The tsars children are related to Britain’s present day monarch through their ancestor Queen Victoria
@isprikitikburkabush62005 жыл бұрын
Tsar Nicholas and the then King George of Britain look like twins
@almalayuwiyyah25125 жыл бұрын
German kaiser, Russian tsar and British monarch we're all related.
@Valencetheshireman9275 жыл бұрын
@JT X- You believe in some utter nonsense!
@zerinzinia86605 жыл бұрын
Ok, so that's y Britishers hate communism so much?!
@freeunderratedmusic42735 жыл бұрын
Jjt X Crazy conspiracy guy
@RADIUMGLASS4 жыл бұрын
The Romanov's were much better looking than Britain's Royals.
@edmarkpolicarpiopineda45414 жыл бұрын
I noticed that too.
@berserk31954 жыл бұрын
True
@reardelt4 жыл бұрын
So when will saudi arabia get a democracy?
@arandomseal47934 жыл бұрын
You wot m8?
@khalidhakami9284 жыл бұрын
@@reardelt we dont want a democracy
@ruskibeaner59836 жыл бұрын
its so sad because 2 days prior to their execution, the bolsheviks offered the tsar's family over to the tsar's cousin, george V of england, and he declined. after receiving the news of their deaths, george went with his family to an orthodox church and prayed there all day for forgiveness
@martinjenkins64672 жыл бұрын
He was worried it could cause Revolution in England. The 20s Were a challenging time in England. There was the great strike of 26 And morals were evolving in the Working class.
@sofiabessonova22142 жыл бұрын
@@martinjenkins6467 it was the reason why in the end he was killed with all his family and all relatives. There were cruel murders.
@tangaz58192 жыл бұрын
@@martinjenkins6467 Morals? Or they just didn’t want to have to be peasants anymore?
@sunnymitra63722 жыл бұрын
@@martinjenkins6467 It also shows how Evil Lenin actually was........but what's surprising is that the Marxists around the World Justifies the Killings of Tsar Nicolas 2 and his Entire Family.
@JaydenGK20042 жыл бұрын
That’s really heartbreaking 😔
@b_f_d_d4 жыл бұрын
" you can only be president for 8 years " Putin: lets turn that 8 to the side and now its infinite 😈
@Amitgupta-uq2up4 жыл бұрын
Copied *
@chrisgriffin91644 жыл бұрын
Just like his Buddy, Asaad Bashar and his father before him. a evil sickness that drowns the hearts of the peoples thoughts.
@outrageousgamer3153 жыл бұрын
@@chrisgriffin9164 keep crying
@reginald_playzz3 жыл бұрын
"One eight, another eight, nonconsecutive terms! See! I'm not violating the rules!"
@sabrinanascimento52483 жыл бұрын
😩
@chelseaadler2436 жыл бұрын
Nicolas's wife and daughters were gorgeous
@itsokay26065 жыл бұрын
The son as well
@FlowerTrollSan5 жыл бұрын
He was quite handsome as well. 😁
@Jonetwothrree45 жыл бұрын
Their fucking dead lol
@barbiquearea5 жыл бұрын
@@Jonetwothrree4 They are forever young.
@mustardbottle86635 жыл бұрын
BrUhMaN69 they well got banged
@padlocktails265 жыл бұрын
France literally did the same thing ~130 years earlier.
@here_we_go_again25715 жыл бұрын
The French Revolution was led by a mob (that soon canabilized its own) The Russian Bolshevik Revolution was financed by International bankers and the German monarchy. The goal of Germany was to expand eastward into Russian- owned lands Austria also wanted to expand east (into the Ukraine)
@padlocktails265 жыл бұрын
Here_We_Go_Again2 look how that played out for them 😂
@thekingshussar18083 жыл бұрын
@@padlocktails26 Total failure. France took a strong leader (Napoleon) to fix all that and making a monarchy of his own.
@nosh81473 жыл бұрын
@@thekingshussar1808 It wasn't a monarchy tho; there was no line of succession, the emperor would usually choose his successor like in the Roman Empire after Octavian
@thekingshussar18083 жыл бұрын
@@nosh8147 Yes there was, Napoleon only had a son who became an Austrian prince (Napoleon II) to which made Austrians have more favour for Bonaparte France as they would have ties with the powerful nation if Napoleon II ascended to the throne, but unfortunately Napoleon lost all power by late 1812 and 1815, discontinuing Austria's plans of such and Napoleon II died young in 1830s of tuberculosis. Austria and France allied against Russia in 1812, you know.
@samovarmaker96736 жыл бұрын
Yeltsin was so democratic that he shelled his own democratically-elected parliament when they refused to change the constitution to suit his benefit. Yeltsin was so democratic that he rigged the 1996 election in his favour with funds from President Clinton. Yeltsin was such a great leader that he drowned his nation's economy below WW2 levels and did nothing to try bring it back up. Thank you, Boris Yeltsin, for letting your people live through hell! Thank you for bringing your country to the lowest of lows! Is this what democracy and Western values represent?
@brandondavidson40856 жыл бұрын
Right. Russia was at its lowest point economically and socially during Yelstin's rule in the '90s. Also, you try converting a country that has been under Fascist rule for nearly 70 years (4 generations) into a free-market economy with perfect regulations.
@samovarmaker96736 жыл бұрын
@@brandondavidson4085 The USSR was under Socialist rule, but you are right.
@brandondavidson40856 жыл бұрын
Samovar maker (1) Socialism isn't a government. (2) The USSR was not Socialist, neither was Vietnam or is North Kora and China; These countries all had or still have a fascist authoritarian autocratic centralized economy, where the government controls ALL the means of production and consumption. Fascism and socialism have become dirty words in economic discussions because of the red scare, but they still have meaning, and they're not the same.
@samovarmaker96736 жыл бұрын
@@brandondavidson4085 Authoritarian, yes, but I don't understand why you call them fascist.
@brandondavidson40856 жыл бұрын
@@samovarmaker9673 Fascism: An authoritarian reactionary movement against progressivism in a country by which a small minority of powerful people pull together the support of the political conservatives and those in the middle, in order to establish for themselves an autocratic state. Hitler and Stalin were the same kind of fascists, but because we were allied with Russia in World War 2, we had to call them something else, "communist". Then afterwards, during the Red Scare era, they became the enemy.
@seventhuser9043 жыл бұрын
When Nicholas Romanov was crowned Tsar of Russia in 1894, he seemed bewildered. “What is going to happen to me…to all Russia?” he asked an advisor when he assumed the throne. “I am not prepared to be Tsar. I never even wanted to become one.”
@Orto-jj2di2 жыл бұрын
Seems like her was wise enough to know that
@raccoondon4882 жыл бұрын
@@Orto-jj2di …..her ? 😂😂😂 just kidding. I couldn’t resist. 😂😂👍👍🎉🎉
@Orto-jj2di2 жыл бұрын
@@raccoondon488 😅😅
@lepetitchat1232 жыл бұрын
The tragedy of being forced to do things against their will
@astralaurora41652 жыл бұрын
that’s nice, he also killed thousands
@here_we_go_again25715 жыл бұрын
Putin, at this point of time, isn't the worst autocrat to rule Russia … Jus' sayin' ;-\ There is something about Russia's physical and psychological composition that seems to embrace autocracy. Perhaps it is because the country is so diverse and so large; that liberal Western-style politics would, most likely, lead to secessionist movements and fragmentation. Russia is not a country of immigrants; the various ethnic groups have been there for thousands of years. They can legitimately claim their native territory as their own.
@shawnullerup68445 жыл бұрын
Catherine the Great was a friend to Voltaire, who implored her to transition towards a constitutional system. To that end, she convened an elected convention to hammer out the details. She did not interfere, but did observe in secret. After weeks of bickering she determined that there was no way to employ democratic republicanism in her nation, that it took a strong ruler from on high to keep order. Read Robert Massie's biography of her, and his fascinating, detailed bio of Peter the Great. Putin does not wish to be Nicholas, nor Stalin. He wants to be Peter.
@Manuel_Fal_Conde5 жыл бұрын
Vaira .123 India has been a colony of great Britain for a long time, and never participated in major wars. Foolish to compare two extremely different people. You would compare the English to the people of Nigeria.
@Anna_M_numbers5 жыл бұрын
russian politicians have been ruining russian`s mentality, creating a strong demand in dictator
@DerricktheWhite5 жыл бұрын
@@shawnullerup6844 just read Hobbes
@peaceandlove5445 жыл бұрын
I totally agree I just came from Russia and I fully confirmed what ypu say here.
@Bryan_Salvador6 жыл бұрын
I just read the entire article of the romanovs on wiki a month ago. The diary of the Tsar’s daughters paint a story of innocent girls who just want the simple of joy of life yet was cursed by their heritage. May they rest in peace.
@Tjecktjeck6 жыл бұрын
''White army, loyal to Nikolas the second'' - seriously? Go back to school! Ps: instead of arguing with 20 people, i rather add some info here. 1. General Ruzsky and A.Guchkov were the ones who insisted Tsar to sign manifesto and that act was supported in that by bunch of other figures who would join the white army shortly after. 2. While some (whites) could sympathize Tsar and monarchy, most the white leaders either remembered Tsar in a negative light like A.Denikin or cared about their own goals like Kolchak. 3. As ''bbonner422'' stated below, ''The white army was fractured into various factions ranging from almost fascist in beliefs to people who wanted a democratic republic. The reason why the Soviets won was because they had more of a united front against the white army''. Many people tend to idealize (whites) for some reason. Their scale of terror in many cases wasn't inferior to the (reds) and even surpassing the (reds) it when speaking mainly about Kolchak. 4. By the time execution did take place, Tsar was left alone by pretty much everyone. His generals didn't care, his British cousin didn't care and most importantly his people didn't care.
@Mrcrunch936 жыл бұрын
Tjecktjeck were they not?
@Tjecktjeck6 жыл бұрын
Christian Caven Nope. Technically they were the ones who dismissed Nikolas from the Tsar post lol. Ps: if anything, they were loyal to Admiral Kolchak.
@khalidalali1866 жыл бұрын
True that! And he was a conservative who believed that Russia should be a republic and decide for itself whether or not it wanted the Tsar or any Tsar for that matter back in power.
@ConvexandDutch6 жыл бұрын
The whole video was content-less and misleading...
@luizhumberto74046 жыл бұрын
The whole video is a festival of stupidity
@TheFedGuy4 жыл бұрын
Just to clarify: the White Army wasn’t necessarily loyal to Tzar Nicholas II. They were merely against the Bolsheviks and weren’t really trying to restore the Russian Empire.
@here_we_go_again25713 жыл бұрын
The Russian Federation is the Russian empire under another name (as was the USSR -- New rulers same empire)
@idontknowwhatmypfpis19183 жыл бұрын
One of the reasons why the Whits failed
@pavelmalikov53212 жыл бұрын
They dont do research. By 1917 everyone was Anti-Tzar.
@ekesandras14812 жыл бұрын
The white army, that threatened to take Yekaterinburg (and did so a few days after) was the Czech legion. The red guards, that kept Tsar Nicolai in the Ipatiev House, were mostly communist Hungarians. Both groups were recruted from captured Austro-Hungarian POWs, that were freed after the Februar Revolution.
@raritica84092 жыл бұрын
My Great Great Granduncle Abram Teisen, was a White Army medic. Because of his actions and bravery he personally recieved a medal from Tzar Nicholas 2. It is now of course a proud family heirloom, but anyways there was closeness between the Czar and his soldiers. his journals talk in much greater detail.
@fatcat80336 жыл бұрын
The Tsars daughters were beautiful .
@lorranlxcrrer11586 жыл бұрын
@@Cov1ngtonsGhOst u sure? I don't think so
@sebagonzalez91276 жыл бұрын
@@Cov1ngtonsGhOst that is a lie..
@lorranlxcrrer11586 жыл бұрын
@SiegeVirtual Good things IDGAF about u
@NishiMiyamura6 жыл бұрын
Anastasia was ready to get shoot wasn't scared like the others
@최윤석-l9b5 жыл бұрын
Were? Are !
@solomonblack26016 жыл бұрын
Russia has really amazing history from the Rurik dynasty to the Tsardom to the Revolution, Soviet Union and then Russian Federation.
@TsarOfRuss6 жыл бұрын
Notice how the british commentator is fast to condemn Russia's last monarch, but when it comes to Queen of England who murdered millions in Africa and America .. the news is always positive
@polishherowitoldpilecki55216 жыл бұрын
Russia does have amazing history for some reason I think soviet history part is really terrible and culturally murdered russsian culture.
@kylemiles4486 жыл бұрын
Solomon Black Russia it’s amazing country
@OkieJames6 жыл бұрын
I would say overall a very complex and in-depth history. The Soviet era was by a far very dark period but they did modernize a country overnight... History is always what you make it some good some bad a lot of Grey...
@rikuvakevainen61576 жыл бұрын
Where does Russian schools' history books begin the history of Russia? From Kiev, from Ruhrik or perhaps from the ancient trieps?
@Junokaii5 жыл бұрын
Between World War One, The Russian Revolution, World War Two and Joseph Stalin, The Collapse of the USSR, The Financial Crisis of 1997 and its Demographic Crisis, Russia has truly been through some hardship. Russia is truly a nation that knows the meaning of perseverance. As for the video, typical bias against Russia.
@crismagogamer93915 жыл бұрын
Rusia es un pais de cosas raras, literal
@tk_23785 жыл бұрын
Junokaii And they‘ll face real problems with the aging population soon. They just not getting enough children and over 60% are women they also have thanks to Stalin a huge men lack.
@Benjamin-iu5ys5 жыл бұрын
True
@1996з34 жыл бұрын
@@tk_2378 Lol every single industrialized country has an aging population and a birth rate below 2. All of europe, usa, canada, china,japan, south korea. All of them
@tk_23784 жыл бұрын
1996 з3 Yeah it’s true and the problems will come with it soon. In about 15-20 years. Japan for example don’t take any immigrants and they try new things to make people get 2.1 children at least. They tryin‘ 3 for every women and it may work out. But they‘ll never ever take immigrants that’s how Japan is and want so be.
@Isaxus124 жыл бұрын
"There were many bad things about the Czar's regime, but he inherited an autocracy and his acts are now being seen in perspective and in comparison to the terrible crimes committed by the Soviets." - Nikolai Tolstoy
@danielwymer15804 жыл бұрын
Remember Ivan the Terrible, he ruled before the tsars, He was 10 times worse than the Soviets
@stefan55733 жыл бұрын
@@oliverroberts7490 in the 1500s or something...
@debaratimukherjee30223 жыл бұрын
@@danielwymer1580 bruh ivan the terrible was the 1st tsar "Tsar Ivan II"
@daseapickleofjustice72313 жыл бұрын
What crimes of the USSR?
@personbob86913 жыл бұрын
@@daseapickleofjustice7231 exactly they did nothing wrong other than be an alternative system lol
@alexisarteev-salazar92475 жыл бұрын
Romanov: *built a powerful russia* Putin: *also built a powerful russia* Westerners: coincidence?
@heythataintme73305 жыл бұрын
Powerful???? Ahaahahahbahabahahaha.. Nice joke
@alexisarteev-salazar92475 жыл бұрын
Nika Kim I’m reading your post out pound and it sounds as if you’re having an asthma attack.
@williamaldridge9755 жыл бұрын
Atomic Apple powerful? I live in Russia and it may be perceived as powerful in foreign countries, but our middle wage is about 300-400 dollars. More than half of them spends for food and for housing and communal services. Pension age for men will be 65 soon, but men's life expectancy is 66.5. Do you think we're proud of our political power in foreign countries? Most of our population just wants 1000$ wage and nothing else.
@here_we_go_again25715 жыл бұрын
Autocracy seems to agree with the Russian empire.
@riazonbin99315 жыл бұрын
@@vvp_rus Да, благодаря такому "нищему говну" наша страна и держится, и существует это "нищее говно" под названием россияне уже с 16 века
@SavyoMouraOFC5 жыл бұрын
No one: Americans: Russia is bad
@bijayshrestha33775 жыл бұрын
This is a british channel
@NikolaAvramov5 жыл бұрын
It's rather: British: Russian man bad.
@SelectedNarcissist5 жыл бұрын
Sadly we Brits tend to tag along with the yanks even though we Brits are more intelligent and aware! It's our government. Most of us Brits love Russia and find we have a lot in common.
@cecileyoras66715 жыл бұрын
Sarah Sally Fake. Obviously a Russian bot posting from Moscow
@SavyoMouraOFC5 жыл бұрын
@@cecileyoras6671 I'm not fake. ._.
@Domhangairt5 жыл бұрын
Czar Nikolai Romanov's biggest weakness was his wife. She was a very bad influence on him, she brought in the mystic Rasputin who ruined the reputation of the imperial family, she also gave her husband very bad advice. The two men who could have saved him: Count Sergei Witte, and Pyotr Stolypin were both dead by 1915. These men were extremely competent politicians. Sergei Witte strongly advised the Czar not to go to war against Germany, but his wife did not like the kaiser, also the British and the French put huge pressure on him to go to war against Germany despite the Treaty of Bjorka he signed with kaiser Wilhelm. Wilhelm loved Nicholas more than any other other relative, he never wanted to go to war with Russia. His true sentiments are revealed in their private telegrams, but Wilhelm's own government over-ruled him.
@lindsayives49152 жыл бұрын
Thnkyou for the story
@fgfgfgfgf29192 жыл бұрын
how true is this ?
@sofiabessonova22142 жыл бұрын
@@lindsayives4915 not all the truth. Stolypin was killed in the Kiev's Opera Theater by Bagrov, Jewish man.
@Ari-ge5cp2 жыл бұрын
This helped answer my question. So sad:(
@SiLuLu_2222 жыл бұрын
@Nogent Nothing can bring down your popularity than losing 2 wars under your watch as a czar.
@omaewamoshinderiunani35243 жыл бұрын
Well it's simple, remove the "Ras" from Rasputin and you have Putin
@eqbertfite24553 жыл бұрын
But wasn't Rasputin one of the main reasons the monarchy ended?
@shaypatra98403 жыл бұрын
@@eqbertfite2455 Hey you did not get it. HE WAS IMMORTAL.
@obe1withtheforce7853 жыл бұрын
And his first name is Vladimir like Prince Charles' Great grandaddy!!
@obe1withtheforce7853 жыл бұрын
@Meph Lest Pretty sure Vlad was short for Vladimir
@ZACHANDJACKSZACHSMAFIA3 жыл бұрын
True he is a relative of blood to rather putin, marx, maybe even stalins own sons descendent?
@wholeNwon6 жыл бұрын
I wonder how different history would have been if Alexander III had had a long life span.
@outofthisworld26516 жыл бұрын
wholeNwon It gives the impression that Putin actually is influenced by Alexander the III than his son. Yes it would have been a very diffrent situation if The III didnt die so early. Had he lived it would have been obvious with another killing attempt from Lenin.
@RPDBY6 жыл бұрын
wholeNwon wasn't he an alcoholic? It wouldn't matter much
@wholeNwon6 жыл бұрын
Not to my knowledge, though the Russians have a long history of heavy drinking. I doubt that his wife would have approved.
@outofthisworld26516 жыл бұрын
wholeNwon Yes unfortionly he was an alcoholic and died of a kidney damage obviously from drinking also due to a stabbing by Lenins older brother Alexandr Ulyanov a few years earlier ( So it wouldnt have been a surprise if Lenin later would have attempt the same if the III would've continued to live.) And to Alexander the III also known as 'The peacekeeper' unfortune- Nikolaj wasnt prepared to rule Russia with the rising communism. But the story would've been very interesting otherwise.
@RPDBY6 жыл бұрын
wholeNwon well, then you definitely need to update your knowledge, that will save you from making stupid claims
@enkheeb23545 жыл бұрын
"When we do it, don't you dare mention morals and laws" - The West
@ZMorpheus5 жыл бұрын
"We got Bagh Daddy. Then, we took our troops out. But we're keeping the Oil..." - Orange King (for security reasons, ofc) ("If someone else wants it, they have to fight us for it" oh nvm)
@myeffulgenthairyballssay93585 жыл бұрын
@Enkhee B I dunno. I'm a Westerner but we are not all (entirely) brainwashed moral supremacists. I admit we have a serious moral supremacist problem polluting the western mindscape, but it is not ubiquitous. We are not all mass media assimilated Borg zombie automatrons. Indeed, many, many of us are sick of it, hence the recent UK election, UK leave EU referendum and Trump victory are in essence, protests against the moral supremacist screamers that demand to dictate our values at us.
@noblechief40234 жыл бұрын
I rather be in a nation that relies on a monarch then. A nation that relies on the promises of a man
@enkheeb23544 жыл бұрын
Liev Semenov one man with many ego problems may spell more trouble
@napoleonibonaparte71986 жыл бұрын
If only Tsar Alexander II managed to pass the reforms to make Russia a constitutional monarchy... the Tsars would have been saved, as well as democracy...
@Hugatree12 жыл бұрын
Now in 2022 this brilliant analysis of Putin proves all too true! The fact that England refused to give sanctuary to the Romanov family is absolutely unforgivable and it seems that some crimes and indiscretions of the past are so great they continue to come back to haunt us and play out throughout the annals of time.
@testla33832 жыл бұрын
it sounds like we never know the truth because he version I read is that England welcomed Nicolas II to come, he's King George V's cousin, but the Bolsheviks delayed that because they didn't want a potential exile government controlled by England.
@ysb082 жыл бұрын
@@testla3383 The version I read was that, as you said, George V welcomed Nicholas II, but out of fear of an communist revolution in the war torn England, the government pushed George V to decline the offer
@tdsims19632 жыл бұрын
@@ysb08 I have never heard of this version! I am now curious. Was there reason to believe that a communist revolt would have been successful in the G.B of that time? I would love it if you gave me the source of your info. Can I find the book easily? I don't care if I have to translate it. Thanks in advance for your reply😊👍.
@braedengriffiths42496 жыл бұрын
The white army lost because of their disorganization. Not all were allied with the Tsar as they say here. They came from all different ideologies, but were against the Bolsheviks. Lack of leadership ruined them militarily.
@BolshevikCarpetbagger19176 жыл бұрын
Braeden Griffiths The White Army had a centralized leadership among the generals loyal to the Czar, Kolchak, Krasnov. Denikin and others. They also had the support of an invasion of 17 of the biggest armies. They lost because the people supported the Bolsheviks, and they were armed to.the teeth. Gun control was overturned by the Bolsheviks.
@randomradek52846 жыл бұрын
Yep, sad. They could save Russia from a disaster.
@coniston31063 жыл бұрын
Yes, some of them didn't support the Tsar, but didn't want the Bolsheviks as their rulers. Basically they were everyone against the Bolsheviks, even if they themselves had different ideologies.
@DrMosseeay2 жыл бұрын
Either way, they would of wanted to recapture the Tsar and use him as a figurehead to the White Faction and gain support from monarchists or benefactors of the monarchy.
@zacharymiller14525 жыл бұрын
Correction: The family and servants were sawed into small pieces, and dumped in some form of acid, then burned, and after that the remains were left in a nearby abandoned mine.
@theemperor-wh40k183 жыл бұрын
They were shot.
@jont63703 жыл бұрын
@@theemperor-wh40k18 They were shot *FIRST*
@coniston31063 жыл бұрын
What has humanity come into, that is barbaric.
@yom0mma2143 жыл бұрын
@@coniston3106 this happens in mexico atleast once a month believe it or not
@Phoenix_eleven3 жыл бұрын
Wrong I believe
@elsakristina26896 жыл бұрын
I can't believe they've been gone for 100 years. When I learned about the youngest daughter Anastasia, it changed my life forever.
@Elainerulesutube6 жыл бұрын
elsa1942 Well, at least the mystery of Anastasia has been solved.
@LightForxes6 жыл бұрын
Cool Lab Fuck off
@aliyah23936 жыл бұрын
Cool Lab You do realize that the Bolsheviks KILLED AN INNOCENT FAMILY!! The children had NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS NOR THE SERVANTS OR THE TSARINA ! Nickolas should have been exiled not killed or him and his family should have fled for America or other parts of the world to be free
@theworldoverheavan5605 жыл бұрын
@@aliyah2393 innocent my ass
@pedrocavalcantesantana73783 жыл бұрын
@@aliyah2393 nicholas had the bullet coming, not his family tho
@H67-o2p4 жыл бұрын
Nicholas 2 was more of a family man than a ruler who never had his ear to the ground
@baldmanforehead72044 жыл бұрын
Hes too weak
@bbblueee82824 жыл бұрын
He and Alexandra had never been trained to be tsar and tsarina, they didn’t know how to properly run a country
@ashketchum54663 жыл бұрын
They should been actors instead.
@danielforeroc3 жыл бұрын
Yes, he didn't want to become Tsar, but he also feared the change of the autocracy, he was raised by the same tutor as his father, and he was afraid of reforming after seeing his grandfather dying in the Winter Palace.
@kirilll78063 жыл бұрын
if only alexander the 3 lived a few more decades...
@user-qz5dq8kn4p6 жыл бұрын
Could you imagine if the Romanovs were still in power they would be the oldest ruling house in Europe and they would be in power for 400 years and out of all the other ruling house the richest in all of Europe Hell my grandpapa always said to me compared to Russian palaces Buckingham palace is a 1 room cottage lol and the jewelry in Russia there were stones the size of goose eggs And out of all the other ruling houses the Romanovs paid the coast of there palaces out of there own pockets since they had there own money from the business that they owned that’s what a lot of people really don’t understand
@BenzinB706 жыл бұрын
Benjamin in the ancient Russian language of Novels means-a new Roman in this case, the word "Roman" can be interpreted as-an Arab or a Gypsy
@nicole.stanhope5 жыл бұрын
*Their That’s their house There - LOOK OVER THERE. They’re (they are) - They’re right.
@murat70065 жыл бұрын
The Osman family rules the ottoman for 600 years. That’s the longest reign of any family in power.
@indycoon5 жыл бұрын
During WWI 4 Empires were destroyed. It's easy to blame Bolsheviks but they were just puppets. It was a fight between Empires.
@AJ-jv1wh5 жыл бұрын
@@murat7006 I think they meant currently. If the Romanovs still ruled, they'd currently be the longest reign alive
@SniperRose16 жыл бұрын
3:46 How I open the door when my boyfriend is coming to meet me.
@kunal_gawade5 жыл бұрын
Lol😂😂😂🤣 that lucky guy😍😍
@MistehbigPants5 жыл бұрын
Are you single?
@sherryr86715 жыл бұрын
@@MistehbigPants dude, you'll get nowhere Dont even try and save some dignity...
@MistehbigPants5 жыл бұрын
@@sherryr8671 You're loss, Im worth marching towards the door for
@sherryr86715 жыл бұрын
@@MistehbigPants lol sure bud
@Texano5-06 жыл бұрын
That last bit. Where she said that the government can change in unpredictable ways is just plain wrong. Everyone from the outside could see the downfall of the romanovs. It was so clear considering the Tsar could barely control the military let alone the actual people.
@mochababy25 жыл бұрын
love the way you blame the Problem in Syrian on Russia 😂😂. they fixed the problem causes by America again
@bigballetlover5 жыл бұрын
I thought the same. The Russians are there at the invitation of Assad in an attempt to get rid of ISIS and the like.
@marisamartin36644 жыл бұрын
You may be right there. I feel the West pushed Bashir into the arms of Russia
@BRPJR4 жыл бұрын
Merican gov't should focus on the communists from the East and ffs stop being delusional about Russia. You might wanna extend NATO's influence among Asian countries. Your gatekeeper Israel will not be able to hold it if communists from the east influences the middle east.
@BRPJR4 жыл бұрын
@Decimus Maximus isnt power same as communist influence? Don't be naive. It's all the same. And how exactly russia is a threat to democracy? Is democracy even existent?
@BRPJR4 жыл бұрын
@Decimus Maximus you are not getting the bigger picture. Have a nice a day.
@Pinhead1015 жыл бұрын
The Economist & the ghosts of independent reporting
@johnarnoldhungary5 жыл бұрын
So everything that doesnt support ur opinion is not independent?
@orangebanana8455 жыл бұрын
Media with alternative point of view: *exists* Russian Bots: ZIONIST PROPAGANDA!!! FUNDED BY BRITISH GOVERNMENT
@nuri23184 жыл бұрын
@@johnarnoldhungary it's not about supporting someone's opinion or not but about 2 things Ideological apparatus and circulation of knowledge. West has always had a way of hegemonizing knowledge and thereby power. What I mean is that they document everything foreign to them as negation of their principles and their social formation, with a bias that is rooted in their own history and ideology. So historically creation of western societies is not same as others in East or middle East or Asia . But they always appropriate and then misrepresent others. They did that during colonial era and they continue doing so in globalised, neo imperialistic world. In today's world, media and social media both play a very important role in fashioning popular beliefs and polarising beliefs. Those from West have access to other parts of world only through popular media houses and most of them are again western. Media is a ideological apparatus essentially. And of course the same would apply to others as well. Russia might also have such media houses.It's not like Russia has no problems too but then Western media houses only portray such things. Like only portarying poverty of India and Nothing or not much about developing India.
@alejandrosotomartin97204 жыл бұрын
The Economist, owned by the same family of open Satanists that funded Marx to spread garbage all across Europe and that created Israel as their personal farmland.
@quanbrooklynkid77764 жыл бұрын
@@johnarnoldhungary hahaha
@eboooo6 жыл бұрын
I met a refugee from the Russian Revolution she was a passenger in my Uber. Nice lady, I was shocked because of how long ago it was.
@chungusmaximus5263 жыл бұрын
That's crazy man.
@tomaszzalewski45413 жыл бұрын
How old was she?
@eboooo3 жыл бұрын
@@tomaszzalewski4541 almost a hundred
@ItsLunaRegina3 жыл бұрын
0:47 Why did those soldiers randomly start making out? lol.
@philippg13903 жыл бұрын
they didn´t start making out, this was the "Brotherhood kiss" used by all communist countries, close to the french version
@schmidty49923 жыл бұрын
In communism u have to share those pretty lips
@cheshirecat78193 жыл бұрын
@@philippg1390 gotta kiss your homies goodbye before participating in a civil war
@daseapickleofjustice72313 жыл бұрын
The power of socialism, nobody is lonely you are all comrades
@pofromteletubbies12433 жыл бұрын
@@philippg1390 I saw the poster of that ussr leader kissing some old dude , was it the same thing?
@tattianasalles30193 жыл бұрын
Russian people loves a "Tsar" like figure. They need a strongman in power to feel themselves safe...
@asdasdasdasd3426 жыл бұрын
Yes compare us russians to religious fanatics in the middle east . Very subtle but not missed . Sly economist . As my english teacher taught me in highschool. A good essay does not have to be long , it needs to have the good side of the story and the bad side . This video just shows your bias and how bad orators you are . Had you shown a couple of good deeds along with the senseless allegations. Really shameless with the bias these days .
@ДраганНишевић5 жыл бұрын
When they talk about Orthodox church they either say how its mystical, traditional and beautiful or how its corrupt, backwards and shady. They either picture us as backwards, brutal and evil or some legendary place where time stopped and people still live a simple, coasy and "normal" life. But thats west and its how they wanna look at us, we cant change that. They like to think that they are a "modern" society that lives in the "21 century" yet they cant explain what is modern nor what it means to live in 21 century. They forgot the simple question of why are we here and what is our purpouse and started worshiping the green dollar as theire new God. To them modern way of life is money, cars, boats, palaces and reaches that they cant believe that people still go to Church that believes in God and that there is still a church that honors Jesus Christ and his teachings, and that there are people who still live a simple life surraunded by modern technology not obsesed with money and power. This is why we will always be different to them, and why they will always look at us and mock and judge us and compare us to theire cars with ours as if that is a meashure of success. Поздрав из Србије брате!
@heathert54555 жыл бұрын
@@ДраганНишевић It depends on the person. You have your selfish, narcissistic, materialistic person everywhere...unfortunately. But, I get your point that we, in the West, are very materialistic and want more...this especially hits hard with the younger generation:/ I still remember a time when I was a child, in the 1990s, and children would still play outside and people would actually TALK face to face with one another instead of always texting. One of the stupidest things that I've ever seen is two friends sitting next to each other and texting to each other instead of talking. Yes, A LOT of us lost our way and we live too fast. Our food is mass produced and most of it is genetically modified so this causes issues with the body which cause obesity and other issues. And sugar is in just about every food nowadays. Most of the local "mom and pop" shops (example: grocery stores that were owned by a family) have been bought out or starved out by big corporations. Just recently, a local, privately owned, pharmacy in my town was bought out and shut down by CVS pharmacy which is a big, multi-million dollar, company. As for Russians, I personally have no issues with them. You are just trying to survive in the world like the rest of us. I pray that you guys do NOT become multi-cultural and that you are able to retain your traditions and your culture. I wish you well, From the USA
@ghostofcato30524 жыл бұрын
Economist = Rothchild LIES!!
@sasukeuchiha9614 жыл бұрын
That's savage tho
@velikorusskiy2 жыл бұрын
The Romanovs fell because of the three hundred year curse of Marina Mnishek. In 1613, after the execution of her child, she said this:"The Romanovs will rule Russia for 300 years. The heirs will not die by their own death. This will happen until all the Romanovs die."This led to palace coups and revolutions, and subsequently, the execution of almost all members of the Romanov House and the creation of the USSR.The USSR was actually created for the complete destruction of the Romanovs and other oldest Russian dynasties, but this did not happen, and in 1991 the union broke up.
@gorelizfilmsmapper48725 жыл бұрын
0:43 «Июль 1918» Вау, Заранее построили мавзолей для Ленина. Что бы потом голову не ломать)))
@Arthur-sd2ul3 жыл бұрын
Думаю это просто рандомный кадр, связанный с текстом только косвенно.
@Jukanella3 жыл бұрын
@@Arthur-sd2ul Это просто кринжовое популистское видео с кучей фактических ошибок
@Николай1Романов3 жыл бұрын
Белые не были все поголовно за царя , это факт , тут же оговорки сплошные .
@kirilll78063 жыл бұрын
@Kryptonian bruh
@growthxcentric5625 жыл бұрын
Yet Russia is a saner and more stable nation compared to the USA
@marisamartin36644 жыл бұрын
Well perhaps at the moment...
@growthxcentric5624 жыл бұрын
@@marisamartin3664 perhaps...
@growthxcentric5624 жыл бұрын
@Gleb B. / Глеб Б. at least someone's in control
@growthxcentric5624 жыл бұрын
@Gleb B. / Глеб Б. Research and compare
@selimfurkandalgic95483 жыл бұрын
Umm... I am not sure about that...
@widget36725 жыл бұрын
It's a shame that whenever one nation tries to be "stronger" it usually means war...
@vinm3002 жыл бұрын
"Infantile" : Is how the Pope described Russia's justification for invasion of Ukraine.
@creativeandaliveat652 жыл бұрын
Like his counterpart who tried out leadership in the US empire, Putin is also simultaneously infantile and senile. But above all: cruel. Not a pretty picture.
@toonzbrah43162 жыл бұрын
He died an unknown hero and none will really know the real reason why. Rip king 👑 now with the king of kings
@pistashioman78174 жыл бұрын
“Vladimir” actually means “Of Great Power”
@alexalexin94913 жыл бұрын
I possess the world - that's what it means.
@saturn7246 жыл бұрын
People around the world have different cultures, you cannot enforce one type of government on everyone and expect it to work. It's just absurd to think that your own government system is superior to everyone else's and hence they must adopt it.
@kakhagvelesiani38776 жыл бұрын
Bullshit. If some country has slavery, I bet you would be the first to call it barbaric. There are cultures and civilizations that are better than others and also brought technological progress to mankind. Rome civilization was far superior to tribes living in Gaulle, Iberia, Britain. Greek world was far greater and better than many other cultures. History tells us, that they are societies which are clearly better than others
@saturn7246 жыл бұрын
Europe alone has a variety of government systems, but each one is successful in its own way. UK and Spain have a hereditary monarchy, France and Germany do not, but each has a flourishing economy. There is no such thing as "one system fits all", even when it comes to democracy, each country has its own approach to it. Differences occur due to cultural and historical roots. There is no way you can enforce one exact system to every nation.
@victorlobos27106 жыл бұрын
Well, you are too kind saying Spain has a flourishing economy….
@junaidfatimah92972 жыл бұрын
I said this a lot, we all can’t have the same governing systems… Democracy was forced on some part in Africa see how it turns out.
@ivanbalkanov30006 жыл бұрын
Its not the 1900s now so dont count on something to rise and fall so easily now
@LifeOfTheParty3236 жыл бұрын
Saddam Hussein.
@julius10856 жыл бұрын
arab shitholes aren't the same as stable first world countries
@Prussian_Defence6 жыл бұрын
Makedonia e BULGARIA
@ifonly67886 жыл бұрын
ivan japan?
@blasty1376 жыл бұрын
One of the key elements for a revolution (especially one which cannot be conducted without at least a little violence) is demographics - it is far likelier to happen in countries with a large percentage of young people (approx. 16 to 25) and a small percentage of old people. Older people tend to be not only significantly less violent but also more conservative - this is one of the drivers of political changes in the West as well (Brexit being the best example).
@reyxus94546 жыл бұрын
My father, who is for a social democracy in my country, Italy, actually supports Putin. He said that the Russians need a strong leader, as it is always been their culture.
@aydendanner56164 жыл бұрын
They were all beautiful and dint deserve to die
@mathewjose47533 жыл бұрын
This horribly..... Some of them didn't died by that bullet alone. They were beaten mercilessly by the Soviets
@manifest57683 жыл бұрын
Monarchs are a stain on society.
@aeoe6653 жыл бұрын
@@manifest5768 monarchs are just country who colonize anything they explored first
@foodiesmukbang8743 жыл бұрын
Looks can’t hold the personality within only their actions can tell how the person really was.
@coniston31063 жыл бұрын
They were stabbed with bayonet, then sawed into pieces and thrown into land mines, then burned. Only to be found decades later.
@billyboberto4 жыл бұрын
"Putin embraces the soviet past" You mean its belief of a unified state and belief? Yes Communism and marxism? Absolutely not.
@mashka15723 жыл бұрын
it's not like USSR was a communistic state, it wasn't even a "socialism" the party claimed, it was straight up totalitarian state no doubt.
@personbob86913 жыл бұрын
@@mashka1572 no have you ever read unbiased sources probably not
@ZAR5566 жыл бұрын
German Kaiser funded Lenin movement including Ticket Train to St. Petersburg, All for excluding Russia from WW1 by weaken it from within. It Worked But, Works too Well. it give birth the USSR
@NikolaAvramov5 жыл бұрын
Finally somebody that knows this!
@arshaq42004 жыл бұрын
I know this he also brought from somwhere i don't know previously he was expelled from the country
@Angel-nu7fm4 жыл бұрын
Read the Kaiser had a thing for the Czarina...weren't they cousins? That family gets a little creepy.....
@Airborne6754 жыл бұрын
Bruh
@joeyreidelbach55094 жыл бұрын
Well Kaiser was hoping that Lenin and his group would cause small enough problems that would force the Russians out of the war without doing major harm cause William the 2nd of Germany didn't want to go to war with his cousin at all which is why he sent a letter to his cousin to talk things out.
@Victor-kt6qn5 жыл бұрын
Youu need a tough man to lead tough people.
@krazytroutcatcher5 жыл бұрын
Victor Tecpa In WW2 the British tortured both German and Russian soldiers for information. When some of those old Germans were interviewed back in the early 2000’s, they praised the the Russians for their strength and resilience to British torture.
@marisamartin36644 жыл бұрын
You don't need a man who kills everyone who questions him...
@Victor-kt6qn4 жыл бұрын
@@marisamartin3664 oh please don't tell me you believe your president doesn't do it either. He's probably just more discreet about it. No one stays in power by being nice to your enemies.
@magdatvfreire4304 жыл бұрын
@@marisamartin3664 E precisohtraduzir para o portugues🤪😳
@yoshi93583 жыл бұрын
@@Victor-kt6qn Yes that's why other countries have changing leaders, because our leaders seek to maintain power by being the more popular alternative rather than strangling the opposition
@gifigi60063 жыл бұрын
He is even built a palace for himself...
@dieudo.6 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say the fall of the Russian Empire was unpredictable. Russia was torn apart from the many revolts in the country. Nicolas II was not prepared to face such a political crisis.
@fahoodie18525 жыл бұрын
These Russian guards have excellent marching/dancing skills
@alexander35582 жыл бұрын
I’m sure their lives depend on it lol
@boufns86 жыл бұрын
Question is, what other Russia do you prefer? Modern Russia under Putin, Socialist Russia under Stalin or Lenin or perhaps the chaotic and horrifying living conditions that the country endured during the nineties? All you can say is "He is like the Tsar" but that only applies because the last time Russia was this stable was during the last Tsar's rule. That's it, that's the comparison and that's where it ends.
@NYmomAdrienne39152 жыл бұрын
Because they killed the entire family (children), Nicholas became a martyr rather than what he was
@modisemakokwe42565 жыл бұрын
Long live the spirit of the Ramonov Monachy
@jesusislordsavior63434 жыл бұрын
Modise Makokwe What IS the spirit of the Romanov Monarchy? Can it be defined? If the Spirit of Christ lives in a person, that person will end up in the best place of all, no matter who his/her ancestors were.
@RT-rb8rn4 жыл бұрын
@@jesusislordsavior6343 Calm down 😆
@personbob86913 жыл бұрын
Нет
@petardukic65413 жыл бұрын
Western media: Putin is a Communist villain ... A little later he is an imperialist, a villain conservative ... A little later he is a communist, then Alexei Navalani holds the imperialist flag, so he is on the right track, then Putin is a communist again ... When you are already doing propaganda, you do how should😂😂😂
@kevinbergin99713 жыл бұрын
Clearly he must be great because he never, never, Never loses an election ... NEVER!
@tectonpro85076 жыл бұрын
It's so cheap propaganda that it's even funny to listen. > "The Army of Whites, which was betrayed to the Tsar" - the Tsar abdicated long before the Civil War, none of the political forces of the White Movement proclaimed its goal to restore the monarchy in Russia, for the most part the White defended their privileges and the hierarchical order that suited them. > "The Bolsheviks decided to shoot Emperor Nicholas II" - He is not only has not been an emperor for a year, but Bolsheviks did not decide to shoot him either. The decision to execution was taken spontaneously, in connection with force majeure circumstances - the White Offensive on Yekaterinburg, the decision of the Ural Revolutionary Military Council without the sanction of Moscow. About "strengthening the power of Putin "Through "Political Repressions™" and "Military conflicts" -- I generally keep quiet. Especially about military conflicts from the lips of NATO members is interesting to listen to. > "Boris Yeltsin tried to build a democratic state" -- AHA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!! Can you hear the knock? This Joseph Goebbels breaks out of Hell to claim compensation for copyright infringement. The death of the royal family is certainly a tragedy of the Civil War. Exactly the same as the death of thousands of other families during this war, fallen under the millstone of history and caught between the White and Red Terror. The death of each family is a tragedy. Not big and not less. And to stick out specifically one and make it a symbol of martyrdom is not right. And this not the first is the Russian king who died on the throne. But for others, for some reason, do not worry. Perhaps because the nobles killed them, gentlemen, sir. They can, it's not "cattle".
@andyreginald62723 жыл бұрын
Long Live Blessed Tsar Nicholas II!!!!
@sauraroy13463 жыл бұрын
Long Live Comrade Lenin
@mathewjose47533 жыл бұрын
@@sauraroy1346 He is dead and the Soviet dictators completely destroyed his Ideologies
@helmutschmidt503 жыл бұрын
@@mathewjose4753 Lenin wasn't a clean figure. Had he lived longer, he would do the same things.
@helmutschmidt503 жыл бұрын
@Anonymer Nutzer Monarchs aren't actuallly bad
@kerajohnson19223 жыл бұрын
@Anonymer Nutzer not all monarchies can be compared to dictatorships. absolute monarchs are problematic (and definitely compatible to tyranny), but constitutional monarchs are very different. If a king or queen is given the proper limitations and restrictions to keep their power in check, I see no problem in it. Look at the UK, Japan, Norway, and Belgium.
@zubaidakablan67825 жыл бұрын
We will not forget the imperial family thanks to Russia men and women were very clever people to remember that shame crime unbelievable murder.
@jnb_1103 жыл бұрын
Im sure the Russian people did enjoy the karma they got when Stalin took power
@pedrojuan80503 жыл бұрын
Definitely an unnecessary killing.
@branimirkolarov34933 жыл бұрын
@B D stolen plan for nuclear weapons from USA, growth population would happen anyway superpower number 2 not 1. It's a pity that Stalin didn't died during his robberies.
@abdoelalaziz76915 жыл бұрын
I believe the new order of Tsar is coming..
@marisamartin36644 жыл бұрын
who would that be?
@jesusislordsavior63434 жыл бұрын
Mantan Orang Kaya I think that Mr. Xi would like to be more than just emperor of China. He might like to be tsar of Russia as well, if not master of the whole world. He has many more employees than does Putin; and he seems to be more ruthless, judging by the concentration camps in Xinjiang. Sometime in the future, an antichrist figure is coming who will demand worship from everyone. But he will be destroyed, and at the end of history JESUS Our Redeemer will reign supreme.
@joebacon68174 жыл бұрын
@@jesusislordsavior6343 Xi would sooner embarass China in front of the entire world than declare himself a Tsarist. He will be the general secretary of the CCP until he dies, no question about it.
@manasbharadwaj20263 жыл бұрын
I am the senate- Emperor Putin.
@bensanderson71446 жыл бұрын
Has anyone seen the Economist video about how Crimea was a part of Russia dating back to the 17th Century? Me neither.
@stefanpigford68915 жыл бұрын
Country boy in : North Carolina...I LOVE RUSSIA...
@Drannn543 жыл бұрын
North Carolina is the region in the USA, US IS A COUNTRY
@Ryanlexz5 жыл бұрын
The economist that cause the 2008 ecomony crisis😂😂😂
@ArturoGarzaID5 жыл бұрын
I would have made myself Czar a long time ago if I was Putin.
@Britishdarnlib4 жыл бұрын
And risk overthrow?
@yourownfather67093 жыл бұрын
@@Britishdarnlib tbf tsar didn’t know anything about running a country let alone the biggest one , so his risk is lower
@Britishdarnlib3 жыл бұрын
@@yourownfather6709only about 20% of the Russian population want the monarchy back, Putin will still risk overthrow
@originalcomment48183 жыл бұрын
@@Britishdarnlib that is a lot considering how much time has passed and how much soviet propaganda has been forced onto russia
@Britishdarnlib3 жыл бұрын
@@originalcomment4818 it’s probably less, and it’s still the vast minority
@Humanmensihsaaninsan3 жыл бұрын
Realy beatifull family realy a clean feeling comes when see these faces.
@gabrielebianchi1613 жыл бұрын
Because they are Christian martyrs.
@Humanmensihsaaninsan3 жыл бұрын
@@gabrielebianchi161 how do you know that ? Jesus did not die on cross its a lie.
@gabrielebianchi1613 жыл бұрын
@@Humanmensihsaaninsan if you do not believe then unfortunately you are going to consume the bitter drink of misery and destruction. You know what I'm taking about........everyone does. Your knee will bow to Christ.
@Humanmensihsaaninsan3 жыл бұрын
@@gabrielebianchi161 oo Jesusz. O Jezuz. Ooooo Jezuz. O Jesuz.
@sendlocation47794 жыл бұрын
When power relays on faith than you have real power
@Victor-kt6qn5 жыл бұрын
I'd take a strong leader that actually cares about my country and its people over a democratic leader who's only goal is to get re-elected and cares little of the actual country.
@WIYD885 жыл бұрын
Victor Tecpa 😂🤦🏼♂️
@l4zrh4wk5 жыл бұрын
Shame you haven’t got one isn’t it?
@leefrankel41915 жыл бұрын
That’s what dictators like Putin count on, to the profound loss of the Russian people. Unfortunately, they’ve never known anything different in their long history.
@Victor-kt6qn5 жыл бұрын
@@leefrankel4191 I'm not from Russia... You guys are thinking like Americans. You won't understand my mindset until you've lived in a country where election are always rigged. President are corrupt. They don't care. Our tax payer money goes to buying their mansions while like half of the population lives in poverty. Then you'll understand why most of us would rather have a dictador and give up a little bit of freedom. For safety and knowing our money is actually going to make our country better and better it for future generations. You can have freedom and security. You gotta choose one or the other. You rich countries easily judge countries for choosing and putting "dictators" in power but until you've seen what a democracy looks like when it goes wrong and fucks over the people it's supposably made for you you'll understand why we'd rather choose a strong leader like putin than some pussy president that sells national companies to rich countries (US) at a super cheap price for his own personal gain. Don't judge us you haven't seen how bad shit can get when election hve been rigged since the 1920's in your country.
@Ikaros235 жыл бұрын
@J. D. So you think its no bureacracy under a dictator?. thats the lie that they sell. In reality no lord can rule without ministers, a court, and the thousands of secretarys ( bureacrats) that run the country in the real day to day world.
@dianaov.19255 жыл бұрын
When talkin shit about others - first look into your heart
@freyamckenzie55832 жыл бұрын
The Tsar and his family were strongly and genuinely devout people. Olga read her Bible daily to her mother whilst they were imprisoned.
@curtiscarpenter98814 жыл бұрын
I think as history tells one story we must learn the history being made now. History helps us write with a finer quill the history made now, look at when Alaska belonged to Russia and was sold to America and the mistake that was.🤯🤯🤯
@here_we_go_again25713 жыл бұрын
Selling Alaska to USA (1867) was a smart move by Alexander ii. Russia needed money to build a national railroad. AND The way people from the British Isles were coming to Canada; Britain taking over Alaska was almost a given.
@charlesskogen79885 жыл бұрын
So much disinformation in this video.
@EddiTaru2 жыл бұрын
Russia has the most fasinating history. It's always been strong and wild.
@immobiliaresachenrecht6 жыл бұрын
This is a complete lie. Russian Empire was supposed to disappear like other monarchy's in Europe. This was a historical process closely connected with industrialization.
@salilbhatnagar2 жыл бұрын
Putin is positioning himself to end like Tsar Nicholas
@vulkron3242 жыл бұрын
If so im gonna make sure you go first
@bl57525 жыл бұрын
The Whites were not a unified force, nor did all the factions that historians label as "whites" support the Tzar. You're the Economist, you should be able to present accurate information.
@ahmetdogan56852 жыл бұрын
That was a totally unnecessary carnage. I'm sure it was Stalin who gave orders of murdering the Romanovs family. Sad.
@Spido68_the_spectator2 жыл бұрын
Yeltsin wasn't that much of democrat. He mostly built an oligarchy that now serves Putin, and his incompetence led to chaos
@seahawk1242 жыл бұрын
And yet again, the KZbin algorithm does its magic.
@bigz43023 жыл бұрын
Yeah, and Yeltsin's rule nearly cause the collapse of Russia. The nation is still sitting on less than ideal grounds
@Asafirus4 жыл бұрын
Как руский человек, могу сказать: Из-за этого видео я так сильно хохотал что разбудил всех соседей. Я узнал много нового о своём президенте) Во многих интервью он одинаково изъяснялся по поводу данного случая, и он не метался во мнениях. По поводу власти в Российской Империи и Власти СССР он тоже изъяснялся, и он не является фанатиком который полностью верит в одно, и полностью отрицает другое. В истории России были моменты за которые можно гордится, и за которые можно стыдится. Смерть Императора не стала неожиданной новостью. Николай II запрашивал убежище у своего двоюродного брата, короля Англии, но тот предал Николая и не пустил за границу. Так же, журналисту и редактором работающим над этим выпуском желательно почитать хотя бы Википедию, а то не знать что такое авторитаризм - позор для журналиста.
@DonDon45-i5h2 жыл бұрын
Правда
@OrnumCR5 жыл бұрын
Boney M said it best at the end of their track ‘Rasputin’......’Oh those Russians!!’...
@tudormardare665 жыл бұрын
Russia is not an autocracy. It may seem to be this way from the outside, but the system is far more complicated. It isn't a full democracy either, nor is it an oligarchy. People who tried to leak information about the reality of Russian power structure got into real trouble, and the Russian secret services tried to censor the information they spread as much as possible, so having a reliable and fully comprehensible source is extremely hard.
@MadMusicNerd2 жыл бұрын
This first picture is never from 1918. on the left you can see Lenin's mausoleum... Which was build several years later.
@blostin3 жыл бұрын
Hey Economist, what about doing a video on the very democratic Chinese government.
@alexander35582 жыл бұрын
Haha I see what you did there
@Orvo20366 жыл бұрын
A lot of misinformation in this video
@maarten92725 жыл бұрын
@@djordjecupic The irony is that while this video is certainly biased, you yourself are a sheep as well for blindly following your master. But I doubt that you are even able to realise that.
@maarten92725 жыл бұрын
@Coz Paynes Sheep to what?
@maarten92725 жыл бұрын
@Coz Paynes Unlike you I don't blindly follow any country, god or man. Putin might be your god but to me he is just another power hungry asshole calling himself a savior. Seriously, I dare you to call me a cnn bot.
@thebiggroup12484 жыл бұрын
That’s one thing that makes me think; what if a lot of countries started to return to their old roots. Germany puts a Kaiser back in power, Russia reverts back to the Russian Empire, England reverts back into a monarchy, etc.
@faramarzmokri91363 жыл бұрын
The oppressed always becomes oppressor at the end.
@shumoon13 жыл бұрын
It seems like Russia has always had to have a strongman leading it, whether you call him czar, premier or president. A democratic Russia would probably still have to govern with a very strong presidency. Some things are just culturally ingrained.
@danielforeroc3 жыл бұрын
Tsar Alexander II once said: "Ruling Russia isn't difficult, it's useless".
@Living_Dead_Girrl3 жыл бұрын
The Tsar wasn’t even Russian, you Russian Nationalist Putin-bot! Use the internet to actually look things up. Nobody buys into your brainwashing.
@GeraldoluizAprendiz3 жыл бұрын
That final statement was more like a wish from The Economist editors than anything substancial...
@tradingnas1003 жыл бұрын
This video says nothing. What are they trying to speculate? Tzar Putin’s fate will be the same of the Romanov’s? I didn’t get the point here
@armavida63672 жыл бұрын
Nicholas was not ready to be a tsar, because his father didn't prepare him. And why you don't tell about Nicholas's relatives in Britain who even didn't want to help?
@tikhomir-ck8mn4 жыл бұрын
Stop! Bolsheviks didn't send Nickolas the 2-nd to Ekaterinburg at first. He was in Tobolsk since 1917. Only in April of 1918 he left it for Ekaterinburg. Honestly saying, I'm grateful for this video. It's cool that not only Russians watch it :)
@coledavis52126 жыл бұрын
I wonder what Tsar Nicholas’ cousins (Wilhelm II and George V) thought of his death. Even when Wilhelm and Nicholas were bestest of cousins and had nicknamed for eachother, Nicky and Willy.
@danielforeroc3 жыл бұрын
Wilhelm was the direct responsible for the death of Nicholas, he sent Lenin to destroy Russia. Wilhelm also manipulated Nicholas a lot, like when he convinced him to go to war with Japan.
@TheCandiceWang2 жыл бұрын
I think people today like to romanticize their relationship a lot. I get the notion, but what happened is unimaginable
@MaximusAugustusOrthodox18 сағат бұрын
Tsar Nicholas II pray for us 🙏🏻 Glory to the Empire 🇷🇺☦️
@johnkim78025 жыл бұрын
The areas making up present day Russia has a long history of becoming centralized and falling upon autocratic emperors. Russia has always been under strong autocratic grip with the Mongol Empire controlling Russia, Ivan the Terrible having autocratic authority, the Communist regimes from Vladimir Lenin to Boris Yeltsin (including mainly Josef Stalin) having absolute authority, etc. being good examples. History always repeats itself to a large degree!
@VasilyVasily2 жыл бұрын
Европа профинансировала переворот в России и из-за Европы умер Николай 2 с семьёй
@this.is.berlin3 жыл бұрын
What happens to a country when weak leaders rule, can be seen in the fate of Nicholas and his poor family! But Russia does not have to worry: Putin is strong!