No video

Quasi Static Analysis in Abaqus/FEA, Part - 02 Mass scaling

  Рет қаралды 10,092

SimTech05

SimTech05

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 37
@topian789
@topian789 Жыл бұрын
So I have reached the end of your beautifully explained series of videos on "Dynamic Analysis using Abaqus". Thanks a lot sir 👍 I really appreciate your input and engagement to explain the not very easy topics in the fields of CAE.
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 Жыл бұрын
Always welcome dear, There are lots of to share but due to restricted time I'm unable to upload more vidy.
@lokeshs3324
@lokeshs3324 4 жыл бұрын
I really happy watching your video. It is nice and gives me better understanding of concepts in Abaqus. Thanks for your content great work
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 4 жыл бұрын
Dear, I suggest you to go with part-1 also.
@lokeshs3324
@lokeshs3324 4 жыл бұрын
@@simtech0598 am trying to start watching all your video from a year back. So definitely I'll watch them in proper sequence for sure 😊 Is there any way that I could contact you to clarify my queries immediately.. when it comes to Abaqus and HM..
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 4 жыл бұрын
Dear, You can mail me and msg me. My contact details is in video discription.
@ivshabaldin
@ivshabaldin 2 ай бұрын
But when scaling the mass, the wave speed also decreases and there may be errors due to its excess? And isn’t it more profitable from the point of view of computational time to shorten the loading period, since in this case the inertial forces are proportional to the first degree of this reduction, and when scaling the mass it is necessary to increase the inertial forces in proportion to the square of the increase in the stable increment?
@theluis469
@theluis469 3 жыл бұрын
How should I validate mass scaling in a dynamic explicit problem? I'm analyzing a machining procedure, and the speed of the tool is considerable, how can I see if the analysis is acceptable by looking at the energies? Thank you so much for your videos!
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 3 жыл бұрын
Dear, Effect of Mass scaling can be checked by kinetic energy with respect to internal energy of system. As i explained in video.
@mohdsuhairilmeon6117
@mohdsuhairilmeon6117 3 жыл бұрын
Hi..very informative video. How to know the right factor?..e.g 16, 24, 32...100....?or we can simply try the factor with any numbers and later on once completed, verify with energy?
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, Better to use scale factor and check energy plot.
@xintong3168
@xintong3168 6 ай бұрын
Good video. I have a question, if I want to scale down the mass, how can I do? Change directly the property of the material? or other ways? Thanks in advance.
@sanjaySanjay-gz7wm
@sanjaySanjay-gz7wm 4 жыл бұрын
Good content
@lokeswarimalepati867
@lokeswarimalepati867 3 жыл бұрын
Sir Can you please explain how to define amplitude for different loading histories For ex: cycling loading
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 3 жыл бұрын
Dear, already 2 videos uploaded for amplitude in Abaqus. Go through channel videos.
@HJ-xr3wq
@HJ-xr3wq 2 жыл бұрын
Hi sir, by defining mass scaling in Explicit step Abaqus will consider quasi static analysis automatically? or we should tell Abaqus somewhere that you must use quasi static analysis?
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 2 жыл бұрын
Dear, Please watch all videos of 'dynamic analysis with Abaqus' playlist carefully. When the system is sufficient slow...we can artificially make it faster by applying mass scale technique...so if problem is already in dynamic condition...we cannot apply mass scaling.
@meetpatel-kt8cv
@meetpatel-kt8cv 4 жыл бұрын
Sir, I am having cyclic load ( 135 seconds) and I am performing quassi static analysis with mass scalling. To use time scaling, what changes in 'Time period' Value and 'amplitude' is required?? Let us say if I am reducing it to 13.5 second, should I keep time period and amplitude time 135 as it is or 13.5 second?
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 4 жыл бұрын
Time period and amplitude both for 13.5 sec.
@samarthacharya5180
@samarthacharya5180 2 жыл бұрын
Can i say that the results of my simulation using mass scaling are accurate if the kinetic energy of the system remains less than 1% of the Internal Energy? is there any such parameter that can quickly help me determine whether my simulation is acceptable or not?
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, 1% KE is less enough to ignore.. compare to IE. However, results may wrong due to some other reason. ENERGY itself a parameter to judge whether simulation is correct or not.
@samarthacharya5180
@samarthacharya5180 2 жыл бұрын
@@simtech0598 thank you so much, this tutorial helped me a lot!
@kothilngammaring718
@kothilngammaring718 4 жыл бұрын
Hi @Simtech05, I have been watching this video again and again with the Part-01 video. I have been thinking and try to express myself that if the inertia effect in the simulation system is neglected(insignificant) by introducing mass scaling & load increment method, the system kinetic energy is still not zero (sometimes very small and big depending on the accuracy of the analysis). Where is this ALLKE kinetic energy comes from? How can I explain that if the ALLKE is high, why is it high and what makes it high? Is it coming from the crushing tube by releasing/converting the strain energy as KE? Thank you!
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 4 жыл бұрын
Dear, You misunderstood the concept. 1. Inertia effect is negligible than only we can utilise quasi static concept (mass scaling and increase load rate techniques).. Not that - inertia effect neglected by mass scaling or increase load rate. 2. The value of KE depends on mass scaling that you used or increased load rate that you defined. Ideally for Quasi-static simulation KE of system at each point is zero. But if someone use huge mass scaling of very fast load rate (short time event) then KE increase and mislead results. 3. KE is not coming form any other energy. Its from momentum of system. Think about this point - KE = 1/2mv^2 If v is very small KE is zero.. We can take advantage of it...even if we increase mass up to certain limit still KE will be approx zero bcz v is very small...and square of v further decrease value.
@kothilngammaring718
@kothilngammaring718 4 жыл бұрын
@@simtech0598 Thank you for your response. You are right, inertia is negligible but not neglected. 2. I believe when we talk about this ALLKE, its the KE of the deformable part only. We always check the KE and compare with IE even in purely explicit dynamics as well as in quasi-static analysis as you have mentioned. We then conclude that the analysis result is acceptable based on the energy plot comparison. I can understand now that the KE in quasi-static analysis can be increased depending on the mass scaling value. How can I express the cause of the high KE plot in pure explicit dynamic analysis? Is it because purely due to the unrealistic relation between the applied load and the time period event? 3. I believe when you say velocity is very small means that v can be made very small by making the inertia negligible.
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 4 жыл бұрын
1. Inertia is negligible and neglected. 2. How can I express the cause of the high KE plot in the pure explicit dynamic analysis? - The cause may be a variable load with high frequency, maybe high inertia, impact, acc..etc. Is it because purely due to the unrealistic relation between the applied load and the time period event? - There is no unrealistic relationship. I don't know what you want to ask? 3. You are not understanding the point - we are not making v negligible by ignoring inertia. V is zero, system is in equilibrium for each increment, that's y we can assume inertia negligible. We are not making KE zero...KE is zero that's why we can use this quasi-static approach. Listen starting of the video carefully.
@chetanshenoy941
@chetanshenoy941 3 жыл бұрын
Hello. Your videos are really helpful.. I have one question.. how to decide the time period for front bumper assembly using dynamic implicit analysis in abaqus standard for Quasi static application.
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 3 жыл бұрын
Dear, For implicit - Quasi static technique you can use natural time period. You need to worry about time period only in explicit step.
@chetanshenoy941
@chetanshenoy941 3 жыл бұрын
@@simtech0598 Thanks for the reply.. is it necessary to use time period value as natural time period or I can use time period value as 1.
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 3 жыл бұрын
Use natural time period.
@Jootawallah
@Jootawallah 3 жыл бұрын
@@simtech0598 I am sorry, how does one calculate the natural time period for a system?
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 3 жыл бұрын
Perform frequency analysis for the model/assembly.
@agunglaksono3852
@agunglaksono3852 3 жыл бұрын
Thankss
@zhaojianfeng3531
@zhaojianfeng3531 Жыл бұрын
why this is called Quasi Static Analysis? as we can see it is a explicit analysis
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 Жыл бұрын
Dear, Please go through part-1 also. Offcourse we are using explicit step but to solve static problem. I highly recommend you to go through 1st video of playlist.
@syakiraliff
@syakiraliff 3 жыл бұрын
can you do a fretting wear simulation on coating sir?
@simtech0598
@simtech0598 3 жыл бұрын
Dear, I make videos on FE concepts...not on special component. However, if you have any specific question in your simulation..you can ask.
SPONGEBOB POWER-UPS IN BRAWL STARS!!!
08:35
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 24 МЛН
АЗАРТНИК 4 |СЕЗОН 2 Серия
31:45
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 676 М.
❌Разве такое возможно? #story
01:00
Кэри Найс
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Quasi-static Analysis with Abaqus/Explicit
27:19
helpSpaceMATLAB
Рет қаралды 39 М.
Abaqus Explicit & Implicit Dynamic Analysis
32:12
ENA2 Innovative Consulting Inc.
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Building the world's LARGEST iPhone
32:05
DIY Perks
Рет қаралды 568 М.
How to run Abaqus Explicit simulations faster - 8 Tips
20:34
10Minuters
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Speeding up Abaqus Dynamic Explicit, Time scaling vs. Mass scaling
4:37
Engineering Software
Рет қаралды 9 М.
[구조해석] Mass Scaling - 준정적 해석(with explicit)
13:11
솔리드웍스 SOLIDWORKS Korea
Рет қаралды 932
SPONGEBOB POWER-UPS IN BRAWL STARS!!!
08:35
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 24 МЛН