QR Decomposition of a matrix and applications to least squares Check out my Orthogonality playlist: • Orthogonal sets Subscribe to my channel: / @drpeyam
Пікірлер: 114
@riccardocapellino76804 жыл бұрын
This guy always leaves a smile on my face
@dani215343 жыл бұрын
3 hrs of lecture and i didnt understand a word. 5 mins of watching this video - and i undersand every thing !! thank you.
@quamos993 жыл бұрын
You are on my elite teachers list: Sal from Khan academy, The organic chemistry tutor, Professor Dave, and now Dr Peyam. Hats off to all of you for making my university life easier. Massive respect and love for all of you
@Rwko.4 күн бұрын
Add Dr Trefor Bazett in that list. :)
@ARNAKLDO4 жыл бұрын
You sir are a genius. This linear algebra extravaganza was super helpful!
@drpeyam4 жыл бұрын
Glad you like it 😄
@OrdinaryXtreme5 жыл бұрын
This is the funnest math tutorial video I've ever seen. You made the process seem so streamlined and easy, thank you!
@NayaM02 жыл бұрын
Best QR decomposition video I've found. Well explained, straight to the point, easy to understand. Thank you.
@abnerandreymartinezzamudio33662 жыл бұрын
Im at the point of the semester where I need to take whatever this guy took
@vassisn20014 жыл бұрын
Thank you for explaining a simple topic as it should be explained, in a simple way. Great explanation!
@elonmusk71423 жыл бұрын
That's awesome. I don't understand matrix and I don't understand english but with your funny explinations, I understand everything. Thank you so much.
@springnuance70483 жыл бұрын
the radiance of his positivity in his teachings make me love linear algebra XD
@GangerPlayz4 жыл бұрын
This was expained so well that i understood despite i talk spanish and dont know even a little of english
@judesharp64723 жыл бұрын
man how did i not find you before, you're litteraly going to make me pass numerical analysis
@Ajay-xd7zq3 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for explanation, It was clear and concise and to the point.
@dengdengkenya5 жыл бұрын
The best explanation given on this topic!
@peytonv.6614 Жыл бұрын
I have been struggling with this topic, you explained this so well. Thank you!
@stekim4 жыл бұрын
thank dr peyam! I really liked the extension to least squares in the second half of the video.
@samytee32823 жыл бұрын
Wow best explanation and nice style of teaching. Very precise and easy to understand
@samytee32823 жыл бұрын
I wanted SVD and two grid method too :)
@吳弘叡 Жыл бұрын
Thanks alot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Prepare to hand in my homework set~~~~~~~
@epiccheeseburgercat4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. This really helped my understanding of qt decomposition
@Bombelus5 жыл бұрын
You're my hero!
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
I’m Captain Peyamerica! 🙂
@fatty391010 ай бұрын
omg you're so cute i can watch you teach all day
@jxw71963 жыл бұрын
What a living legend... Amazing Peyam
@joaofernandes80515 жыл бұрын
And I thought it was something to do with QR codes :P
@vijayank11705 жыл бұрын
🤔😅😁😁😀
@IlMarinz5 жыл бұрын
I've Always seen matrix decompositions (QR, LU) done with square matrix, it's a bit strange for me to see them in the nonsquare world. Also, I was told that Q must be Unitarian and Hermitian (I guess for IR orthogonal and symmetric would be fine) hence making QR only be possible in square matrices by definition. I wonder how much of a lie resides in what I just told
@FunctionalIntegral5 жыл бұрын
And the next decomposition should be the very important SV decomposition which one typically uses in the matrix product state formalism. :D
@kyliemun26813 жыл бұрын
God Bless you, man!
@RiVaLBrite4 жыл бұрын
WOW this was explained really well, I wish my professor could teach like this :(
@TheInuyashaGuy2 жыл бұрын
This tutorial is amazing, thank you
@holyshit9223 жыл бұрын
Gram Schmidt is good for paper and pencil calculations but i heard that it is numerically unstable and I should avoid it when I write program for QR decomposition Householder reflections or Givens rotations are better choice for those who want to write a program Silly , or maybe not in Householder reflections we need transpose of matrix to get Q and square matrices are easy to transpose in place Transpose of rectangular matrix also can be done in place but it is not so easy
@enamanjgo89305 ай бұрын
u are like the bob ross of math :) thank you
@BloemkoolGaming5 жыл бұрын
Your enthousiasm is amazing, the only thing that triggers me is that you put your line of your Q on the wrong side !
@chiragmittal33135 жыл бұрын
Enthusiasm increases by exp(2) when Watching it on 2x
@Mr.HugsHoney3 жыл бұрын
WOW THANK YOU DR. YOU ARE THE BEST
@gulrukhsor_akhmadjanova4 ай бұрын
omg, thank you a lot for your priceless knowlage
@paultaufalele18212 ай бұрын
Thank you so much. Very helpful
@drpeyam2 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@unruly_ronin3 ай бұрын
Great video man
@sandorszabo24705 жыл бұрын
A nice lin alg video again. I hope my students will also like it 😊
@carlosalbertodelgadoelizon44574 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot!! The example was very illustrating!
@zonglehuang41472 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for your clear explanation!
@syedmuhammadabdullah29203 ай бұрын
Thankyou for being successful in successfully wasting my time
@drpeyam3 ай бұрын
Awww you’re welcome!!
@joaomorais61014 жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation. Thx professor
@dariusfoodeei81812 жыл бұрын
I love this man
@ankitb3954 Жыл бұрын
The watch steals the show
@MrRyanroberson15 жыл бұрын
I wonder... Would a left-sided RQ decomposition ever be useful? And how easy is it to generate compared to QR?
@virgenalosveinte5915 Жыл бұрын
thank you great video
@Elisko2454 жыл бұрын
Thanks you for an amazing explanation!
@arwatawfiq4088 Жыл бұрын
Very useful session thank you so much ❤
@harshala538510 ай бұрын
Thank you sir.
@0598123 жыл бұрын
Great explanation, thanks!
@abdelrhmandameen22153 жыл бұрын
absolutely fantastic
@JohnDoe-sc4zf3 жыл бұрын
Hey, thanks for the amazing video. I just have one quick doubt. As you said Q is orthonormal matrix, then when I compute Q*Q' it does not give I. Please enlighten me, or am I misunderstanding something?
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
It doesn’t have to. For nonsquare orthogonal matrices we don’t always have Q Q’ = I, that’s only true for square matrices
@humanwang9854 Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir👍
@Matrioshka_Brain3 жыл бұрын
This was really good :)
@kevinshao91483 жыл бұрын
thanks for the video! but one question, even if R' is not invertible (meaning A has linear dependency) , there still solution for LS right? just lose one dimension. No?
@rampage14x134 жыл бұрын
Thanks this video series has really been helpful! Also, just wondering if you would be willing to share but I was wondering what watch you're wearing? I think it looks great
@drpeyam4 жыл бұрын
It’s an Invicta watch, you can get it on amazon
@rampage14x134 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam Thanks for letting me know!
@marce38935 жыл бұрын
thanks for your work.
@kyc37224 жыл бұрын
very very clear
@a.s.68983 жыл бұрын
crazy good, thank you
@yapzhilin98573 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO SO MUCH
@DSKim-ej5uf5 жыл бұрын
Good video! I looked very good. What do you think of Jimmy Hendrix? If you like my guitar and harmonica you will be happy.
@eduardamachado76874 жыл бұрын
Foi muito útil! Thank you so much!
@aminfadaei40564 жыл бұрын
good job peyam
@mohammadburhanmanzoor38063 жыл бұрын
How about its importance in finding evalues?
@ReversePrimeOFFICIAL2 жыл бұрын
Do you have videos on SVD? Thanks for this video
@ademalliche8784 жыл бұрын
pleaseee in 03MIN.12 why the first resultat is 15/9 !!!
@RenegadeFury3 жыл бұрын
I thought u2 hat was perpendicular to V1, but apparently that's what v2 is? Or is u2 hat supposed to be parallel to V1?
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
No, u2-u2hat is perpendicular to v1
@Handelsbilanzdefizit5 жыл бұрын
What, if you define a kind of Matrix-Product with the compositon of the elements: A = { {a11(x), a12(x)},{a12(x), a22(x)} } and B = { {b11(x), b12(x)},{b12(x), b22(x)} } So that, A°B = { { a11(b11(x)) + a21(b12(x)), a12(b11(x)) + a22(b12(x)) }, { a11(b21(x)) + a21(b22(x)), a11(b21(x)) + a21(b22(x)) } } Linear Algebra is boring, because I never understood it well. Make more videos about this crazy fractional calculus stuff! Something like this: (d/dx)^f(x) x = f'(x), where f(x) is the order of the derivative. Or functions that transform other functios to their derivatives: g1(f(x)) = f'(x), g2(f(x))= f"(x), ... where gn depends of (d/dx)^n f. Then you could "maybe" generalize derivatives by these functions --> g0.3(f) = (d/dx)^0.3 f
@kolinnhtooaung24084 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Sir
@ninisky27062 жыл бұрын
3:16 what does he mean here? what is rescaling a vector ? just getting rid of the denominator ?
@drpeyam2 жыл бұрын
Multiplying by a constant, here so that the components are integers
@huongtran79223 жыл бұрын
What is the application of QR decomposition?
@phantom8673 Жыл бұрын
in W1 , where did you get 1/3 ? and what is W1? you said its the lenght of vector[2 2 1] it should be 3 . but why its 1/3?? i dont get it
@drpeyam Жыл бұрын
You divide by the length of the vector to get a unit vector
@phantom8673 Жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam I just understand that numerator 1 is part of the formula right ? that was my question . 😄
@rasikajayathilaka35164 жыл бұрын
Great!
@sabbaramine27193 жыл бұрын
thx bro !!
@counterko3 жыл бұрын
6:50 known Q find R
@mzeeshanzafar283 ай бұрын
Dr Ariya from Krish
@vijayank11705 жыл бұрын
Dr Peyam.. can you please explain what LU decomposition is.. I kind of noticed in my textbook... but no idea what it is..
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
There’s a video on that
@vijayank11705 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam Ok thanks... I'll check it out
@7amood405 жыл бұрын
Could you do QZ decomposition.
@Rundas694205 жыл бұрын
Orthogonal Matrices are a bit strange anyway. I will never understand why you call a Matrix with orthoNORMAL column-vectors orthoGONAL and not orthonormal. Most of the time I love maths, but sometimes I hate it xD.
@sandorszabo24705 жыл бұрын
I agree with you. Luckily, there is a book where authors say orthonormal matrix. In my lectures I also say this. And there are other cases where I use the corresponding correct name. Similar, more terrible thing is 😄 "this infinite series is convergent". Math is nice, but the language created by persons is not necessarily correct.
@Rundas694205 жыл бұрын
@@sandorszabo2470 Finally someone understands me :D
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
I totally agree
@HilbertXVI5 жыл бұрын
Eh useless semantics
@1.41428 ай бұрын
IR=V fin.
@3ia18_prasetyaharkrisnowo75 жыл бұрын
Do 100 integral challenge!!!
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
There’s already a 100 T/F challenge
@deniztunayildiz45189 ай бұрын
08: 10
@deepgems22464 жыл бұрын
Your V's look exactly like your U's
@junior-ee5dm Жыл бұрын
t amo gringo, entendi como el putas no mk lo amo me ayudaste a estudiar para el parcial no nea feliz
@typo6915 жыл бұрын
Do you put the slash in the wrong place in "Q" just annoy viewers like me!?
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
No, that’s just the way I’m used to writing it
@typo6915 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam fair enough
@Sup3rlum5 жыл бұрын
@@typo691 he is left handed so its easier to swipe down and away
@jiongt26772 жыл бұрын
「動画の音が良くない」、
@shokan71785 жыл бұрын
First uwu!
@esutana Жыл бұрын
The math people call this Q is semi-orthogonal matrix. They define that orthogonal matrix must be square. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-orthogonal_matrix