You're one of those few people I would actually love to click every video of theirs and immediately give a like without a further thought
@clionekimura96043 ай бұрын
I feel you, that’s exactly what I just did!
@Necrozene2 ай бұрын
I immediately answered "yes". In my mind I saw the graphs of y = x, y = x^3, and saw there were differences above and below +3, and I did not know exactly where. So, inituitively, I used the IVT. Cheers!
@demongeminix Жыл бұрын
Awesome demonstration of the use of the IVT.
@sinanmertulucay942728 күн бұрын
I think it could also be proved like this: x = x^3 + 3 x^3 - x + 3 = 0 let P(x) = x^3 - x + 3 Inspecting the coefficients: 1 ∈ R, -1 ∈ R and 3 ∈ R. Hence, P(x) is a real cubic polynomial. Therefore it either has: a. 3 real solutions (x - R1)(x - R2)(x - R3) b. 1 real and 2 complex solutions (x - c)(x - a - bi)(x - a + bi), a ∈ R and b ∈ R So, there exists at least one real x such that P(x) = 0.
@tcoren1Ай бұрын
You can also use the fundamental theorem of arithmatic, which is arguably more advanced but is a bit more generic and is more fundamental to the question. The idea is to prove every odd degree polynomial with real coefficients has a real root. Every n degree polynomial has exactly n roots, and can be decomposed as p(x)=a(x-x1)(x-x2)...(x-xn), with x1,x2,...xn the roots. Taking the complex conjugate should result in the same polynomial since it's real, so p(x)=a(x-x1*)(x-x2*)...(x-xn*) Equating the roots of the two versions of the polynomial shows that each coefficient is either real or comes in a pair with another coefficient such that each is the other's coefficient. Since it is impossible to arrange an odd number of numbers into pairs at least one of them must be real
@markmajkowski954510 ай бұрын
??? By observation - Every cubic (odd polynomial as well) has at least one real solution. Plus there is a cubic “formula” despite its modern perceived complexity - especially when the x^2 term is 0 which was first solved before the generalized cubic.
@ramennoodle9918Ай бұрын
well yeah i think this is for more general proofs of this type
@kragiharp10 ай бұрын
Your videos are great, sir. I really appreciate them. Best wishes to you.
@PrimeNewtons10 ай бұрын
Glad you like them!
@magefreak93568 ай бұрын
I think you could also say that: f(x) is continuous on all real numbers. As x approaches negative infinity, f(x) approaches negative infinity. As x approaches positive infinity, f(x) approaches positive infinity. I don't know if the intermediate value theorem would apply here as infinity and negative infinity isn't a number. This would also apply to all polynomials which have an odd number for the highest power of x.
@9adam48 ай бұрын
I don't think you're technically allowed to do that. But what you can do is prove that f(-c) is negative and f(c) is positive, where c is any integer greater than the sum of the absolute values of the coefficients of the polynomial.
@magefreak93568 ай бұрын
@@9adam4 why do you need the extra restriction of the coefficients?
@9adam48 ай бұрын
@magefreak9356 The coefficients will determine how far you need to go to assure you have applicable points. For instance, f(x) = x^3 - 1000x^2, you need to get past 1000 before f(-c) is negative.
@manpreetkhokhar53186 ай бұрын
As per asked question, x^3 + 3 = x; I.e x^3 - x + 3 = 0 Let's define f(x) = x^3 - x + 3 So, question now transforms to checking if f(x) = 0 has any real root. We can clearly examine that, f(-2) = -3 and f(-1) = 3. Since, 0 lies between -3 and 3, so, by IVT, there exists atleast one c between -2 and -1, such that f(c) = 0. This proves, that f has atleast one root.Hence, for some c between -2 and -1, c^3 - c + 3 = 0. Also, by further analyzing the limits at -inf and its increasing,decreasing nature, we can deduce that,it is the only root.
@Ignoranceisbliss-i2e3 ай бұрын
@@9adam4 yes you can because the graph is continuous and always increasing...
@rceretta7 ай бұрын
Beautiful dialect solution!!!! I simply love it!
@davidcawthorne71153 ай бұрын
It is real important to remember that the function has to be continuous for IVT to hold or at least continuous over the interval a b. And to always wear a cool hat when doing mathematics. 😊❤
@pk27125 ай бұрын
Great demonstration of the use of the intermediate value theorem .
@jesusthroughmary4 ай бұрын
Every cubic function (in fact every polynomial of any odd degree) must have at least one real root because complex roots come in pairs
@okaro65953 ай бұрын
Or if one goes towards plus or minus infinity he x³ term dominates and the value also goes towards the same infinity.
@jesusthroughmary3 ай бұрын
@okaro6595 true, and therefore since it tends to both infinities it must pass through 0 on the way
@김민국-c9f3 ай бұрын
If the coefficients of a polynomial are complex numbers, it doesn't need to have a real number root
@anilbera94992 ай бұрын
@@김민국-c9f but they are not here..
@michaelbujaki24622 ай бұрын
The number turns out to be approximately -1.67169988165716.
@davidbrisbane72062 ай бұрын
x³ - x + 3 = 0 has one real root and two complex conjugate roots. In fact, Descartes' Rule of Signs tells us that one negative real root.
@Faroshkas10 ай бұрын
I love this channel
@JayTemple9 ай бұрын
I used the Sign Rule (I think that's the name) to show that there is exactly one solution that's negative. As originally stated, the number the problem asks for is a solution of x = x^3 + 3, which works out to x^3 - x + 3 = 0. If x is a solution, let y = -x. Then -y^3 + y + 3 = 0. The polynomial has exactly one sign change, so it has exactly one positive zero, but if y is positive, then x, which is -y, is negative. ETA: Also, I find 10 and -10 to be easier to use than smaller numbers (other than 1). My test here would be (-10)^3 - (-10) + 3 = -1000 + 100 + 3
@davidbrisbane72064 ай бұрын
Cardano's cubic formula always find a real solution to a cubic equation, so at least one such c exists and we know f(c) = 0.
@abdikadirsalad1572 Жыл бұрын
Thanks sir . Please make a video on mid term and final exam reviews calculus 1
@markgraham2312Ай бұрын
Excellent!
@jan-willemreens9010 Жыл бұрын
... A good day to you Newton despite the bad weather, Didn't I tell you ... BLACKBOARD --> SIR. NEWTON
@PrimeNewtons Жыл бұрын
😊😊😊😊 Thank you!
@artandata6 ай бұрын
I kept waiting for the numerical real value of the answer!
@sjn72207 ай бұрын
Is there a solution that doesn’t involve guessing?
@TheTrx3richie6 ай бұрын
Good demonstration!
@tanjilsarker7678 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the help!!
@tcmxiyw24 күн бұрын
The question is “Is x real?”. You have answered the question “Can x be real?”. In order to answer the given question, you must rule out option 2, in which two of the possibilities for x are imaginary. For a cubic equation with real coefficients, there are these possibilities: three real solutions, two real solutions (one with multiplicity two), or one real solution and two imaginary solutions. So the answer to the question could be “no”. More work to do. You did, however, answer the question in the thumbnail for the video.
@kennethgee20044 ай бұрын
well the question changed a little from the thumb nail to the question on the board. This one feels like a no, but it is the proof they want.
@Ahmed-kg2gf5 ай бұрын
The question is , "is x real" in order to solve that u need to get the notation for the equation and it is x³+3=x Reenraging the terms X³-x+3=0 Any cubic polynomial with real coefficient must have at least one real solution so the answer is ye , no need to solve
@tudorsafir2766 Жыл бұрын
Isn't that also called Bolzano's Theorem?
@PrimeNewtons Жыл бұрын
Yes, it is!
@manitubergaming Жыл бұрын
U soooo intelligent
@denniskisule8131Ай бұрын
what about iteration?
@moeberry82267 ай бұрын
Good video brother but you haven’t shown that x^3-x+3 is continuous even though I know it’s a polynomial and it’s continuous on R. Taking the derivative would also be good to show. Because differentiability implies continuity.
@tcoren1Ай бұрын
That's circular logic. The proof for the derivative of a polynomial goes through proving it is continuous. It's like using L'hopital's rule to find the limit of sinx/x
@williamspostoronnim984510 ай бұрын
I like Your English very much!
@physifeАй бұрын
I just used -10 and 0, these are easy enough
@Harrykesh6306 ай бұрын
Using Derivatives would have been a better approach 🤔
@NathanSibali Жыл бұрын
Wow
@Dr_piFrog29 күн бұрын
Approximately: -1.67...
@9adam48 ай бұрын
It's about -1.6717
@senseof_outrage93908 ай бұрын
Can you post the exact format of the solution. Did you solve the problem yourself... 😅
@neevhingrajia38226 ай бұрын
Thats a transcendental number right? So how can the a transcendental number be 3 more than its own cube?
@9adam46 ай бұрын
@neevhingrajia3822 What leads you to believe it's a transcendental number? As you correctly point out, a transcendental number can't be the solution to an equation like this.
@neevhingrajia38226 ай бұрын
@@9adam4 so are you saying that -1.6717 cubed would be 3 less than -1.6717?
@9adam46 ай бұрын
@neevhingrajia3822 Yes I am. Put it into the calculator yourself.
@BB-sc8ed Жыл бұрын
Thank you for saving my ass
@elreturner12273 ай бұрын
I did x^3 -x =-3 x(x^2 -1)=-3 x((x+1)(x-1))=-3 x=-3, x=-4, and x=-2 and not one is right
@yaronbracha49235 ай бұрын
Who's Dad?
@holyshit922 Жыл бұрын
It is not so difficult to calculate x Assume that x is sum of two unknowns,plug in into the equation use binomial expansion , rewrite as system of equations Transform this system of equations to Vieta formulas for quadratic Check if solution of quadratic satisfies system of equations before transformation
@m.h.6470 Жыл бұрын
Solution: is there a real solution to x = x³ + 3? x = x³ + 3 |-x³ x - x³ = 3 |therefore x³ < x, which means that, as the result is an integer, x *has* to be negative! (x³ < x would also be possible, if 0 < x < 1, but then the result of x - x³ would not be an integer) Since x³ is growing very fast, x has to be quite small. testing left term assuming x = -1 -1 - (-1)³ = -1 - (-1) = -1 + 1 = 0 testing left term assuming x = -2 -2 - (-2)³ = -2 - (-8) = -2 + 8 = 6 Therefore there is a real solution of x between -1 and -2.
@sunil.shegaonkar110 ай бұрын
Nearest answer is - 1.672, it is still an approximate. Question remains: is there an exact solution ? Probably not in rational numbers, but may be an irrational one. Oh, That is why they are called irrational number.
@ThompsonUpton-k7l2 ай бұрын
Harris Kimberly Perez Anthony Clark Betty
@Noor-kq9ho11 ай бұрын
depressed cubics
@johnconrardy84863 ай бұрын
why don't you why don't you create a tee shirt with your famous saying
@colina6411 ай бұрын
nice as usual, please try to change your blackboard to a white one or improve the light system for better visualization of your videos, best regards👍
@AbouTaim-Lille6 ай бұрын
X=3x³ , and excluding the trivial solution X=0. We have 3x²= 1 so x=±1/√3
@Taric259 ай бұрын
Why all this proof stuff? Just solve it. x≈-1.6717 or x≈0.83585 ± 1.0469 i. That's it.
@xyz92507 ай бұрын
Could you post how you solved it ?
@hridikkanjilal4604 ай бұрын
All negative number is greater than it's cube
@sinexitoalmiedo3 ай бұрын
False because (-(1/2))^3=-1/8 but -1/8 is greater than -1/2
@hridikkanjilal4603 ай бұрын
@@sinexitoalmiedo I forgot to add 'all negative ' non fractions of decimals are greater than their squres
@sinexitoalmiedo3 ай бұрын
@@hridikkanjilal460 what??
@hridikkanjilal4603 ай бұрын
@@sinexitoalmiedo all negative number which are not fractions or decimals are greater than their cubes