Proof of existence by I.V.T.

  Рет қаралды 22,610

Prime Newtons

Prime Newtons

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 80
@oraculum_
@oraculum_ 9 ай бұрын
You're one of those few people I would actually love to click every video of theirs and immediately give a like without a further thought
@clionekimura9604
@clionekimura9604 3 ай бұрын
I feel you, that’s exactly what I just did!
@Necrozene
@Necrozene 2 ай бұрын
I immediately answered "yes". In my mind I saw the graphs of y = x, y = x^3, and saw there were differences above and below +3, and I did not know exactly where. So, inituitively, I used the IVT. Cheers!
@demongeminix
@demongeminix Жыл бұрын
Awesome demonstration of the use of the IVT.
@sinanmertulucay9427
@sinanmertulucay9427 28 күн бұрын
I think it could also be proved like this: x = x^3 + 3 x^3 - x + 3 = 0 let P(x) = x^3 - x + 3 Inspecting the coefficients: 1 ∈ R, -1 ∈ R and 3 ∈ R. Hence, P(x) is a real cubic polynomial. Therefore it either has: a. 3 real solutions (x - R1)(x - R2)(x - R3) b. 1 real and 2 complex solutions (x - c)(x - a - bi)(x - a + bi), a ∈ R and b ∈ R So, there exists at least one real x such that P(x) = 0.
@tcoren1
@tcoren1 Ай бұрын
You can also use the fundamental theorem of arithmatic, which is arguably more advanced but is a bit more generic and is more fundamental to the question. The idea is to prove every odd degree polynomial with real coefficients has a real root. Every n degree polynomial has exactly n roots, and can be decomposed as p(x)=a(x-x1)(x-x2)...(x-xn), with x1,x2,...xn the roots. Taking the complex conjugate should result in the same polynomial since it's real, so p(x)=a(x-x1*)(x-x2*)...(x-xn*) Equating the roots of the two versions of the polynomial shows that each coefficient is either real or comes in a pair with another coefficient such that each is the other's coefficient. Since it is impossible to arrange an odd number of numbers into pairs at least one of them must be real
@markmajkowski9545
@markmajkowski9545 10 ай бұрын
??? By observation - Every cubic (odd polynomial as well) has at least one real solution. Plus there is a cubic “formula” despite its modern perceived complexity - especially when the x^2 term is 0 which was first solved before the generalized cubic.
@ramennoodle9918
@ramennoodle9918 Ай бұрын
well yeah i think this is for more general proofs of this type
@kragiharp
@kragiharp 10 ай бұрын
Your videos are great, sir. I really appreciate them. Best wishes to you.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 10 ай бұрын
Glad you like them!
@magefreak9356
@magefreak9356 8 ай бұрын
I think you could also say that: f(x) is continuous on all real numbers. As x approaches negative infinity, f(x) approaches negative infinity. As x approaches positive infinity, f(x) approaches positive infinity. I don't know if the intermediate value theorem would apply here as infinity and negative infinity isn't a number. This would also apply to all polynomials which have an odd number for the highest power of x.
@9adam4
@9adam4 8 ай бұрын
I don't think you're technically allowed to do that. But what you can do is prove that f(-c) is negative and f(c) is positive, where c is any integer greater than the sum of the absolute values of the coefficients of the polynomial.
@magefreak9356
@magefreak9356 8 ай бұрын
@@9adam4 why do you need the extra restriction of the coefficients?
@9adam4
@9adam4 8 ай бұрын
@magefreak9356 The coefficients will determine how far you need to go to assure you have applicable points. For instance, f(x) = x^3 - 1000x^2, you need to get past 1000 before f(-c) is negative.
@manpreetkhokhar5318
@manpreetkhokhar5318 6 ай бұрын
As per asked question, x^3 + 3 = x; I.e x^3 - x + 3 = 0 Let's define f(x) = x^3 - x + 3 So, question now transforms to checking if f(x) = 0 has any real root. We can clearly examine that, f(-2) = -3 and f(-1) = 3. Since, 0 lies between -3 and 3, so, by IVT, there exists atleast one c between -2 and -1, such that f(c) = 0. This proves, that f has atleast one root.Hence, for some c between -2 and -1, c^3 - c + 3 = 0. Also, by further analyzing the limits at -inf and its increasing,decreasing nature, we can deduce that,it is the only root.
@Ignoranceisbliss-i2e
@Ignoranceisbliss-i2e 3 ай бұрын
@@9adam4 yes you can because the graph is continuous and always increasing...
@rceretta
@rceretta 7 ай бұрын
Beautiful dialect solution!!!! I simply love it!
@davidcawthorne7115
@davidcawthorne7115 3 ай бұрын
It is real important to remember that the function has to be continuous for IVT to hold or at least continuous over the interval a b. And to always wear a cool hat when doing mathematics. 😊❤
@pk2712
@pk2712 5 ай бұрын
Great demonstration of the use of the intermediate value theorem .
@jesusthroughmary
@jesusthroughmary 4 ай бұрын
Every cubic function (in fact every polynomial of any odd degree) must have at least one real root because complex roots come in pairs
@okaro6595
@okaro6595 3 ай бұрын
Or if one goes towards plus or minus infinity he x³ term dominates and the value also goes towards the same infinity.
@jesusthroughmary
@jesusthroughmary 3 ай бұрын
@okaro6595 true, and therefore since it tends to both infinities it must pass through 0 on the way
@김민국-c9f
@김민국-c9f 3 ай бұрын
If the coefficients of a polynomial are complex numbers, it doesn't need to have a real number root
@anilbera9499
@anilbera9499 2 ай бұрын
@@김민국-c9f but they are not here..
@michaelbujaki2462
@michaelbujaki2462 2 ай бұрын
The number turns out to be approximately -1.67169988165716.
@davidbrisbane7206
@davidbrisbane7206 2 ай бұрын
x³ - x + 3 = 0 has one real root and two complex conjugate roots. In fact, Descartes' Rule of Signs tells us that one negative real root.
@Faroshkas
@Faroshkas 10 ай бұрын
I love this channel
@JayTemple
@JayTemple 9 ай бұрын
I used the Sign Rule (I think that's the name) to show that there is exactly one solution that's negative. As originally stated, the number the problem asks for is a solution of x = x^3 + 3, which works out to x^3 - x + 3 = 0. If x is a solution, let y = -x. Then -y^3 + y + 3 = 0. The polynomial has exactly one sign change, so it has exactly one positive zero, but if y is positive, then x, which is -y, is negative. ETA: Also, I find 10 and -10 to be easier to use than smaller numbers (other than 1). My test here would be (-10)^3 - (-10) + 3 = -1000 + 100 + 3
@davidbrisbane7206
@davidbrisbane7206 4 ай бұрын
Cardano's cubic formula always find a real solution to a cubic equation, so at least one such c exists and we know f(c) = 0.
@abdikadirsalad1572
@abdikadirsalad1572 Жыл бұрын
Thanks sir . Please make a video on mid term and final exam reviews calculus 1
@markgraham2312
@markgraham2312 Ай бұрын
Excellent!
@jan-willemreens9010
@jan-willemreens9010 Жыл бұрын
... A good day to you Newton despite the bad weather, Didn't I tell you ... BLACKBOARD --> SIR. NEWTON
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons Жыл бұрын
😊😊😊😊 Thank you!
@artandata
@artandata 6 ай бұрын
I kept waiting for the numerical real value of the answer!
@sjn7220
@sjn7220 7 ай бұрын
Is there a solution that doesn’t involve guessing?
@TheTrx3richie
@TheTrx3richie 6 ай бұрын
Good demonstration!
@tanjilsarker7678
@tanjilsarker7678 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the help!!
@tcmxiyw
@tcmxiyw 24 күн бұрын
The question is “Is x real?”. You have answered the question “Can x be real?”. In order to answer the given question, you must rule out option 2, in which two of the possibilities for x are imaginary. For a cubic equation with real coefficients, there are these possibilities: three real solutions, two real solutions (one with multiplicity two), or one real solution and two imaginary solutions. So the answer to the question could be “no”. More work to do. You did, however, answer the question in the thumbnail for the video.
@kennethgee2004
@kennethgee2004 4 ай бұрын
well the question changed a little from the thumb nail to the question on the board. This one feels like a no, but it is the proof they want.
@Ahmed-kg2gf
@Ahmed-kg2gf 5 ай бұрын
The question is , "is x real" in order to solve that u need to get the notation for the equation and it is x³+3=x Reenraging the terms X³-x+3=0 Any cubic polynomial with real coefficient must have at least one real solution so the answer is ye , no need to solve
@tudorsafir2766
@tudorsafir2766 Жыл бұрын
Isn't that also called Bolzano's Theorem?
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons Жыл бұрын
Yes, it is!
@manitubergaming
@manitubergaming Жыл бұрын
U soooo intelligent
@denniskisule8131
@denniskisule8131 Ай бұрын
what about iteration?
@moeberry8226
@moeberry8226 7 ай бұрын
Good video brother but you haven’t shown that x^3-x+3 is continuous even though I know it’s a polynomial and it’s continuous on R. Taking the derivative would also be good to show. Because differentiability implies continuity.
@tcoren1
@tcoren1 Ай бұрын
That's circular logic. The proof for the derivative of a polynomial goes through proving it is continuous. It's like using L'hopital's rule to find the limit of sinx/x
@williamspostoronnim9845
@williamspostoronnim9845 10 ай бұрын
I like Your English very much!
@physife
@physife Ай бұрын
I just used -10 and 0, these are easy enough
@Harrykesh630
@Harrykesh630 6 ай бұрын
Using Derivatives would have been a better approach 🤔
@NathanSibali
@NathanSibali Жыл бұрын
Wow
@Dr_piFrog
@Dr_piFrog 29 күн бұрын
Approximately: -1.67...
@9adam4
@9adam4 8 ай бұрын
It's about -1.6717
@senseof_outrage9390
@senseof_outrage9390 8 ай бұрын
Can you post the exact format of the solution. Did you solve the problem yourself... 😅
@neevhingrajia3822
@neevhingrajia3822 6 ай бұрын
Thats a transcendental number right? So how can the a transcendental number be 3 more than its own cube?
@9adam4
@9adam4 6 ай бұрын
@neevhingrajia3822 What leads you to believe it's a transcendental number? As you correctly point out, a transcendental number can't be the solution to an equation like this.
@neevhingrajia3822
@neevhingrajia3822 6 ай бұрын
@@9adam4 so are you saying that -1.6717 cubed would be 3 less than -1.6717?
@9adam4
@9adam4 6 ай бұрын
@neevhingrajia3822 Yes I am. Put it into the calculator yourself.
@BB-sc8ed
@BB-sc8ed Жыл бұрын
Thank you for saving my ass
@elreturner1227
@elreturner1227 3 ай бұрын
I did x^3 -x =-3 x(x^2 -1)=-3 x((x+1)(x-1))=-3 x=-3, x=-4, and x=-2 and not one is right
@yaronbracha4923
@yaronbracha4923 5 ай бұрын
Who's Dad?
@holyshit922
@holyshit922 Жыл бұрын
It is not so difficult to calculate x Assume that x is sum of two unknowns,plug in into the equation use binomial expansion , rewrite as system of equations Transform this system of equations to Vieta formulas for quadratic Check if solution of quadratic satisfies system of equations before transformation
@m.h.6470
@m.h.6470 Жыл бұрын
Solution: is there a real solution to x = x³ + 3? x = x³ + 3 |-x³ x - x³ = 3 |therefore x³ < x, which means that, as the result is an integer, x *has* to be negative! (x³ < x would also be possible, if 0 < x < 1, but then the result of x - x³ would not be an integer) Since x³ is growing very fast, x has to be quite small. testing left term assuming x = -1 -1 - (-1)³ = -1 - (-1) = -1 + 1 = 0 testing left term assuming x = -2 -2 - (-2)³ = -2 - (-8) = -2 + 8 = 6 Therefore there is a real solution of x between -1 and -2.
@sunil.shegaonkar1
@sunil.shegaonkar1 10 ай бұрын
Nearest answer is - 1.672, it is still an approximate. Question remains: is there an exact solution ? Probably not in rational numbers, but may be an irrational one. Oh, That is why they are called irrational number.
@ThompsonUpton-k7l
@ThompsonUpton-k7l 2 ай бұрын
Harris Kimberly Perez Anthony Clark Betty
@Noor-kq9ho
@Noor-kq9ho 11 ай бұрын
depressed cubics
@johnconrardy8486
@johnconrardy8486 3 ай бұрын
why don't you why don't you create a tee shirt with your famous saying
@colina64
@colina64 11 ай бұрын
nice as usual, please try to change your blackboard to a white one or improve the light system for better visualization of your videos, best regards👍
@AbouTaim-Lille
@AbouTaim-Lille 6 ай бұрын
X=3x³ , and excluding the trivial solution X=0. We have 3x²= 1 so x=±1/√3
@Taric25
@Taric25 9 ай бұрын
Why all this proof stuff? Just solve it. x≈-1.6717 or x≈0.83585 ± 1.0469 i. That's it.
@xyz9250
@xyz9250 7 ай бұрын
Could you post how you solved it ?
@hridikkanjilal460
@hridikkanjilal460 4 ай бұрын
All negative number is greater than it's cube
@sinexitoalmiedo
@sinexitoalmiedo 3 ай бұрын
False because (-(1/2))^3=-1/8 but -1/8 is greater than -1/2
@hridikkanjilal460
@hridikkanjilal460 3 ай бұрын
@@sinexitoalmiedo I forgot to add 'all negative ' non fractions of decimals are greater than their squres
@sinexitoalmiedo
@sinexitoalmiedo 3 ай бұрын
@@hridikkanjilal460 what??
@hridikkanjilal460
@hridikkanjilal460 3 ай бұрын
@@sinexitoalmiedo all negative number which are not fractions or decimals are greater than their cubes
6th term of (2x-y^3)^8
8:29
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 3,8 М.
Limits requiring L'Hopital's Rule
16:35
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 19 М.
Каха и лужа  #непосредственнокаха
00:15
Intermediate Value Theorem and Finding Zeros | Calculus 1
8:26
Wrath of Math
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Mean Value Theorem
14:00
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Epsilon-delta proof for rational functions
20:13
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 21 М.
Real Analysis 32 | Intermediate Value Theorem
8:46
The Bright Side of Mathematics
Рет қаралды 25 М.
Application of mean value theorem
11:54
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Proof of Rational Root Theorem
19:28
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Intermediate Value Theorem Explained - To Find Zeros, Roots or C value - Calculus
13:11
The Organic Chemistry Tutor
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
The Limit (do not use L'Hospital rule)
12:08
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 690 М.
Lambert W Function
14:35
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 673 М.
Каха и лужа  #непосредственнокаха
00:15