Hi sam i have question what is zizek view on colin mcginn idea of new mysterianism from hegelain lens. Os zizek reject it or accept it ? Also why
@RahulSam2 ай бұрын
Not too sure, mate. You may have to Google it around.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems3 ай бұрын
.🔥.
@akbar-nr4kc2 ай бұрын
Hi sam i have question what is zizek view on colin mcginn mysterianism from hegelain philosphy of conyridictions lens . Is zizek accept or reject it ? Also why he reject or accept colin mcginn mysterianism from hegelain lens.
@RahulSam2 ай бұрын
I don't think he has commented on the matter, mate. Try looking around online, and if you do find something, please share it with me!
@Footnotes2Plato3 ай бұрын
Total caricature of panpsychism, I’d say? Even the Goffian substance version is more nuanced than he’s suggesting, to say nothing of the process-relational version.
@RahulSam3 ай бұрын
Fair criticism, Matthew. I think Prof Johnston was going off the cuff here. And I, too, am not well-read on Panpsychist literature in any way. I have your essay 'Physics Within the Limits of Feeling Alone' to read, which I hope to get to soon!
@MasoudJohnAzizi3 ай бұрын
Well, there seems to be a lot of misunderstanding about "panpsychism" and/or there is no consensus on how to define it (like "consciousness"). Even Dr. Bernardo Kastrup, in his interview with Prof. Dr. Brian Keating, referred to "panpsychism" as nothing but "hopelessness" that is not grounded in physical reality...
@MasoudJohnAzizi3 ай бұрын
I think Dr. Iain McGilchrist would classify the perspectives of Prof. Dr. Adrian Johnston as those which represent moreso the cognition of the brain's left-hemisphere relative to that of the right-hemisphere.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems3 ай бұрын
He who knows only his own side of the story knows little even of that. John S Mills. The self that knows only itself knows little even of that. Materialism and minds in a nutshell. But usefulness exists... so is it more?