Quantum Spin Ice and Magnetic Monopoles

[@JackBlackNinja]

Great great video. Well scripted and spoken with perfect visuals. And as always shout out dirac

[@thequantumage]

Thank you on behalf of the whole team!

[@ltbaxter]

Very cool! As an undergrad I briefly worked with a Physics Prof researching monopoles - we even got to visit a research lab at Cal Tech. 😊 Looking forward to future videos about quantum materials.

[@thequantumage]

I'm jealous! I had a friend at Caltech who was involved in the search for a magnetic monopole, but eventually decided to write his dissertation about *not* finding one.

[@lesbrown8099]

Fascinating... thank you...:)

[@BushaBandulu]

Love your channel. Thx for explaining. U have a new subscriber

[@SpotterVideo]

What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit). Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton.

[@barrypickford1443]

Utterly fascinating

[@BushaBandulu]

Will you be making videos on plasma and how it works and the possibilities of it.

[@yasploofyh8358]

Very interesting and clear explanation! Just stubscribed :)

[@thequantumage]

Welcome to the channel - great to have you here!

[@preguica_net]

If you have magnetic monopolo (quasiparticle) so where is the magnetic current?

[@martinstubs6203]

Havn't you heard? Magnetism doesn't exist. It's all electric charge and special relativity.