Q&A - What is the Future of Particle Accelerators?

[@GodlikeIridium]

Great talk and really nice guest choice: "Linear is best" "Circular is best" "That's the physics. I don't care how we find it" "I'm the new guy. Plasma is making progress and coming for you guys!" Super interesting talk. As everyone with Suzie.

[@ddorman365]

Thank you Ri, colleagues and audience participants!! May I suggest that for the Rs there is a very deep connection between the visible ( as well as for the 'invisible" Rs EDM ) plasma state in which Rs ASP Rp is found in, consider our Moon and its macro external radiation field expression or lack of one as a consequence of a lack of a Gluon/ Quark plasma core, so then briefly, when the study of Rs or any spectrum expression ( consider that our existence came into being as a consequence of a plasma convergence expression )is the focus, that there is good reason to continue research with plasma and radiation fields. I think radiation fields research is very important and will ultimately lead to a Boundary transition for us. Peace and love, Doug.

[@TechNed]

Informative as well as enjoyable, especially the inter-disciplinary humour and banter.

[@heysemberthkingdom-brunel5041]

25:40 I understand a large share of high energy cosmic rays are (thankfully!) absorbed by our atmosphere and/or redirected by our magnetic field. The moon has no or negligible of both. So could such detectors replace a particle accelerator if built on the lunar surface?

[@beachboardfan9544]

So will the work of accelerators ever be finished? Whats after the standard model?

[@alangarland8571]

More stuff.

[@GodlikeIridium]

The standard model still doesn't explain much of astronomy (dark energy and dark matter) so it has to be updated or maybe even replaced. There is still a lot of research to be done.

[@MichaelAussie05]

I would like to thank Suzie Sheehy, the RI and everyone involved for a brilliant series of lectures and panels on this subject I thoroughly enjoyed them and I would also like to echo the comment made by Cameron Lee that I am a little sad that more people haven't viewed these lectures they are informative and very entertaining.

[@strings1984]

Cosmic Ray's are generated from cosmic things like nutron stars, pulsars and the like, and collapsing stars; where the plasma is likely helping, and mater streams that pass by black holes or dark matter where it probably dose not; and information from data sets generated from that will be the next steps in radio telescopy and help us map and understand the universe; but we brace few with high energy particle factories want to look under a microscope that generates a constant stream of them, figure out what makes them tick; we have to understand them, to measure, and weigh them, to build them and tear them apart hundreds of times to even be able to find ways to utilize these strange and other odd high energy particles.

[@jessstuart7495]

This talk is the first I've heard about plasma wakefield accelerators. Thank you. I have some reading to do...

[@wandiloch]

Wonderful discussion, well presented.

[@paulmcmc4005]

Jack Dee in the audience @ 20:10:-)...Great discussion by the way!

[@larsonwells2656]

Paul M who is the lady?

[@jordiewalters871]

How good is Suzie😊

[@alangarland8571]

very.

[@GodlikeIridium]

24:27 "Probably plasmas" bam! xD

[@sumotherdude]

so good!

[@avi1212avi]

4.5k views, front row, top notch, cream de la cream of the particle science community is present devoting their precious time and effort to explain the future in elementary school level. Meanwhile Kelvin Harris, pewdiepie.. you can actually start counting their views with scientific notations. Amount of faith in humanity ~ -10^20

[@strings1984]

I know it's cheesy but I hope you like the joke at the end.

[@beachboardfan9544]

Guy all the way on the left reminds me of a nerdy Clive Owen.

[@mancunianlee]

The first question sounds like it was asked by thunderf00t.

[@igodinoel]

+Anon A Mouse No, only a socially backwards chemical engineer with reactionary opinions could help you.

[@igodinoel]

+Anon A Mouse Because his opinions are to be conflated with the science he does. Bring back the Nazis if that is the case. They were damn good at sciency stuff, werent they?

[@igodinoel]

+Anon A Mouse He has always complained about the money DONATED to Anita by her fans, while comparing it to his low budget science videos, which he has largely neglected to deal with social issues, which detracts from his science although he insists on conflating it. If you cant see the the irony of his delusion the there is nothing else I can say. By the way, his antifem videos gets him better rates than his science ones, while at the same time being the poorest content he makes. Go figure.

[@igodinoel]

+Anon A Mouse +

[@kmmaheen8121]

It's a shame that Bieber's songs have more views than these type of contents.

[@WarzSchoolchild]

299.792.458 m/s. or 299,792,459 m/s ...??? or 299,792,457 m/s..??? ... And we will never know now, because some (Bleep!) person decided to define the standard "Metre Length" as 1/299792458th of a light second. How do we undo this terrible mistake?

[@GodlikeIridium]

We needed a fixed constant. And since that was the state of the art knowledge, that value was chosen. It is just a fixed ratio to bind all units to the speed of light in a vacuum which we know is constant. We just fixed the ratio to keep our units bonded to a physical constant instead of an object in paris which will inevitably change over time (a lot).

[@jimlangley840]

We really don't need this, to what end will this lead. Better to research Carbon capture than waste a few "billion" dollars on this..