PTC Mathcad - Internal Hyperlinks

[@AsserMunch]

Thanks for all your very useful videos! One detail on this topic: The hyperlinks are not exported when saving as a pdf - at least in my couple of tests, saving as and printing to a pdf printer. So for someone (most people, I guess) handing in in pdf format, it may not be worth spending a whole lot of time creating links and a table of content. Sadly. These seemingly trivial writing/reporting features are a huge potential for improvement for Mathcad, so keep them coming! If you are aware of a setting that changes this, I'm all ears and eyes! Thanks again :)

[@PatJHeffernan]

This is a new feature in Mathcad so I am sure they will continue to improve its functionality. I can appreciate how this would be value added. The PTC folk keep an eye on the social media dealing with their product so they are likely to see your comment. If not, I will mention it the next time I'm talking with them.

[@AsserMunch]

@@PatJHeffernan Thanks, sounds good :) I'm a fairly patient type, but I'm glad I tested pdf export before setting it all up in the document. So I thought I would share my 'test result' to perhaps save someone else from getting old too fast.

[@PatJHeffernan]

@@AsserMunch We do tend to assume features from one program automatically port to another! Fingers crossed this enhancement gets worked into their plan!

[@AsserMunch]

@@PatJHeffernan Yes, I want the best of ALL worlds! Yesterday!

[@nihilistpc5799]

Does mathcad have the autocomplcation for variables functionality like Smath?

[@PatJHeffernan]

Sorry, I'm not familiar with either the feature nor Smath. Sorry.

[@peterpolman6407]

Thanks for the useful videos, the tag function is totally obsolete at my end in the text formatting ribbon, I'm using prime 8.0, do you have an idea? I already did an Google search, but cant find the solution. Thx!

[@PatJHeffernan]

Hi Peter. Unfortunately the Tag/Internal Hyperlink capability was introduced with Prime 9.0 this spring. I am unaware of an imaginative way to accomplish it in earlier versions. Sorry.

[@peterpolman6407]

@@PatJHeffernan no worries, but thank you so much for the reply, it helps me at least understanding.👍