Puma Deviate Nitro Elite vs Saucony Endorphin Pro 3 after 100 miles

Testing again the Puma Deviate Nitro Elite vs Saucony Endorphin Pro 3 after 100 miles. I've felt the Puma were slacking off and I wanted to compare them with the Saucony Endorphin Pro 3 covering the same mileage.
Saucony are definitely durable (I've run 600km with the Pro 2), but they cost twice. So, the big question is: "Wouldn't it been better to purchase 2 pairs of Puma, rather than 1 pair of Saucony?"
startfitness.co.uk/products/p...
startfitness.co.uk/products/p...

[@vasilismaroulis1432]

is the puma good for casual easy walks?? is it brethable and light?? thanks in advance

[@gpersonaltrainer]

Although the Deviate Nitro Elite are very versatile, breathable and light (you can watch my other video about them), I wouldn't use a pair of racing shoes for walking. The purpose of them is to make you running faster, therefore they are engineered to optimize the running gait, not the walking one.

[@albertosampaio7683]

Good video, obviously not definitive.

[@gpersonaltrainer]

Now I've hit 220km wearing the Deviate Nitro Elite and 360km wearing the Endorphin Pro 3, I can tell you this review is definitive, indeed! Despite the Puma are the fastest carbon plated shoes II've tested (so far) they cost less and, obviously, they don't last (in terms of speed and comfort) as much as the Saucony. At the end of the day the "old" saying you get what you pay for is absolutely true. Having said that, if tomorrow I would have to run a 10K aiming for a PB, a pair of brand new Deviate Nitro Elite will do the job, pretty easily.