Dear Mr. Dave, Thank you for creating various series on different scientific concepts. I am recent graduate from M.Sc. Biology, LU, Canada, hoping to get into Med school and this is such a boon as I get to revise, clear my concepts and learn in depth. Thank you for helping millions of students all over the world. Extremely grateful to you. I guess with Science, something that we need to imbibe in academia is simplicity and the art of communication. I love science and sincerely hope that you keep spreading the love for Science and curiosity.
@zak30 Жыл бұрын
yapping at its finest
@Ciorstaidh9 ай бұрын
@@zak30 womp womp
@zak309 ай бұрын
got 8 whomp whomp@@Ciorstaidh
@zak308 ай бұрын
@@Ciorstaidh at your big age
@Ciorstaidh8 ай бұрын
@@zak30 😢
@crissy54318 жыл бұрын
Please never stop making videos! You are the GOAT (Greatest of all time).
@ProfessorDaveExplains8 жыл бұрын
oh, i won't stop!
@memoryerror10083 жыл бұрын
@Owen Alejandro Both of you are bots/fake accounts run by the same dude, created on the same day.
@nikhilramprasad68873 жыл бұрын
@@memoryerror1008 lol
@moonandtanu75913 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains 😂k thanks
@EliotThemastermind-xb6xp Жыл бұрын
When was the word GOAT actually created
@Jnely9 Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Vikas-ow8mm7 жыл бұрын
U deserve way More Recognition dude ;)
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
tell your friends!
@Vikas-ow8mm7 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave Explains Sure :)
@fireemblem27703 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains And yet here we are 3 years later, and you are over 1 million subscribers too few! Not enough! People need to know about you
@shivamchouhan50772 жыл бұрын
Almost 2M now
@shivamchouhan50772 жыл бұрын
@johnnytheprick The idea of using gold foil is that, we want to have a single atom to do experiment which is not possible in real life till now, but gold is the most malleable thing in the world. So we can make gold foils so thin that their thickness is around 1000 atoms. So Rutherford's experiment works with gold foils. But in liquids and gases, the density is definitely less than solid but they can't be made that thin because all time their thickness is more than quintilians of particles. Which definately affects the Rutherford's experiment
@SlAVE4993 ай бұрын
Who is watching in 2024
@aradhazari3 ай бұрын
I have test in 2 weeks
@mr.jojofan3 ай бұрын
@@aradhazarigood luck 🙏
@lieelechosa3 ай бұрын
I am (im using my moms account lol im jr. highschool test in 1 week😢)
@Iambbatman3 ай бұрын
Test tomorrow 😔
@3vilinc4rn4te3 ай бұрын
@@aradhazariI have an exam tomorrow 😢
@lauracabrera82574 жыл бұрын
I am so happy to have found this channel. The content is so easy to understand and the production of the video is so well done. Thank you so much! You make an awesome professor!
@Likers-v1l2 ай бұрын
Your videos are the top in the entire milkyway, goodjob.
@TheKids4222 ай бұрын
Professor Dave, never ever stop your spectacular videos! I am not kidding when I say this, but 90 - 100% of my day are learning from your absolutely amazing and spectacular videos! I am not exaggerating when I say this, but you deserve to be the top KZbinr in the academic field. 😍
@nickstuaw2 жыл бұрын
1:06 - Is anyone else questioning the hydrogen to oxygen ratio in water? Surely it should be 3/9 oxygen and 6/9 hydrogen since there is 1 oxygen atom and 2 hydrogen atoms in a water molecule. He then says at 1:27 that "no matter how much water there is, it will always have the same ratio of H to O by number of atoms and therefore by mass". One water molecule contains 3 atoms: 2/3 of it are Hydrogen atoms and 1/3 is an Oxygen atom.
@ProfessorDaveExplains2 жыл бұрын
The ratio given is by mass, not number of atoms.
@nickstuaw2 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains Oh! Thanks Dave!! That explains it, I thought I'd missed something
@StructuralEngineer-e3m2 ай бұрын
Absolutely amazed by your videos in every aspect.
@landat_872 ай бұрын
Because of this subject. I'm going to stuck with you Prof Dave.
@TheKids4222 ай бұрын
same here
@EngineeringAcademy-y8s2 ай бұрын
Love your work Professor
@davidm56743 жыл бұрын
This is literally my favorite topic. Knowing how the concept of the atom evolved. While it may seem to the side, I love the experiments used.
@JasonsWeirdPizz4 жыл бұрын
I know why my chemistry teacher uses your videos now, this was so easy to understand thanks to you 🙏
@annabethelston81016 жыл бұрын
this video is so clear and easy to understand while still keeping a good speed. this helped me a lot with me remediation for my chemistry class so thank you!!!!!
@Nofer-i5w2 ай бұрын
make more videos, what you waiting for, you will be even more successful
@king_arthurplays6 ай бұрын
I really love the intro. Good explanation too!
@TheKids4222 ай бұрын
Dave, you are amazing
@aevessean3 ай бұрын
bro you're a savior❤
@atomicsweetXx2 ай бұрын
Who got a test tomorrow
@sheldon-g4gАй бұрын
Me 😂 this is why I’m watching
@jeydrielmartinez813529 күн бұрын
Watching right before a test😅
@AriannaStewart-vd2ue25 күн бұрын
Me
@brentpagador809424 күн бұрын
Me
@abdullakurd817418 күн бұрын
Me 😅
@kimirene31473 жыл бұрын
this is my first time hearing that atoms are 99.95% empty, thank you so much
@servantofgod96793 жыл бұрын
JESUS loves :)
@ronen444444474 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I dreamed of delving deeper into Chemistry for years
@stefxc8 ай бұрын
I have a chemistry test tomorrow morning, this helps SO MUCH!
@sofiastock-fn4rd4 ай бұрын
please don't ever stop making these videos AND please please please NEVER cut your hair, your hair is amazing and absolutely stunning 💝💝💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖
@knull12374 ай бұрын
If not for you and The Organic Chemistry Tutor I'd have failed my degree. So thank you 😂
@atumicgain10 ай бұрын
Crash course on an atom, the electrons are points of intersection from strong force; each shell starting from the nucleus out are lessened due to less perpetual motion acting out from kinetic force of the nuclei. Therefore an atom is still a ball shaped structure but flows like modern interpretations think. Think of each point of intersection as a node and comparatively a person pulling on a rope in unison. If you can understand this then you can understand string theory
@courtcomposer2 жыл бұрын
I just read your book. It was great. Thank you.
@jacobvidales1233 ай бұрын
I recently heard a book by a professor first name Benjamin don’t remember the last name. The book is called Black Holes ties and curved space in his first lecture. He says Isaac Newton did not discover gravity because it was simply already there and if that’s his look upon something then the science community needs to decide if he didn’t then the person who discovered the electron or electrode, I forgot which one you said did not discover it. He just revealed it’s already existence so and in one instance in another science book by another professor teacher Dean of a school, I forgot which one he says nothing is faster than light but he describes something 10 times the speed of light so why the contradiction
@afrog75952 ай бұрын
Mr. Dave, I am watching this video to help understand the history of modern atomic theory for a paper I'm in the process of writing, and it was incredibly helpful. However, I am troubled by the early claim that separates philosophy from science, and that Democritus's view contained no supporting evidence for some time (0:35). There are serious fundamental differences between what John Dalton would call an atom, and the necessary characteristics of Democritus's atom (since Democritus refers to, effectively, a Parmenidean being). That said, philosophy and science were understood historically to be the same thing, the word science coming from the Latin "scientia", which was seen by philosophers of the time as a type of knowledge. Democritus uses what I would argue is no different than the lines of reasoning that a modern scientist might use to arrive at a conclusion. Given the practice of natural philosophy which Democritus's theory stems from, he does begin with observation as contemporary sciences do. I love the video! I could not help but express my concern with the opening statement, but I don't want to be misunderstood. Everything in the video is entirely accurate to the best of my knowledge and you demonstrate an understanding far more comprehensive than mine on the topic. Despite the differences in metaphysical commitments, and the fundamental differences between the views, I still believe that the wording used undervalues the thinking and reasoning behind Democritus's theory. For example, the proposition that "compounds consist of different type of atoms in whole number ratios" (summarizing a view proposed by Dalton at 0:50) is true by Democritus's account as well, as well as the claim that rearrangement of atoms form new combinations. Still, Dalton's view is more explicit, numerical, and more helpfully linked to mathematical truths in our observation. Please let me know if anything in my comments aren't accurate. I'm nine years late to the video, too. Not too helpful for me to put this here now. Lol.
@rinyeongi63222 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this prof dave
@lakshmiprasanna61814 жыл бұрын
Best educational KZbin channel Love from India 😍
@siddharththayil1227 жыл бұрын
Why hadn't I found you earlier?
@selam1232310 ай бұрын
I swear my phone were broken and when my new phone bought i open YT and subscribe you.keep it up
@ajsworld776 ай бұрын
What’s the best next video after this explaining the history of the atomic theory?
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 ай бұрын
just keep going through the general chemistry playlist
@sergclr4 жыл бұрын
u made me survive my online chemistry class thank u master
@mxoeneod904 жыл бұрын
Oh
@quantaali5437 жыл бұрын
Simple but best teaching style...you are what I was looking for....
@Felishamois6 жыл бұрын
He truly rocks
@norvinsevilla5893Ай бұрын
Watching this before my chem test 😂
@abinayasivasamy47084 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave Can u please explain who discovered proton? Rutherford or goldstein?
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
Rutherford.
@abinayasivasamy47084 жыл бұрын
Thank you And what did Goldstein discover?
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
Never heard of him.
@abinayasivasamy47084 жыл бұрын
Eugen Goldstein?
@spideybot2 жыл бұрын
@@abinayasivasamy4708 Eugen Goldstein was a German physicist. He was an early investigator of discharge tubes, and the discoverer of anode rays or canal rays, later identified as positive ions in the gas phase including the hydrogen ion.
@KushagraYadav-kush710 ай бұрын
thank you proffeser dave you are the best you never complicate anythingand always make it simple and easy to understtand your love from india
@VanshKumar-iy5tj7 ай бұрын
Sir please continue and start making new videos it's amazing helped a lot
@MeskeremWorku-d3i4 ай бұрын
It is very good❤❤❤❤❤
@katrinafung90724 жыл бұрын
So glad I found this channel! You're awesome! But I have a question for this video - what are alpha particles??
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
helium nuclei, it'll make more sense later!
@rhlsy32092 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains still answering questions years later, amazing!
@ReynaBenitez-qd8usАй бұрын
One I saw this was you video I was like “OH THIS GUY” and now I’m learning about Atomic theory 😀
@bjornfeuerbacher55143 ай бұрын
Actually, Nagaoka Hantarō already came up with a "planetary model" for the atom in the year 1904, seven years before Rutherford's experiments were done.
@BlueSky_BotАй бұрын
hopefully this can save my test tomorrow
@rudymelo8802 жыл бұрын
I've heard about the gold foil experiment maybe even more than once and only now do I understand what it was. Thanks
@gokulanithanandakumar96286 жыл бұрын
Maharishi kanad actually proposed the atomic theory 2 centuries before aristotle
@jhanavis56904 жыл бұрын
My school is sending ur videos sir for online class😎 but i already saw a lot of videos from ur channel
@operationaltactics10066 ай бұрын
At which university are you a professor?
@TheKids4222 ай бұрын
all of them
@violent-firelightАй бұрын
Bro what happened when the alpha particles hit the electron?
@thehotgates14247 жыл бұрын
Great summary.
@jdzbabatoan4 жыл бұрын
Please do Inorganic Chemistry Series
@GingerWaters Жыл бұрын
How did Rutheford fire positively charged alfa particles to gold foil?
@klynerp4 жыл бұрын
I take a chemistry course and I am learning English. I use these videos to train my English and learn more about chemistry. I'm from Brazil.
@abdul-latifsoudmussa38626 жыл бұрын
Great one, Thanks a lot Professor perfect one
@ludicrous3210 Жыл бұрын
pls cover stoichiometry you make so much sense 🫶
@ludicrous3210 Жыл бұрын
nevermind thanks for the videos dave
@bijoyshah31078 жыл бұрын
your video are great sir !
@krishnaswamy66844 жыл бұрын
Your videos are short and to the point. I really wish more people discover this channel
@Nellson_Miless6 ай бұрын
Thank God I found you😭❤️ I like the whole content and explanation Textbook is just so bulky and boring Thanks for this And also you remind me of 'Young Shelton '😂🤭
@TheKids4222 ай бұрын
young sheldon*
@no_more_dream_bts48756 ай бұрын
Thanks for this wonderful video with the help of ur video I was able to complete my project and I even mentioned ur KZbin channel name 😀😊
@Hardsacker Жыл бұрын
thank you for this share of knowledge :D
@amannoobs7 жыл бұрын
Maharishi kanad actually proposed the atomic theory 2 centuries before the Greek philosopher. At takshashila. Greeks used to come and visit our universities in ancient times. Nalanda and takshashila which were famous during those times
@gokulanithanandakumar96286 жыл бұрын
buckethead 90 you are right
@mauryanempire7503 Жыл бұрын
Lol 🤣🤣🤣 ancient Greeks philosopher Democritus and leuceppi already proposed atomic theory centuries before ancient indians did it.
@mauryanempire7503 Жыл бұрын
Leucippus first proposed atomic theory centuries before kanada did it.Kanada was born in 2nd century BC
@mauryanempire7503 Жыл бұрын
Source -wikipedia and brittanica
@mauryanempire7503 Жыл бұрын
Lol 🤣🤣🤣 ancient Greeks philosopher Democritus and leuceppi already proposed atomic theory centuries before ancient indians did it.
@krsantosh06Күн бұрын
you are soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo good
@josejordan75285 жыл бұрын
I never realized how small alpha particles truly were!!!
@JakubChalupnik Жыл бұрын
I am nitpicking, but in the book I've read ages ago, they said Rutherford was talking about 15-inch shell, not a shotgun. It's more funny this way :)
@ScienceBusted Жыл бұрын
Atomic structure theory Atroms are eternal electricity generators and transformers. All atoms consist of indestructible, electrically charged hollow sphere and internally charged solid sphere. What are called electrons are actually negatively charged liquid attached to the surface of the atom. The hollow sphere has multiple layers, each with an opposite charge. The inner sphere and inner layer of all atoms have the same charge. According to Coulomb's law, the inner sphere of all atoms are oscillating constantly at a natural frequency and never can touch the inner layer. Theoretically, the ability of an atom to carry any amount of energy depends on the input. Due to every atom has equal positive and negative charge. Therefore they all attract each other like magnets attract magnets no matter direction or distance. This is the mechanism of gravity.
@nanpyal81087 жыл бұрын
your are a good teacher you are supposed to be over 1k sub Infact
@nanigarringer59707 жыл бұрын
Thank you funny and awsome dud NEVER EVER STOP MAKING!
@greater40lifeinAmerica9 ай бұрын
This heps a lot thanks!
@Anshulhe2 жыл бұрын
My friend please check out sage aruni 800bce and sage Kand 600bce they're first to come up with idea of atoms followed by greeks
@aaryanandaryakhot44222 ай бұрын
I always luv the intro ❤😂
@the_advance_chemistry Жыл бұрын
Thanks for information
@krisclark86199 ай бұрын
Great job Dave. But Rutherford meant shells as in artillery shells. Awesome content though!
@MB-nv6hf3 жыл бұрын
Thanks from Morocco 🇲🇦
@chochee07 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for vid!
@cgsx6910 күн бұрын
thank u ❤️
@cgsx6910 күн бұрын
ok
@dr.garbage89655 жыл бұрын
You're the hero of school projects!
@uwotm86347 жыл бұрын
wasn't kanada the first to do so?
@bradhilton22836 ай бұрын
Dave is one ☝🏻 smart whopper! He could sharpen a butter knife too that of a razor.
@Red_Eyed_Gravy2 күн бұрын
Who has a Chemistry exam today and is just cramming before the test😭😭😭
@avjeet8886 жыл бұрын
Maharishi Kanad proposed that matter consist of small individuals and he termed it "PARMANU" He did it 2 centuries before Demcritus THAT'S THE TRUTH!!!!
@chutenderchodi7369 Жыл бұрын
In a Bollywood movie
@wpgjet61Ай бұрын
Bro I have to watch this for a unit test coming up😂😂😂
@ربيعالكيمياء2 жыл бұрын
That's great
@chourouk-gr9qgАй бұрын
Ty the goaat as always
@zeannejoylabadia2225 жыл бұрын
thank you prof
@Okolife3 ай бұрын
WAIT CAN YOU MAKE A VIDEO FROM NIELS BOHR TO ERWIN SCHRODINGER THANK YOU
@justinpettit34325 жыл бұрын
3:37 "We arrived at a model that looks like this which should look familiar" Me: Yeah from Jimmy Neutron
@dhichicpop25313 жыл бұрын
Wrong the concept of small, indivisible, self-revolving particles that make up matter was first proposed not by Democritus but by Kanad in his book 'Vaisheshika Sutra' around 600 BC
@chutenderchodi7369 Жыл бұрын
Just an indian lie 😂
@justmonika33658 ай бұрын
thanks I hate having to remember history for science, I dislike history overall
@subrajeetmaharana4 жыл бұрын
Favourite Student of Richard Feynman:- Professor Dave
@lolitalolita16673 жыл бұрын
why when I press aumatic translation, there is no translation?😓😩
@MB-nv6hf3 жыл бұрын
شكراا لك من المغرب
@rassimsimou15942 жыл бұрын
Good
@spaceinsight66799 ай бұрын
Thanks! But then atoms are not the building blocks of the universe? As electrons and protons make up atoms? And are atoms invisible? I mean does light pass through them like the alpha particles? And what are alpha particles? Recognition from India 👍
@eduardob84588 жыл бұрын
what about niels bohr, what was his contribuction
@ProfessorDaveExplains8 жыл бұрын
+Eduardo Buzzetto the Bohr model! I have a whole clip on it.
@thegoodlydragon74525 жыл бұрын
How did they know what a neutral charge was before discovering g the electron?
@carultch3 жыл бұрын
We knew that charge existed before the individual electron was discovered. Benjamin Franklin and Charles Coulomb made discoveries that led to our understanding of the electrostatic force, with macroscopic amounts of charge at macroscopic distances. Franklin discovered it qualitatively, and Coulomb discovered it quantitatively. We also had already assigned the size of the ampere unit, prior to the discovery of the electron, since electrochemical voltaic piles (that you'd think of as batteries) as well as the magnetic effects of current enabled us to reliably produce and measure current.
@t.thomas69678 жыл бұрын
it would help if there was video of the actually experiments
@ProfessorDaveExplains8 жыл бұрын
+T. Thomas unfortunately, there were no video cameras in the 19th century.
@waltersobchak72758 жыл бұрын
+Professor Dave Explains That's fact!! Yes the truth shall set him free!! Like your clips Professor Dave.
@carultch3 жыл бұрын
You can look for videos that people used for reproducing these experiments in modern times. Here is a replica of Rutherford's Gold Foil experiment, with a modern upgrade to the equipment: kzbin.info/www/bejne/jnPUeZ6olstrn6c And here is a replica of JJ Thompson's experiments to determine the charge-mass ratio of the electron: kzbin.info/www/bejne/f2PahGeHqdWbiNU
@danieldanieldadada10 ай бұрын
If a photon is needed to move an electron from one energy to the next one, why wouldn't electrons always be ejected from the atom since light is everywhere? I mean, photons are bombarding atoms all the time, no? Except in darkness.
@jomomma82613 жыл бұрын
So when columb force disappears why does it make a supernova?