PrsM Completes Short-Range Flight Test with the US Army

On November 13, the U.S. Army and Lockheed Martin successfully launched the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) in a short-range production qualification test demonstrating precision and reliability.
Learn more about the test here: lmt.co/3MPHetz

[@philchristmas4071]

Nice work! 🇺🇸

[@user-xm9do4vl2j]

Lockheed Martin doing the cooling shit ever since b4 I've been born!!😂 keep killing it gang!

[@1epton]

It has a longer range than ATACMS, but seems to be able to carry two shots with the HIMARS launcher.

[@wojtekimbier]

Yes but it has a much smaller warhead than the ATACMS which is 610mm in diameter vs 410mm

[@wojtekimbier]

@@fuzer4047 ATACMS has airburst as well and nobody's ever going to replace a warhead "for the application". You receive a mission and shoot what you have

[@kameronjones7139]

It will also be able to hit ships

[@CaliforniaMISC]

send to Ukraine for more testing

[@ddd.777-]

How to just send it in Ukraine the all the world would blame US from attacking Ukraine

[@antonamiel2366]

Go 👏

[@dissaid]

Great!!

[@lemoroccanMW]

modern warships needs this

[@sozzled3053]

The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computation scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air"

[@williamzk9083]

Missiles do not navigate by knowing where they are not.

[@staz3014]

@@williamzk9083 You obviously never heard of inertial guidance then :)

[@williamzk9083]

@@staz3014 inertial navigation does not work this way. I national navigation, works by integrating acceleration into velocity and then integrating velocity into displacement. Obviously you haven’t heard of Schuler Loop tuning.

[@sozzled3053]

@@williamzk9083 hahahaha. It's a meme brother. I'm just messing around. Look up "the missile knows where it is because it knows where it isnt".

[@elnesti1890]

Sory one question somebody if can explain the difference between er gmlrs and prsm? Thanks a lot in advance.

[@kameronjones7139]

The prsm is a ballistic missiles like the actams. However, it is half the size and double the range of it, so the prsm can carry double the number of shots, and it will be able to hit ships to. The gmlrs the normal rocket artillery that is gps guided

[@rollin60z]

Russia dont want this smoke 😤😤

[@michaelsweeney596]

You're corny AF

[@TheWorldsOkayestUSMarine]

I hate you because you misappropriate all of my tax money, but I love you because you make the coolest stuff ever. Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

[@zeeshancohen3927]

What's the range

[@elpenprice679]

500km ! D:

[@robert-px8vu]

Keep walking!

[@gont183]

Ukraine needs these now.

[@matthewwagner47]

Longer range, that's it?

[@marshalllapenta7656]

Question? Could this be capable of hypersonic?

[@Eshrakgaming934]

no high super sonic

[@jurajsintaj6644]

Probably not. Then again it doesn't need to. Just "going fast" isn't gonna achieve much in the age of automated defence systems.

[@Boomkokogamez]

​@jurajsintaj6644 Well, it just reduce the reaction and decision time that the defender have.

[@samuelmolano5840]

It already is capable of hypersonic speeds, just like most ballistic missiles

[@JeffBee-vo3gf]

Maybe, it's former competitor Raytheon's Deep Strike has a speed of 6.7 mach according to it's website...

[@Eshrakgaming934]

500 km range.

[@ms3862]

For now. A version 2 is already under development, increasing range to 750km

[@Eshrakgaming934]

@@ms3862 wow thats amazing.

[@susanshipanik336]

Death and destruction BOOOOOOO

[@wirehyperspace]

Any satellite pictures and sound of Israel

[@hj1535]

저걸로 J.A_P 기시다 면상에 한방 쏴주시길

[@apollo.11x]

hi

[@Miha9650]

hi

[@PeteMaverickMitchel]

Hi

[@randommadness1021]

Low

[@Joelmonterrey]

We'll need it. Russian state media they said Alaska is Russian/Russia. Stay frosty, taxpayers because we're going to need to be very agreeable on military spending now so we can survive later.

[@LLSemi]

Is that work for mobile ship ? Taiwan need anti ship missile. We own self production missile, but not enough. not only AGM-84,and other equipment like F-16 block 70/72, M109A7, why US government support Taiwan so difficult? We face China on front line, alone. Ok, AGM-84 was made via Boeing, haha ,drop this. I knew that Ukraine war was the other important shit in the world, ok.....

[@renatobrito3455]

🇮🇱🇺🇲🤝

[@Ade-mu4zn]

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷

[@Ade-mu4zn]

🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

[@Buchstabensuppe75]

send it to ukraine

[@rhadiem]

And make THEM pay for it, not the US.

[@AlexT094]

​@@rhadiemyou many pay for this? Maybe you want american soldiers fighting with Russia after destroyed Ukraine?🤡

[@ddd.777-]

Wait they aren’t allowed to just send it like that, it would kill people and destroy buildings then the US Hoverment would be blamed for attacking Ucraine

[@user-bd6go6pf4f]

​@@rhadiemwhen u return to Ukraine our nuclear weapons!

[@torbothy]

​@@user-bd6go6pf4fK.M.M.F.A.

[@olpkol]

Moscow received 1 million shells and 10,000 old cannons for the war in Ukraine. Are you proposing to defeat 1 million shells and 10,000 guns with "more accurate systems"? Exactly? 1 million and 10,000?

[@randommadness1021]

Am pretty sure that there's plenty more missles that we're sending them that will do most of the work. This thing isn't even finished testing lol

[@suddenlytitan739]

don't be stupid. this is meant for high value targets

[@MrObvious-tg8lz]

1/2 of those will probably destroy themselves.

[@iamsorryforbeingrudebefore1626]

​@@MrObvious-tg8lzok we got it, you are effin stupid.

[@50shadesofbeige88]

Sending Ukraine a top tier brand new weapons system would only escalate things. That's a terrible idea.

[@jurajsintaj6644]

Why and what would escalate?

[@EnergiaII]

Another red line crossed? Checkpoints by now.

[@WalD991]

Your message should have been conveyed to the Minutemen in the American Revolutionary War, as well as to those countries that helped them.

[@andersonfred1021]

"I don't want peace, I want War!" Lockheed Martin

[@RCAvhstape]

"If want peace, prepare for war." - Publius Flavius Vegetius Renatus

[@MrObvious-tg8lz]

"I want a peaceful SMO!" -Lockheed Martin😂😂😂😂