Thank you for not being like other Chem professors who pretend these particular reactions are so simple. The language itself is confusing and the Chem Department doesn't try to simplify despite the the thousands we pay them to TEACH US! THANK YOU!
@shannonriley82992 жыл бұрын
yes i have noticed that too, when i went to embry riddle the teachers there helped us out. but now at an a&m univeristy, i feel most of the time i have to hunt and peck to find my answers.
@JackDawf3 күн бұрын
what is it that gets done with this infomation though? Im desperately struggling to understand what practice would utilize this knowledge for any real world application. It seems utterly contrived and useless. I would appreciate if someone can elaborate which real world process requires you to measure hypothetical oxidation levels of nonexistent, purely-mathematical atoms/ molecules.
@yenifervanegas5 жыл бұрын
I am 10 min away from a test and I just learned the last thing I needed to know 😭 thank you so much!!!
@dzbro11944 жыл бұрын
how much did u get
@phoebegotanco79044 жыл бұрын
yea i wanna know too
@yenifervanegas3 жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly 80
@rambo67673 жыл бұрын
@@yenifervanegas nice
@shahzadahmed50123 жыл бұрын
@@yenifervanegas better late than never
@toniacladera88857 жыл бұрын
Thank you, professor David. Your videos were absolutely useful in my first year teaching Chemistry in your country!
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
so happy to help a teacher! please tell all your students to subscribe!
@krizh-rq6jx Жыл бұрын
i have no words to express sir other channels online put vids of 10 hours and show hundreds of reactions but dont even explain a single one properly i was frustrated with this thanx a lot for making it simpler
@martinmemo12533 жыл бұрын
There is a mnemonic: OIL RIG. OIL- "Oxidation Is Loosing (electrons)" and RIG- "Reduction Is Gaining".
@thadszmaciasz89714 ай бұрын
LEO and GER are also great (Lose Electrons Oxidation) (Gain Electrons Reduce)
@SkynByShadene5 жыл бұрын
I still don’t understand
@Realramboff10 ай бұрын
Go eat Morvite😂
@ysabellefranz96259 ай бұрын
you should look for the reactants, not in the products
@cutty34827 ай бұрын
@@ysabellefranz9625bless
@SarahKhan-sv4fc7 ай бұрын
So me
@ari_i336 ай бұрын
Been 5 years,hope you understand it now 😭
@willardmakinishi69806 жыл бұрын
Prof Dave rocks. Your explanations are very simple and direct. Thumbs up for making life easier for me
@zombieslayersofdoom6 жыл бұрын
Thanks again Professor Dave. You explain chemistry well, and concisely too - two reasons why I subscribed! :D Keep it up.
@maxjones46503 ай бұрын
Two things: 1) Is the idea of an element being reduced by gaining electrons essentially like adding a negative number in algebra? So, if the starting number is 10 and -2 is added, then 10 is reduced to 8 because it "gained" -2. Yes/No? 2) Are oxidation eductions typically covalent or ionic bonds? Or can it be either one depending on the circumstance? Thanks Prof. Dave & mates!
@hydromic251821 күн бұрын
1) Yes 2) it depends, it can form a covalent or an ionic bond
@esmfamil50863 жыл бұрын
I wish you had a video over every single topic out there. When I search something on youtube and finally your video comes up, ik my search is over
@p.vidhya63053 жыл бұрын
Yes
@mazazaboy3 жыл бұрын
Okay my man you are better than my teacher, this has summed everything I've done for months without understanding
@MedK0012 жыл бұрын
In the checking comprehension exercise, on the last exercise... Al2(SO4)3 You assigned +3 to Al2, +6 to S and -2 to O. Would it be possible to assign 8 to S and keep Al as 0? If not, why not?
@user-kb3qw4jf4d3 ай бұрын
While assigning oxidation states (OS) of +8 to sulfur (S) and 0 to aluminum (Al) in Al2(SO4)3 might seem mathematically possible, it deviates from established principles for two key reasons: Charge Neutrality: Al2(SO4)3 is a neutral molecule, meaning the sum of its oxidation states must equal zero. Since each sulfate ion (SO4) carries a -2 charge (-2 x 3 = -6 for three sulfate ions), aluminum collectively must have an oxidation state of +6 to balance this negative charge. Assigning +0 to Al would violate this principle. Typical Oxidation States: Sulfur's common oxidation states range from -2 to +6. In Al2(SO4)3, sulfur shares electrons with oxygen in the sulfate ion. Based on these electron sharing patterns, a +6 oxidation state for sulfur is more realistic. Aluminum, on the other hand, almost exclusively exhibits a +3 oxidation state in ionic compounds due to its tendency to lose its three valence electrons for stability. Therefore, assigning +3 to Al and +6 to S adheres to both the charge neutrality requirement and the established oxidation state behaviors of these elements within Al2(SO4)3. Sorry if my explanation was a bit long 😅😅
@brandenanderson65804 жыл бұрын
1 week of lecture taught in 4 minutes
@joshuamontgomery07 жыл бұрын
Hi Professor Dave! I love your checking comprehension section at the end!
@An_Onion4 жыл бұрын
There is one other time that oxygen has a oxidation state other than (-2) and that's in OF₂, where it has a (terrifying) charge of (+2). Your videos are awesome, btw. You teach a lot like I do, skipping a lot of the BS and half-assing that a lot of general chemistry courses use.
@boofang106 ай бұрын
BRILLIANTLY explained Professor David.. not easy for sure to be untrained mind, but with repeated viewing of this short 3 min 51 second clip.. YOU WILL UNDERSTAND & know how to recognize the Oxidation and Reduction in terms of change of charge + recognizing the Agents by seeing what happens to it originally 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@roroh.t11805 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😆😆you really made me understand chemistry finally !! Since I was in high school I felt like I will never understand chemistry and thanks again I get good grades in my exam because of you 🌚✌🏼
@sealogic45526 жыл бұрын
I feel like these videos are entertaining enough that I'd actually go out of my way to watch them, not just when I'm struggling to complete the chemistry project that's due tomorrow. It's like Game Theory, but without the games.
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
That's exactly what I'm going for! My dream is that everyone will watch them just to learn a little science, not just because they have to for school. But take of your obligations first! Then you can bonus learn.
@areejmateen51835 жыл бұрын
I’ve been learning from your videos since quite a few months now, lets just say you’re a hero.
@gamingwithpopzzz26143 жыл бұрын
I was really confused by watching other videos finally I came to watch ur video I'm really thankful sir🤩
@krishbarot49843 жыл бұрын
Thank You SOOO SOOO Much, you don't know how much of a LEGEND you are!!! I've been looking for a simple and straightforward explanation to recap what I had learnt and you finally helped me out. I don't know why I didn't watch your video earlier. But now I've subbed you so I will always remember to watch your videos for help :)
@p.vidhya63053 жыл бұрын
Mee too same thing 😭😭😭 I don't understand this topic but after seeing his lecture I could understand it easily I too subscribe him 😀😀😀
@Buzzhumma7 жыл бұрын
thanks for elevating me from feeling like a moron 😀
@nishita95874 жыл бұрын
Can you explain half reaction??? Btw this video is amazing I loved it and it is really helpful
@arwaandphysics4773 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/nXPHiniceJWal9U Please have a look May be you find this useful
@eb_14982 жыл бұрын
this guy has taught me oxidation and reduction reactions within 3 mins whilst my teachers couldn't do it with hours and days teaching me some boring ass textbook work that didn't help me one bit, it just goes to show that if you want to learn something you have to go out and learn it yourself
@willnicolas91987 жыл бұрын
Thank you for saving my soul from failing chem.
@vivekpathak69495 жыл бұрын
ideal11 app khailo
@christiancamacho60338 жыл бұрын
Thanks Professor Davis!!! Sending appreciation all the way from California!!!!
@maxguarda4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Dave for the GREAT free content!
@samcoopermusic4 жыл бұрын
In the final comprehension question, is there anyway to know that SO4 has a net charge of -2 without looking up Sulphur on the table? Or is that ultimately inferred from the fact that there are 2 Als and 3 SO4s? Question for Dave or anyone. Also, I LOVE THIS CHANNEL! Thanks for the vids.
@tantsuya32743 жыл бұрын
in my ap chem class we just had to memorize the polyatomic ions and their charges so that's what's in the bag for us sorry for being a year late
@samcoopermusic3 жыл бұрын
@@tantsuya3274 Better late than never! Yes, memorization and/or cheat sheets are the way to go.
@fendas1235 жыл бұрын
I didn't comprehend anything!
@Daniel-pe9zr4 жыл бұрын
You are amazing. Simple and down to earth, straight to the facts.
@adhiyanthaprabhujeyashanka20913 жыл бұрын
Yeah
@heinstein28118 жыл бұрын
You deserve a million subscribers sir! I love you so much already!
@nyx2463 жыл бұрын
your wish was our command
@observer74189 ай бұрын
I have that same shirt and now I can wear it while knowing a little more about redox reactions.
@kikithepupper67745 жыл бұрын
he looks like someone who shreds guitar, but he shreds knowledge and sprinkles on our pizza
@kumarvaibhav49376 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation professor.It cleared my confusion.Thanks.!
@karthikdani3 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooo much sir, u r helping a lot in my 2 years preparation
@lesonyafire3107 жыл бұрын
A BIG thanks from Texas. thanks you sooooo much.
@gaia78042 жыл бұрын
THIS MAKES SO MUCH SENSE NOW THANK YOU
@larssrensen43533 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I am in 4th year of industrial engineering and I have a subject called "Metal science: Corrosion and Surface Technology". I used to learn this multiple times but keep forgetting about this.
@T1tanSalazar3 жыл бұрын
That beginning tho😂😂
@abinayasivasamy47083 жыл бұрын
Thank you Professor Dave for making science more easier. Could you please try to upload the method to balance an equation using oxidation number. Esp. the equation FeSO4 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 -> Fe2(SO4)3 + MnSO4 +K2SO4 +H2O
@ProfessorDaveExplains3 жыл бұрын
check out my tutorial on balancing redox reactions
@kisho26793 ай бұрын
Why is it important to determine how many oxidation states an element has; what conclusions does it tell?
@satishjangir194 жыл бұрын
Nice teaching
@zahara30706 жыл бұрын
THANK U SO MUCH. U JUST SAVED MY LIFE FOR MY CHEM MIDTERM!!!!!
@A2ZU2BR12 күн бұрын
I am Indian really you explain it very well thankyou ☺️
@ahmedelbadry70088 жыл бұрын
i love u man ,thanks from Egypt
@fromtopgun35606 жыл бұрын
Wow this literally did not help me at all but thank you for the effort. I might sound dumb but I legit need pictures not chemical formulas
@nerengen00543 жыл бұрын
3:14 explain the last one
@EEEE-zs8sz11 күн бұрын
Wanted to explain but u prolly graduated now
@indy82983 күн бұрын
@@EEEE-zs8szcan you explain to me instead? 😁
@EEEE-zs8sz3 күн бұрын
@indy8298 sure man but lowkey had to do all the calculation again cuz chemistry have been goin so fast. Anyways basically the Al charge is 3+ cuz u can see a 3 after the bracket of SO4 suggesting that aluminum got a charge of 3+ and SO4 got a charge of 2- because u can see beside the Al there is a 2, now S is 6+ because after doin the math where x+4(-2)= -2 the answer gonna be 6 as u take the negative 8 to the other side and subtract it, and then the Oxygen is 2- as ya know. Idk if ya get it cuz im explaining it while shitting 🙏🏼
@LorenzoBattilocchi8 жыл бұрын
Thanks a million, Professor Dave, from Ireland!
@patrickj.77823 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your content as always! I was able to solve all of them except the last one Al2(SO4)3. I dont see how I would have assumed the oxidation number for sulfur and aluminum to be those values. Am I missing something?
@ProfessorDaveExplains3 жыл бұрын
You can assume -2 for oxygen and go from there.
@user-ko9de8yv9m2 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains I am also confused, shouldn't the sulfur be +8 if the oxygen was -2(4)
@ProfessorDaveExplains2 жыл бұрын
The ion has a 2- charge so the numbers must add up to -2, not 0.
@AKoboldsAdventures9 ай бұрын
@@user-ko9de8yv9m The so4 has a minus 2 charge so the S is +2. The entire molecule is neutral and since the ion appears thrice it is -6 so the Al has to be +3
@dastanroy37847 жыл бұрын
sir please make video on grahams law of diffusion
@pvptwist4 жыл бұрын
This video was so resourceful .Thank you so much .Everything was explained so easily.
@hehebwoy41323 жыл бұрын
I wish you are my chemistry teacher. You would be the best. Like the videos.🙌💯
@LaneOswalt Жыл бұрын
thank you for explaining this, it has taken me so long to figure these problems out
@food_44 Жыл бұрын
Much clearer than the CrashCourse video, geess
@victoriacure5132 жыл бұрын
I love you chemistry jesus
@kevineodira6734 ай бұрын
What a simple way of learning!!
@jonathansoriano27947 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this video it really helped on my homework!!!!
@lukehauser11823 жыл бұрын
Thanks, great mnemonic
@lisafiorino4626 Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, this really helped me study for my unit test!
@zaid-zi6qy7 жыл бұрын
jesus is teaching us. 😛
@musabqaiser36586 жыл бұрын
i had the same thought for a sec
@agentsquid90795 жыл бұрын
@@askjfjawjhwahwjehjsjah1668 He looks Jewish
@kenjiro26764 жыл бұрын
ITS THE MESSIAH
@RunningManPhClipsАй бұрын
don't be disrespectful you ritard
@syedah99417 жыл бұрын
Thanks professor Dave, you helped me so much but I'm a little confused about the checking comprehension. I got the first 5 right but I don't understand that last compound. Aluminum sulfate? I don't understand how the oxidation number for S is +6
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
the whole sulfate ion must add up to -2, as that is the charge on the ion, so 4 times -2 for the oxygens gives -8, we need +6 on the sulfur to get to -2
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
check out the lewis dot structure for the sulfate ion!
@lexfransis Жыл бұрын
Dude you have no idea how much you helped me thx
@SairaAbbas-l8y Жыл бұрын
Your cartoon in start is very funny I enjoyed😂 well done . Good explanation . God bless u
@maxschrader24115 жыл бұрын
thanks for the help!! did not understand this in the least until watching your video
@gopalmatcha44364 жыл бұрын
Short, sweet... Perfect!
@user-lq8jq2rk7d Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much professor Dave you just break everything down for me to my understand❤❤ I'm so grateful
@wowiezowiepowie5 жыл бұрын
also if you have a glass batch containing antimony acting as the redux chem in glass it is a "sweeper" creating oxygen which rises to the top of the pot "grabbing" all other bubbles including any oxygen to be reabsorbed putting the glass into reduction......
@saintofchelseathomascarlyl57136 жыл бұрын
(press pause for more time) makes me smile every time ^__^
@christiancamacho60338 жыл бұрын
Dave* Sorry ._. but I really do love your videos. Thanks for extending my love of science! !😁
@scottbutler37744 жыл бұрын
Hi Professor Dave, taking 3U chemistry here. Just wondering if you could do a video or a snippet on balancing redox rxn's. That way folks can can learn to plug in some coefficients using this.
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
I already did that!
@scottbutler37744 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains was that in this video? I've been looking for that tidbit, as I'm stuck with it. But I was talking about using the electron transfer to find coefficients for the entire equation.
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
Just search professor dave balancing redox reactions.
@scottbutler37744 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains thank you kindly sir!
@hyehye40635 жыл бұрын
Wonderful Explanation . I love that . Thank you very much.
@brd87642 жыл бұрын
when redox is really something.
@ceylonunboxer4 жыл бұрын
You are a good teacher Dr. Dave. Thank you.
@the.mermaid.scientist2 жыл бұрын
Finally. I understand now 😂😂This is the ONE concept I absolutely could. not. grasp. in high school chemistry. 25 years ago. i just gave away my age but so what. Fortunately I passed and the Universe decided I should not despise chemistry after all =)
@goitomsereke12864 жыл бұрын
Thank you too much from today I am your client. Oredy I was subscribing to your channel
@goitomsereke12864 жыл бұрын
🖐️👍😅😋🙄🤩😢
@middleweightchamp77986 жыл бұрын
Best teacher on youtube by a mile
@robinlazulite31677 жыл бұрын
Super helpful, thanks so much!
@wieslawkruczala32053 жыл бұрын
What strange words "oxidized" and "reduced". As a physisist I hate misleading terms plentiful in chemistry and biology. I would say "deelectronized" and "electronized".
@aariamore21204 жыл бұрын
nicely explained ! thank u so much! 🙌i thought as if my brain cells were leaving me (coz of my chem prof's "teaching skills")...but now am ok...
@cadiusthegreat4530 Жыл бұрын
I be feelin so smart then boom, “let’s check for comprehension”
@ajsim7 жыл бұрын
great video! thank you
@raven_7054 ай бұрын
two hours before my test 💪🏻
@SKippySounds5 жыл бұрын
How does Cr2 have an oxidation number of 6 if you just said that single elements are equal to 0?
@robertofalgiano18465 жыл бұрын
Cr2O7 ^(2-) is a poliatomic ion. If one atom of Oxygen has -2, 7 atom of oxigen will have -14( 7x-2).Now,in order to respect the rule,we must have: Ox.number of Cr x 2(because we have 2 atom of Cr) + Ox.number of Oxygen x 7(for what we said)= 2-(charge of poliatomic ion). We can rewrite using "x" for ox.number of Cr: 2x -14=-2 2x=12 x=6.
@sharmiladavid3965 жыл бұрын
From India thanks a lot sir do more such basic vedios because if the base is strong then everything is well automated
@zero_meercat86245 жыл бұрын
lol
@sharmiladavid3965 жыл бұрын
Zero_Meercat y wts wrong
@bismahsadaqat41293 жыл бұрын
Woah you just stopped the teacher-student favoritism in our chem-class.
@jbuno97562 жыл бұрын
Finally I found What they call "chemistry jesus" 😭😭🙏
@marshalcraft6 жыл бұрын
Thanks, but what difference of electronegativity and oxydation number?
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
they are not related at all so that's tough to answer
@yashwasnik60837 жыл бұрын
great sirji, ur videos are very good to understand and remember concepts in chemistry.... from center of India, NAGPUR
@mageshkailashkailash97913 жыл бұрын
Now, i am studying class 12 until i watch your video I don't about these clearly..👁 thanks dave sir (" professor dave explains")
@axediepied69932 жыл бұрын
amazing explanation
@ArtinTheBeast6 жыл бұрын
2:13 - Well, that depends. If it's bonded to a nonmetal, then yes, it's +1, though if it's bonded to a metal it's actually -1.
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
that's why i said "almost always".
@ArtinTheBeast6 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave Explains oh right, that makes sense. I overheard that part.
@commandergamez1 Жыл бұрын
Good luck on your tests guys!
@Chloe-mm9ms3 жыл бұрын
at 2:52 why are the reactants both zero and the products their respective charges even though all of those are just single elements?
@rahulk44823 жыл бұрын
Dude my mom spends money on chem tutions, and this was more helpful than 4 to 6 hours worth of classes
@hadjerjija13314 ай бұрын
شكرا على الترجمة
@dude98644 жыл бұрын
O2 was shown to have 0 charge and O was shown to have a -2 charge then in the comprehension part O2 is -2
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
elements have zero for oxidation number
@dude98644 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains Is O the element or is O2 the element? (because it it exists as a diatomic molecule)
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
O2 is elemental oxygen, a diatomic molecule. O3 would also count as elemental. When oxygen is present in a molecule, it is not elemental.
@dude98644 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains So O has 0 charge and both 02 and 03 have -2 charges?
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
No, when an element is by itself, like molecular oxygen, which is O2 and O3, the oxygen atoms have oxidation numbers of zero, because they are bound only to other identical oxygen atoms. When oxygen is in a molecule, bound to other elements, it has some non-zero oxidation number. Consider watching this tutorial again.
@ccc11936 жыл бұрын
But why charge of ON of Al2(SO4)3 is +3 +6 -2 at last question??
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
oxygen is always -2, sulfates add up to -2 so S must be +6, and there are three sulfates that add up to -6 so each Al must be +3. it all has to add up to zero!
@ccc11936 жыл бұрын
Thx!
@stelo1558 Жыл бұрын
in the last compound in the assigning oxidation set, why does 'S' in (SO4)3 get an oxidation number of 6? Why wouldn't it be 2-?