QSIM toolkit and quantum technology| UPSC| News Simplified | Forum IAS

[@Bpscjourney9]

Wow....itna achha se kabhi nhi samjha tha

[@paurushsharma1922]

Very Informative program, Thanks 🙏🙏

[@Chintusahu757]

Awesome mam

[@siddhantpatil2579]

Plz makes shorts on NCERT important notes like Drishti ias

[@YashSutariya23896]

Can you make a flash card of it in soft copy... So we have just watch video and revised always that flash card, all aspirant have time constraints so

[@bubaisardar8909]

Good class

[@shivanshtiwari6794]

Amazing one

[@shreensiddiqui8614]

Very well explained. Thank you mam

[@gulmohar4724]

Thank you mam

[@shahistasareenlodhi5040]

Best explaination mam.

[@shwetavashisht514]

No words to thank you enough.. still.. thank you mam

[@pawanpaliwal2394]

wow... :)

[@arnashobraj8704]

Amazing .

[@Heplinghands7]

😊

[@JugalGohel]

Ise thoda aur easy aur simple bana sake to aur a66a hoga bcoz science background nhi jinka unhe ye abhi bhi samajne me dikkat a sakti hai

[@willmeet9022]

Thank you so much !

[@vijaysparesp6221]

Thank you mam...

[@piyushgaur9462]

C- MINISTRY OF ELECTRINICS

[@rsingh1508]

💐💐👌👍

[@ThatFitnessDude]

MIETY

[@avinashbalakrishna5975]

If u take N bits, your outcomes/memory size = 2^N... i don’t understand the point you explained. Ok, I don't want to know also. Forget about Quantum Computer, Quantum mechanics topic basics itself are headache. But superposition and entanglement concept explanation is misleading. Felt like you should not have explained the basics, which are not needed. Purely technical, see how complex to understand 2 outputs... Even in single slit/double slit experiment, there will be interference but the outcome is maxima/ minima (1/0)...Here it is confusing.

[@Ailee-Jaw]

A/c to my knowledge it means in traditional the amount of information it can process is in the form of 2^n i.e. From 1 bit it can process 2 information (0,1) but in quantum it works in 2^2n i.e from one mobit 4 information can process. I hope you got my point.

[@JugalGohel]

Ans is C. MiETY

[@dilip7610]

Quantum tech not explained well

[@Aspirant334]

Meity