Hi. Unfortunately, I can't understand your language. That's why i couldn't understand the video. I would appreciate it if you could briefly write your comparison of Mavo and c40. I'm also curious about your mavo comment in general.
@二哥咖啡说8 ай бұрын
Mavo has a very low fine powder yield and offers a cleaner flavor compared to C40. It is also more convenient with its stepless adjustment and requires less effort in grinding compared to C40. However, C40 is an important symbol in the field of coffee grinders. The build quality of C40 is slightly better than Mavo, and many vendors provide grinding parameter suggestions specifically for C40 but not for Mavo, at least for a certain period of time. Honestly speaking, currently, the price of C40 is more than twice that of Mavo, indicating that Mavo offers better value for money。 BTW, you might open the auto translation option while watching this viedio on youtube.
@cengizhanakdas94888 ай бұрын
@@二哥咖啡说 Thanks for the comment. Unfortunately, no subtitles can be added. KZbin may be blocking it due to location difference.
@二哥咖啡说8 ай бұрын
I'll try to add English subtile in the next viedo. Cheers!@@cengizhanakdas9488
@cengizhanakdas94888 ай бұрын
Thank u! 🙏@@二哥咖啡说
@Oneirophrenian8 ай бұрын
@@二哥咖啡说 Comparing the S3 Against the Mavo, which is better suited for espresso in your opinion?
Hello from Russia Thanks for your video. Please tell, Mavo Phantox Pro the grinding for the jezve? Does it give a compatible grind with Comandante C40 (3-9 clicks or 6-15 red clicks)) And how the grinding changes during adjustment: smoothly and gradually or stepwise heterogeneous.
You're awesome! I've never seen such an in depth comparison on KZbin within the English community like yours! Keep it up, bro! I’d love to know your opinion on the R3 for pour over, and where you would place it in the comparison table
@二哥咖啡说7 ай бұрын
Actually there's an individual video for R3, you may check it out. R3 has so many interesting features to play. It's also a good choice for pour over.