PUMA FILES HUGE LAWSUIT ON Tiger Woods's Sun Day Red Trademark!

[@scottmcdonald9924]

My best friend had a small golf shop in largo, FL, who ended up going to court against John Daily/Hooters back in the mid 2000's. His shop was called Bluecollargolf and he had every thing trade marked in the early 2000's. They (JD)came out with a line of clothing called Bluecollargolf and then tried threatening and bullying him about the name. He won in court and they paid him his court fees and stopped the name by pulling all the clothes out circulation and then rename it(loudmouth). It definitely was a David and Goliath story that the courts upheld the little guy.

[@becauseluken]

I mean, the Jaguar 'leaping cat' figure is closer to the Puma 'leaping cat' figure.... but dont see them taking Jag to court..... so this is definitely a cash grab

[@bradleystuart8608]

@@becauseluken I disagree. Puma and Tiger are in the same market for God’s sake 🤣Tiger’s mark is definitely probable to cause confusion because of its similarities. Highly doubt that Tiger will win this one.

[@becauseluken]

@@bradleystuart8608 bud, Jag has it's own line of clothing also - which is why Puma tried to take both Caterpillar and Arctic Cat to task over their respective logos and lost. And both of those had WAY more similar logos than Tiger's. So while it's 'possible', I'd think any honest judge would agree it's not 'probable'.

[@MOz112]

@@becauseluken I think you can safely say you won that one.

[@bradleystuart8608]

@@becauseluken You are close. Puma tried to add a new logo “ProCat” and lost because of similarities to Caterpillar. Had nothing to do with the iconic Puma cat trademark.

[@skitvaddetvartrist]

Finally a cat fight 😅

[@dukejet6997]

😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@danthemaninfierno]

Miaow!!

[@bryanarmstrong7967]

is slazenger going to jump on the bandwagon

[@bradleystuart8608]

The Slazenger cat logo trademark expired in 1999.

[@Wilksey75]

A Tiger is not a Puma, no confusion

[@Oahugolfguy]

I don’t know. You can’t claim all cats for golf equipment logos because you have a Puma. Tigers 🐅 line has stripes. It’s a Tiger. There are other logos that look much closer to Sunday Red than Puma.

[@danthemaninfierno]

Its a rubbish logo. I wouldn't wear it. Looks like a Chinese knock off. He should have acquited the Frank Tiger. I assume Daphne's headcovers owns the rights? That is a great logo.

[@DMKFACTOR]

The funny thing is US teademark law is pretty specific. As long as your design is at least 10% different it’s not a problem! Puma is looking for a cash grab! They’re hoping for an out of court settlement!

[@bradleystuart8608]

@@DMKFACTOR whoever told you that is clueless. Spend 5 minutes looking up Buc-ee’s successfully contested trademark lawsuits in Texas and you will see how wrong your statement is. Like REALLY wrong.

[@MG_Franklin_Kirby]

The Nike Jordan logo looks a lot more like the Puma logo.

[@Ducebogies]

A puma is also known as a cougar. A tiger is a tiger a much bigger critter with stripes tell them to get lost

[@charlesbond4413]

I think the old jaguar logo ought to sue Puma, oh never mind, they dropped the animal.

[@oliverwex3246]

When i saw Sundayred first, i never brought this in any relation to Puma. It was hard for me to see the tiger😉

[@shaunwilliams4231]

I see you wearing that Puma!!! I've got soo much Puma gear!!!

[@Socks-q9b]

Yes, I believe it is a copy. Maybe they tried getting it changed privately first!

[@billfrohberg3206]

I looked at the Sun Day Red logo. Dissimilar. Puma to be embarrassed in court.

[@23x31]

Nobody buys his sunday red garbage. So....not a big deal.

[@mikeS-ow7lc]

Why is it garbage ?

[@bradleystuart8608]

Watch Tiger end up just buying Puma. 🤣

[@vanbalzup6481]

Errrrrr. Not a chance. Puma turned over 6 billion last year…..

[@rhoever]

You talk about comparing the two logos and then you don’t show the two logos side by side throughout the entire video.

[@abstractavltd.9571]

Got no chance, jaguar and slazanger look more similar to puma

[@wonderingwhatsnext9834]

Your video would be much better if you actually showed the logos in question instead of just reading from your computer screen.

[@jasoncaetanogolf]

What a joke a tiger and a puma are 2 differnt animals from completely difernt places and the tiger logo looks nothing like puma pure nonsense

[@robertbranco1126]

When was the last time Tiger really leaped ? Maybe limping Tiger would be better

[@BazzasGolf]

They just looking for easy money

[@slakethesnake]

Really ? You are literally looking at the two logos on your screen talking about how identical they are and you aren’t showing them ? Your vids are often like this what’s the deal ?

[@DionPilkington]

Bleats on about the logo's then doesnt show them so we know what he is talking about.....nice work, pointless video

[@bradleystuart8608]

@@DionPilkington who doesn’t know what each of the logos looks like? 🤣

[@DionPilkington]

@bradleystuart8608 I have never seen the Le tigre or the sunday red logos....Puma, Slazenger and Jaguar are pretty well lnown

[@robertdefazio2885]

It looks nothing like like the same

[@edanzore]

It's going to settle

[@Pud56]

Sunday red is tanking, too expensive and bang average quality.

[@benhill8384]

Look like a puma to me

[@germgerm89]

Silly

[@indianajim]

Puma’s full of crap and just butthurt about their lack of market share. It’s obviously a tiger, not a puma.

[@bradleystuart8608]

@@indianajim it’s actually very likely to cause consumer confusion, which is grounds for litigation.

[@mj9608]

Funny coming from puma when they copied slazenger

[@bradleystuart8608]

@@mj9608 Slazenger did have a logo featuring a jumping cat, which caused trademark disputes with Puma due to their similarities. However, Slazenger phased out the cat logo in the late 1990s and transitioned to their current text-based logo.

[@sevesellors2831]

Slazenger and Puma look the same.

[@Jddvs]

That is true and have you noticed the similarity to the leaping Jaguar hood (bonnet) ornament. I will be surprised if the law suit goes anywhere. There are too many cats of different breeds that look similar that can’t be claimed as owned by one trademark.

[@bradleystuart8608]

@@Jddvs Tiger will definitely lose this suit. Way too similar in the exact same market.

[@subsailor1445]

Who really cares?

[@shaneemmerson4658]

Cash grab, just highlights how low pumas sales must be and how they are struggling as a brand in golf. Sunday red must really be a threat to them.

[@mikeS-ow7lc]

I’ll never buy puma again not that I bought much of it anyways there’s so many brands in the world and a couple in golf with jumping cats tigers is nothing like it I don’t like anyone who uses these tactics in business unless it’s warranted

[@bradleystuart8608]

Because you have never owned a trademark, and don’t understand why people spend the money to protect their brand? I applaud Puma for protecting their intellectual property.

[@mikeS-ow7lc]

@ it’s not the same and tiger owns his I just looked it up so no one can have any jumping cat as a logo because there’s 2 others in the comments that were around before puma. If you do see the ulterior motive here you’re a fool

[@bradleystuart8608]

@@mikeS-ow7lcyou don’t have a clue how Trademarks work. 😂

[@mikeS-ow7lc]

@@bradleystuart8608 yea I do and it’s not similar 😂😂😂😂😂😂 clown

[@shankedit65]

Odd looking kitchen

[@shanetanner1122]

It's Poomah, not Pewmah lmao