Pulsar Forward F155 vs F455 digital night vision clip-ons | Optics Trade Debates

[@crafter170]

Got the f155 .Its great but pulsar need to produce a simple version for people like me.No stream vision etc .more things to break .All I wanted was an attachment to add on to my rifles .See in the dark well and pull the trigger .I will never use all the extra stuff .That said the product is fantastic .Ps surely this. Would cut down production time to supply to guys like me who are after a high quality image in the dark and nothing else.

[@richardschustek3421]

Hello Optics-Trade, thank you for being one of the most interesting optics Channel. Great and thorough Reviews. Three Questions which are quite important to me. 1.) How would you compare the new Pulsar F455 to the Nivex NVD 156? 2.) I have a Kahles K624i from you. Is the Pulsar F455 good to use with that scope? Because the minimal magnification is 6x. Might that be too much? 3.) What about the Pulsar F450? Does this provide more Field of View? Would that be more applicable to a 6x Minimum magnification scope?

[@OpticsTradeEU]

First of all, thank you for your kind words! 1. Unfortunately, we didn't compare these two devices yet, so I can't tell which one is better. 2. Pulsar recommends day sight optics with a minimal magnification from 2-8x, so the F455 should work perfectly with your Kahles. 3. The F455 has 2.6 meters wider field of view than the older F155. The F155 has 8,4 meters and the F455 11 meters at 100 meters. Hopefully, this helps. If you have more questions, don't hesitate to contact us at this email: [e-mail]

[@michielstevens1614]

​@@OpticsTradeEU Pleasse test the NIVEX NVD 156 for us? Im seriously considering selling my fn 455 for a nivex

[@fotolovac]

What is about problems with electronics at F155, is problem solved on F455 ?

[@crafter170]

Now the f455 is out I wonder if Pulsar will bring out a model with an integrated laser rangefinder....That would be a winner .Ps I have the laserluchs mounted on mine and it's fantastic guys.

[@zaungast5194]

I heard that the illuminator in the 455 is not fokusable so you have to buy a extra better one. Some would say the 155 is still the better choice.

[@michielstevens1614]

I have problems with it 2, you can't change the focus and also the position of the beam. Mine is pointing to much downwards and when hunting on ground or from a highseat half of the beam of the ir is out of sight pointing downwards. Resulting not only in missing light, but the light also shines on the bottom or cover and just blinds you in your sight. This is a real big Big let down for me cause it really influences your vi visibility. It defently isn't better then f155. It disappointed me

[@michielstevens1614]

I would like a real opinion on this by optics trade. 2 nights in the field and I really struggled with it

[@zaungast5194]

@@michielstevens1614 you are not alone with that problem. I know some guys who are really angry with pulsar for that new model that isn't better than the old one.

[@michielstevens1614]

@@zaungast5194 same here, i'm really dissapointed

[@nenadsolesa5347]

posedujem oba uredjaja......f155 radio tri sezone besprekorno. Stavljan na dve razlicite puske, bez korekcije . Baterija još uvek punog kapaciteta. Pulsar f455 kupljen pre 5 dana, zavrsna obrada mnogo losija nego na f155. Punjac baterije od lose plastike, baterija tesko ide na punjac. Daljinski upravljac nije u kompletu, nema snimanja zvuka, u meniju samo kontrast i osvetljenje. Pulsar f155 napravljen u Litvaniji , F 455 u Belorusiji....vreme ce pokazati da li ce f455 ponoviti uspeh f155....pozdrav

[@patdacap]

Can the rail that the ir is mounted to be adjusted?

[@patdacap]

I have the same problem, the ir shines to low.

[@mchughcb]

Guys, what happened no HD video?

[@OpticsTradeEU]

KZbin takes a while to process the video, so the Full HD and 4K resolution is available after a few hours. You can view the video in 4K now.

[@mchughcb]

@@OpticsTradeEU its all good now. Thanks.

[@wildboarhunter8615]

Kolikšen je minimalni prostor med cevjo in daljnogledom, da omogoča montažo?

[@OpticsTradeEU]

Pozdravljeni. Razdalja med cevjo in daljnogledom je odvisna od izbire adapterja - pri Rusanovem in Smartclipovem adapterju je minimalna razdalja približno 4 mm, medtem ko je pri Pulsarjevem adapterju nekje 6, 7 mm.

[@josipukic9326]

👏🔝