Question and Answers

[@spykerhond7008]

12:10 Absolutely !

[@mkelkar1]

Comments from Vashista on Eurogenes, March 14th 2020 1. They went looking for a common source in all the agewise groups - SPGT, SPGT_o, H, MA, moderns etc. 2. the sample size is different in all the groups. 1 Loebanr outlier should not be a critical part of your decision. 3. Who knows what other ancestries entered post IA? The buddhist site with Swat_H label clearly has a different cline than SPGT itself, for eg. we are not concerned with those ancestries when answering the PIE question. the only population that matters is SPGT while answering that question, and also the outliers from BMAC bronze age. 4. Modeling using Onge as 3rd source for moderns and making conclusions based on that is just plain stupid when you know for certain that no pure AASI population existed in the north or even the south for that matter. Especially with the piss poor p values for North indians. Comments from Rob on Eurogenes Feb 28, 2020 Harvard are being dishonest, fudging sasmples and withholding others. On top of that, we have to watch Reich prance around preaching about a continent he has no clue about, promoting his shitty book So I really dont care for them. Regarding Reich/Harvard and his genetic successes, I don't think that in Europe he/they are a reference. He has to defend an ideological agenda and that is why his conclusions are often wrong (in the case of BB culture they are scandalously wrong and biased) As always, the supporters of the steppe theory applaud that agenda when it suits them and run away like rabbits when they talk about Iranian ancestry.But the fault is yours for the sickly obsession for bringing everything from the steppes. You have to overcome the trauma of the failure of the Yamnaya culture, 2019 has shown that it was just a fable which has generated useless discussions for 5 years @Davidski-Remember that my friends talked about M269 in northern Russia? it seems to be true and that Volosovo has a lot to say. However they talked about L51 and it seems that this haplogroup does not appear- I'm curious to check its origin @Ric said-At least we do not sit with Haplogroup R1b in Western Europe during the Paleolithic kind of scenario anymore... R1b has been in Western Europe since the epigravettian and the Villabruna cluster is indispensable to understand the genetics of modern Europeans- The BBculture saved your collective L21 butts when the Iranian/Indoeuropeans was terrorizing mainland Europe

[@ottarvendel]

This clip (and head line) with interesting questions needs a real subedition!

[@dwightehowell8179]

John Hawks has called Europe a population sink. The locals are constantly/repeatedly getting replaced with some degree of introgression most of the time. That's the nice way of saying the males get shanked and the cute females get knocked up without regard to their wishes. No point in even asking what happens to seniors though young kids _might_ get taken in.

[@spykerhond7008]

some proper history for a change

[@MrC-55]

We killed the other groups.

[@davidnoone3254]

Of course they are not going to show us Philistine Dna as it was Greek. And they will not show us Ancient Israelite Dna as it is more like Palestinians than like Jews. Neanderthals evolved into Cromags.

[@one-more-land]

surrounded by "The Chosen Tribe" hah, Svante? Making sure you're saying what THEY want you to say pretending that it's your own "findings?"

[@iulyanah]

"hybridization is an important force in evolution" Not saying it's not correct but for sure it will be used for immigration propaganda

[@one-more-land]

Yes..he is just the "White" scientist "they" put up in front such that we (White people, European people) will accept this new Babylonian agenda of mixing ourselves out of existence...

[@one-more-land]

@psykosonikwarrior "Seemed to reveal he is against the idea that mixing must be done?" -- I did not see or hear that! Secondly "He's a scientist, he goes where evidence leads him."so I have to understand it like this: "he's a scientist and some 'evidence' then leads him in a direction and thus this implies that it's correct?" you don't see the potential self--bias and complete contradiction of such a statement? First of all you have to assume that the fossil-records and other "evidence" is not obscured by the "Chosen" people's main German institute: "The Max Plank Institute"..which has been disproven again and again that they just have bogus cultural marxistic ideas and that Russian, Chinese and other scientist outside the common agenda completely disagrees? So, coming back to the phrase: "he's a scientist and he just goes where the evidence goes" well, that's strange, then, that Chinese and Russian (amongst more scientists) are going a completely different direction; either: they have different evidence than their opponents OR the Chinese and Russian scientist are ACTUALLY going for the lead with a non-idiosyncratic approach? Yes back in the day they mixed but for example, in Denmark, there has not been any significan mixing or change of the DNA for 45.000 years.. BUT that does not explain or prove anything of whether these "shills" like Svante is paid or not to do a certain "job"...

[@davidnoone3254]

A gay and a jew

[@GaryR55]

Well, not really. Paabo is bi-sexual and has children with a woman he's married to. But, so what? Homosexuality is a genetic trait, not a lifestyle choice. As for Reich, while he and his parents believe themselves to be descendants of the Hebrews, the truth (proven by DNA collected from two medieval Khazar burials that disprove the supposed descent from the Hebrews) is that "Jews" of Eastern European origin (i.e, so-called "Ashkenazi Jews") are not descendants of the Hebrews, but rather, are descendants of the Khazars, a turkic people who, in 749 A.D, converted to Judaism from Tingrism, a pagan religion centered upon worship of the sky-god Tingri. After the Khazar rulers converted to Judaism, they began teaching successive generations of Khazars to believe they are "Hebrews" and thus began the myth that Ashkenazis (including Israelis) are somehow "semitic" people. The term "semitic" correctly refers to an origin in the Middle East, not Eastern Europe. Further, the Ashkenazis carry the R-M269 genetic marker, which originated in the turkic peoples of Eastern Europe some 4,000 to 10,000 years ago, and not in the Middle East. This was confirmed by DNA collected from the two aforementioned Khazar burials. So, the Ashkenazis', as well as the Israelis' contention that they are somehow "God's chosen people" is as mythical as their supposed semitism. Guess my KZbin channel will disappear now. ;)