@3:03 - the transfer of heat energy will NOT always alter the temperature of a system, such as when a phase change is occurring at a constant pressure. Very common misconception, so watch out.
@ProfessorDaveExplains5 жыл бұрын
Yes good point, that was a misspeak on my part.
@professor_m_gibbons5 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains It's true 99% of the time we're talking about solid objects though, so I understand. Thanks for the reply!
@10anjalinarayan604 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains u can pin her comment
@localverse4 жыл бұрын
@@professor_m_gibbons Does that mean the heat's energy temporarily stops going into kinetic energy and instead goes into breaking bonds at the instance of phase change (with constant pressure) then switches back to affecting kinetic speed of molecules after the phase change?
@smaran3534 жыл бұрын
One question: Isn't the expression "heat flows from" misleading and incorrect? Instead, the expressions "thermal energy flows from" or "heat flow occurs from" are actually correct, isn't it?
@morrainn8154 жыл бұрын
man,,, this dude really be saving my grades. thank you professor jesus
@samyukta47463 жыл бұрын
jesus😂😂
@kingboi78563 жыл бұрын
jesus LOL
@leagodalle9953 жыл бұрын
yooo look at the top of his head!
@dalemalunes11003 жыл бұрын
Wtf QHAHAHAB
@AnthaxPhotoworks2 жыл бұрын
Hello
@retsepilemothepu1396 Жыл бұрын
My Physics improved from 50% on semester test 1 to 97% on semester test 2🎉🎉 Thank you sir, I have nothing to offer. I’ll thank you properly in the future.
@alias40anon6 жыл бұрын
Excellent short and simple explanation.
@jorostuff6 жыл бұрын
I love when he says: "Let's check comprehension." I LOVE IT!
@saudigirlyy4 жыл бұрын
Ikr!! Like it helps me a LOT
@aedenthegreatyt4 жыл бұрын
My Chem. Honors teacher had me watch this video for an assignment. I was not disappointed.
@kedarparab80016 жыл бұрын
Man you actually explained nicely and scientifically than other videos
@voltdragneel10527 жыл бұрын
after 10 hours I have my chemistry test and I was reading thermodynamic when I see notification of your video lol and yhea you're videos are useful
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
more thermo all next week!
@prisminc1585 жыл бұрын
Is that Kaneki/Haise?
@controlequebrado44555 жыл бұрын
your*
@pritchardsangai32884 жыл бұрын
I love the explanations, thank you very much.
@aedenthegreatyt4 жыл бұрын
Any hard science concept: *exists* Dave: *Understandable, have a great day*
@Ethan-uo6fv Жыл бұрын
2:22 Not all phases of matter expand with higher temperature. Water for example, is at its densest at 3.98 ⁰ C (according to the internet). Contraction upon heating in solids is called "negative thermal expansion."
@xyrhdks2 жыл бұрын
i didn’t understand one single thing lmao, i guess i’m really dumb
@pradeepkar4563Ай бұрын
Hello bro
@GojowifefrАй бұрын
Real
@EstherMwakipesile22 күн бұрын
I think Ur not in the mood 😅😅
@howitzerm7775 жыл бұрын
i just saw the intro and was instant subscribe push!
@crazygamers95744 жыл бұрын
तुला जास्त येतय का वेड्या
@po41873 жыл бұрын
wtf his intro is cringe asf
@sughraagha55513 жыл бұрын
Man he don't even blink
@hammadurrehman93716 ай бұрын
I can't unsee that now...😂
@vivianasierra14 жыл бұрын
thank you I needed this video for my end of the year test!!! :)
@SW-nx4jz5 жыл бұрын
Omg your the best! Thermochemistry is so confusing to me but your making it alot easier. I can't say thank you enough for these quick video!
@paramitam40025 жыл бұрын
teen Titans go Can we feel temperature kzbin.info/www/bejne/qXzLlJSiZqaVf8k
@IEleMenTIx7 жыл бұрын
1:20 faster moving particles with higher temperaure ... is correct for gasses and liquids, but not a sufficient expression and explanation for temperature changes in solids. One could misinterprete the statement and think that the atoms will vibrate more often, which is one of the most frequent misconseptions I have read about on scientific websites and forums about atomic motion. Every molecule, molecular solid or atomic solid has characteristic vibration frequencies in the range of 10^13 Hz due to their mass and force interactions. For example: If the frequency of a radiation source matches a molecules or atoms natural resonant frequency it begins to vibrate stronger, not more frequently! Now the energy of those vibrations can be transferred in solids due to whole lattice vibrations called phonons. I'm not trying to give a lecture here. But its such a common misconception that people say if you heat stuff, the frequency of the atomic vibrations increase, which is absolutely NOT true. It's the amplitude of the vibrations that gets larger. Of course this explanation was viewed at with classical mechanics, quantummechanically everything has to do with probability waves and distributions... but the probability of finding a particle will shift towards a higher distance if we give the system more energy. If you look at the asymmetric potential curve you get the idea... The frequency of atomic oscillations simply do not change, otherwise IR-Spectroscopy would not work, as peaks would shift around all the time being a strongly temperature dependant measurement method, which it is not! One thing you can get is overtones of vibrations at higher temperatures... The frequencies which change will eventually be those of the whole macroscopic lattice due to thermal expansion and changes in the elastic modulus of the solid. I think why most people think that atoms change their vibration frequencies is due to incandescence... simply speaking if the amplitude of a vibrating system increases but the vibration frequency stays the same, the particles have to travel a longer distance in the same amount of oscillations. Thus ultimately your statement is correct that the particles have to move faster. Faster moving particles means that more energy is involved... Electromagnetic radiation is generated by the movement of charged particles in space, so at temperatures of around 800 Kelvin our eyes begin to see dim red light emitted from that object depending on its emissivity. At these temperatures the atomic vibrations are so intense that the strong acceleration and deceleration leads to the incandescent effect emitting red light. Plancks law, Wien's displacement law and the stefan boltzmann law are responsible for the shape of the function, the maximal emitted wavelength at a certain temperature and the intensity of the radiation... OK sorry this has escalated to become a lecture ;)
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
interesting! i see your point with IR, that makes sense. at any rate, this was a little more in the context of gases, but this is excellent supplemental information.
@IEleMenTIx7 жыл бұрын
thanks :)
@sandk79696 жыл бұрын
Sound energy make air particles to vibrate and so does solid object.. do sound have some kind of temperature? I mean will sound energy transfer faster in high temperature condition and do otherwise in lower temperature.
@pram55325 жыл бұрын
That has to be the longest KZbin comment I've seen - and not read.
@xOxAdnanxOx5 жыл бұрын
Praveen M the longest “ useful “ youtube comment I have ever seen.. u should read it
@chrispieG2 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave. You're the man!!! My Gr. 10 class finally gets it.
@rajpanigrahi70087 жыл бұрын
Hello Dr Dave... you explain everything in very easy way, so anyone can understand it easily...I am the first to watch and comment on this video.
@ShyaMKumAr-bo1ji6 жыл бұрын
*GREAT EXPLANATION* 🙏
@tiffany53334 ай бұрын
You make life seem very interesting. Thank you for making my experiences on Earth more fun.
@Antbo4ReV0Lt3 ай бұрын
thank you professor Dave- heat transfer of energy molecules - collision and friction, which phase change according to temperature manipulation.
@mohammadhafeezullah18466 жыл бұрын
thanks for my completing the first question of my assignment
@MightyFooliery3 жыл бұрын
I ended up here after watching the first 4 videos in the "Math and Science" channel -chemistry 1. It become paid to see at the same point where Prof. Dave here pics up the topic. Thanks for not making me Pay to Learn Dave. I wanna learn for free
@cbtaylor3034 жыл бұрын
I have a question that has troubled me for some time (making the link between the atomic world to the macroscopic). What happens if we have a spaceship in outer space, and let’s say it’s a perfect vacuum (so no friction will occur). If we accelerate the spaceship, it now has higher velocity and so higher kinetic energy. You could say therefore it has higher temperature? After all the average kinetic energy of all the particles has increased? This doesn’t make sense though. Is temperature relative? Another similar problem, say if the earth sped up due to a gravitational force, does that mean our individual temperature increases, after all our kinetic energy has increased.
@kurage_medusa2 жыл бұрын
Kinetic energy is based on velocity and velocity is relative, so temperature is too. If you accelerate an object in space relative to something else, I believe that it would count as increasing the average temperature of the system, as there would be more kinetic energy available. It would not increase the temperature of the object itself however, since relative to itself the average kinetic energy of its particles is the same.
@subhashishbehera24247 жыл бұрын
Sir you're explaining things really good
@richardfraussen1057 Жыл бұрын
Wish I had professor Dave videos during my studies, 55 years ago.
@brianfrancis55483 жыл бұрын
"all phases of matter expand with higher temperature" actually not always true. the density of water decreases as the temperature increases from 32F to 39F
@katrinamae35104 жыл бұрын
The song at the checking comprehension is so calming lol
@Meringue_Pie2 жыл бұрын
saved my life and my science test, thank you
@danielcastagna19413 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Dave Grohl \m/
@joserobing6612 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your clarity of ideas and simple presentation
@raedibrahim94096 жыл бұрын
I love your lectures 😍
@carolarentz32087 жыл бұрын
YOU SHOULD BE MY TEACHER!!!!!!!!
@you2tooyou2too11 ай бұрын
re 2:30 Not "all" but "generally"; but I'm sure he knows that there are exceptions for some crystalline solids.
@niceguy48013 жыл бұрын
Thankyou professor dave!
@littletin84534 жыл бұрын
the intro is the best i have seen
@guidomista35704 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave is the Oversimplified of science, change my mind
@abdullahalhabsi930210 ай бұрын
I have an assignment due next week hope similarity doesn’t go high 😅 thank you professor
@alriktimo6447 ай бұрын
Can I say that any system has no need to transfer its energy to the other one in contact but as a natural consequence of action and reaction the energy gets distributed, eventually making the whole system reach equilibrium. Doesn't necessarily imply that energy is transferred from hot to cold and not from cold to hot it is just that the former does the transfer with a faster rate than the latter. Correct my intuition if I am wrong.
@abutaymiyyahlectures3 жыл бұрын
this lecture was mind blowing ngl
@shirohanna10 ай бұрын
Great video and visuals. Thank you! Follow up question: The high specific heat capacity of water is due to strong covalent bonds of Hydrogen and Oxygen molecules INSIDE each water atom? Or, strong bonds between water molecules? Thank you, again!
@eyobwendmagen8494 жыл бұрын
I rely understand Difference of Temperature and Heat. I like your explanation system. It is easy and nice.
@nirupamam28146 жыл бұрын
All of your videos are very very very very nice....
@markbendig5552 жыл бұрын
RAISES the question, not "begs". Please. Love the videos!
@binabonmary.marbaniang64564 жыл бұрын
Love the explanation👍👍👍
@binadam94594 жыл бұрын
I love you man, you are brilliant
@jilliandavenport94045 жыл бұрын
Taking my last CSET and need to know this info. Clear ,concise and very helpful! Thank you!
@ram_c4 жыл бұрын
@1:02 heat energy is not average of KE but the total KE of all molecules.....
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
I said temperature is a measure of the average kinetic energy.
@wako12854 жыл бұрын
Who else had a teacher who made you type the URL
@Sage-i6j4 жыл бұрын
thought i was the only one
@korbixszn11914 жыл бұрын
yup
@furqankhalid1583 Жыл бұрын
He is the only reason I stopped hating Physics
@ahappyimago6 жыл бұрын
U da man, dave!!
@mechanicalvibes79274 жыл бұрын
@1:07 temperature is not the measure of heat energy available for work in a system
@iqrayousaf68986 жыл бұрын
My question is if any object having 37 celsius temp and our body has also d same then we will feel any cold or hot sensation or not
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
if they are at the same temperature there should be no heat transfer.
@jh_art_studio683 жыл бұрын
Man, your are so amazing 💗 , thank you 😊
@SamiUllah-bg2br3 жыл бұрын
You have no indeed explained it very well sir
@ghazalabibi95703 жыл бұрын
@Professor Dave Explains I love all your highly educational videos that you do here on KZbin. I have a question! How come cold temperatures have a limit of around -273 C and warm temperatures can go well over 10,000 C or even can be over 1 million degrees? Please explain - THANKS.
@ProfessorDaveExplains3 жыл бұрын
that's absolute zero! a total absence of kinetic energy
@kotishjaiman823110 ай бұрын
Just like you can take away only 1 liter of water from a 1 litre beaker but you can keep adding water to it eventually leading it to overflow and you can still just add more. Atoms have a definite amount of energy so you can take away only that small amount, whereas you can give it a lot of heat but after a point its structure will be affected maybe bonds will break (in case of molecules) and after a point you will get plasma.
@johnfeyissa40593 жыл бұрын
professor Dave is not a professor his genius in explaining
@akrm29447 жыл бұрын
Is it better to use High/Low than More/Less kinetic energy in 4:00?
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
eh, either way!
@lowall3 жыл бұрын
i like very to the point and easy to understand :D
@CharcoolDev3 жыл бұрын
POV: Rory Fenelon and Melissa Gibbons
@roryfenelonfilm3 жыл бұрын
Do you have a foot fetish
@ohmy92616 жыл бұрын
You're the man dave
@noahway132 жыл бұрын
So everything is just vibration. When, in my cold room, I sit in front the heater, the electricity makes the coils vibrate, which makes the air vibrate, which I feel and label as heat, and eventually all the objects in the room is vibrating more, and the ice in my toilet vibrates and melts. My body likes a certain vibration frequency.
@christianmgbike618811 ай бұрын
When two objects or things are in thermal equilibrium, are their molecules vibrating or moving at the same speeds due to same temp?
@nirmalmishra6404 Жыл бұрын
If heat inherently has physical meaning when in transit, constituting its existential definition as a form of energy in motion, what does it truly mean to say that heat 'flows'? When we assert that heat is a form of energy in transit, it implies movement; however, using the term 'flow' seems to redundantly invoke the concept of movement. How can the movement of energy itself be described as 'flow' without introducing redundancy?" I created this analogy to understand what the definition is trying to say:"When we say 'heat always flows from higher to lower temperature until thermal equilibrium is reached,' it conjures an image in my mind of an invisible 'glitter glow' dispersed in the atmosphere(massless being in motion). This 'glitter glow' represents the thermal energy, and with a temperature change, it becomes unevenly distributed. In this mental model, a chunk of the glitter glow with a relatively higher distribution moves towards a lower distribution in a flow, seeking to maintain symmetry as per the Thumb Rule of the universe.The glitter glow is thermal energy and when it flows we say that it's heat
@carolarentz32087 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for the video it helped A LOT!!!! :)
@geramaerosales5727 жыл бұрын
Great Video! very useful as a resource material
@incrediblestudios56098 ай бұрын
I love you Professor Dave
@kevinlapulapu86516 жыл бұрын
thankful for your lecture
@bellaferreir67326 жыл бұрын
UR THE BEST!
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
you are!
@abrarmohammed67352 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😊
@hindutva26853 жыл бұрын
Outstanding explaination sir
@oliverbrunncarstens42153 жыл бұрын
Thank you Dave!
@btsblackpink9577 ай бұрын
I have a question.... If temperature measures the flow of heat then why do we not have any unit for say flow of pressure, potential,charges etc. Why only flow of heat gets a whole new SI unit
@יוסיבןצבי4 жыл бұрын
Great explanation!
@angeliemaebonaobra44487 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave! Thank you!
@rajthegamerz71183 жыл бұрын
so long suker
@rajthegamerz71183 жыл бұрын
hey
@zjayyyyy3 жыл бұрын
Wow thank you so much!
@kioo69803 жыл бұрын
3:30
@AnilKumar-is7wm3 жыл бұрын
Hi I m from India learning from u
@waffles_18234 жыл бұрын
This is damn useful I even subscribed
@mamathashaik24524 жыл бұрын
Sir ur just awesome sir ur the best sir
@jxkeriley.41663 жыл бұрын
who here cause of a school lesson
@siphesihlekhayalethumdamba85003 ай бұрын
😂me
@rekhadevi96724 жыл бұрын
Helpful..!
@AlexKnauth2 жыл бұрын
(2:17) "all phases of matter expand with higher temperature, whether solid, liquid, or gas" What happens with Water when it's at the freezing point? Or just above it about to freeze? Ice is less dense than water so how does that work?
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
That's a special condition in a substance that is a special case. Throughout the majority of water's heating from absolute zero to vapor form, it expands when adding thermal energy to the system.
@mahmoudhalawa55884 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much ❤️😊
@nugget...2 жыл бұрын
You are just great❤
@EricPham-gr8pg Жыл бұрын
Is pressure and intensity or decibel and compression of space elasticity
@tsehayenegash8394 Жыл бұрын
what is the differnce between work done on the system and work done by the system
@KakaniElisha11 ай бұрын
Temperature measure the amount of thermal energy available for work in system not heat...heat is transfer of thermal energy ( heat is a mechanism or process through which thermal energy transist)
@kabouch4 жыл бұрын
The covalent bond stretching and bending is an example of potential but not kinetic energy, am I right?
@TriPham-j3bАй бұрын
I thought the heat is the ratio of randomness over highest directional pressure like 100 w laser had higher heat than 100w light bulb light so temperature is like measuring available energy while heat measuring the ratio of focus over randomness
@srenbohn49047 ай бұрын
Please explain "work in a system", This is the only part I don't understand what means 🙂
@DoubleMrE3 жыл бұрын
Yay Dave!
@salganik4 жыл бұрын
@2:22 "All phases of matter expand with higher temperatures". How about water? It has a negative thermal expansion coefficient at temperatures between 0°C and 4°?
@carultch3 жыл бұрын
That's a special case. Most substances expand when heated throughout the majority of all of their phases. Water is a very unique case when it freezes and when it is near freezing in the liquid state.
@asifmandal97583 жыл бұрын
Thanks :) Professor Dave
@mona59986 жыл бұрын
hi thank about this information ..but i have a qeustion if delta T is zero how the heat(q) is not zero although they are related so the heat must also be zero ???
@carultch3 жыл бұрын
You probably have an example of an object undergoing a phase change, where the heat transfer converts into the latent heat of the phase change, instead of an increase in the kinetic energy of the molecules.
@hari86546 жыл бұрын
Thanks you sir most conceptual video
@raizenvillagracia76444 жыл бұрын
Thankyou professor
@shogunyams3 жыл бұрын
Watching this before I blow up an febreeze can in a microwave
@rossfriedman6570 Жыл бұрын
I'm confused why watt over meter kelvin is used for thermal transfer