Questions for the Rector | Ep. 19: What Happens When You Take God Out of the Reproductive Process?

Read the post here: inveritateblog.com/?p=1045
Support MHT Seminary: mostholytrinityseminary.org/d...

[@johnraymond-pz9bo]

Good job! I have listened to Francis Watch episodes so many times! Like listening to these interviews for Catholic history (where you get NO WHERE Else!!!!!! And it adds to my criminal lack of formation.

[@3kayoung]

Thank you, your Excellency. Great video makes perfect sense to me. I really enjoyed it. God bless!!

[@beenbeatenbybishops5845]

It is good to see that there is at least one Seminary Rector who is not a stooge of CARDINAL Theodore McCarrick and the lavenders.

[@bernardjackson6594]

Fr. Theodore was "consecrated" in the invalid new rite of 1968, thus he was never a bishop to begin with, let alone a cardinal.

[@vincentfarrell3868]

@@bernardjackson6594Cardinal by colored title/supplied jurisdiction

[@johnraymond-pz9bo]

You'll find no sede that likes that criminal. To be fair, many in novus ordo despise him

[@johnraymond-pz9bo]

Bishop Sanborn is a Sacramental Bishop. It's not his fault (or any sede) that cowardly Cardinals voted for Roncalli,, a free mason who hated Catholic Church 1958 I was born in 1960. Most sedes except feeneyites are doing heroic job during Great Apostasy. We are being used by God to keep His Church alive. You're welcome

[@beenbeatenbybishops5845]

Yes, but to the vast majority of Novus Ordo Bishops, he is a hero and a model .@@johnraymond-pz9bo

[@ryan742]

HIs excellency sure loves plane analogies!

[@patrickzapp2799]

Thanks

[@glennso47]

Someone asked if you converted from the Protestant faith and wound up in the Novus Ordo wouldn’t that be like changing seats on the titanic? Could you answer that?

[@antoniodelarosa7696]

I mean, yeah, I guess that makes sense...? have you tried informing this person about the reality of the situation that the church is currently in? that would help I suppose?

[@robertkolinsky1286]

Well firstly a protestant who has converted to the novus ordo has now accepted and embraced the marian doctrines and the rosary. So yes its still a different place altogether.

[@TheSedevacantist]

Absolutely similar. God's grace would not deceive.

[@johnraymond-pz9bo]

Roncalli hated Dogma of Assumption. John Paul II rejected Catholic teaching on Behold they Mother - said it was just to John, not all of us. Paul VI, that UN would bring us peace, not our Lady of Fatima. Francis denied Coredemptrix, Immaculate Conception

[@johnraymond-pz9bo]

Some Novus ordo "priests" hate the Rosary. After 1st grade sister, nobody (except Dad) talked to me about Mother of God I paid for these animals

[@dh14785200]

Are frozen embryos human beings? Even though they are literally frozen, have no cellular respiration or any other biological activity, and can live forever in the freezer?

[@lunamar100]

If the embryo is a human embryo, and not, say, an elephant embryo, then yes, it is human, as expressed in the term “human embryo.” All the other conditions that you mentioned are just that, conditions; they do not alter the fact that the embryo is a human being.

[@didymussumydid9726]

Nothing lives forever, even in a freezer

[@dh14785200]

Ok thanks for the answer. So a human can be held in a freezer long term? Of course, if it were a real baby, it would die, since anything living, when put in a freezer, dies pretty quick. Therefore a frozen human embryo is not a baby and not a human. I thought someone might actually be able to clear up the contradiction because either I’m missing something or you folks (and the esteemed bishop) are not speaking logically. Okie doke, I’m gonna turn this off now and go watch a biology video 😂 k bye!

[@corbenalley8382]

Aren't they then, in some cases used for in vitro fertilization? Those embryos are then unfrozen and implanted and continue growing into fetuses and babies etc.

[@lunamar100]

@@dh14785200 Hello there, it seems that you are misunderstanding the process of how human embryos are frozen. Cryoprotectants are used to preserve them, and even then, there are some that do die, as it is not a 100% foolproof process. This process could also be applied to humans at a more advanced reproductive stage, but that is deemed unethical and therefore, illegal. As of now, only the dead can be cryogenically frozen in hopes that they can be revived in the future. So, the answer is that yes, living beings could be preserved alive by freezing with cryogenic solutions, but due to the risks and ethical dilemma, this is not permitted. Once again, we see the double standard at play - those who can speak up for themselves, are deemed to have human rights, but those who could never do so are fair game for murder, experimentation, etc… A cursory Google search can verify this, if you are in doubt. Unfortunately, I cannot add any links here, as adding links seems to render my comment invisible.

[@Mike_and_Ike-xb3io]

Abortion is, of course, in all cases, a mortal sin. What is His Excellency’s view on the souls of aborted babies? Are they considered conceived in original sin? What happens to their souls?

[@StephenHeiner]

traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=73