Profex XRD: Background refinement

  Рет қаралды 6,303

Profex Tutorials

Profex Tutorials

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 11
@srk21994
@srk21994 3 жыл бұрын
it's like when I have any doubts I got the exact tutorial. Thanks a lot for the efforts in these tutorials and every new feature in the updates.
@Lilhobis
@Lilhobis 2 жыл бұрын
great video, thanks!
@mohamedoraby8044
@mohamedoraby8044 3 ай бұрын
How to push the background up at specific parts of the curve to fit every thing for better X2?
@qmtv5772
@qmtv5772 2 жыл бұрын
how to subtract the background contribution caused by the instrument?
@nunya8701
@nunya8701 3 жыл бұрын
Asome
@nunya8701
@nunya8701 3 жыл бұрын
Also face revale asome
@ZZZZzzzcccc
@ZZZZzzzcccc 8 ай бұрын
Hi Sir. Thank you for your tutorials. May I ask you a question? Where can I find the scale factor in Profex? I tried to find it and increase the absolute intensity of some peaks however cannot find it in the manual. Thank you! Looking forward to your reply!
@profextutorials2325
@profextutorials2325 8 ай бұрын
The scale factor is the GEWICHT parameter. It is not the Rietveld scale factor, though, because it is already corrected for the unit cell density: GEWICHT is equivalent to S*(Z*M*V)
@honkola999
@honkola999 3 жыл бұрын
thx for the video!! We have issues with smectite/illite peaks at about 5,7 2Theta (deg). The background is often way to low or the for the following peaks, such as the 8,7 2Theta (deg.) illite peak. The Problem might also come from unfitting smectite structure files. We have tried the montmorillonite str. files as a substitute for the smectite file, which is also not a good solution.
@profextutorials2325
@profextutorials2325 3 жыл бұрын
It is difficult to guess what the problem is without seeing the data. It could be because the measured low angle peak is actually smaller than it should be, for example because the automatic divergence slit is inaccurate, or because the beam spills over the sample. At very low angles instrument alignment is more critical than at high angles. So you should check if the modelled peak is too strong, or the measured peak is too weak. It could be one or the other. The former must be fixed in the refinement, the latter in the hardware/sample. Either way, the too strong model peak pushes the background down. Once the peak intensity is correct, the background will fit well, too. Here are some tips for accurate low angle peaks: - make sure your sample surface is perfectly centered in the center of the goniometer (no height error) - maybe use a fix divergence slit. Not the automatic one set to fix mode, but really insert a fix slit. They are more precise - make sure that the sample dimensions in the Profex instrument configuration are entered correctly
@honkola999
@honkola999 3 жыл бұрын
@@profextutorials2325 Thanks a lot!! Its working way better now. Although, we don't have any other chance but to work with the automatic slit in fixed mode and an additional one (behind the automatic one) with the same size.
Le Bail refinement in Profex
13:24
Profex Tutorials
Рет қаралды 3,4 М.
Phase identification from XRD data with Profex
28:26
Profex Tutorials
Рет қаралды 39 М.
coco在求救? #小丑 #天使 #shorts
00:29
好人小丑
Рет қаралды 87 МЛН
Don't underestimate anyone
00:47
奇軒Tricking
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
Environmental Variables Understood in Bash and Unix - You Suck at Programming #039
2:41
Profex XRD: First Rietveld Refinement with Profex
59:15
Profex Tutorials
Рет қаралды 27 М.
Diffraction Lecture 26: A Practical Guide to Rietveld Refinements
34:26
Pat's Perovskites
Рет қаралды 11 М.
XRD(Data analysis)
30:51
Vidya-mitra
Рет қаралды 34 М.
Calibrated structure factor lists (a.k.a. PONKCS) in Profex
18:50
Profex Tutorials
Рет қаралды 1,4 М.
Why Does Diffusion Work Better than Auto-Regression?
20:18
Algorithmic Simplicity
Рет қаралды 389 М.
Profex XRD: Instrument Configurations
29:44
Profex Tutorials
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Calculating FWHM for XRD Peaks using ORIGIN
9:47
Phys Whiz
Рет қаралды 318 М.
Profex XRD: Refining crystallite sizes and texture
21:56
Profex Tutorials
Рет қаралды 8 М.