamjee6022 2 жыл бұрын
@@AvnishKumar-gy5nh why are you boasting haha
@philchernichenko9422
@philchernichenko9422 6 жыл бұрын
It's always crazy to see just how quickly and thoroughly you can teach a whole concept in under 10 minutes. Amazing work
@corey5454
@corey5454 5 жыл бұрын
Wish it was a step by step process on how you solved for x in the last example.
@themathguy5492
@themathguy5492 2 жыл бұрын
It's in there, look at the previous example for help. Remember products over reactants
@michaeljessica6374
@michaeljessica6374 8 ай бұрын
Please I still don't understand
@babatundejoseph4415
@babatundejoseph4415 5 ай бұрын
Already confused he used 4x instead of 2x pls can someone explain that side to me,I mean the last place
@SphokuhleNdlovu
@SphokuhleNdlovu 5 ай бұрын
(2X)^2= 4X^2 I hope you understand 🥲
@iz_latte
@iz_latte 16 күн бұрын
the exponent applies to both 2 and x so you get the product of 2^2 and x^2 = 4(x^2)
@teachtech8265
@teachtech8265 5 жыл бұрын
U really explained very well.... 🇮🇳loads of love frm India
@ModernEducationYt
@ModernEducationYt 3 жыл бұрын
same
@Sith-c3s
@Sith-c3s 4 ай бұрын
The intro song aint lying he really knows a lot of stuff And explains it beautifully
@jamesahmadpour9001
@jamesahmadpour9001 3 жыл бұрын
Got a exam in 30 mins! Let’s hope Dave can save me from failing!
@jamesahmadpour9001
@jamesahmadpour9001 3 жыл бұрын
@Mari Christofidou i passes with a decent grade!
@unfoundedidentity
@unfoundedidentity 5 ай бұрын
Wish me luck, I'll be doing tha same :')
@smellydonut5088
@smellydonut5088 4 жыл бұрын
god bless this man you make chem endurable :,)
@gilliancollins3324
@gilliancollins3324 7 жыл бұрын
Literally saving my life! Thanks so much
@nicholaspoh4916
@nicholaspoh4916 3 жыл бұрын
May I know how you solve 0.126=x/0.10-2x? If possible, please show me step by step. Thank you Dave.
@Zero-th2sc
@Zero-th2sc Жыл бұрын
just cross multiply, the rest is just algebra manipulation
@arvojustice
@arvojustice 10 ай бұрын
I think that “subjects taught at a university level” is just a nice way to say things taught poorly by people who don’t want to teach.
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 10 ай бұрын
Um, what?
@arvojustice
@arvojustice 10 ай бұрын
Joke lol, my prof spent a fair amount of time today complaining about how he needs to teach after someone asked him to further explain this concept
@neaeanblue
@neaeanblue 7 жыл бұрын
Hello, On the checking comprehension why is [NO2]^2 changed to 4x^2 and not 2x^2? Is it because of the equation give?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 7 жыл бұрын
don't forget that when you do (2x)^2 the exponent operates on both the 2 and the x! so it becomes (2^2)(x^2) or 4x^2
@neaeanblue
@neaeanblue 7 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave Explains Thank you. Your videos are great!
@kmarie1102
@kmarie1102 Жыл бұрын
I love that you are able to present concepts in a way that makes sense. A lot of professors jump into certain topics without really letting us know the importance of it, what its used for in or why we should care. You have an amazing gift of giving students the AHA moment and making things click! Thank you doesn't suffice for the work you do. Much love 🤗
@iqmal3910
@iqmal3910 2 жыл бұрын
Wow this is very helpful. I've been staring at my Icebox Questions for hours. Thanks Dave💪🏽
@kripashankarshukla4073
@kripashankarshukla4073 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for explaining this concept. You are superb and amazing
@mariamartinademarte
@mariamartinademarte 4 жыл бұрын
Bruuhh im on a professor dave marathon since online classes got me confused as heck and now i have a test and i barely know what a chemical formula is xD
@jpmhess
@jpmhess 5 жыл бұрын
I tell everyone about your channel, god bless you
@darkseth23
@darkseth23 3 жыл бұрын
2:55 "Simple no? ...no
@trieuhuyvan5020
@trieuhuyvan5020 2 жыл бұрын
i'm so grateful to you 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘
@aychaabs5024
@aychaabs5024 2 жыл бұрын
in 2:52 why did he only take away one (0.135) form the 1m instead of two? shouldn't the product be 0.730 as both reactants have 0.135. someone please explain
@nevilkumara9038
@nevilkumara9038 6 жыл бұрын
I'm from Sri Lanka.... The way you teach is really amazing..... Really it covers our A/L syllabus.thank you so much
@theepicsalad9576
@theepicsalad9576 3 жыл бұрын
I've never had an online tutor that has been the pillar of my chemistry marks. LMAO
@1NikkiPink1
@1NikkiPink1 6 жыл бұрын
Hi professor Dave. Thanks again for the great videos. Quick question on the checking comprehension. Did you multiply both sides by negative one to get to the quadratic form? When I multiply both sides by the denominator, I get the opposites for addition and subtraction.
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 6 жыл бұрын
nope i just brought the left side to the right side! if you have 0.036 - 0.36x and you bring it to the other side to be with 4x^2, you have to subtract the number and add the x term so the signs reverse.
@1NikkiPink1
@1NikkiPink1 6 жыл бұрын
wow lol that was silly of me. Thanks for taking the time to answer such a mundane question! You are awesome!
@EarlSweatshirt1096
@EarlSweatshirt1096 3 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains this was also helpful to me, thank you
@Ramusacol
@Ramusacol Жыл бұрын
Profesor Dave, your on line classes are helpful even to some teachers and professors. Your explanation is absolutely understandable. Thanks
@dr.bucci.
@dr.bucci. 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much this is extremely helpful. However, I am confused about how you got 4x^2 in the numerator when solving for X using the Equilibrium Constant Expression. Could you explain why we use 4x^2 instead of 2x^2? Thanks again!
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 5 жыл бұрын
you have to square the 2 as well!
@mrpickles1
@mrpickles1 2 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains Yeah i was super confused as to why the 2 remained AS WELL as having it raised to a power of 2. I thought the coefficient was what became the power.
@aswaths4184
@aswaths4184 2 жыл бұрын
Why can't we talk about the concentration of solids? Isn't concentration of solids equal to the number of moles of the solids present in 1 liter of the solution?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 2 жыл бұрын
But that wouldn't be a solid. When a solid dissolves it is a solute in the aqueous phase.
@aswaths4184
@aswaths4184 2 жыл бұрын
Oh ok thank you for the quick reply!
@gouripandey4148
@gouripandey4148 5 жыл бұрын
Sir plz can you in another video of yours.."The addition of inert gas at equilibrium at : (a) Constant pressure (b) Constant volume...... I would be really thankful if you could help.😃
@saintofchelseathomascarlyl5713
@saintofchelseathomascarlyl5713 6 жыл бұрын
i thought this new semester was going to be a headache now im good thanks dude
@elzika739
@elzika739 Жыл бұрын
You haven’t explain how to solve for x
@draugami
@draugami 5 ай бұрын
In that example, x was given in the problem. 0.135 moles was produced. From that, you can deduce how many moles of reactant is left.
@jyfelisilda8194
@jyfelisilda8194 2 жыл бұрын
Can I ask something? What if the K is greater than 1 but the product is a solid. Is it still product favored?
@shashankshekhar1266
@shashankshekhar1266 5 жыл бұрын
Hey Professor Christ. Suppose If I take the equation of PCl5 PCl3 and Cl2 at 1:44 . Now, since Kc(equilibrium constant) is independent of initial concentration, I can take Z molar solution and should still get the same answer. But if initial concentration is Z and degree of dissociation is a , Kc comes out to be (Za)^2/(Z-Za) => Za^2/(1-a). That is, it depends on Z(initial concentration) . PLEASE HELP.
@zainuddinmulla.5357
@zainuddinmulla.5357 3 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave , you have doctoral degree of all subjects as you explain physics chemistry biology and other things , or you are speaker.
@vanderburg.M
@vanderburg.M 5 жыл бұрын
Actually thought I knew what I was doing until I watched this, now I'm completely lost haha
@asheeshjha2182
@asheeshjha2182 4 жыл бұрын
Are u sure about your thought 🤣🤣
@anishmathewjose9374
@anishmathewjose9374 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooooooo much Professor Dave, you are a real life saver, Love from India::::))))
@raghulbalaji8226
@raghulbalaji8226 2 жыл бұрын
Bro where are you from
@dennishandfield4369
@dennishandfield4369 9 ай бұрын
I would love to learn more about balance being stillness please!
@MohammadAlMarzooqi-hh5hj
@MohammadAlMarzooqi-hh5hj 5 ай бұрын
why is it 4x squared and not 2x squared, in the comprehension check?
@StephenJM94
@StephenJM94 3 ай бұрын
These steps aren't shown in the video's solution, but remember that everything inside the brackets/parentheses raised to the power of 2 is squared: [NO2] = 2x [NO2]² = [2x]² [2x]² = 4x²
@MohammadAlMarzooqi-hh5hj
@MohammadAlMarzooqi-hh5hj 3 ай бұрын
@@StephenJM94 thank you
@matheusgodoy8288
@matheusgodoy8288 8 жыл бұрын
Hi Professor Dave, how are you? Well, I just wanna ask you (please) to put subtitles in yours videos, at least in English. I know that some of those have it, but some don't (like this one).
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 8 жыл бұрын
+Matheus Eduardo Domingues de Godoy i certainly will! i normally do have subtitles for everything, i am just a little behind on the new content. thanks for watching!
@matheusgodoy8288
@matheusgodoy8288 8 жыл бұрын
Ah, ok thanks Professor!
@Summer-jw7qw
@Summer-jw7qw 6 жыл бұрын
i have a question about the example, how did you professor Dave get 0.036 from? And why is it 4x^2?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 6 жыл бұрын
(2x)^2 = 4x^2, and the rest is just from doing some algebra. check out my algebra tutorials if its confusing!
@raghulbalaji8226
@raghulbalaji8226 2 жыл бұрын
Your way of teaching is awesome 👌 sir. I like it. I am from India.
@RhynocerousRex
@RhynocerousRex 9 ай бұрын
Another way I learned this is with a Homophone. Kanye Quest. if Kanye Quest. Always helped me remember it because I could never remember if it was Q then K or K then Q.
@bihararathnayake4056
@bihararathnayake4056 6 жыл бұрын
WOW SIR.... GREAT SIMPLE EXPLANATION. THANK YOU
@manu-mm4pc
@manu-mm4pc 4 жыл бұрын
How do you find 0.135 moles for x?
@Mc.spy.cryptoboy
@Mc.spy.cryptoboy 22 күн бұрын
Thanks a million you are are lifting me up with your tutorials. Andrew from Nigeria
@ankitkeer4597
@ankitkeer4597 5 жыл бұрын
I wish my teacher teaches like you
@krishnaswamy6684
@krishnaswamy6684 4 жыл бұрын
Prof.Dave, You explain everything so well. Guys, everyone watch the ad completely without skipping. This way, the prof gets some money. Thanks a million!
@lucaruggiero6683
@lucaruggiero6683 2 жыл бұрын
Grazie.
@sumitachakraborty1127
@sumitachakraborty1127 6 жыл бұрын
even the lower order students would top by hearing his lectures so innovative hats off!!!
@rabzy9591
@rabzy9591 2 жыл бұрын
not me :/
@mimiMie-ys3lx
@mimiMie-ys3lx 7 ай бұрын
So can someone explain the math, how did he get 0.080?
@tahaazalai1995
@tahaazalai1995 4 ай бұрын
proffesor Dave you really exactly teacher who should all students rely on your lessons shorts and clear and convincing. i really appreciate you professor , but only few topics i didn't get on your lessons. that's Nervous system. CNS and PNS
@birdyboy4490
@birdyboy4490 5 жыл бұрын
if qc is higher than kc, the reaction proceeds in the reverse direction to achieve chemical equilibrium. So am i right to say that at the start of the reaction, the initial concentration of product is high while the reactant is 0?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 5 жыл бұрын
well you could start the reaction from anywhere, all products, all reactants, some combination, and it will go in one direction or the other until it equilibrates
@birdyboy4490
@birdyboy4490 5 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains oh alright thank you
@nejatahmed1584
@nejatahmed1584 7 жыл бұрын
I honestly love you! Thank you so Much! Many thanks 🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗.
@abcdefg-hv2ks
@abcdefg-hv2ks Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!!! My chemistry "professor" was literally gaslighting us wtf, he taught us the entire process wrong and then told us the answer keys are given wrong in our book. 🤢🤢 Can't believe such people exist in this world Anyway, thanks again professor dave!
@Kate-Tea
@Kate-Tea 4 жыл бұрын
this is great but.. im still so losttttt
@linde2603
@linde2603 3 жыл бұрын
I have a test in a few days and you're saving my life dude
@Emilia-wh6oz
@Emilia-wh6oz Жыл бұрын
Hi, do someone know why in the formula "C" is raised to "c", "D" to "d" and so on? and why C is multiplied by D and A by B, before division.
@ummaraamjad1950
@ummaraamjad1950 3 жыл бұрын
I belong to pakistan,and aced my examinations in flying colours!thats just because of prof dave!tysm!✨
@kookshow86
@kookshow86 11 ай бұрын
oh man, I'm stuck trying to figure out how you got x=0.010 , my algebra is rusty af
@dari4638
@dari4638 3 жыл бұрын
the only actual meaning of Kc is whether it greater than 1, less than 1 or equal to 1, because we can multiply all of the coefficients of a given reaction by any positive number and the new Kc for that reaction will be equal to the old one raised to the power of said positive number. what I'm trying to say is that there's no one scale for Kc so we can't really compare it to any number other than 1. why do I seem to be the only person that's gotten to that conclusion?
@realizejust415
@realizejust415 3 жыл бұрын
question Equilibrium does mean the rate of the forward reaction is equal to the rate of the reverse reaction Equilibrium constant = forward reaction / backward reaction If equal, it means one Why does the reaction reach the equilibrium state? The equilibrium constant is not one?
@linakalilo735
@linakalilo735 2 жыл бұрын
Good day sir... I honestly do not understand how one gets the change and equilibrium amount using the ICE I am lost
@sanjaythiagarajan8349
@sanjaythiagarajan8349 4 жыл бұрын
You crazy man you saved my life
@deepaksingh-ip2dv
@deepaksingh-ip2dv 6 жыл бұрын
Thx sir love from india 😘😘😘😘
@victormakari3812
@victormakari3812 3 жыл бұрын
why are we using Kc.....i thought we use partial pressures when talking about gaseous elements (Kp)
@richardkeilig4062
@richardkeilig4062 Жыл бұрын
Prof Dave is the best.
@trevornixon642
@trevornixon642 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely.
@emmaebbasta6028
@emmaebbasta6028 2 жыл бұрын
I didn't really understood the difference between Kc and Q, since the formula is actually the same
@aggudude624
@aggudude624 4 жыл бұрын
Understood everything very well, except i failed at the math part, but i guess that's on my own shortcomings
@candidranger9110
@candidranger9110 2 жыл бұрын
I love my chemistry C.I. but man it's easier for me to understand what he's saying if he provided us more visuals.
@arjaydeleon5996
@arjaydeleon5996 6 жыл бұрын
Can somebody explain to me how did he got X at 5:45?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 6 жыл бұрын
the math is laid out step by step, was there one step in particular that is confusing?
@sultandpippa
@sultandpippa 3 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains I am not sure I understand either, it seemed as though it went straight from 0.126 to just knowing what x was? I feel like I missed something
@Aayesha739
@Aayesha739 6 ай бұрын
Ya made this one go easy too....Lucky to have prof like ya 😊😇
@homesweetcooking939
@homesweetcooking939 4 жыл бұрын
not understand still, you should explain it more slowly and throughly...
@farmahdin
@farmahdin 7 ай бұрын
Why coefficients are squared?
@pinkman9927
@pinkman9927 7 жыл бұрын
hello, prof. dave, i would like to ask which equilibrium constant(Kp or Kc) we should consider when a reaction involves GAS and LIQUID and even SOLID in the same reaction
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 7 жыл бұрын
ah good question, i suppose Kc? that's just a general equilibrium constant.
@pinkman9927
@pinkman9927 7 жыл бұрын
well in thermodynamics we have K=e^-DeltaG/RT now which 'K' is that one!? these are actually ignore in our ordinary books. i dont understand why are these little things are ignored.
@preethamjee6022
@preethamjee6022 2 жыл бұрын
It's Kc
@coolkid9770
@coolkid9770 4 жыл бұрын
I LUV YOU SOO MUCH!!!!! thank you thank you thank you!!!!! nobody told me anything about the ICE thing i had to assume everything myself...but thanks to this, im confident to answer these types of questions!!! THANK YOU THANKYOU THANKYOUU
@Illzy
@Illzy 2 жыл бұрын
Howd you solve for X?
@esraamohamed9930
@esraamohamed9930 6 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot from my heart
@chillandp7648
@chillandp7648 6 жыл бұрын
But i want according to chemistry that at static equilibrium will the concentrations will be same of both reactants and products
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 6 жыл бұрын
it doesn't happen in chemistry, equilibria are always dynamic.
@NRAN477
@NRAN477 3 жыл бұрын
he knows lot about science stuff professor dave explains!!
@plantbasedkavin
@plantbasedkavin 7 жыл бұрын
Thank You so much for explaining this concept so easily and mess free.
@agrianchimwaya5078
@agrianchimwaya5078 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks professor Dave,you really know how to explain....Zambia
@nahomsamuel2102
@nahomsamuel2102 3 ай бұрын
A hundred page unit summarized in one 7min video ur the best
@loshithasahan7164
@loshithasahan7164 7 жыл бұрын
I love your explanations ! wish you all the best.......
@Goyam0_0
@Goyam0_0 11 ай бұрын
Even the first sentence of this video made so much more sense that what my teacher has taught
@mrscherryhuggypoinks9438
@mrscherryhuggypoinks9438 6 жыл бұрын
In 2:06, what do you mean by “In this case, all stoichiometric coefficients are one”? Can you explain that in layman’s term? :( And what are stoichiometric coefficients? :((( Sorry for the dumb questions.
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 6 жыл бұрын
check out my tutorials on stoichiometry, the mole, balancing equations, etc. from earlier in the general chemistry series! they are necessary for understanding these concepts.
@gabriellakaremire
@gabriellakaremire 3 жыл бұрын
YOU ARE THE BEST BROOOOOOOOO
@mjtolentino9294
@mjtolentino9294 5 жыл бұрын
your video really help in my review for board exam. thankyou so much. requesting for difficult example in problem solving on analytical chemistry.
@نيومي-ع5ح
@نيومي-ع5ح 2 жыл бұрын
Perfect except for Q
@emmaebbasta6028
@emmaebbasta6028 2 жыл бұрын
idem
Le Chatelier's Principle
4:09
Professor Dave Explains
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Поветкин заставил себя уважать!
01:00
МИНУС БАЛЛ
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Do you choose Inside Out 2 or The Amazing World of Gumball? 🤔
00:19
iPhone or Chocolate??
00:16
Hungry FAM
Рет қаралды 41 МЛН
Why is All Life Carbon Based, Not Silicon? Three Startling Reasons!
14:05
Chemical Equilibrium Constant K - Ice Tables - Kp and Kc
53:22
The Organic Chemistry Tutor
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Nuclear Reactions, Radioactivity, Fission and Fusion
14:12
Professor Dave Explains
Рет қаралды 839 М.
how to study less and get higher grades
11:16
Gohar Khan
Рет қаралды 256 М.
Solubility Product Constant (Ksp)
8:36
Professor Dave Explains
Рет қаралды 346 М.
Acid-Base Equilibria and Buffer Solutions
5:04
Professor Dave Explains
Рет қаралды 465 М.
Equilibrium: Crash Course Chemistry #28
10:56
CrashCourse
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
Quantum Numbers, Atomic Orbitals, and Electron Configurations
8:42
Professor Dave Explains
Рет қаралды 4,4 МЛН
Kinetics: Initial Rates and Integrated Rate Laws
9:10
Professor Dave Explains
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Поветкин заставил себя уважать!
01:00
МИНУС БАЛЛ
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН