Рет қаралды 2,941
So time for a Q&A, this one coming from my buddy Solomon Nelson (subscribe to his channel NOW).
He asks: You’ve written that high frequency training has a history of getting folks injured. Is this because (a) high frequency is inherently more injurious-perhaps for some
physiological reason-or (b) because the way most people implement high frequency is dumb? And if (a), then what’s the reason?
And the short answer is well: it's kind of both. Or rather the combination of both.
And the long answer is my typical overlong explanation where I look at the issue of frequency and intensity interactions, focusing primarily on hypertrophy but also looking at powerlifting, Olympic lifting with even a couple of endurance sports examples to answer the question and why I said what I said (which is what I said).
The answer will probably not shock you. Not unless you're pretty easily shocked.
store.bodyreco...
bodyrecomposit...
IG: @mcdonaldlyle
My awesome Facebook group: / 810890695609053
Questions for me to ignore: questions@bodyrecomposition.com
I also do Zoom consultations now if you want me to tell you how to live your life:
store.bodyreco...
Only one reference this time
Zourdos MC et al. Efficcy of daily one-repetition maximum training in well-trained powerlifters: a case series. Nutricion Hositalaria (2015)
tinyurl.com/yh...
#hypertrophy #highfrequencytraining #powerlifting #olympiclifting #weightlifting